Haines His Way

Archives => Archive 15 => Topic started by: bk on February 22, 2009, 12:18:59 AM

Title: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 12:18:59 AM
Well, you've read the notes, the notes were Oscar bait, and now it is time for you to post until the cows come home - they're nervously waiting to see if they won an honorary Oscar for Best Cow.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 12:20:11 AM
And the word of the day is: NEOTENY!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 03:13:41 AM
DR Jane and others - thanks for your concern.  I am still waiting for the pain to arrive, but so far I am fine.  So that's good.     :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 03:14:05 AM
My plan is to be here tonight for the big bash.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ben on February 22, 2009, 03:54:58 AM
I don't have a clue who will win. I have seen, I think, exactly 3 of the nominated movies. I don't even know who was nominated in many of the categories. I certainly won't be up till the end of the broadcast I know that.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:40:12 AM
I have printed out my ballot furnished by DR JOSE.  But I must say that the information provided by DR CILLA LIZ makes me think this is going to be the dreariest Oscar Telecast EVER!!!

I don't want a NARRATIVE.....I don't want Scottish Pipers or Japanese Dancers.....I just want to see who wins!!!

UGH!!!  And I had just about made up my mind to skip TAR.....now I am not so sure.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:41:36 AM
Lots of competition this year....and lots of room for upsets....if such a thing is possible.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 05:50:00 AM
And the word of the day is: NEOTENY!

And The Song Of The Day Is:  YOU MAKE ME FEEL SO YOUNG
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jennifer on February 22, 2009, 06:05:48 AM
I'm glad DR DAW is okay. But now DR Cillaliz has me worried about DR Danise. I had no idea it had been that long since she posted. Hopefully someone will talk to her and post it here.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:13:22 AM
I have to work today.  Oh well.

Ah yes....I have never had a doggie who did NOT know that the pizza crust belonged to him/her.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:14:01 AM
And Friday evening on THE SOUP - Stains the Cupcake Dog won Entertainer of the Year and was rewarded with a tray of dog-safe cupcakes which he enjoyed on the air!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 06:19:03 AM
Our very own Mark Bakalor has a website where through some mathematical computation predicts the win. He usually does very well. He has never gotten 100%, but the blogs and critics who do make the predictions never get 100% and that is if they make predictions in all the categories.

Here is the link to the complete list of predictions.

http://oscarcentral.com/ (http://oscarcentral.com/)

I have include a list of some of the awards where I have indicated who I would like to see win rather than who will be the actual winners.

Picture
Slumdog Millionaire    31%
 The Curious Case of Benjamin Button    20%
Milk    19%
Frost/Nixon    16%
The Reader    14%

Although Slumdog Millionaire has a lock on this award as it has won practically every other award. Milk might be the surprise winner as Academy has (I assume) many gay members and they just might vote for this film
             
Director
Slumdog Millionaire    33%
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button    21%
Milk    16%
Frost/Nixon    15%
The Reader    15%

Actor    
Mickey Rourke    28%
Sean Penn    26%
Frank Langella 17%
Brad Pitt    15%
Richard Jenkins    13%

I think the Frank Langella just might win here as the votes just might have split between Rourke and Penn. Langella has been around for a long time and is a highly respected actor in the industry.
 
Actress
Kate Winslet    30%
Meryl Streep    23%
Anne Hathaway 18%
Angelina Jolie 16%
Melissa Leo    14%

I would like to see Ann Hathaway win as it was a break from her “sweet” roles. Although she had a great turn in Brokeback Mountain. This performance was a lot rawer and I think she was nominated more for the performance than being Meryl Streep who seems to be nominated for practically any movie she appears in. Kate Winslet was a surprise nominee for The Reader, which won her awards in the Supporting Category, and this may work against her although the Academy saw fit to nominate in the role instead of Revolutionary Road.
 
