haines his way
 
Donate Column Archives live chat ask bruce
the broadway radio show juliana's journal interview section
first nudie musical stuff the unseemly photo album the kritzer novels
 
  even more unseemly linkage  
hijinks design  
 

05/10/2002:
"SMELL-O-VISION"

Photo of Bruce Kimmel

bk's notes II

Well, dear readers, it is 5:48 on a Friday morning and I am up. I could not sleep. I have arisen and am sitting, bleary-eyed at my handy-dandy laptop computer writing these here notes because what the hell else am I going to do at 5:48 on a Friday morning? I suppose I’m still hung-over from yesterday’s rather amazing celebration. So much Diet Coke, so many cheese slices and ham chunks, so much dancing of the Hora and the Mashed Potato. I feel like a mashed potato. First of all, I was feeling ever so much better – I’d actually won the fight and hadn’t really gotten full-on sick. Then, yesterday, I started feeling bad again – same exact symptoms. I don’t know if it’s just my allergies or if something more sinister is afoot, or even aknee, but I’m damn tired of it and I am hereby putting my ill-feeling on warning: Stop this now, you ill-feeling, or there will be hell to pay and haven’t we already paid hell enough? Yes, as Barbra Streisand and Donna Summer so eloquently put it, Enough is Enough.

In honor of it being 5:48, perhaps I’ll go read the marvelous short story The 5:48 by Mr. John Cheever. No, I will not do that because it is now 5:49 and Mr. John Cheever did not write a story entitled The 5:49. If I had a handy-dandy swimming pool then I could go swimming and then read the marvelous short-story The Swimmer by Mr. John Cheever. However, I do not have a handy-dandy swimming pool, hence I will not be reading the marvelous short story, The Swimmer. Oh, well, I guess Mr. John Cheever shall go unread this fine Friday morning, at least by the likes of me.

Did you know that Mr. Michael Todd, Jr. passed away? I will always have a fond place in my heart for Mr. Michael Todd, Jr. for it was Mr. Michael Todd, Jr. that gave the world the one-and-only feature film made in his marvelous patented process, Smell-o-Vision. Oh, yes, there was a competing smell process called AromaRama, but it couldn’t hold a candle to Smell-o-Vision. Movies that smelled, of course, did not catch on with the public, because usually the public can smell a movie before it ever gets to the theater, especially a stinker. But I saw the one-and-only feature made in Smell-o-Vision and I’m here to tell you that I loved it, loved it, do you hear me? It was called Scent of Mystery, and it starred Denholm Elliot as Lucky Larker, with Diana Dors (who could not love a woman called Diana Dors), Peter Lorre and Paul Lukas in support. There was also a “mystery woman” who we never see, except from the back, and she is always wearing the Scent of Mystery perfume. At the end of the film, the mystery woman is revealed to be the one-and-only Elizabeth Taylor. The film was stunning to look at, all shot on location is Spain in Todd AO, with astonishing six track stereophonic sound. So vivid is my memory of this film that I can tell you that the overture started with horns honking from all around the theater. In the first scene of the film, the camera follows a butterfly as it flits to and fro and fro and to and hither and thither and yon, until it finally swoops down into a rose garden and we, the audience, are treated to a beautiful smell of roses. Each seat in the theater had a tube beneath it and that is how the smells were piped in – in the projection booth was a huge machine which held all the smells and those smells were triggered by the film itself. There has been much speculation that the reason Smell-o-Vision failed was because they couldn’t clear the smells out in time for the next smell and smell confusion ran rampant. But that is not so, dear readers, they cleared those smells just fine and there was no smell confusion. Plus, if you had a good sense of smell, you could solve the mystery in Scent of Mystery. Being an aficiando of this sort of thing, I also saw the competing smell movie in AromaRama (it actually beat Scent of Mystery into the theater by a week, damn their smelly eyes), entitled Behind the Great Wall. What those cheeseball exploitation mavens had done was to buy a cheap documentary about China and add smells to it. I remember there was a prologue with either Chet Huntley or David Brinkley, in which they explained the process of AromaRama, in which the smells were blown in through the air-conditioning unit of the theater, in this case the Four Star on Wilshire Blvd (literally two blocks from where Scent of Mystery was playing at the Ritz). At some point, Mr. Huntley or Mr. Brinkley cut an orange in half and suddenly we were treated to the smell of an orange. It was not nearly as effective as Smell-o-Vision, because the smells were not instant and it did take forever to clear the air.

