1
on: Today at 06:29:56 AM
|
||
Started by bk - Last post by singdaw | ||
Rare documentation of Rex Harrison performing "YMCA" at my bar mitzvah.
|
2
on: Today at 06:29:29 AM
|
||
Started by bk - Last post by singdaw | ||
Raise your arms and someone's always there. Like this? |
3
on: Today at 06:28:42 AM
|
||
Started by bk - Last post by ChasSmith | ||
I'll come back when I can't stay as long!
|
4
on: Today at 06:28:29 AM
|
||
Started by bk - Last post by ChasSmith | ||
Well, it's been nice, but I gotta get outta here and get ready for some Rodgers & Hammerstein!
|
5
on: Today at 06:27:48 AM
|
||
Started by bk - Last post by ChasSmith | ||
BK, I agree completely with you about 3-act plays being repositioned to 2-acts and a similar attitude about plays - mostly musicals, it seems - that played originally without intermission getting sliced into two sections. AMEN. |
6
on: Today at 06:27:12 AM
|
||
Started by bk - Last post by ChasSmith | ||
Good morning, all.
|
7
on: Today at 06:26:10 AM
|
||
Started by bk - Last post by Ron Pulliam | ||
Enjoyed DR Rodzinski's posts about the ballet last night. That's because everything is beautiful at the ballet. Raise your arms and someone's always there. |
8
on: Today at 06:23:53 AM
|
||
Started by bk - Last post by Ron Pulliam | ||
You Can't Take it With You has always been one of my favorite plays. But, do you wear yoga pants when you watch it? |
9
on: Today at 06:23:16 AM
|
||
Started by bk - Last post by Ron Pulliam | ||
It is Sunday.
It is cloudy and should rain some today. I shall have a Zoom chat this afternoon with a coterie of like-minded individuals about film music, politics and societal woes. It should be fun. |
10
on: Today at 06:19:33 AM
|
||
Started by bk - Last post by Ron Pulliam | ||
As you can decipher from these posts, I did not change my mind about traveling with relatives to Lexington SC to watch a ball game.
I did, however, have some exchanges with my cousin Ashley's husband, Clay, over a difference of opinion about Trump's days in court. He was kind enough to point out that the trial was a fascistic sham, perpetrated by hateful individuals with political motives. To wit, he said he knows for a fact that the judge should have recused himself because he violated a New York State law prohibiting judges from making political contributions and that Judge Merchan had done this in support of Joe Biden; He said that Merchan has previously prosecuted cases involving Trump and was, therefore, prejudgiced; He said he knows for a fact that Merchan's daughter is involved in political activities determined to prosecute Trump and that Merchan was legally obligated to recuse himself because of this; He further said that one of the people testifying had been a DOJ employee and had left to join a legal team prosecuting Trump and was never a supporter of Trump (which was my original contention about those who were witnesses). I changed the wording in my post saying that the most significant witnesses had been Trump supporters. I suggested that his first two "facts" are more allegations than factual. He declared he learned it all on CNN and could prove they are facts. I suspect Fox News is more likely the culprit of his facts. I demurred from challenging him. |