Supporting Actor
Heath Ledger    33%
Robert Downey Jr.    18%
Josh Brolin    18%
Philip Seymour Hoffman    17%
Michael Shannon    14%
 
I would have chosen Heath Ledger even if he had not passed away
                       
Supporting Actress    
Penelope Cruz    30%
Viola Davis    23%
Marisa Tomei    17%
Taraji P. Henson    15%
Amy Adams    15%

No choice here
 
Original Screenplay    
Milk 31%
Wall-E 21%
In Bruges 17%
Happy-Go-Lucky    17%
Frozen River    15%
     
Adapted Screenplay    
Slumdog Millionaire    33%
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button    19%
Frost / Nixon    16%
The Reader    16%
Doubt    15%

I love the structure used in telling the story of Slumdog Millionaire. No screenplay 101 (in my opinion) in telling the story. Both Frost/Nixon and Doubt are adaptations of stage plays and latter winner of the Pulitzer Prize and the Tony Award for Best Play, but that doesn’t mean anything in Hollywood.
            
Animated Feature
Wall-E    50%
Kung-Fu Panda    27%
Bolt    23%

Animated Short
Presto 31%
La Maison En Petitis Cubes 19%
This Way Up 18%
Lavatory - Lovestory 17%
Oktapodi 15%

I saw all five of them and thought Oktapodi was short and sweet. Good use of computer graphics. Presto was nothing special story wise and reminded me of a Bugs Bunny/Elmer Fudd cartoon where Fudd chases Bugs around the stage. It was the one where they “get married” and Bugs drops him into a large wedding cake. La Maison En Petitis Cubes was a traditional hand drawn character with no dialogue. This Way Up would be my second choice.

Live Action Short
Spielzeugland (Toyland) 26%
New Boy 21%
The Pig 20%
Manon on the Asphalt 17%
Auf der Strecke (On the Line) 16%

I have chosen Toyland because it provided me with an emotional wallop. Very well told in about 13 minutes. Surprisingly On the Line has been chosen by other bloggers/critics to win. Very well done but nothing-special story wise. The Pig can be considered NOT Politically Correct as it rails against members of the Islamic faith. Manon on the Asphalt is why did they nominate this film? Did they need a fifth nomination? As some people said around me at the theatre, "A good student film.”

Song
Jai Ho (Slumdog Millionaire) 43%
Down to Earth (Wall-E) 33%
O Saya (Slumdog Millionaire) 24%

Hard category to choose from as when the two Slumdog songs were used in the film there was no English translation. Jai Ho was the song used at the end of the film along side the credits. A good placement and use of the songs, Down to Earth is one of those songs played over the end credits hoping it would get an Oscar nomination. When I saw the film people were walking out during the credits and paying no attention to the song unlike Jai Ho where people stayed to watch it as the credits rolled. Even those that started to walk out stayed to watch. I have no idea where O Saya was used.

After I posted the above I found an English translation for Jai Ho and therefore it is now my choice

 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 06:27:30 AM
6,000th Posting
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 06:29:56 AM
Here is the English translation of Jai Ho

Jai Ho!
Jai Ho

I got shivers
When you touch of a (?)
I’ll make you hot, Get what you got,
I’ll make you wanna say
(Jai Ho, Jai Ho)

I got fever, running like a fire
For you I will go all the way
I wanna take you higher
(Jai Ho)

I keep it steady steady, that’s how I do it
This beat is heavy, so heavy you gonna feel it.

(Jai Ho)
You are the reason that I breathe (Jai Ho)
You are the reason that I still believe (Jai Ho)
You are my destiny
(Jai Oh) Oh-oh-oh

(Jai Ho)
No there is nothing that can stop us (Jai Ho)
Nothing can ever come between us (Jai Ho)
So come and dance with me
Jai Ho!

Catch me, catch me, catch me, c’mon, catch me,
I want you now,
I know you can save me, you can save me,
I need you now.
I am yours forever, yes, forever,
I will follow,
Anywhere in anyway,
Never gonna let go

Jai Ho!
Jai Ho!

Escape (escape) away (away),
I’ll take you to a place,
This fantasy of you and me
I’ll never lose my chance
(Jai Ho)

Mmmhh yeaahhhh .. hhmm yeaaaha

I can (I can) feel you (feel you),
Rushing through my veins
There’s an ocean in my heart
I will never be the same
(Jai Ho)

Just keep it burnin’, yeah baby, just keep it comin’ (Jai Ho)
You’re gonna find out baby, I’m one in a million

(Jai Ho)
You are the reason that I breathe (Jai Ho)
You are the reason that I still believe (Jai Ho)
You are my destiny
Jai Oh! Oh-oh-oh-oooooh

