Haines His Way

Archives => Archive 1 => Topic started by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:04:20 AM

Title: REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:04:20 AM
Well, you've read the notes, you've understood their inherent meaning, you know the topic so all that's left to do is post until the cows come home.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:06:51 AM
I hope none of those late-night denizens who were just sitting there like logs (at least LauraII responded) are going to post now.  Uh uh.  See you in the morning.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: S. Woody White on January 18, 2004, 12:16:27 AM
Hey, I was off checking some other places while staying on here.  

Der Brucer is exhausted, but happy to be home.  And I should see about getting to bed soon, so we can get up and get things done tomorrow, and then head over to the Purple Parrot for some yummilicious prime rib.

Oh, I made some cookies, too, with dried cranberries and oatmeal!  I don't think they're going to last very long, with my favorite cookie eater back home!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Laura II on January 18, 2004, 12:29:57 AM
Uncle Woody, I would like a cookie! :)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:32:29 AM
For example, I can see that George is "replying to this thread".  He has been replying to this thread for ten minutes, just as he was replying to this thread in last night's topic, said reply never showing up.  Just what do we suppose George is typing and why do we suppose it doesn't show up?  This whole evening is worthy of Agatha Christie.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Laura II on January 18, 2004, 12:33:18 AM
Re Pajama Party: I should be there! I think I want to wear my pink footie pajamas--a throwback to childhood!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:33:54 AM
As long as they don't have one of those "drop-seats" in the back.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:34:16 AM
And you'd better be here - you were the fershluganah inspiration.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:34:49 AM
George is now "previewing a post".  This is getting exciting.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Laura II on January 18, 2004, 12:34:53 AM
[move=left,scroll,6,transparent,100%]HAPPY BIRTHDAY, DR CHARLES
POGUE!!
[/move]
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:36:56 AM
George has apparently written a novel which needs careful editing before posting.  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 12:37:43 AM
I was reading the end of yesterday's notes and by the time I wanted to respond, the day changed and I lost my entire post.  I hate it when that happens. :(

Anyway, I ushered for Kate Clinton's performance here in Olympia and she was great!  The Washington Center for the Performing Arts holds about 1000 people and even though they sold between 600-700 tickets, there were very few men in the audience.  I counted less than two dozen on the main floor (which holds over 200 people) where I was seating people.  It was one big, giant roomful of women!  Kate put on a great show.  She talked for an hour and a half without stopping and everyone laughed the whole show.  Afterwards, she came out (no pun intended) into the lobby and gave autographs and spoke with anyone who wanted to.  A good time was had by all. ;D
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 12:38:07 AM
I always preview and reedit my posts...always!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 12:38:46 AM
And Happy, Happy Birthday, Charles Pogue!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:39:25 AM
Well, gee, George, it's not like I wasn't giving warnings every three minutes.  Just write the post and hit "post".  LauraII got hers in before the topic changed.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:40:27 AM
Edit, shmedit.  Be free, live, take a chance, don't hold back, DARLING, I'M YOUR AUNTIE MAME!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:43:14 AM
And then there's Jed - Jed who just thinks he can come waltzing in here like a flibbitigibbit, readin' book reviews as if they was books.  Well, I'm SORRY Jed, but you are NOT going to see LauraII in her pink PJs unless you ATONE.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 12:43:35 AM
This is nothing...at work I have been known to spend two hours on one paragraph!  I'm weird that way. ::)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:45:23 AM
THAT, dear George, will be the title of your autobiography: I'm Weird That Way by George, by George.

And then there's TCB - he's viewing the main page, which means he's off somewhere in his house having a meat sandwich whilst picking his toes.  I mean, honestly people.  PEOPLE, work with me.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Laura II on January 18, 2004, 12:45:59 AM
Ok, my question for all dear readers (since I don't think anyone saw it before :)): what is the first cast recording/album/showtune to which you were exposed (as far back as you can remember)?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jed on January 18, 2004, 12:46:38 AM
Yes, I've been showing as being online here for quite awhile, but I was simply doing other things and hadn't updated the page in about an hour.  So I was most definitely not being obstinate and not posting, I simply wasn't really here, even though it looked like I was.

Happy day to Mr. Charles Pogue!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:48:37 AM
LauraII, you, of course, will know the answer to that question as you continue reading that book you're reading.

Look at Jed - he just sits there like a big piece of whitefish, like some unearthly Buddah, staring at his screen, hands in his lap, whilst he repeats, "I won't post, I won't post, I'll show them."  He sits there like a dead herring in the moonlight, like some errant and truant biker.  Well, Jed, that's just fine with all of us because we are having FUN.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 12:48:41 AM
THAT, dear George, will be the title of your autobiography: I'm Weird That Way by George, by George.

That works for me.  I think I'll use it! ;D
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jed on January 18, 2004, 12:49:48 AM
First show album I recall?  That would be A Chorus Line.  I'm sure I could sing "Shit, Richie" at the age of 3. :D  That and the Annie OCR were two of the most played pieces of vinyl during my childhood.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:50:12 AM
What is this doing other things?  There are no other things.  Other things are for fools and simpletons.  THIS is the thing.  THIS, right here.  THIS IS THE THING.  This is the girl - oh, a Mulhullond Drive reference.  Well, GEE, Jed, can we get you a latte or something?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:52:12 AM
I feel I am on a roll here.  Or perhaps I'm on a role here.  Or perhaps I AM on a roll - a kaiser roll.  Have you EVEN read the notes, Jed, old stick?  Have you EVEN.  I'm on a roll, baby, and nothing can stop me now - oh, a Newley and Bricusse reference.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 12:53:40 AM
I am a one-man posting frenzy and I am out of control and on a roll and 100 posts is my goal although that would take its toll.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 12:58:05 AM
Ok, my question for all dear readers (since I don't think anyone saw it before :)): what is the first cast recording/album/showtune to which you were exposed (as far back as you can remember)?

The first musical cast recordings that I specifically chose to listen to were Ain't Misbehavin' and Sweeney Todd.  For some reason, I checked them out of the library to listen to when I was writing a paper about geothermal energy for 8th grade science.  I fell instantly in love with Ain't Misbehavin' but it took me a while to warm up to Sweeney Todd.  Since then I have learned to love all that is Sondheim.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Laura II on January 18, 2004, 12:59:46 AM
I think I was distracting Jed for this last hour or two or so...I apologize.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:02:20 AM
Ah, now we hear what the "other things" are.  Now, yes, now, now we know.  The truth is out there.  You were doing "other things" with Jed - you were not reading books, you were canoodling with Jed.  You and Jed sitting in a tree.  Well, I'm sorry, but Jed will have to ATONE for this.  He will have to wear toreador pants, a frilly blouse, and spiked heels and he will have to LIKE IT.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:04:28 AM
And why do I have the feeling that you two wild kids are STILL doing other things?  Why do I have this feeling?  Ya wild kids, ya.  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Laura II on January 18, 2004, 01:06:15 AM
Ah, BK, I think you discovered the first HHW love affair! Kidding, kidding! :) We just talk in the same way I talk to Sarah and Maya.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jed on January 18, 2004, 01:06:30 AM
Well, I'm sorry, but Jed will have to ATONE for this.  He will have to wear toreador pants, a frilly blouse, and spiked heels and he will have to LIKE IT.

Well, there went my surprise outfit for the pajama party!

Oh, and I shall never apologize for canoodling. :)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jed on January 18, 2004, 01:07:15 AM
Ah, BK, I think you discovered the first HHW love affair! Kidding, kidding! :) We just talk in the same way I talk to Sarah and Maya.

Why am I suddenly jealous of Sarah and Maya?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:11:11 AM
And just where in tarnation IS Maya?  She will have to ATONE.  Yes, at the ATONE leave your name and number and a short message.  You two wild kids do your canoodling right here in posts.  We will not have private canoodling.  That is Unseemly and besides, Jed is an OLDER MAN and he could be put in the State Prison and he could be given electroshock therapy.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 01:11:59 AM
I shall now say goodnight.  I've been sitting at my computer for so long (without my pillow) that my butt hurts.  So, I need a comphy place to place my tush.  Goodnight all!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:12:59 AM
Did you preview that post?  That was very brief and it was about your butt.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Laura II on January 18, 2004, 01:13:13 AM
Hmm, I don't think he could be put in jail as I'm 18...I "have" a 16 year old, and my uncle likes to tell me to watch it because "16 will get you 20."
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:14:16 AM
Well, won't people be surprised when they log on in the morning.  They will scratch their collective errant and truant heads in wonderment and they will say, "My goodness, what is THIS about?"

And just where in tarnation IS Maya?  She used to be much more regular.  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:15:35 AM
LauraII is eighteen?  Who knew?  Now, LauraII, instead of so much damnable canoodling, you should read some more book, don't you THINK?  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jed on January 18, 2004, 01:17:16 AM
Well, won't people be surprised when they log on in the morning.  They will scratch their collective errant and truant heads in wonderment and they will say, "My goodness, what is THIS about?"

Heck, I'm here for it and I'm still saying that! :D
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:17:53 AM
And, of course, there's TCB, sitting there scratching his head, eating his meat sandwich and trying to figure out what in tarnation we ARE talking about?  I wonder if TCB's meat sandwich is on a roll because I certainly am.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:18:41 AM
Oh, Jed, your head is in the clouds because you are drunk on Love Potion Number Nine.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:19:25 AM
Ya wild kid ya.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jed on January 18, 2004, 01:21:02 AM
Is that what it is?  That gypsy on 34th and Vine wouldn't tell me what the fershluganah stuff was.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: TCB on January 18, 2004, 01:23:51 AM
Well, that meat sandwich was very tasty... and on a kaiser roll...(or is that on a kaiser role?).  Unfortunately, I think I may have gotten toe lint in my meat sandwich, or perhaps a little priest (I don't have to explain that one do I?)