Scent of Mystery had an interesting fate. It was a huge flop, and then it was recut, shortened by almost an hour, narration was added to keep the story coherent, and it was shown in Cinerama theaters as Holiday in Spain. It is, as far as I know, the only Todd AO (or any other 65mm film) that has never been printed down to 35mm, so it is almost literally a lost film. It was shown once on television, almost twenty years ago under the title Scent of Mystery, even though they showed the cut version, Holiday in Spain. Viewers could purchase scratch ‘n sniff cards at 7-11 and recreate the thrill of Smell-o-Vision in their very own homes. But the print they showed literally looked like it had been videotaped off a movie screen, which it may well have been. It was totally faded and just awful. I would love to see the original cut restored to its Todd AO glory, but one doubts that will be happening any time soon.

What am I, writing the whole of these here notes in the first section? I can’t do that, that is unseemly and I will be bitch-slapped at 6:10 on a fine Friday morning. So, let’s all click on the Unseemly Button and be done with this section.

I caught up on some DVD watching last night and I must say that it was disappointing that nothing that I watched was in Smell-o-Vision. First I watched the remake of Ocean’s 11. It was certainly enjoyable in a surface kind of way, but sloppily written and plotted. I do love heist films (eight years ago I told David Wechter that we should write one, because no one had done a classic heist film in twenty years and I knew the genre would come back – boy, has it come back) so I’m a sucker for this kind of thing, but all these heist movies today are so busy being high-tech that they just totally lose all believability. I mean the crooks in these heist movies today have billions of dollars worth of the most incredible theft equipment ever put on earth, so why do they need to steal anything? They could just not buy all those billions of dollars worth of high-tech equipment and they’d have plenty of money. In the true classics of this genre, Riffifi and Topkapi and their like, the crooks have to use their home-grown skills and wiles, which I find more interesting. In any case, the cast is clearly having a good time, and I’ll watch any film set in Las Vegas.

Then I watched a true classic of 50s filmmaking, Alfred E. Green’s supremely wacky, Invasion USA! Is there a stranger film than this? It is mesmerizingly awful, but you sit there and watch, unable to turn it off. Great B cast, including Gerald Mohr and Peggie Castle, as well as Dan O’Herlihy who is great as a mysterious character named, wait for it, Mr. Ohman. This film is about communists. Not only communists, but a communist takeover of this here country, the United States of America. It is a frightening cautionary tale and the communists are terrifying, more terrifying even than Godzilla or Rodan. There is nothing more terrifying than communists and this movie is the living proof. It is a lovely transfer from Synapse Films and I recommend it without reservation, if you are a fan of this sort of thing.

What am I, Ebert and Roeper all of a sudden? Tomorrow, I will be doing our very own handy-dandy The Broadway Radio Hour. Mr. Donald Feltham has asked me to pick out my twelve favorite showtunes, whether original cast versions or cover versions. I’ve decided to limit myself to original cast versions, because the whole thing is too daunting for me to muck it up with cover versions. Choosing just twelve things is very difficult indeed – one can’t simply get all their favorites in, so I’m trying to be interesting and particular in my choices. Anyway, it should be fun, and unless I’m mistaken, I think that show will go up on Sunday.

Don’t forget, tomorrow we will have our handy-dandy Unseemly Trivia Contest question and we do hope that all of you will play along so that you have a chance to win a sparkling prize. And just think – that sparkling prize might just be in Smell-o-Vision. In fact, I think these notes should be in Smell-o-Vision, don’t you, dear readers? Wouldn’t that be exciting? Wouldn’t that just be too too? To not only read these here notes, but to smell them? That would just put us into a whole new sphere, popularity-wise. For example, if I say “I was sitting on my couch like so much fish” suddenly you would smell fish. I love this idea. If I said, “Let’s do the butterscotch pudding dance” you would smell butterscotch pudding”. And if I said, “Let’s do the Coprophiliac’s Joke Book” you would smell…
Oh. Well, maybe we shouldn’t go there.

Well, dear readers, perhaps I shall go back to bed and try to get an additional two hours of sleep so that I don’t look like a wizened old YodaJew. Today’s topic of discussion: Yesterday we discussed favorite trashy movies. Today let’s discuss favorite gimmick or exploitation movies. I’ll start: Anything William Castle did, but especially The Tingler. I also am quite partial to Freaks, Marijuana (the film, not the plant) and Reefer Madness (maybe those are the same film), Rudy Ray Moore’s brilliant Dolemite, Mr. Roger Corman’s The Wild Angels, and Russ Meyer’s masterpiece of strangeness, Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Starring the luminous Tura Satana. Your turn.