(Jai Ho)
No there is nothing that can stop us (Jai Ho)
Nothing can ever come between us (Jai Ho)
So come and dance with me
Jai Ho! (oohh)

Catch me, catch me, catch me, c’mon, catch me,
I want you now,
I know you can save me, you can save me,
I need you now.
I am yours forever, yes, forever
I will follow
Anywhere in anyway,
Never gonna let go

(Jai Ho)
Hmmm yaeaaaaahhh
(repeat 2x)

I need you, gonna make it
I’m ready, so take it

(Jai Ho)
You are the reason that I breathe (I breathe)
You are the reason that I still believe (still believe)
You are my destiny (destiny)
Jai Oh! Oh-oh-oh-ooooh

(Jai Ho)
No there is nothing that can stop us (can stop us)
Nothing can ever come between us
So come and dance with me,
Jai Ho! (oohh)

Jai Ho!
Bai-la bai-la!
Bai-la bai-la!
Jai Ho! Bai-la bai-la!
Jai Ho
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 06:37:23 AM
Lyrics for O Saya

o...saya
they can't touch me
we break off
run so fast they can't even touch me
been that --
touch me i'll show you -- my zig zag quickly
pick up that pack on my journey
dont suddenly start to follow me
i am in a luck, some days they suck
when we live by the buck
we get for the family

one day i wanna be a star
so i get to hang in a bar
i'll go to vegas in a --
just to forget my scars

ek do teen char panch ... terah (1,2,3,4,5 till 13) (hindi)

street shops have made me thrifty
like a ninja with speed i am nifty
i hope i live till i am fifty
see my city go a quick to a --
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Laura on February 22, 2009, 06:37:56 AM
Good morning.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: elmore3003 on February 22, 2009, 06:39:43 AM
Good morning, all! I'm moving about, planning my day, listening to Dvorak's Requiem, and catching up on posts. When the Requiem finishes, I'll vacuum the apartment before I get down to work. I'm meeting Matthew, my best frend from college, at 2:00 on 42nd Street to catch a showing of "The International," about which I know nothing, although I would have preferred to see "Slumdog Millionaire," which he's seen. I don't think I've seen him since before my two weeks in Ohio, so we've lots of catching up
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: elmore3003 on February 22, 2009, 06:40:06 AM
Good morning.

Good morning, DR Laura!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Kerry on February 22, 2009, 06:42:42 AM
Good Morning!  Good vibes!  Sugar and I  took our first walk of the day (luckily just a short one).

I have seen two of th movies that been nominated.  I like Hugh Jackman (a lot), but i haven't watched the Oscars for a few years now since there are no stars I really care about (let alone have heard of).

Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JMK on February 22, 2009, 06:52:50 AM
I have a very busy day, including more PRODUCERS auditions, so I may not be able to partake of the HHW Oscar Partay.  Have fun, all.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: MBarnum on February 22, 2009, 06:58:36 AM
I will watch the Oscars and record The Amazing Race...or vice versa.

Since I only managed to see one of the movies that is up for best picture I can't really make a prediction, but I am certain that all are worthy.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:00:57 AM
Congratulations to DR MS on 6000 posts!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:07:04 AM
Off to work....see you at the Oscars!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 07:09:06 AM
Congratulations to Michael S on His Millstone
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 07:13:57 AM
OSCARS:

Kate Winslet was nominated for the wrong movie. The Reader IMHO was a disappointment all around. Revolutionary Road was the One. However,Leonardo's performance in that movie was stunning'
I hope Meryl Streep wins for Doubt.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Druxy on February 22, 2009, 07:14:05 AM
Oscar Predictions:

SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE   (Would prefer THE READER)
Kate Winslet
Sean Penn  (would prefer Frank Langella)
Heath Ledger
Penelope Cruz
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 07:30:50 AM
SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE

MERYL STREEP

MICKEY ROURKE

HEATH LEDGER

PENELOPE CRUZ
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:31:57 AM
Good morning!