And, Dear BK, how do you know that Jed has not already seen Laura II in her pink footie -pajamas?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:24:48 AM
All right, hold the phone, stop the world, halten zie traffic - there are NINE GUESTS at one-thirty in the morning???  That is more peculiar than ANY of these peculiar posts?  Just who are these NINE GUESTS?  Oh, MYSTERY GUESTS, won't you come in and sign in please.  Let's go to Miss Kilgallan for the first question.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:25:53 AM
All right, Mr. Cerf?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: TCB on January 18, 2004, 01:26:08 AM
And what in tarnation are you talking about?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Laura II on January 18, 2004, 01:26:42 AM
I must needs read the book (my best Nurse impression from Romeo and Juliet), but talking to people online is so appealing at the moment. I shall read more tomorrow.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:27:48 AM
Of course, the minute I mention NINE GUESTS, suddenly there were three GUESTS.  Who are these GUESTS and what are they doing up at this hour?  What are they LOOKING for?  What do they want of us?  Are they POD PEOPLE?  Are they ALIENS FROM OUTER SPACE?  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: TCB on January 18, 2004, 01:27:51 AM
I am wondering if they say tarnation in Carnation?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:28:23 AM
As long as you read more tomorrow you shall not have to ATONE.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:30:08 AM
I'm laughing myself silly because there are fifty-something posts and they are all so QUEER.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: TCB on January 18, 2004, 01:30:30 AM
Whoops, sorry, I have got to go..........

the cows just came home.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:31:53 AM
Now, to the people who'll be perusing this whilst I am fast asleep amidst pillows, this is only a preview of what our Pajama Party will be like and all I can say is that Jed and LauraII best not be off doing "other things".  TCB, of course, CAN eat a meat sandwich and pick his toes whilst attending our Pajama Party.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:32:24 AM
The cows just came home?  Damn them, damn them all to hell.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Laura II on January 18, 2004, 01:33:16 AM
I certainly think that people will be freaked out when they log in tomorrow and find these posts. We are a lovely bunch of coconuts. :)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:34:50 AM
Well, I'm hitting the hay.  It's lots of fun to hit hay, I recommend it.  Now, don't play with Jed TOO much longer, and do read your book - we're anxious to know your thoughts, oh, yes, we're anxious, and frankly, Jed can't hold a candle to a good book, although he'd like to.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jed on January 18, 2004, 01:37:02 AM
You're quite right, BK, I can't hold a candle to a good book.  I just tried, but neither the book nor the candle would anything to do with it.  Damn them, damn them all to hell!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 01:40:12 AM
And a final post to take us to page three - just so those that log on in the morning can scratch their heads in wonderment.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Laura II on January 18, 2004, 01:53:20 AM
Wonder of wonders, miracle of miracles! My mom came downstairs and did not yell! She said that I should go to bed really soon, but then she turned around and let me be!

It doesn't rhyme, but oh well! Also, the rhythm is off, but you can figure it out. Forgive me, it's 4:52 here! Still chattin with Jed and an Australian friend.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: S. Woody White on January 18, 2004, 03:28:29 AM
I knew I shouldn't have had that coffee with dinner.  I haven't been able to sleep a wink as of yet.  Dang and double tarnations.  Buster has been cuddling up on one side of me, and Bonnie has been cuddling up on the other and sleeping with her head in my lap, but no sleep has come my way.

On to the topic of the day.  I've long been convinced that Jason de la Graae got onto so many BK discs because he (Jason) was sleeping in the studio and he (BK) simply found he (Jason again) was handy.  Heck, why not?  I also think Sally Mayes is a real cutie.

My favorite single track on the compliation albums, however, is from The Stephen Schwartz Album, which is a great disc, even if I never have liked the song "Meadowlark."  Favorite track is the late Dorothy Loudin singing "No Time At All," which was already a great song before Ms. L proved to be it's perfect match.  Can you imagine what a duet could have been had, had Ms. L and Nell Carter recorded "Bosom Buddies" from Mame together?  That would have been a riot!  I only got to meet Nell, and wish I'd met Dorothy, but I can imagine the two of them in Heaven comparing their Annie experiences and laughing up a storm!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jed on January 18, 2004, 03:39:18 AM
Oh yes, I probably should comment on BK's (or "cyber-Yente," as we canoodlers now call him :)) topic...

When it comes to the compilation albums, I have to admit that I'm only familiar with the Lost in Boston series.  Don't have the Schwartz or Sondheim albums, no Unsung Musicals... unseemly, I know, but my CD dollar only goes so far.  But, from the LIB's, I always enjoy Ron Raines work, Liz Callaway (of course), Michelle Nicastro, Lynne Wintersteller ("Pink Taffeta Sample, Size 10" is an absolute favorite of mine).  And can not fail to mention Karen Morrow on the Ballroom tracks... simply sublime.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Noel on January 18, 2004, 05:58:59 AM
To top off a terrible birthday, I find out that I owe many of the HHW community an apology.

Yesterday's topic was about flop shows you loved and why didn't they succeed.

I talked about Baby, a lovely show from the 1980's about three couple's experiences with pregnancy.

I wrote:
Quote
Yes, Baby seemed a little small for Broadway.  It had rounded curtains and a film of sperm and egg was shown on these - hardly the spectacle audiences expected from a Broadway show.

But I've two other theories, and they're controversial.

Abortion is a topic that makes a lot of people sit rigidly and clench their teeth.  It was an even bigger issue on the national political scene 20 years ago than it is today.  Baby had the balls to have one couple consider abortion.  That means that a certain percentage of the audience was going to find the show distasteful.

Homosexuals make up a large section of the musical-attending public, and, at the time Baby opened, La Cage Aux Folles was a big hit you could take your gay uncle to.  I hope it doesn't offend anyone to point out that childbirth is not something many homosexuals have personal first-hand experience with.  Sure, there are many execeptions, but Baby depicted an (blessed) event or three that wasn't easily related to by a segment of the musical-going population.

Plus, the book isn't very good.

DR S. Woody White responded:
Quote
I found your post deeply offensive and ill-informed.  You owe many of us here an apology.

This is most dismaying.  As I said, "I hope it doesn't offend anybody to point out..." and, apparently, my hopes were dashed.  I'm sorry.

As my post acknowledged, a proportion of the gay population has experienced childbirth first-hand, and I've observed that includes some of the DRs here.

DR S. Woody White goes on to say:
Quote
In my experience, the gay community as a whole is just as committed to their families as the sampling we have here, making total nonsense of the entire "family values" rhetoric.

and I'm a little mystified as to why anyone would think I would need to be told this.  Baby is not a musical about commitment to one's family.  (Another of my favorites from the 1980s, March of the Falsettos, is.)  Baby doesn't depict a single scene between parent and child.  I never implied that the gay community isn't committed to their families.  I merely suggested that the stuff that goes on in Baby - conception, infertility, wondering what happened with the birth control, contemplating abortion, the first kick, La Maze and rhtymic breathing - are things most gay theatre-goers haven't experienced (DR S Woody White says it's 90% of gay males) and that this could account for Baby's lack of appeal.

Or not.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Danise on January 18, 2004, 06:22:16 AM
Good morning all.  I don't know why but I'm scratching my head in wonderment!

It's raining here.  Raining down buckets.  Raining down sheets.  Raining down cats and dogs!  Now just what I'm going to do with all these buckets, sheets, cats and dogs I don't know!  I guess I'm going to have to try to find them good homes!

Anyone want a bucket, sheet, cat or dog?

It would have to rain on the day I'm going to the theater!  I hate to drive and now I may have to drive in the RAIN.  Sigh.    If I hadn't already bought the ticket, I would say forget it and stay home.

At least it's not until 2 so maybe it will stop by then.

Sigh.

I'm so sorry you had a bad B-day Noel.  I hope you have an extra nice day today to make up for it.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Robin on January 18, 2004, 07:01:29 AM
<<Today’s topic of discussion: It’s free-for-all day, the day in which you get to choose the topic, you get to initiate the discussion and you get to revitalize the prose. To kick start it, who are your most favorite singers on my compilation albums?>>

I must start the day off with a confession.  I've always preferred female singers to male singers.  Not that I dislike male singers by any stretch of the imagination, mind you.  I just simply adore a girl singer!  

This is one of the reasons I hold the Jeepers Creepers CD in such high esteem.  So many singers of the female persuasion!  And the few men hanging about aren't exactly chopped liver, either!  In fact, my favorite track on the album is the "Teenage Horror Medley", by Jason Graae.  But the gamine charms of the album win me over every time.

So, to finally answer the damned question: Christianne Noll, Emily Skinner, Michelle Nicastro and Dame Edna.  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Robin on January 18, 2004, 07:04:20 AM
And a question for Mr. BK:

Have you been getting the latest LI'L ABNER reprints from Dark Horse Books?  They're reprinting four volumes of the Sunday color strips that Frank Frazetta "ghosted" for Al Capp.  (Capp still wrote the strip, but Mr. Frazetta was drawing it.)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Robin on January 18, 2004, 07:05:08 AM
Oh, and Happy Natal Anniversary to Mr. Charles Pogue!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jennifer on January 18, 2004, 07:06:11 AM
Happy Birthday Charles Pogue!

DR Noel: Sorry your birthday wasn't the greatest.

But re: S Woody taking offense to your post.

I think you (Noel) have a right to give your opinion. I did not take your post as saying you didn't think gays had family values. To me you were just saying why you believed the show failed.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jennifer on January 18, 2004, 07:09:48 AM
Hey BK, just because someone's name shows that they are logged on, doesn't mean they are at their computer! :)

My favorite singers on the compilation cds are definitely: Ruthie Henshall and Kristin Chenoweth.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Robin on January 18, 2004, 07:18:55 AM
Ok, my question for all dear readers (since I don't think anyone saw it before :)): what is the first cast recording/album/showtune to which you were exposed (as far back as you can remember)?