- Bruce Kimmel



Replies: 22 Unseemly Comments


BK, I am sorry you are not feeling up to snuff. Actually.. what does that mean anyway. Is What is snuff and why is it always at the peak of health? Anyway.. get better soon.

Donald - I asked this of Bruce one ASK BK Day, and now I have to ask you -- how many cd's do YOU have.. and how are they organized?

As for gimmicky films.. when I was younger I would always go to the 3D movies that hit the theaters. My favorite movie in this genre as I feel it's pretty much the only one that had a great plot and didn't just film a random script to show off effects was Vincent Price in House of Wax. In fact, it is a guilty pleasure still when it is on late night TV because it's still fun to watch.

In the 80s there were a few movies that went 3D (Amityville, Jaws, MetalStorm or something like that and a few others) NONE will ever hold a candle to House of Wax.

And I am not sure if this counts.. but I LOVE the Muppetvision 3D movie at Disney MGM which combines not only a 3D movie, but also effects in the theatre from explosions, to animitronic characters.

Oh yeah -- and I saw a film in 3D IMAX about Sigfried and Roy.. that was fun

Posted by Craig @ 05/10/2002 07:48 AM PST


I do not know any gimmick or exploitation movies, but by, golly, I wanted to post the first post.

Hello everyone, good morning, and let us all drink and smell orange juice.

Posted by Lolita @ 05/10/2002 07:49 AM PST


In the words of Emily Litella: Nevermind.

Posted by Lolita @ 05/10/2002 07:50 AM PST


As one of the millions who has musicalized Reefer Madness, I can tell you that Reefer and Marijuana are two different films. Watch Reefer again sometime for the almost unbelievable continuity errors--I think those filmmakers were on something.

Mr. Alfred E. Green has one very special credit in his background--he was the director who worked most with Frances Farmer, directing her in three films, "Ride a Crooked Mile" (with her then-husband Leif Erickson and Akim Tamiroff), "South of Pago Pago" (with Jon Hall, Victor McLaglen and Gene Lockhart) and "Badlands of Dakota" (with Robert Stack, Richard Dix, Lon Chaney, Jr., and a host of other great character actors). "Ride a Crooked Mile" is, believe it or not, even stranger than "Invasion U.S.A." It deals with Cossack cattle-rustlers who have moved to the U.S. Frances plays a Cossack former-rodeo star who is now a saloon singer (yes, there were lots of those, I imagine). A truly incredible film experience from start to finish (Leif and Frances do have a marvelous duet in Russian--he was a singer with Ted Fio Rito's band before he became an actor).

Posted by JMK @ 05/10/2002 07:58 AM PST


Interesting piece of information I just read on IMDB..director André De Toth (HOUSE OF WAX) --was blind in one eye and hence could not see the effect.

Also.. how could I forget to ask if anyone ever saw KISS ME KATE in 3D? Of course there is also Dial M, The Mask (not the Jim Carrey version) to name two more...

Posted by Craig @ 05/10/2002 08:06 AM PST


I gotta get a gimmick?

Naming a favorite exploitation or gimmick movie is even tougher than trying to name a Western. I do not think CinemaScope, Cinerama, or Imax films should count as gimmicks, so the only gimmick picture I have seen, and only in part, is Gypsy, unless Kiss Me, Kate in 3-D counts, and that is a favorite motion picture I have seen many times. As for exploitation flicks, Oliver! and Norma Rae are exploitation pictures, of course. Certainly, Pink Flamingos is exploitive, as early John Waters movies are, but then, what movie isn’t exploitive or exploited?

Or does name mean to give a title to, because I am sure I could rename some if I knew any…

Posted by freedunit @ 05/10/2002 08:44 AM PST


It's Barbra not Barbara.