Another cold but gorgeous day with bright blue skies. Exactly what February should be like around here.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:33:06 AM
My predictions:

Film: SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE
Actor: Mickey Rourke
Actress: Kate Winslet
Supporting Actor: Heath Ledger
Supporting Actress: Viola Davis
Director: Danny Boyle
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 07:35:14 AM
my choices:

SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE

MICKEY ROURKE

ANNE HATHAWAY

HEATH LEDGER

AMY ADAMS
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:35:58 AM
On TV Tonight:™

ABC - Barbara Walters (7 p.m. EST), Oscar Arrivals (8 p.m. EST), Oscar broadcast (8:30 p.m. EST)
CBS - 60 MINUTES, THE AMAZING RACE
NBC - DATELINE, TOP 100 MOST OUTRAGEOUS MOMENTS 2
FOX - NASCAR race
PBS - OLIVER TWIST (conclusion)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:36:12 AM
Page Two Dance!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:37:57 AM
I'll be working today on PRIMAL FEAR. I haven't looked to see what bonus features are on the disc, but the film is less than two hours, so I hope to finish it and get it written up before I check back in at HHW for the show.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 07:38:48 AM
Congrats to Michael S on his new plateau
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Dan (the Man) on February 22, 2009, 07:43:56 AM
Oscar Predictions:

SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE   (Would prefer THE READER)
Kate Winslet
Sean Penn  (would prefer Frank Langella)
Heath Ledger
Penelope Cruz

Ditto on all five categories plus I will go with Danny Boyle for SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Dan (the Man) on February 22, 2009, 07:44:28 AM
Congrats to DR Michael Shayne on 6000 posts!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:01:51 AM
Yes, DR der Brucer, those THE CLOSER episodes are the ones with "Elaine" who talked about herself in the third person. Loved the character and loved the episode.
That's also the episode with two other favorites: William Daniels and Paul Shulze
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:03:44 AM
And speaking of THE CLOSER. The fourth season box set comes out in late May and is now available for preorder at Amazon. Can't wait to get these episodes to watch and enjoy all over again.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 08:05:35 AM
Just read the the musical

The Story of My Life is closing today
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 08:24:06 AM
And Yes

DIRECTOR- DANNY BOYLE- SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:24:21 AM
Just read the the musical

The Story of My Life is closing today

DR Jose and DR Elmore mentioned this information a few days ago. You must have missed it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:25:06 AM
I am heading downstairs now to get clothes ready for washing and then I'll start thinking about what's for lunch.

WBBL.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: TCB on February 22, 2009, 08:49:31 AM
Gee, a slow start for the Oscar party.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:50:31 AM
Good Morning!

I'm up, I'm up... And I'm drinking coffee.  And watching the new version of "The Electric Company". :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:53:34 AM
I think you're a few hours early, DR TCB.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:55:12 AM
I jumped back on-line for a minute making sure the wireless connection downstairs was working properly for the party tonight. It seems to be OK though the browser is a bit slower than I'm used to.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:56:04 AM
OK. Things seem OK on this end.

WBBL.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jane on February 22, 2009, 09:06:14 AM
DR Jane and others - thanks for your concern.  I am still waiting for the pain to arrive, but so far I am fine.  So that's good.     :)

That is very good, and with each day your chances all will be well improve-continued vibes.  Thanks for letting us know.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:09:16 AM
As for Oscar Predictions:

Here's who I would like to win:

Picture: "Slumdog Millionaire"
Direction: "Milk" - Gus van Sant
Supporting Actress: Marisa Tomei
Supporting Actor: Josh Brolin
Actress: *Kate Winslet for "Revolutionary Road" - I'm with you on this one, DR ArnoldMBrockman.  Otherwise, Anne Hathaway
Actor: Richard Jenkins "The Visitor"

Here's who I think should win:

Picture: "Frost/Nixon"
Direction: Gus van Sant
Supporting Actress: Viola Davis "Doubt"
Supporting Actor: Robert Downey, Jr. "Tropic Thunder"
Actress: Again, this should have been Kate Winslet for "Revolutionary Road".  Otherwise, I'll take the underdog, Melissa Leo "Frozen River"
Actor: Sean Penn "Milk"

And, finally, for who will win:

Picture: "Slumdog Millionaire"
Director: Danny Boyle "Slumdog Millionaire"
Supporting Actress: Viola Davis "Doubt" - This role just seems to have awards attached to it.
Supporting Actor: Heath Ledger "The Dark Knight"
Actress: Meryl Streep "Doubt" - but, truly, this could very easily to Kate Winslet for "The Reader" (with voters "subconsciouly acknowledging her performance in "Revolutionary Road")
Actor: Mickey Rourke "The Wrestler"
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 09:12:02 AM
Add my choice of Danny Boyle for SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE as well. . .
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 09:12:32 AM
I am baking Ina Garten's Carrot Pineapple Cake in honor of the Oscars.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:13:33 AM
OSCARS:

Kate Winslet was nominated for the wrong movie. The Reader IMHO was a disappointment all around. Revolutionary Road was the One. However,Leonardo's performance in that movie was stunning'
I hope Meryl Streep wins for Doubt.