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum.  My parents saw the show on its' first Broadway run, and bought the LP.  Oddly enough, I liked the LP better than they did, and pretty much wore the album out.  My favorite song on the LP was "Impossible", which I found hilarious, even if I didn't understand most of it.  

Co-incidentally enough, one of the first musicals I was ever lucky enough to be cast in was Forum.  And oddly enough, as Miles Gloriosus.  To be funny, decided they would cast the scrawniest-looking kid they could find, and outfit said kid with a fake-looking false chest.  Which was me.  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jrand73 on January 18, 2004, 07:41:22 AM
[move=left,scroll,6,transparent,100%]HAPPY BIRTHDAY MR CHARLES POGUE!!![/move]


Hmmmmmmmm....first cast album....probably either BYE BYE BIRDIE or GYPSY.  Hard to remember.  I know I had some of the songs from LIL ABNER and GYPSY on an album by Mr Johnny Mathis which was very good!   ;D

I like ALL the singers on MR BK's albums of course - but my favorites would have to be Mr Brent Barrett, Mr Jason Graae, Ms Rebecca Luker, Ms Susan Gordon, and Mr Guy Haines!
 8)

DRMATTH like you I abandoned LIS when BATMAN showed up - and I hated Dr Smith - I thought if he were not around, then maybe LIS would have been the real sci fi series I thought it was going to be.  I thought it was just a wasted opportunity and very boring...especially HIM!!!  I do not understand the veneration of this annoying character who got in the way of the series being something that I thought could be good!

So sorry the Courts show was a disappointment.  :(

Maybe it will be better today!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Matt H. on January 18, 2004, 07:42:10 AM
As usual, I'm always astonished when I log on and see this huge number of posts for such an early time of the morning. Posting frenzy aplenty. . . .


My first original cast recording was MY FAIR LADY because that was the first show I ever saw on Broadway. I didn't know such a thing existed as a cast recording, and my aunt and uncle brought my brother and me back from NYC after seeing MFL, there was the recording waiting for me that my mom had bought. I have been a Broadway Baby (a FOLLIES reference) ever since.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: td on January 18, 2004, 07:54:31 AM
AFTER having finished last night's late night notes; BEFORE perusing today's notes; I shall post this little missive (sans editing, of course - 'cos if BK is your Auntie Mame, that might just make me Vera Charles) regarding today's TOD:

Jason Graae, without a doubt!  Love the voice, the humor, the selections which he was given.
Liz Larsen - not a lot there on the compilations, but, what is there is cherce, from dittie from THE VAMP to the cut song from ANNIE GET YOUR GUN, she has a special place in my heart.
Yvette Lawrence - well, I got to see her onstage BEFORE BK had released a compilation with her voice on it, but, I got to meet her the week that A BROADWAY CHRISTMAS was released.
Karen Morrow, Elaine Stritch and Lauren Bacall - let's just call them "the Legends" and be done with it.
Debbie Shapiro, of course!  First heard her on a PBS special, belting Frank Loesser's "Junkman," and it's been love ever since; now, if I could only meet her!
Michelle Nicastro, whom I find charming on each and every one of her releases for BK; as a matter of fact, when I spoke on the phone (so very long ago) for a few moments with BK, Michelle's ears should've been burning.
TWMHM - but, how many compilations is he on?
Michael Piontek - don't know why he hasn't been used more, but, his track on UNSUNG IRVING BERLIN is to die for!
Liz Callaway
and, of course GUY HAINES!  and that guy on UNSUNG IRVING BERLIN who sings the c&w inspired, "Please Let Me Come Back to You."

and now:

[move=right,scroll,6,transparent,100%]HAPPY NATAL DAY, CHARLES POGUE![/move]
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Matt H. on January 18, 2004, 07:54:33 AM
My one comment on the BABY business. DR Noel, I have two nephews and a niece, and I'm not particularly close to them (not particularly close to my brother either). But the point is that you're pretty naive if you think gay people are only interested in subjects that we have actual experience with. With very few exceptions, books, television, and films deal with heterosexual characters, something gay people have lived with and adjusted to forever. The fact that I haven't had a wife or child in no way makes me less interested in stories that deal with straight characters and their stories.

Maybe it doesn't work that way for straight audiences (not wanting to view gay-themed works), but I kind of doubt the big box-office grosses for something like PHILADELPHIA were purely the result of gay patronage.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Michael on January 18, 2004, 07:58:17 AM
I believe the first cast album I ever listened to was My Fair Lady. And no I never saw it. My parents did and they had it as part of their collection. They also had Fiddler on the Roof. But I believe the first cast albums that were given to me (too young to buy) and not cast albums but soundtracks  Mary Poppins and The Sound of Music. I also remember getting the cast album of Camelot for a birthday but don't remember which one.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Matt H. on January 18, 2004, 08:01:31 AM
Favorites vocalists on bk compilations:

Debbie Gravitte on UNSUNG SONDHEIM. Sorry for sounding like a broken record, but I think "Water Under the Bridge" is a great song, and she sings it so wonderfully that it puts Liza Minnelli's version of the song on the Sondheim Tribute show to shame.

Jason Graae is a wonderful singer with great personality in his voice. I know he's got a large following  on the West Coast, but why this guy doesn't have a shelf full of Tonys is a mystery.

Michael Rupert has a depth to his voice that I really love. He's not on a bunch of the recordings, but the few songs that he's done have been wonderfully performed.

Other than "Water Under the Bridge," my favorite cut is "Sherry!" so that means I must also include Christine Baranski and Jonathan Freeman, both exceptionally talented performers. I've never gotten to see Baranski on stage, but Freeman is always wonderful.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Michael on January 18, 2004, 08:11:29 AM
Hard for me to choose as I have the complete BK music series. But of course the regualrs Jason Graae, Liz Callaway, Debbie Shaprio, Michelle Nicastro, Sally Mayes, Guy Haines and the "unsung" Harry Groener who has been of many of the recordings (I am sure I am missing some others)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: PennyO on January 18, 2004, 08:21:06 AM
Hi, there. Anyone know why all my text on this site is now in GERMAN???
Gebruik kit formulier voor snel-antwoorden..... en smilies mogen gebruikt worden... stuff like that. Or might it be DUTCH??? oy.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: PennyO on January 18, 2004, 08:22:26 AM
It also says I'm offline. I'm not, am I???
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: PennyO on January 18, 2004, 08:23:54 AM
And just by the way, when I get to their house tomorrow, Keith and Jane will help me upload this photo so it doesn't look like a Play-Dough transfer.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: td on January 18, 2004, 08:28:29 AM
is this it, BK?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: td on January 18, 2004, 08:29:16 AM
sorta looks like LIFE IS BEAUTIFUL, doesn't it?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jrand73 on January 18, 2004, 08:30:37 AM
DRPENNYO - how strange...sounds like your browser settings are wacky!

But - that reminds me of the Sunday afternoon in the mid 1960's when I was watching EAST OF EDEN on a local Indianapolis channel - there was a reel changeover (a Benjamin Kritzer reference) and then suddenly everyone was speaking dubbed German.  This went on until the next changeover when everyone went back to speaking English.  Twilight Zone time.

I understand the point the DRNOEL was making yesterday.....I don't think it is necessarily the case, but I see what he is saying.  My problem with BABY when I saw it was that it was so damned boring, predictable, and annoying.  It was all about feelings....and all the couples sang songs about the SAME feelings.....first one then the other....I feel this way...you feel this way....we feel this way....how do you feel?....how do I feel?....how do we feel?....  It was an EST festival.  And I didn't really care much about the stock characters as they were presented.  Maybe there were just too many couples.  I might have liked a show about the older couple and the younger unmarried couple and watching them deal with the situation as a quartet.  

Free for all day.  Have any of the DR ever visited the site where a movie was filmed and felt a deja vu....or joy in being there.  I liked seeing Mt Rushmore....and thinking about North by Northwest....   And are there any movie locations you would like to visit?  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Kerry on January 18, 2004, 08:40:35 AM
Good Morning
Good Day
Isn't this a beautiful day?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on January 18, 2004, 08:42:01 AM
HAPPY BIRTHDAY CHARLES POGUE!!!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jrand73 on January 18, 2004, 08:58:26 AM
That's the same dress you had on yesterday!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jrand73 on January 18, 2004, 09:20:55 AM
HELP!  I was just doing some research....and there is a listing for a TV remake of "Sudden Fear".  The original starred of course Miss Joan Crawford and Mr Jack Palance.  The TV cast is listed as Miss Raquel Welch and Mr Craig Bierko!

Did anyone see this movie?  Is it available?  What is the deal?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 09:23:59 AM
I have been locked out of posting for the last half hour.  I also didn’t have any pictures up.  Has anyone else been having difficulty?  Keith thinks it is from our end.

DR Noel I sorry you didn’t have a nice birthday.  Even if birthdays aren’t special they shouldn’t be terrible.

Bruce to help TIVO understand your preferences give the shows you don’t like “thumbs down”, up to three of those and give the shows you like “thumbs up.  I also go through the movie channels and record movies I like, even if I won’t be watching, just to give TIVO an idea of my personal taste.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jrand73 on January 18, 2004, 09:33:14 AM
No problems here DRJane.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 09:34:32 AM
[move=left,scroll,6,transparent,100%]HAPPY BIRTHDAY CHARLES POGUE!![/move]
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 09:42:21 AM
My photo may appear strange for a bit.  I'm having a Stepford-kind-of-day.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Noel on January 18, 2004, 10:00:48 AM
A lovely snow to wipe away the gloom of yesterday.

I thank all the birthday well-wishers, and wish a good birthday to DR Charles Pogue
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Ron Pulliam on January 18, 2004, 10:07:09 AM
I think you (Noel) have a right to give your opinion. I did not take your post as saying you didn't think gays had family values. To me you were just saying why you believed the show failed.

