Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: Today at 06:29:56 AM 
Started by bk - Last post by singdaw
Rare documentation of Rex Harrison performing "YMCA" at my bar mitzvah.

 2 
 on: Today at 06:29:29 AM 
Started by bk - Last post by singdaw
  Raise your arms and someone's always there. 

Like this?

 3 
 on: Today at 06:28:42 AM 
Started by bk - Last post by ChasSmith
I'll come back when I can't stay as long!  :)

 4 
 on: Today at 06:28:29 AM 
Started by bk - Last post by ChasSmith
Well, it's been nice, but I gotta get outta here and get ready for some Rodgers & Hammerstein!

 5 
 on: Today at 06:27:48 AM 
Started by bk - Last post by ChasSmith
BK, I agree completely with you about 3-act plays being repositioned to 2-acts and a similar attitude about plays - mostly musicals, it seems - that played originally without intermission getting sliced into two sections.

AMEN.

 6 
 on: Today at 06:27:12 AM 
Started by bk - Last post by ChasSmith
Good morning, all.

 7 
 on: Today at 06:26:10 AM 
Started by bk - Last post by Ron Pulliam
Enjoyed DR Rodzinski's posts about the ballet last night.

That's because everything is beautiful at the ballet.  Raise your arms and someone's always there.


 8 
 on: Today at 06:23:53 AM 
Started by bk - Last post by Ron Pulliam
You Can't Take it With You has always been one of my favorite plays.

But, do you wear yoga pants when you watch it?

 9 
 on: Today at 06:23:16 AM 
Started by bk - Last post by Ron Pulliam
It is Sunday.

It is cloudy and should rain some today.

I shall have a Zoom chat this afternoon with a coterie of like-minded individuals about film music, politics and societal woes.  It should be fun.

 10 
 on: Today at 06:19:33 AM 
Started by bk - Last post by Ron Pulliam
As you can decipher from these posts, I did not change my mind about traveling with relatives to Lexington SC to watch a ball game.

I did, however, have some exchanges with my cousin Ashley's husband, Clay, over a difference of opinion about Trump's days in court.

He was kind enough to point out that the trial was a fascistic sham, perpetrated by hateful individuals with political motives.  To wit, he said he knows for a fact that the judge should have recused himself because he violated a New York State law prohibiting judges from making political contributions and that Judge Merchan had done this in support of Joe Biden;

He said that Merchan has previously prosecuted cases involving Trump and was, therefore, prejudgiced;

He said he knows for a fact that Merchan's daughter is involved in political activities determined to prosecute Trump and that Merchan was legally obligated to recuse himself because of this;

He further said that one of the people testifying had been a DOJ employee and had left to join a legal team prosecuting Trump and was never a supporter of Trump (which was my original contention about those who were witnesses).  I changed the wording in my post saying that the most significant witnesses had been Trump supporters.

I suggested that his first two "facts" are more allegations than factual.  He declared he learned it all on CNN and could prove they are facts.  I suspect Fox News is more likely the culprit of his facts.
 
I demurred from challenging him.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10