And, yes, it's too bad that the Leading Actor category could not have added a sixth slot this year for Leonardo di Caprio.  But it was nice to see that Richard Jenkins was recognized for his work in a "small" film that had come out earlier in the year.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 09:18:19 AM
It was also nice to see Melissa Leo get a nomination; I worked with her (and Valerie Bertinelli) on the tv movie SILENT WITNESS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:27:19 AM
As for some of the other categories:

Foreign Language Film: "Waltz with Bashir"
Animated feature: "WALL-E"
Animated Short: "Oktapodi"*
Live Action Short: "Spielzeugland (Toyland)"*
Documentary Feature: "Man on Wire"*
Documentary Short: "Smile Pinki"*

Art Direction: "The Duchess"
Cinematography: "Slumdog Millionaire"
Costume Design: "...Benjamin Button" (maybe "The Duchess")
Makeup: "...Benjamin Button"
Film Editing: "Slumdog Millionaire"
Sound Editing: "The Dark Knight"
Sound Mixing: "The Dark Knight" - But would like to see "WALL-E" sneak in and take this one.
Visual Effects: "...Benjamin Button"

Adapted Screenplay: "Slumdog/Millionaire"
Original Screenplay: "Milk" - But this is another category where it could go any and either way for me. And for The Academy. ;)

Original Score: A.R. Rahman "Slumdog Millionaire"
Original Song: "Jai Ho" (A.R. Rahman) "Slumdog Millionaire"

*I did not see all of the "shorts" nominees, nor all of the documentary nominees.  But, for the first time in a long time, I actually saw all of the major motion pictures up for awards this year.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 09:30:07 AM
OSCARS:

Kate Winslet was nominated for the wrong movie. The Reader IMHO was a disappointment all around. Revolutionary Road was the One. However,Leonardo's performance in that movie was stunning'
I hope Meryl Streep wins for Doubt.

This is interesting, I thought The Reader was much better than Revolutionary Road
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jane on February 22, 2009, 09:32:51 AM
Cilla, did you also think Kate Winslet's performance is more deserving for THE READER?  I haven't seen either.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jane on February 22, 2009, 09:34:07 AM
Jose why is there a difference between who you want to win & who you think should?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 09:36:54 AM
DR Jose, for Original Screenplay, do you, like me, think that the Academy is going to honor WALL-E?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Dan (the Man) on February 22, 2009, 09:36:56 AM
Trying to decide whether to go out and dither away a few hours.  Since I'm paying for the rental car (plus insurance) I feel like I should get some use out of it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 09:37:02 AM
I'm watching Man on Wire on my Roku Netflix instant viewer. They've upgraded the viewer to HD. I have to say buying it was really worth it.  They are also going to add more ways to get instant movies from other sources including Amazon rentals and apparently other sources as well. 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:38:03 AM
Picture
Slumdog Millionaire    31%
 The Curious Case of Benjamin Button    20%
Milk    19%
Frost/Nixon    16%
The Reader    14%

Although Slumdog Millionaire has a lock on this award as it has won practically every other award. Milk might be the surprise winner as Academy has (I assume) many gay members and they just might vote for this film
              

DR Michael S - Yes, you "assume"... I know a couple of the "gay members" of The Academy, and not all of them thought/think that "Milk" was the Best Picture of last year.  Heck, if all of the gay members of The Academy "voted gay", then "Prop 8: The Musical" would have been included in the "Short Film, Live Action" category.

*And, heck, just think that if all the gay Tony voters - and I "assume" that there are quite number of them too - "voted gay", just think of how many more Tony's that Patti LuPone and Bernadette Peters would have by now?  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:41:34 AM
Jose why is there a difference between who you want to win & who you think should?

The "I want" list is me at my most subjective - personal, sentimental(?) favorites. More or less longshots.