DR Noel, I wasn't offended, but I can understand how others believed you were basing your observation on a notion that gay men and lesbians may have stayed away from a play about the angst of impending parenthood out of a lack of interest...NOT that there were none with interest but that they might not embrace it the way they would other topics.

What apparently matters -- and it's just my opinion (and Jennifer has stated I should be free to give it) -- is that Jennifer, with her vast understanding of the homosexual experience and sensibilities, didn't take offense, so it's quite obvious that everyone who did is just wrong.

Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 10:16:21 AM
Allow me to join the Academy and all the Guilds of Hollywood in wishing Dear Reader Charles Pogue a very happy birthday.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 10:17:01 AM
I also join the American Theatre Wing and Equity in wishing Dear Reader Noel a belated happy birthday.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 10:18:28 AM
Dear Reader Penny-O--

Although your posts still read like you should try decaf now and then, I see that your picture has been un-play-dohed and you....look.....mahvelous.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 10:22:17 AM
Well, there weren't any trumpets.  (Oh, a Sondheim reference.)  I made my way to HHW Godliness and nary a peep.  Maybe it's easier to pass a camel through the eye of a needle than most people believe.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 10:23:20 AM
PennyO - maybe you clicked on something in your edit profile-there's a button for language in there, I almost clicked on mine once.  Of course, if PennyO is seeing this in German she won't know WHAT the hell I'm talking about.

Re Water Under the Bridge - I'll tell you a funny story about that song sometime - it has to do with rehearsing it and trying to figure out the structure so Debbie could build it right and so that the emotion was right - there's a reason Liza's version doesn't work.

I'm glad to see all these Nicastro mentions - she's gotten knocked a lot by some people on another board, but I love her.  Speaking of my favorite voices, I heard from one of them yesterday - someone who has done some of my favorite tracks, but someone I haven't had contact with since The Stephen Schwartz Album, where she was supposed to do the Beautiful City/Day by Day track - Alet Oury.  I'm going to call her now, and I'll have more to tell in a bit.

Lovely posts all.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 10:25:33 AM
Dear Reader Penny-O--

I see that your picture has been un-play-dohed and you....look.....mahvelous.

Jay are you referring to the picture that briefly showed up under my name or the one that is currently under Penny O’s names?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 10:27:27 AM
Bruce Penny O won’t see anything.  Her computer is disconnected and she should be leaving her house just about now.  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 10:27:50 AM
Jay are you referring to the picture that briefly showed up under my name or the one that is currently under Penny O’s names?

The one appearing with PennyO's name.

Who's the stunning couple appearing with your name?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: td on January 18, 2004, 10:56:14 AM
(http://www.wargamer.com/reviews/zeus/mtolympus_lg.jpg)

[move=left,scroll,6,transparent,100%]WELCOME TO MOUNT OLYMPUS, DEAR READER JAY![/move]
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: MBarnum on January 18, 2004, 10:57:44 AM
Jane, is that new picture on your profile you and Keith? I love it! What a darling couple, I want to know more about when and where it was taken!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: MBarnum on January 18, 2004, 10:58:50 AM
Hurray for Jay! What a cool God to have up here!!!  ;D
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 11:06:51 AM
Jane: I KNOW that girl in your picture.  THAT'S Jane!  That's the JANE I remember.  

Just had a wonderful conversation with Alet Oury.  I'm gonna do an Unseemly Interview with her this week - very interesting stories.  She's now married to Andy Taylor who's on the road playing Leo in The Producers.  For those who don't know her name right off the bat, listen to your Peter Pan album or your Lost in Boston IV album (that track is one of my all-time favorites).
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 11:07:24 AM
I saw a new show called Like Jazz yesterday, Dear Readers, at the Mark Taper Forum.  It is a revue with music by Cy Coleman and lyrics by Alan and Marilyn Bergman.  The patter delivered between the songs by actor Harry Groener was scribed by Larry Gelbart.

It certainly was not an unpleasant way to spend two hours in the theatre, but this is not great material, by any stretch.  The songs are about various aspects of jazz:  different styles of jazz, the instruments associated with jazz, the people--well-known and anonymous--who create jazz.

While the music is pleasant enough, I can't say it is particularly memorable.  Most of the the songs are narrative story songs, which plays right into the Bergmans' penchant for literal straightaway lyrics, untouched by poetry, metaphor or wordplay.  (Can you tell that I'd never be accused of being a fan of the Bergmans?)

The low point of the show was a ballad called "A Little Trav'lin Music," which offered the most banal song lyrics I've ever heard sung from a stage.  Worse, it was performed by Jack Sheldon, whose skills on the trumpet are considerably superior to his vocal ability.  Sheldon was also given "Don't Touch My Horn," which no doubt was intended to be a song filled with double entendre.  I'm sorry, the entendre was not very double.

There was a touching ballad about the woes of anonymous piano bar pianists, called "Another Night, Another Song," pleasantly delivered by Cleavant Derricks.  Patti Austin did fine with the numbers she was given, and Lillias White was a delight in her songs.  She was lucky to have the rousing first act curtain number, "Those Hands."  She made her entrance for this song atop an upright piano as it was rolled onstage, a visual from which only the heartless could not take pleasure.

(Seeing Miss White in this show, and recently having seen her in the film Pieces of April, makes me hungry to see more of her.  I know she made a splash in The Life a few years ago, which I, unfortunately, missed.  This artist deserves much greater exposure than she has had.)

And now, for my standard gripe:  the amplification was deplorable.  The onstage orchestra consisted of 18 pieces, 14 of which were brass.  There was a microphone at each stand and the volume levels consisted of loud and louder.  Mediocre as the lyrics that could be heard in the smaller numbers may have been, it was near impossible to make them out in the bigger ensemble songs.  The Mark Taper Forum holds 750 seats, and I can assure you that had the brass played unamplified, they would have had no problem filling the hall with sound.  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: MBarnum on January 18, 2004, 11:11:40 AM
As for JRand53s question, when I went to Los Angeles last September we travelled up to the Griffith Observatory. As it was used as a setting for so many movies we thought it would be fun to go and look at. Unfortunately it was closed for renovation and we could only see it through a large fence that had been put up to keep people away! But some parts of the road going up looked familiar.

Also, the hospital where ONE FLEW OVER THE CUCKOOS NEST was filmed is just a few blocks from my house. It doesn't bring back any memories for me, however, as I have not yet seen that film.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 11:12:22 AM
Thank you, Dear Reader td.  And thank you, Dear Reader MBarnum.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Ron Pulliam on January 18, 2004, 11:27:45 AM
DR Charles Pogue:

Although at times
I think you see
My views as "Pogue
hostility,"
It's only fair
for me to say,
"I wish you joy
on your birthday!"

Happy Birthday, Charles!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: DearReaderLaura on January 18, 2004, 11:38:17 AM
Belated Birthday Wishes, DR Noel. Sorry your birthday was rotten. I know the feeling.

Happy Birthday, DR Charles Pogue.

Congrats on your achievement, Jay.

I'm off to a probable three-hour board meeting.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: S. Woody White on January 18, 2004, 11:41:40 AM
[move=up,scroll,6,transparent,100%][size=20]DR JAY ASCENDS![/size][/move]

(I'd punctuate with a  :-* but that might seem too fresh!)

Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jrand73 on January 18, 2004, 11:42:48 AM
[move=left,scroll,6,transparent,100%]Welcome to new deity

DR JAY!!!![/move]
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 11:47:54 AM
Why, thank you, Dear Readers S. Woody White and JRand53!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: S. Woody White on January 18, 2004, 11:48:48 AM
And Happy B'day to Charles!

(Not to be confused with a bidet, of course.   :-\)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 11:49:08 AM
(I'd punctuate with a  :-* but that might seem too fresh!)

Are you kiddin'?  Not at all.

 :-* right back at you!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: S. Woody White on January 18, 2004, 11:51:34 AM
The earliest cast recordings that I can remember were My Fair Lady and Oklahoma, but the Oklahoma was definately older because it was on 78s.  One song per side, and an actual album of discs.

I'm starting to feel ancient.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: S. Woody White on January 18, 2004, 12:05:57 PM
Buster has now had his first bath!

Der Brucer was soaking his sore muscles in the tub, and Buster decided he had to inspect.

SPLOOSH!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Tomovoz on January 18, 2004, 12:07:44 PM
Welcome DR Jay to the clouds.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Maya on January 18, 2004, 12:08:09 PM
HAPPY BIRTHDAY, CHARLES!!!!

HAPPY BELATED BIRTHDAY, NOEL!!!

I'm here BK!  I've been kind of going through a weird phase in my life, is all...

There are SO many singers I love that have sung on BK's albums...let's divide them up into male and female:

Favorite Male Singers: Brent Barrett, Jason Graae, Harry Groener, Malcolm Gets

Favorite Female Singers: Sally Mayes, Debbie Gravitte, Judy Kaye, Kristin Chenoweth, Alice Ripley, Emily Skinner, Christiane Noll

Like BK, my first cast album was Gypsy.  I don't believe that you can hear Gypsy and not immediately become obsessed with Broadway musicals.  Anyway, that's what happened to me, and almost 10 years later, here I am!

Jay--Thanks for the review!  I'm a big Coleman fan and I did see The Life...I really don't remember it all that vividly, as I was about 15 or so when I saw it, but I do recall having liked it.

Laura II and Jed--you guys would make a cute couple!


Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: TCB on January 18, 2004, 12:13:47 PM
Since this is Sunday Free-for-All Day, topic-wise, I fell I can put my two-cents in about Noel's Baby comments (My! What a lot of hypens!).

At the risk of losing my Gay Membership Card AND my complimentary toaster oven, I am a little stunned by my gay brothers' reactions.  DR Noel, was after all expressing his opinion (the point of this here page) on some of the reasons he felt were responsible for the semi-failure of a show that opened over twenty years ago (1983), and not about a show that might be opening today.