Posted by steveg @ 05/10/2002 09:27 AM PST


in answer to CRAIG:

to be honest, I don't know how many CDs I own....hundereds, I guess....I have all the cast recordings together in alphabetical order....I then have all the theatre related compilations grouped together....film soundtracks (a somewhat small collection) are together in alpha order....and, finally, all my artist CDs (and I have a real mix of theatre performers and pop and soul) are together in alpha order....I hope that answers the question

Posted by Donald @ 05/10/2002 09:36 AM PST


Who misspelled Babs? I don't see any misspelled Babs :-) Alfred E. Green does, of course, have one major film to his credit, The Jolson Story. I have seen Kiss Me Kate in 3Dimensions several times. It's quite quite good. And as long as we're on the subject of Kiss Me Kate, George Sidney passed away several days ago. I always liked Mr. George Sidney, and I will forever remember and revere him for the opening of Bye Bye Birdie (dear Ann-Margret on the treadmill).

Posted by bk @ 05/10/2002 11:05 AM PST


All this categorizing of movies is making me dizzy! Here, instead, are some chicken soup sites to get Mr. BK feeling well again ...

http://www.funandsun.com/1tocf/food/kosh.html
http://www.foodfunandfacts.com/chickensoup.htm
http://www.practicalkitchen.com/chicken_soup.shtml
http://www.campbellssoup.com
http://hallfood.com/meals/242.shtml
http://www.chickensoup.com/books/cookbook.html

Posted by Donna @ 05/10/2002 12:11 PM PST


I have long enjoyed George Sidney’s work. I read all the obituaries I could find. I luv Ann-Margret in the titles sequences of Bye, Bye, Birdie! Oh, what fun! I first saw the picture when I was twelve. It was in our—Ann-Margret’s and my—home town—apropos of Birdie, we even had the same English teacher—and I was in the sixth grade. It was a two-grade junior high school, and the entire fifth-grade class had to take standardized examinations that the sixth grade did not. So, while they were tested, we were entertained by none other than Bye, Bye, Birdie in glorious Technicolor. It was Technicolor, wasn't it? Anyway, it was marvelous. I went crazy for Ann-Margret in yellow against that blue background singing the title song.

Posted by freedunit @ 05/10/2002 01:10 PM PST


I hope I don't get bitch-slapped by Mr. Mark Baylor for this suggestion, but would it be posible to have each day's comments going from earliest to most recent? After reading the daily doings of Bruce I find that in order for the replies to comments to make sense I have to scroll to the bottom and read the oldest comment first and then work my way up back to the end of Bruce's portion. It would seem to me to make more sense if I could just continue working down towards the end. Has anyone else noticed this?

Posted by William E. Lurie @ 05/10/2002 01:29 PM PST


Well, we certainly won't get Mr. Mark Bakalor to make a change if he's called Mark Baylor, although I feel it's a better name and he should now change his. I will suggest it to him as it is a fine suggestion - that way we'll all know what the hell we're talking about.

Bye Bye Birdie was not in Technicolor, just plain old Eastman, but it sure looks swell on the DVD. Did you know that that sequence was an afterthought, and not part of the principal photography of the film? What an afterthought! We should all have such afterthoughts.

Posted by bk @ 05/10/2002 01:34 PM PST


I have been remiss. Alfred E. Green actually directed Frances in FOUR, count' em, FOUR films. How could I have forgotten the semi-wonderful "Flowing Gold," with John Garfield and Pat O'Brien? This is the movie made famous (and incorrectly attributed) in the Lange feature "Frances" where the real Ms. Farmer had the scene in the mud which was evidently re-taken umpteen times. Alfred E. Green has many fascinating credits, if you look him up--he directed George Arliss to an Oscar in "Disraeli", and also did the straight from the stage filming of "Top Banana" with Phil Silvers.

Posted by JMK @ 05/10/2002 02:47 PM PST


I saw Oceans 11 The Remake on a cross-country flight about a month ago. I found the air turbulence filled the gaps in the plot nicely. I recommend this technique for any films anyone might suspect of having plot gaps.

Der Brucer and I are constantly arguing about how to divide our CD collection. He wants to put opera in a section for opera, musicals done on stage in a section for musicals done on stage, and musicals done on film in yet another section for musicals done on film. Me, I just lump them all together, one big happy section of sung music for something that was either done on stage or at least has some semblance of a plot. "Sung Show Music." This also makes it easier, since compilations by fill in name of favorite disc producer who's initials are BK also fit in this section. Soundtracks, non-vocal, I tend to shove in with Classical, because so many of them end up played by professional orchestras these days.

Finally, I think it would be tasty if Mark were to change his last name to Baklava. If anything, he would become very popular with dentists.

