Quote from: bk on November 11, 2008, 10:11:25 PMQuote from: JoseSPiano on November 11, 2008, 08:25:22 PMQuote from: bk on November 11, 2008, 08:22:42 PMYes, a couple of people went and I know it was loved. But I also remember a whole slew of other hainsies/kimlets who had every sort of excuse under the sun about not going - in other words, there was something about this film that wasn't "must see." Since it's a brilliant work of art, I have no idea what that something was.Do we have to go through all of this again?!?!?!The DRs who normally go out to the theaters to see movies, saw "WALL-E" when it came out. And, now, those who usually end up watching movies on DVD will do so now.*And if only five or six DRs actually saw "Wall-E" during it's original theatrical release, then that's still a good percentage of regular DRs who saw the film. This is, of course, not quite accurate and a simple perusal of the posts from back then will tell the tale more eloquently than I can or you can. It wasn't just people on this site (although the majority here did NOT see it back then), it was people everywhere.Well... Next time, take ads out in "Variety" and "The Hollywood Reporter", and run a commercial on all four networks during primetime. "I'm Bruce Kimmel, and I say, "See This Movie!""
Quote from: JoseSPiano on November 11, 2008, 08:25:22 PMQuote from: bk on November 11, 2008, 08:22:42 PMYes, a couple of people went and I know it was loved. But I also remember a whole slew of other hainsies/kimlets who had every sort of excuse under the sun about not going - in other words, there was something about this film that wasn't "must see." Since it's a brilliant work of art, I have no idea what that something was.Do we have to go through all of this again?!?!?!The DRs who normally go out to the theaters to see movies, saw "WALL-E" when it came out. And, now, those who usually end up watching movies on DVD will do so now.*And if only five or six DRs actually saw "Wall-E" during it's original theatrical release, then that's still a good percentage of regular DRs who saw the film. This is, of course, not quite accurate and a simple perusal of the posts from back then will tell the tale more eloquently than I can or you can. It wasn't just people on this site (although the majority here did NOT see it back then), it was people everywhere.
Quote from: bk on November 11, 2008, 08:22:42 PMYes, a couple of people went and I know it was loved. But I also remember a whole slew of other hainsies/kimlets who had every sort of excuse under the sun about not going - in other words, there was something about this film that wasn't "must see." Since it's a brilliant work of art, I have no idea what that something was.Do we have to go through all of this again?!?!?!The DRs who normally go out to the theaters to see movies, saw "WALL-E" when it came out. And, now, those who usually end up watching movies on DVD will do so now.*And if only five or six DRs actually saw "Wall-E" during it's original theatrical release, then that's still a good percentage of regular DRs who saw the film.
Yes, a couple of people went and I know it was loved. But I also remember a whole slew of other hainsies/kimlets who had every sort of excuse under the sun about not going - in other words, there was something about this film that wasn't "must see." Since it's a brilliant work of art, I have no idea what that something was.
I am now off to Best Buy to purchase ANNETTE!
Where are my smiley faces?
DR singdaw, you can remarry in Connecticut!
well folks, the votes are in.... I see the oncologist on FridayWe have not told the Vixter yet - we will wait until the oncolgist tells us specifics, no need getting her upset when we don't have any specific answers for herPlease keep those prayers and vibes acoming