First of all, Noel suggested that, back in 1983, that your average gay theater-goer might be more interested in seeing a show written by gay artists with a gay theme, instead of a musical about straight couples attempting to have a baby.  I don’t find anything radical, inflammatory, or offensive with that statement, and I would say it was quite accurate.  I was part of the gay theater going population of New York in 1983, and I remember clearly that La Cage was a theater event to the gay population.  And why not?   Here, we have a big-name, big-budget, mainstream musical comedy hit that focused on a committed gay couple.  A musical that laughed, for the most part with the gay characters and, shock of all shocks, laughed at the heterosexual characters.  I suspect that had one of one of the gay members of this site suggested this as a possible factor for the failure of Baby, no one would have thought twice about it.

However, I imagine the ire of some of our gay members may have more to do with Noel’s second assertion that gay men and women have less experience and therefore less interest in conception, child birth, etc.  Perhaps the problem lies in Noel’s choice of the word most to describe the number off gays that have these experiences and these interests.  DR SWW suggested that, I believe, about 10% of gay men and a larger share of gay women are indeed parents.  That would leave 90% that are not parents.  Perhaps Noel could have used the word, some or the word, majority or had he felt the need to clarify his statement even further, the phrase, 90% of might have been more accurate.  But, again, we are talking about 1983.  I would be interested to know what share of that 10% of men who were parents then, did so as a conscious choice of their gay lives, and how many became parents because of marriages and relationships that took place before they began to accept or live their lives as gay men.  I would think that (again, back in 1983 terms) this has a lot more to say about the repression and unacceptability of homosexuality in the 50s, 60s, and 70s; than it does about gay's desire and needs, or of Noel’s disapproval or disdain of gay parents.  I found nothing in Noel’s comments to suggest that he felt that gays were bad parents, unfit parents, or that their was any lack of love on either these parents or their children's part.

I know that Noel does not need me to defend his opinions or his intentions.  I just felt it was unfortunate that several of us found the need to read something offensive into what was mrely offered as a possible explanation of a show's lack of success, which was exactly the topic of the day that had been put fourth by BK.  Anyway, sorry, I didn't mean to ramble.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 12:16:03 PM
Buster has now had his first bath!

Der Brucer was soaking his sore muscles in the tub, and Buster decided he had to inspect.

SPLOOSH!

[size=10]LOL[/size] ;D ;D
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 12:17:12 PM
Welcome DR Jay to the clouds.

Thank you, Dear Reader Tomovoz.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 12:18:07 PM
[move=left,scroll,6,transparent,100%]Jay Congratulations and welcome to the clouds.[/move]
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 12:20:36 PM
[move=left,scroll,6,transparent,100%]Jay Congratulations and welcome to the clouds.[/move]

Thank you, Dear Reader Jane!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Charles Pogue on January 18, 2004, 12:43:15 PM
It's also Cary Grant's Birthday!  I raise a ham chunk in his honour!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Matt H. on January 18, 2004, 01:15:12 PM
The earliest cast recordings that I can remember were My Fair Lady and Oklahoma, but the Oklahoma was definately older because it was on 78s.  One song per side, and an actual album of discs.

I'm starting to feel ancient.


My first KISS ME KATE was the album of 78s. Our record player played 33's, 78's, and 45's (and 16's as I recall though I don't believe we ever had any of those. I'm not THAT old.)

Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Matt H. on January 18, 2004, 01:16:16 PM
Welcome to Valhalla, DR Jay! Didn't mean to ignore the important event; I was offline and off-cloud when it happened.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 01:27:23 PM
Welcome to Valhalla, DR Jay! Didn't mean to ignore the important event; I was offline and off-cloud when it happened.

Thank you, Dear Reader Matt H.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jed on January 18, 2004, 01:31:14 PM
Welcome, new Dear HHW God Jay!

SWoody - LOVE the bath story! :D
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 01:40:16 PM
Welcome, new Dear HHW God Jay!

SWoody - LOVE the bath story! :D

Thank you, Dear Reader Jed!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Noel on January 18, 2004, 01:41:30 PM
Outside my window is the sort of sight painters paint, but, when you see the painting, you can't really believe it's true.  There's a big tree that grows on the island in the center of Broadway and it's painted white, perfectly, by today's snow.  Judging by pedestrians, the sidwalks seem managable.  Soon, we're going to a wedding in Central Park.

I enjoyed TCB's post, elaborating on my earlier thoughts.  Again, I apologize for the hurt feelings and even anticipated some ruffled feathers: it's why I said my view was controversial.  I, too, was a New York theatre-goer when Baby and La cage aux folles were playing.

The first cast album I can remember is Hello Dolly!  I thought Carol Channing sounded like a weird old lady and now, all these years later, she's a weird old lady.  There's something wonderful about that.  I, too, had Mary Poppins and The Sound of Music and also recall two obscure shows: Young Abe Lincoln, and Bock & Harnick's The Man in the Moon.  All got worn and warped.

If the wedding doesn't wear me out, perhaps I'll join the pajama party.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Matt H. on January 18, 2004, 01:43:13 PM
Yesterday I received in the mail the "purple" collection of Hercule Poirot hour-long mysteries (6 programs on two discs). These are the MOST entertaining 45 minute mysteries I know of. I had taped them all off either PBS' MYSTERY or A&E over the years, but it's great to be getting them now in such nice editions. This is the fourth box of them that Acorn Media has released, and they can't come out fast enough to suit me.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Ann on January 18, 2004, 01:44:47 PM
Good morning (To me, at least) Everyone.
My goodness, what an interesting bunch of late night posts I was greeted with today!  DR's Jed and Laura are canoodling, Jed whilst wearing a frilly shirt and pantaloons, and Laura in pink footy-pajamas, both of them sitting in a tree while a cyber-yente BK hollers at both of them.  Right?  Of course right.  At least that's the story I got... :)
I made the rather foolish decision to drive over the pass at 11 pm last night...thank goodness for Sondheim to sing along to, I was very close to falling asleep.
Noel - I'm sorry your b-day was less than stellar.  I had less than stellar day myself, but at least it wasn't my b-day on top of it.  Many hopes that today will be lovely and sparkling to make up for it.
SWoody - LOL to the sploosh story.  I'll never forget the first time our old basenji decided to inspect the bathtub when my mom was giving my sister a bath...similar antics, except he got bubble bath all over himself and kept trying to lick the bubbles off.  Poor little guy.
I should be able to attend the pj party tonight.  I shall be wearing my favorite pj pants, shiny blue with yellow moons and stars all over them.  
As for cast albums, let me think on that one...tough to remember.  I think it might have been ALNM, but there might have been one before that.  Are we talking ones that I personally owned, or that I heard because my parents played them?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jennifer on January 18, 2004, 01:47:43 PM
Congrats DR Jay!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jennifer on January 18, 2004, 02:08:06 PM
DR Jane: When is that picture from?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jennifer on January 18, 2004, 02:09:30 PM
DR Ann, sorry you had a bad day.  If you need to vent, email me.

I think I will go eat now. Hope everyone has a good evening. I will try to make it back for the chat.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Michael on January 18, 2004, 02:10:50 PM
To all Canadian readers:

Is Hymn Sing still on the CBC Sunday afternoons?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Michael on January 18, 2004, 02:14:46 PM
Just to mention that the wonderful Alet Oury is also featured on The Burt Bacarach Album, Cinderella, Night of the Hunter, Primetime Musicals, The Paul Simon Album, Sondheim at The Movies, Unsung Musicals III
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Michael on January 18, 2004, 02:18:02 PM
And here is a wedding photo of Alet Oury and Andy Taylor

(http://www.missoulian.com/brides/weddings/0303-taylor-oury.jpg)

Alet Oury and Andrew D. Taylor were married Aug. 25, 2001, by the Rev. Douglas A. Land in Hamilton.
Their parents are Jim and Peggie Oury of Hamilton and Norman and Mary Taylor of Missoula.
Man of honor was John Cockrell. Bridesmaids were Carrie Oury, Holly Denton and Katie McWane. Racine Oury was flower girl.
Best man was Sam Taylor and groomsmen were Alan Taylor, Lar Autio and Hal Fossum. Dashiell Taylor was ring bearer.
Alet graduated from Trinity College in Hartford, Conn., and Andrew is a graduate of Oberlin College in Ohio.
They live in Los Angeles.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 02:25:00 PM
Congrats DR Jay!

Thank you, Dear Reader Jennifer!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Michael on January 18, 2004, 02:30:03 PM
I just read an interview with the late Dorothy Loudon that she did last summer. In was in connection with the Demo/Studio release of the cast recording of The Fig Leaves Are Falling. What I found interesting was the coda at the end of the interview; FIG LEAVES ARE FALLING is still on our agenda for release. However, we are working with several estates to gain the rights to release the material...and we are unsure as to when the release of this show will be. Any new information will be posted to the website  They have been promoting it for months now and they don't have the rights yet? Oy Vey!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 02:37:53 PM
TWMHM - but, how many compilations is he on?

Who?  Or do you mean the WSMA?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Matt H. on January 18, 2004, 02:40:09 PM
That is SO frustrating! I don't understand the reluctance of these estates to release this material.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 02:41:27 PM
Re Water Under the Bridge - I'll tell you a funny story about that song sometime - it has to do with rehearsing it and trying to figure out the structure so Debbie could build it right and so that the emotion was right - there's a reason Liza's version doesn't work.