Posted by S. Woody White @ 05/10/2002 03:58 PM PST


For some reason I had to see Ocean's 11 twice in the theatre with various and sun-dried people. Though it wasn't totally unpleasent (everyone was very attractive, at least), the redeeming feature of the whole feature was the end sequence. I loved it, I loved it, I loved it. Anyway. Where is everyone?

Posted by Lolita @ 05/10/2002 05:38 PM PST


If I may address several of the off-topic topics without incurring the wrath of the Topic Police--who seem to be, thankfully, absent on this wonderful web site:

BK:
Ah, Ann-Margret (does she actually hyphenate?)! Ah, "Bye-by, Bird-hhee!" Bruce, we know that you have had the pleasure of working in a whorehouse with her lately. Did you intimate to her your admiration for that particular film sequence? And your crush-related youthful affection? Youth wants to know. And so does middle age.

S. Woody White:

This is one of the few times that I am thankful that my Joe and I have very different tastes in preferred music, although we each enjoy the other's.

We keep most of our CD's separate. Jazz and rock are his. Musicals, and most vocalists are mine, although he lays claim to Amanda McBroom and Cleo Lane, as well as more "pop" ones, such as Ricky Lee Jones. Classical are separate by composer--which is a headache with so many compilation albums.

His are in the music room, mine in the study. Otherwise I would not offer a solution and risk interferring with a marriage of long standing.

But if Mr. Mark Bakalor changed his name, would he forfeit his Bakaloreate?

William E. Lurie:

I second the motion. In fact, I lay down a software challenge to Mr. Mark Bakalor. Observe the threads under articles at Free Republic, the infamous Conservative discussion site. Are you up to the task of numbering and -ing them? Or is that just too too?

Posted by William F. Orr @ 05/10/2002 09:39 PM PST


Ah, Eastmancolor. I asked
because after using
"Technicolor"--a no-no--I
realized it must not be
Technicolor actually, although
the palette is similar, if you
know what I mean. I did know
that the titles sequences were
afterthoughts, photographed
and tacked on after the film, or
at least principal photography,
was completed. What an
afterthought! Wonderful!

Speaking of Follies
...

I love Donna McKechnie, but Carlotta? Carlotta?! Of
all the roles?! Geesh. No point
in recording that. She was a
wonderful Sally at Paper Mill
Playhouse, really perfect for
the part in so many ways. Luv
the recording with Dorothy
Collins--luv it--but McKechnie
was excellent in her own right
on stage. I just cannot
imagine her in the demanding
role of Carlotta, which among
its demands requires an
entirely different type of
performer. Who is she--Elaine
Stritch, all of a sudden? First,
Elaine, now Carlotta. What
next--Mimi Paragon and then
At Liberty?

Posted by freedunit @ 05/10/2002 09:55 PM PST


If my post just turned
everything bold, I am really
sorry. I am posting from a
remote Power Mac in an
unfamiliar browser, but I
checked, double-checked, and
triple-checked and the code I
typed and posted was correct:
bold on and off, italics on and
off, and bold on and off again.
Perhaps someone can
illuminate the reason Mister
Macintosh--or is it Mistress?--
appears unreceptive to HTML
code?

Posted by freedunit @ 05/10/2002 09:57 PM PST


Apologies again for bolding. I
think I figured it out. The
Macintosh browser forces
unseemly body text and
margin widths on these poor
posts and in the process
inserts unseemly invisible
hard returns that interrupt and
invalidate valid HTML code. I
am sorry. I am bitch-slapping
myself, and I have learned at
least one lesson.

Posted by freedunit @ 05/10/2002 10:21 PM PST


I had a blast working with Ann-Margret, and yes I did tell her that I was totally smitten with her from Bye Bye Birdie. I have the feeling she hears that a lot.

Posted by bk @ 05/11/2002 12:19 AM PST


Mr. Mark Bakalor:

Excuse, please, the seeming nonsense of "Are you up to the task of numbering and -ing them? "

That should read:

Are you up to the task of [less than sign]a name="..."[greater than sign]-ing them?

Does this work:

Are you up to the task of <a name="...">-ing them?

It's the fershluganah double interpretation of the code that mucks it up.

Posted by William F. Orr @ 05/11/2002 08:40 AM PST





Ask BK: Got a question? Ask Bruce Kimmel...


   © Copyright 2001-2003 Bruce Kimmel.
All Rights Reserved. Site design by hijinks design.