Why wait?  Tell!  I love Debbie Gravitte and I love her version of this song.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Matt H. on January 18, 2004, 02:42:09 PM
The World's Most Handsome Man = Brent Barrett
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 02:44:18 PM
So now we can call him TWMH&SMA? ;)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 02:46:11 PM
I have some things to do, but I'll be back in time for chat as well as the pajama party.  Happy Bruce?  No previewing!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Michael on January 18, 2004, 02:46:26 PM
The World's Most Handsome Man = Brent Barrett

Oh my! I forgot to add Brent Barrett to my list. I think I also forgot Judy Kaye! There are just so manny! (a Poseidon adventure reference)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Matt H. on January 18, 2004, 02:49:11 PM
So now we can call him TWMH&SMA? ;)


I wish I could call him mine, but alas, no . . . .
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Michael on January 18, 2004, 02:52:14 PM
I wish I could call him mine, but alas, no . . . .

he's single at current time
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Michael on January 18, 2004, 02:56:36 PM
Anyone by chance have a video of  If Love Were All with Twiggy Lawson and Harry Groener. I got an email from someone who just must have some of that footage.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Michael on January 18, 2004, 02:58:11 PM
Quick pole:
Now that we have done away with the Karma thingabob. What do people think about  HHW God and other titles?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Ann on January 18, 2004, 03:08:49 PM
Quick pole:
Now that we have done away with the Karma thingabob. What do people think about  HHW God and other titles?

I like them!  Keep them!!! I think they're merely a fun way of marking how often one posts on the site.  I myself am rather far away from God-dom, but I feel no malice or jealousy for those who have already attained such heights.  I think they're fun and harmless, so let the God's remaind on their clouds :)

And wouldn't be it "Quick Poll"?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jrand73 on January 18, 2004, 03:19:37 PM
I don't mind the titles.....goals are wonderful!  

DRMATTH re:estates.....obviously the people in question want MORE money.

I wonder how things are at the Beverly Garland Holiday Inn in North Hollywood today?  I hope Mr BK and Mr Redman have more fun that did Mr BK and Mr Pogue did yesterday!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jrand73 on January 18, 2004, 03:30:38 PM
Pajama Party.....PST or EST?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Matt H. on January 18, 2004, 03:44:10 PM
DR JRand wrote:  "DRMATTH re:estates.....obviously the people in question want MORE money."


So, instead of getting SOME money, their greed forces them into a position of getting NO money.

Again, I don't understand that kind of attitude.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jrand73 on January 18, 2004, 04:10:22 PM
Isn't it sad, MATTH?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Dan-in-Toronto on January 18, 2004, 04:15:02 PM
There are so many wonderful singers on the BK compilations.  I was already familiar with some, but Lynne Wintersteller was brand new to my ears. I can listen to her singing "When It Happens To You" (The Red Shoes) over and over again.

We also had the 78s of Oklahoma when I grew up. I think the first OCR I received as a gift was Peter Pan (Mary Martin). And the first one I bought for myself was Fiorello.

Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 04:26:04 PM
The year was 1966.  Keith and I were 17 and it was the summer before our last semester in high school.  It was the best and happiest summer of my teen years.  If we weren’t working at the Bruin Theater in Westwood we were probably at the beach swimming, riding the waves on a raft or playing cards on the beach.  We also took walks along the water to the Santa Monica pier.  Keith would play arcade games and I would ride the Carousel or play skeet ball.  This picture was taken in a photo booth on the pier.  Two days after we graduated from high school Keith proposed to me at the beach.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: TCB on January 18, 2004, 04:34:36 PM
HAPPY BELATED BIRTHDAY, NOEL!

HAPPY BIRTHDAY, DR CHARLES!

CONGRATULATIONS,
GOD JAY!

The first OBC that I remember was probably My Fair Lady.  As I recall, it was remastered (or whatever they called it at the time) to be in Stereo, which basically meant mono with an echo.

The first OO-BC that I purchased for myself was Anything Goes with Hal Linden and Eileen Rodgers.  I absolutely loved that album.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: TCB on January 18, 2004, 04:38:09 PM
Jane -- That photo is wonderful.

Gidget and Moondoggie!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jrand73 on January 18, 2004, 04:39:01 PM
Oh TCB I have that ANYTHING GOES album too.  I love "BLow Gabriel Blow", "The Heaven Hop", and of course the title soon....and Eileen is no slouch when it comes to "I Get a Kick Out of You."
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Ron Pulliam on January 18, 2004, 04:56:46 PM
Since this is Sunday Free-for-All Day, topic-wise, I fell I can put my two-cents in about Noel's Baby comments (.

At the risk of losing my Gay Membership Card AND my complimentary toaster oven, I am a little stunned by my gay brothers' reactions.  DR Noel, was after all expressing his opinion (the point of this here page) on some of the reasons he felt were responsible for the semi-failure of a show that opened over twenty years ago (1983), and not about a show that might be opening today.

First of all, Noel suggested that, back in 1983, that your average gay theater-goer might be more interested in seeing a show written by gay artists with a gay theme, instead of a musical about straight couples attempting to have a baby.  I don’t find anything radical, inflammatory, or offensive with that statement, and I would say it was quite accurate.  

Gee, TCB...!!!

When has the gay theatergoer ever made or broken a show?  I think never.  Not 20 years ago and not today.

So please forgive me for saying that the idea that "Baby" may have failed because "average gay theatergoers" stayed away from it is, I think, wrong.  If anything, I'm willing to bet gay theatergoers supported it a great deal.  

I keep reading that folks have the right to express opinions here.  Yet when someone has a negative reaction to an opinion, there seems to be a tendency to start telling folks they aren't reacting correctly.

We can all speak only for how something makes us feel, individually.  That's a right, too.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: MBarnum on January 18, 2004, 05:17:36 PM
DR Jane, you and Keith made a most adorable couple, and, I am guessing, still do! And if you don't mind my saying, Keith is a hottie! And you were (are) just the cutest! You two show go to one of those booths again and take an updated shot for posting her on HHW!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 05:20:11 PM
I say keep the HHW God and bring back the karma fairy.  Let’s put her with the smiley faces so we can give someone karma without keeping count.  :)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: SwishySarah on January 18, 2004, 05:28:26 PM
So I lunched with the new eye candy today, and we had a nice long chat about everything and nothing. I'm pretty sure that this is just going to be a "really good friends who keep each other company" deal, which is fine. I'd rather be great friends and hang out a lot, than be dating and risk losing it. He's really great though.

My first cast r ecording was Annie, and then The Sound of Music, both of which I fell in LOVE with. I would sing Annie night and day, 24/7/365.

THE PATRIOTS ARE GOING TO THE SUPERBOWL!!!!! YEAH!!! *does a blissfully happy dance*

My plans were cancelled for tonight, so I may just  come to le soiree de pyjamas. Or however you say it.

Jane: I love that picture of you and Keith! You were/are very pretty!

I hope Jose is having a good time in NYC!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 05:29:09 PM
DR Jane,  You two show go to one of those booths again and take an updated shot for posting here on HHW!

Thank you.  It isn't a photo booth but here is a picture of us taken on our 32nd anniversary in Pisa, Italy.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jennifer on January 18, 2004, 05:29:39 PM
DR Jane, I cannot believe that you guys were 17 in that picture.  Keith looks much older.  But great pic!

I will definitely try to be back for chat.  But for some reason I am falling asleep.  In case I don't make it, I'm already in my pjs: light grey pj bottoms, with my navy seussical soft shirt (again!).
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: S. Woody White on January 18, 2004, 05:31:07 PM
Thank you.  It isn't a photo booth but here is a picture of us taken on our 32nd anniversary in Pisa, Italy.
Yep, he's still woofy and you're still a babe!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jennifer on January 18, 2004, 05:35:42 PM
DR Jane: Love that Italy pic, wow!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 05:39:19 PM
Thanks for all the compliments.

Jennifer Keith did look older and I looked much younger, plus I was only about 5’2”.  I am now all of 5’3¼.  There were times when we received unpleasant looks from those who thought he was robbing the cradle.  LOL
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Michael on January 18, 2004, 05:50:18 PM
I like them!  Keep them!!! I think they're merely a fun way of marking how often one posts on the site.  I myself am rather far away from God-dom, but I feel no malice or jealousy for those who have already attained such heights.  I think they're fun and harmless, so let the God's remaind on their clouds :)

And wouldn't be it "Quick Poll"?

You are right. I have never heard of a quick Pole. They lay their like so much fish
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 05:51:11 PM
Skee ball, not skeet ball.  And how conveniently my darling Jane doesn't even acknowledge my post about that picture being JANE.  

I'm still deciding how our Pajama Party will work.  I hadn't intended it to be a chat room thing, but a Pajama Posting Party.  What say all of you?

td: That Decameron poster you posted is French, not Italian.  To further complicate matters, there were several style Italian posters, of which my art was one.  

The Courts show was fun today.  I again saw Miss Julie Benz, the cutest celeb there.  Of course, she's probably twenty so it's not hard to be cute at that age.  The most shocking was Angel Tomkins (who wasn't there yesterday) - she was wearing a dress that gave cleavage a whole new meaning.  Neither Nick or I could believe our eyes.  Nick bought a photo and chatted up Ken Kercheval, from Dallas - Nick is a big Dallas fan.  Luciana Paluzzi never made it to today's show.  Carol Lynley does not look good at all.  Nick couldn't believe Kim Darby either.  And Kathy Showers was as stunning today as she was yesterday.  

Nick and I supped at Stanley's.  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Robin on January 18, 2004, 05:52:49 PM
I think that building in the background may have some structural flaws in it.  But the couple in the foreground, however, seems to have excellent structure.  And good posture, too.  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Robin on January 18, 2004, 05:54:59 PM
By the way, I'm a "Jr. Member" now.  

I'm not sure I'm comfortable with that terminology.  Makes me feel somehow less, you know, manly.  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Michael on January 18, 2004, 05:56:37 PM
I never heard of Kathy Showers and what I came up with was an Assistant to the Chancellor from Texas Rech University but I don't think she would be at the Courts Show. So who is she?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Michael on January 18, 2004, 05:58:56 PM
Actually I had to look up who Julie Benz as the name sounded familar. She plays (played) Darla on Angel and Buffy. And believe it or not she is 32 in May!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: S. Woody White on January 18, 2004, 05:59:06 PM
I just did a little digging over at the Tony Awards page (http://www.tonyawards.com/en_US/nominees/index.html), to double-check on what was on Broadway in the 83/84 season.  It was the year of Baby and La Cage, all right, but it was also the year of The Tap Dance Kid, The Rink, and Sunday In the Park With George.  (Major holdovers from the previous season were My One and Only, a revival of On Your Toes, and something called Cats.)

Of all of these, La Cage may have been called the "Gay Show", but it really wasn't, at least not as far as the "gay audience" was concerned, if there is such a thing.  La Cage was built to bring in straight audiences, reinforcing old stereotypes in a pleasantly old-fashioned and not really challenging vehicle.  (In his acceptance speach, Herman made a point of pointing out how "traditional" the show was, compared with his real competition, SITPWG.)  Meanwhile, gay people were dealing with real prejudice and AIDS.  La Cage was not the show for them.

What knocked Baby out of the picture was that there was plenty of good product out there, which made a so-so show less interesting to ticket buyers.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 06:00:16 PM
Kathy Showers (or maybe it's just Shower) was a Playmate of the Year in the eighties.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Danise on January 18, 2004, 06:15:09 PM
Evening all!    I’ll go back and read all the posts I missed and comment but as I typed this up off line, I haven’t had a chance to see them yet.

The rain finely ended in time for me to leave to go to the theater.  I was still nervous having drive on the wet roads but it could have been a LOT worse.  Still I had to get into the left hand lane so I would be able to be in the correct lane when I4 and I75 (known fondly as Malfunction Junction to locals) merge into I275,  

I was going at pretty good clip (65 mph) and people were passing me like I was standing still.  My heart was beating so loud in my ears by the time I go to the parking garage that I was very glad that I was so early for the show.  I needed the time to calm down from my version of Mr. Toads Wild Ride.

So many memories as I made my way to the ticket booth.  The spot where the  lady asked me for my autograph and  the bush where I found a baby bird to name but a few.

After getting my ticket, I still had over a half hour until the lobby doors opened so I found a bench next to an older couple.  Had a very nice chat with them and it was nice to see that they obviously still very much in love.

When the lobby doors opened at one and said “Goodbye” to the couple to find my seat.  Of course it turned out that my seat was on the other side of the theater but I didn’t mind.  Again being early, I had another half hour wait for them to open the doors to the balcony so I found myself a seat to wait.  One of the ushers came by and asked if I would fill out a survey so I said “Sure”.  

After I filled it out and returned it to him, we sat and had a very pleasant conversation along with another lady who was also early.  We talked about Tommy Tune, DOTV, NYC, the high price of the tickets and Broadway web sites.

I was very happy with my seat.  I was able to see the entire stage and the orchestra pit.  I spotted the lady I had the conversation while waiting for the door to open and we waved to each other.  

Finely the lights went down and the play started.  I looked into the orchestra pit and was very surprised to only see seven people there!  3 guitar players, 3 keyboard players and the drummer. I’m guessing the keyboards made all the sounds   I found that somewhat disappointing.    

Having seen the show before, I thought I knew exactly what to expect but this must have been a new staging of it with different costumes then I remember.  I loved the long swishy coats some of the men wore.    

Some the words to the songs were somewhat different as well.  

The set was a simple set of stairs with a catwalk between two columns that they used to great advantage.  Like for the Temple scene, they dropped tote boards like the stock market and when Herod had his song, they dropped his name, all in lights and the stairs lit up as well.  When Jesus was in prison, they dropped prison bars over the cat walk and the scene where Judas commits suicide was handled well.

Jesus was played by Eric Kunze who did an outstanding job.  I watched his version of Gethsemane very closely and was not disappointed .  He had the punch on the right words which is what I have said before about other versions of the song.  I’m beginning to wonder if singing the song in a concert is considered different than singing it in a play.  It seems the emotions are different but that just might be me.

I would tell you about the great body and  handsome face Jesus had but that might be considered the wrong thing to do.  I might wind up in Hades if I did tell you that because one should not lust after Jesus. So consider yourself not told.  Is it warm in here or is it just me?  Anyway, my only problem with him was his hair which was very long and silky looking and he kept running his hands through it.  After a time it drove me nuts.  At least he wasn’t a quick draw Jesus with a mike in a holster under his arm.  

I also greatly enjoyed “Could We Start Again Please” which was choreographed to show the beatings he took in prison in slow motion.  Very, very well done but I have such a hard time watching that kind of thing.  Even if it is a play, I had to keep a firm hand myself because I wanted them to stop hurting him.  I know, he wasn’t really hurt but I get involved in the story.

Mary Magadalene was played by Natalie Toro who had a wonderful sweet voice.  Very, very nice and would like to see her again someday.

Other stand outs were Pontius Pilate/Stephen Breithaupt, Judas/Lawrence Clayton and I have to say, Catiaphas/Lawson Skala who had a voice so deep it sounded like it was coming from his toes.  I swear he looked like Ming the Merciless from “Flash Gorden”.  The kicker was (and I’m very sorry I don’t know the character name so I can’t name the actor) the one priest was the total opposite of him.  He was a short, bald,  black man with a very high voice.  They were GREAT together.    Tall/deep, short/high.  

Anyway, I enjoyed myself  and I strongly recommend seeing this version of “Jesus Christ: Superstar” if you are lucky enough to have it come to your town.

Luckily, the drive home less stressful.  I know how to get in the lane I needed to go home without having to fight to get on the Interstate and I don’t have to change lanes the whole way.  Whew!  I hate driving very fast.  55 is fast enough for me.

Congrats to Jay!

[move=up,scroll,6,transparent,100%](http://www.click-smilies.de/sammlung0903/travesmilies/smilie_happyb.gif)[/move]
 DR Charles & Belated Good wishes to Noel!
 
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jrand73 on January 18, 2004, 06:16:57 PM
MR BK you should have encouraged Ms Paluzzi to return today!

Angel (Darlene) Tompkins....cleavage....oh my.

DRMBARNUM got an autograph and took a photo of Ms Carol Lynley for me at the 1999 Courts show.  I think that perhaps her theme song from "The Poseidon Adventure" is most appropriate...this is indeed "The Morning After."

But I still think she was wonderful in "Blue Denim" and "Return to Peyton Place" and "The Pleasure Seekers."

Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 06:21:13 PM
My first cast r ecording was Annie, and then The Sound of Music, both of which I fell in LOVE with. I would sing Annie night and day, 24/7/365.

Swishy, which Sound of Music recording?  Mary Martin or Julie Andrews?  It probably wasn't the one I happened to listen to today (well, side one of the album, so far) the Original 1981 London Production with Petula Clark.  I'm making a CD of it for a friend.  It has a lot of pops, but so far, no scratches.  I don't really care for some of Petula's "pop singer" vocalisms, but I like her voice and the sound is otherwise very good.  It's labeled as "33 1/3 rpm Digital Album.  The first original cast Album recorded in this manner."  No wonder it sounds good...except for all the pops from the record.  They used "I Have Confidence" and "Something Good."  Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think that this was the first stage production to use those songs from the movie.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 06:43:17 PM
So, our official Pajama Party will start at eight Pacific Time.  I'm still undecided whether it will be via posts or in the chat room - no one has offered an opinion, although my instinct is it would be more fun as posts - that way it doesn't go by too fast and doesn't get too crazy.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Danise on January 18, 2004, 06:45:30 PM
And I'm about to poop out.  I thought I could make it but I'm getting more tired by the second and I have an eight o'clock doctor appointment.  What was I thinking!  

Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: SwishySarah on January 18, 2004, 06:54:28 PM
Um. I have to get up kind of SUPER early, so I'm going to bed sometime within the next hour. I shall be missing the chat/post/PJ party. Have a blast, though!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jennifer on January 18, 2004, 07:05:45 PM
I thought it was going to be a chat, not just posting. And didn't you say 10pm? :(

I don't think I will be here at 11pm, too late for the east coasters.  But I also hope everyone has FUN!

Btw, I taped Alias at 7pm, and I'm glad I did. Cause I cried through the last 10 minutes.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 07:10:15 PM
Excuse me for living - eleven is TOO LATE?  I believe we took a poll here, did we not?  I believe that many many people said Sunday rather than Saturday because Monday is a holiday and they could stay up late.  My goodness, we do have us some wusses.  I can say for sure that if we're only going to have a handful of folks we'll just do the posting thing.  If it looks like a full boat I might just open the chat room.

Eleven is late.  Pish-tosh and also tosh-pish.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: SwishySarah on January 18, 2004, 07:14:54 PM
Well *I* believe that yes, darling, we took a poll about what DAY to have it, but YOU, my darling, decided on the time. Normal chat-type-things are at 9 EST, darling, which is what I was planning around.

Pish posh and Tish tosh to YOU. Darling.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 07:16:33 PM
Chat...post...let's get crackin'.  (almost a West Side Story reference).
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 07:21:36 PM
Um, DARLING, Pajama Parties don't start at six or even nine.  This wasn't meant to be one of our regular chats, DARLING.  You just go to bed and we'll manage just fine and have a peachy-keen time DARLING.  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: S. Woody White on January 18, 2004, 07:27:47 PM
I have to stand up for Jennifer here.  Monday is a holiday in the United States, but not in Canada, her own home sweet home.  

Fresh dreams, Jennifer, as they say in Maguire's novel of Wicked.

(Oh, and I watched Alias too, while taping an Alton Brown special on FoodTV.)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: td on January 18, 2004, 07:35:05 PM
Quick pole:
Now that we have done away with the Karma thingabob. What do people think about  HHW God and other titles?

Shouldn't that be "My Gun in Quick," mr. detective?
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Andrea on January 18, 2004, 07:37:55 PM
Excuse me for living - eleven is TOO LATE?  I believe we took a poll here, did we not?  I believe that many many people said Sunday rather than Saturday because Monday is a holiday and they could stay up late.  


Wait... Monday is a holiday? Why can't the rest of the world be on American time?



Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 07:38:00 PM
Pajama Party in twenty minutes.  Be there or be round.  I'm now leaning towards having it in the chat room.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 07:39:52 PM
Skee ball, not skeet ball.  And how conveniently my darling Jane doesn't even acknowledge my post about that picture being JANE.  


Okay skee ball.  I was very good at it.

Bruce I posted the picture at your request.  It just took me several months to do it.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 07:41:52 PM
I know WHY you posted it, I was just commenting on the fact that that is you as I remember you.  I was also an ace skee ball player and still am for that or any other matter.

In other words, Jane, just in case my point is escaping you - YOU WERE CUTE!!!!!!  And are, of course.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 07:50:29 PM
Bruce, so sweet.  Penny still thinks of me as a blond.  How come if we were both so good at skee ball we never played it together.  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jrand73 on January 18, 2004, 07:53:42 PM
Pajama Chat at eleven?  all right
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 07:55:54 PM
Why DIDN'T we ever play Skee Ball?  Did we go to the beach?  I seem to remember we did, but then again, I'm senile.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 07:56:30 PM
Yes, it's the Pajama Game in five count them five minutes.  

Oh, and I HATE MARZIPAN.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jrand73 on January 18, 2004, 07:57:50 PM
Why is it 15 degrees in Indiana?  Why I am watching a submarine movie?
Silent CABIRIA on at midnight followed by LIGHT IN THE PIAZZA!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: S. Woody White on January 18, 2004, 07:58:33 PM
Wait... Monday is a holiday? Why can't the rest of the world be on American time?
Monday we celebrate Martin Luther King Jr's Birthday.  That's when we honor a man of peace and dignity by getting drunk and crass.  It's sort of a rehearsal for Super Bowl Weekend, not that we need that much rehearsal.

The thought of the rest of the world being on American time is...well, scary.  Don't get me wrong, I love my country, but I also like the variety.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Michael on January 18, 2004, 07:59:10 PM
I  do have to work tomorrow. So I am off to bed. Have a great one everyone
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 08:01:03 PM
Don't forget, you must be in your PJs to participate in the Pajama Party.  Also, I will keep the chat room open only for one hour, and then the party will continue via posting.  That way we get the best of both worlds.  Okay, the room is open, so let's party!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: td on January 18, 2004, 08:02:49 PM
Don't forget, you must be in your PJs to participate in the Pajama Party.  Also, I will keep the chat room open only for one hour, and then the party will continue via posting.  That way we get the best of both worlds.  Okay, the room is open, so let's party!

Well, I for one, will not sit in a chat room wearing ABSOLUTELY NOTHING! ! !

There are people who get paid to do that sort of thing. . .
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: MBarnum on January 18, 2004, 08:06:17 PM
Ok, I am ready for the pajama party Annette!

Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Matt H. on January 18, 2004, 08:12:48 PM
TCB wrote: "The first OBC that I remember was probably My Fair Lady.  As I recall, it was remastered (or whatever they called it at the time) to be in Stereo, which basically meant mono with an echo."

I don't think so, TCB. Rather than do that, Columbia recorded the show again in real stereo when the three leads (and Robert Coote) took the show to London. That album had a gold cover while the original cast LP was white. I got the white one when I returned from NYC that CHristmas and later bought the gold one.

Columbia did the "reprocessed stereo" stuff with a bunch of their pre-WEST SIDE STORY cast albums, but I don't think the 1956 MY FAIR LADY was ever reprocessed since the show had a true stereo recording.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Panni on January 18, 2004, 08:18:21 PM
I'm back from San Francisco... but you're all pajama partying. I'll look in for a bit in a moment (although I do not own pajamas). Meanwhile, Happy Birthday, fellow scribe Pogue!
And belated Happy Birthday, Noel!

Jrand 53 - Re your post yesterday... The name spelling was not incorrect on the actual paste-on name tag, just on the notice. So, that's probably not the problem. But who knows! Thanks for trying to puzzle it out, though.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 08:41:27 PM
Why DIDN'T we ever play Skee Ball?  Did we go to the beach?  I seem to remember we did, but then again, I'm senile.

Beach party at night-that is all I remember.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jane on January 18, 2004, 08:46:01 PM
Good night.  Have fun at the p.j. party.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Matt H. on January 18, 2004, 09:02:27 PM
ENjoyed my brief time at the PJ party. My white bathrobe didn't seem to clash with anyone else's attire.

Hope those who don't have to work tomorrow will enjoy their day off.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: MBarnum on January 18, 2004, 09:06:41 PM
The pajama part was a hit! We giggled, and laughed, and told stories about boys, and stayed up late, and all that! LOL!

We must do this again sometime!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: td on January 18, 2004, 09:16:43 PM
Big hit!  Black boxer briefs and all!  Even priavet conversations!  There were definitely some major hotties in the room, too!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 09:16:51 PM
Thank you, Dear Readers TCB and Danise, for your good wishes.

Dear Reader Jane, I am thinking that you and DH Keith were Mr. and Miss Popularity in high school.  Ya know, he the QB on the football team, you the head of the cheerleading squad, that sort of thing.  In any event, it is a blessing that you two remain in love and together after all these years!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 09:34:48 PM
(I know this post will elicit some wiseacre comment or other from Dear Reader TCB and/or Dear Reader Tomovoz, but here goes anyway.)

I went to an organ recital this afternoon, Dear Readers, something I've never done before.  The instrument was not just any organ, but the one at the First Congregational Church of Los Angeles, which is reputed to be the world's largest church pipe organ.  The organist was Ken Cowan, a very young and very talented musician.  The program consisted of pieces by Bach, Franck, Karg-Elert (whom I had never heard of before), von Weber and Liszt.  As an encore, Mr. Cowan played Saint-Saens' Danse Macabre, and to hear it played (and quite well!) on an instrument with, according to the informational materials I picked up in the church lobby, 346 ranks, 265 stops, 233 voices, 18 divisions and more than 20,000 pipes is quite an experience, indeed.

Confidential to Dear Reader Music Guy (that is, if he ever returns to this site and reads this post):  I picked up some brochures that contain technical information about the organ.  If you would like to see them, just let me know, and I'd be happy to send them off to you.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 09:36:47 PM
I just left the chat (after 1 & 1/2 hours!) and it was its usual sparkling and lively chat.  We made a new friend...hopefully she'll make her presence known on the board.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jay on January 18, 2004, 09:59:51 PM
Sorry I missed the PJ party.  I couldn't find the turban in my collection that matches the the chiffon and feathers babydoll I planned to wear this evening, and I certainly could not arrive at the soiree turbanless.  Pity, as I even bought a new pair of the most darling high-heel mules especially for the occasion.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 10:29:40 PM
Welcome Tiff!  Let the partay continue!  The chat room is closed up, but we are going to party until the cows come home right on this board.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jed on January 18, 2004, 10:33:48 PM
My goodness, the chat portion of the pajama party was fantabulous!  Now, on to the posting portion!!!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Laura II on January 18, 2004, 10:34:56 PM
Chat was glorious! Tiff has joined us!! Yay for my bestest friend! :D Please take it easy on her as she's not really a theatre gal, but she took a film studies course, so I bet she can add to discussions on films!

(She and I neeeeed to watch Casablanca, Uncle Woody!)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jed on January 18, 2004, 10:35:06 PM
Oh yes, and welcome to our newest member, Tiff! :D
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Ann on January 18, 2004, 10:38:59 PM
Welcome Tiff!  
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Tiff on January 18, 2004, 10:53:23 PM
Thanks for the welcomes! I'm indeed a friend of Laura (so if you ever need any dirt on her... I'm kidding Laura, or am I?  ;) ). I had fun talking to yall tonight, so I decided to register. So hi to everyone!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jed on January 18, 2004, 11:14:11 PM
Just what kind of pajama party is this?  C'mon, people!  It's party time!!!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Laura II on January 18, 2004, 11:15:33 PM
Wooooo I'm not wearing pink, and I'm listening to John Mayer! Which one of those things is abnormal? :)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: George on January 18, 2004, 11:23:44 PM
I'm watching my new favorite new show:  "Mythbusters" on The Discovery Channel.  It's a HOOT!!  They take myth (tonight's has to do with frozen chickens versus thawed chickens being shot at an airplane windshield out of a cannon) and either prove or disprove the possibility of the myth...not whether it's true or not.  I can't recommend this show highly enough!
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 18, 2004, 11:27:24 PM
This is a party?  I'm in my PJs for God's sake.  I hope that LauraII and Jed are not off doing the... "other things" thing.  I do hope that they are doing their other things thing right here where we can all keep an eye on them.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jed on January 18, 2004, 11:29:37 PM
Ahh!  Forgot about MythBusters tonight... darn!  Would watch now, but "Light in the Piazza" is about to start on TCM, and I've not seen the movie before, so I want to catch it.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Ann on January 18, 2004, 11:30:59 PM
I do hope that they are doing their other things thing right here where we can all keep an eye on them.

bk!  I didn't know you were into that kind of thing ;)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Laura II on January 18, 2004, 11:39:44 PM
Haha, Ann! I assure BK that everything is a-ok! Nothing's happening! We're not hiding anything! :)
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Tiff on January 18, 2004, 11:45:28 PM
::shaking head:: Quite scandalous if you ask me.
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Laura II on January 18, 2004, 11:50:26 PM
In response to Tiff: "For there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so." Basically, draw your own conclusions based on how you feel. *I* don't think/feel anything is scandalous! :P
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: Jed on January 18, 2004, 11:53:49 PM
::shaking head:: Quite scandalous if you ask me.

Precisely why you shall not be asked. :D
Title: Re:REVITALIZING THE PROSE
Post by: bk on January 19, 2004, 12:06:47 AM
Hold tight, and then read the new notes and let's start the day off with a plethora of postings, shall we?