The "should" list is based on how I thought everyone stacked up against each other this past year. -I added a bit more "history" for the "will win" list.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:45:27 AM
DR Jose, for Original Screenplay, do you, like me, think that the Academy is going to honor WALL-E?

Yep - in part as a sort of consolation prize for not getting nominated in the "Best Picture" category.

*And I'm really hoping that "Kung-Fu Panda" does not come in and steal the prize from "WALL-E" in the Animated Feature.  -It's been interesting reading some of the "stuff" and "crap" that "caused" "Kung-Fu Panda" to win some of the other awards this season.

**Wow! that was a lot of "quotes" in that previous sentence. ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 09:46:44 AM



Although Slumdog Millionaire has a lock on this award as it has won practically every other award. Milk might be the surprise winner as Academy has (I assume) many gay members and they just might vote for this film

 

Well. . . .If that were true, then CRASH would never have won for Best Picture a couple of years ago. 
Remember, you have Academy members like Ernest Borgnine (and to a lesser degree, Tony Curtis) who vehemently and vocally spoke out against BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:47:07 AM
Trying to decide whether to go out and dither away a few hours.  Since I'm paying for the rental car (plus insurance) I feel like I should get some use out of it.

I get that same "feeling" whenever I'm staying and paying for a really nice hotel room. ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 09:49:29 AM
Cilla, did you also think Kate Winslet's performance is more deserving for THE READER?  I haven't seen either.
Well, I'm always a bit biased by whether I like a movie or not, and I didn't really like Revolutionary Road.  The Reader made me think and I like that in a movie.  If I really look at the characters, I suppose the Revolutionary Road was probably more difficult and she did a great job.  I hope she wins.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 09:57:55 AM
Had a nice, long sleep.  It's very gray out, but I'm still going to try and do the long jog about ten-thirty.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: elmore3003 on February 22, 2009, 09:58:28 AM
I've had some lunch, worked on some edits for those 1903 Babes, played at the computer and listened to the ZIEGFELFD FOLLIES OF 1936. I need to bid on a vocal score on eBay and then I head down to midtown for the movie.  So far, it's been a good day.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 09:59:01 AM
So, JMK is our first Oscar WUSSBURGER and for what?  Because of some auditions - on a SUNDAY?  I'm quite sure all that will be done by Oscar show time and hopefully he'll come to his senses and join the partay of the year.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 09:59:15 AM
I think we had a fairly slow start last year, too.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:59:17 AM
Original Screenplay    
Milk 31%
Wall-E 21%
In Bruges 17%
Happy-Go-Lucky    17%
Frozen River    15%
     
Adapted Screenplay    
Slumdog Millionaire    33%
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button    19%
Frost / Nixon    16%
The Reader    16%
Doubt    15%

I love the structure used in telling the story of Slumdog Millionaire. No screenplay 101 (in my opinion) in telling the story. Both Frost/Nixon and Doubt are adaptations of stage plays and latter winner of the Pulitzer Prize and the Tony Award for Best Play, but that doesn’t mean anything in Hollywood.
            
 

Both Screenplay categories didn't seem so cut and dry to me this year.  I liked "Happy-Go-Lucky", but with Mike Leigh's admitted and documented very improvisatory approach to directing and dialogue, I always wonder just how many of those words actually came from Mike Leigh, and how many came out of the actors' improvisations.  -I haven't read much about the making of this particular movie, so I could be totally off-base here.  However...

Yes, "Benjamin Button" was based on a short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald, but Eric Roth and Robin Swicord really expanded and transformed and transplanted the story to more, very recent time.  There was a lot of "original" work, imho.  I even had a similar problem with "Milk" but in the reverse, since so much of the film's structure was based on the actual historical events, and the inclusion of news and documentary footage.  -But that's truly a small quibble.

At least on Broadway, there's no such distinction made when it comes to shows based on previous historical events or literary or theatrical sources.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:00:25 AM
While I haven't seen Mr. Rourke's performance, his win (should he win, and I think it's pretty obvious he will) is entirely predictable - comeback, bad boy, ruined his once-promising career years ago - all the crap Hollywood loves.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 10:03:23 AM
Ok, my predictions:
Actor - Sean Penn (I'd like to see Frank Langella)
Supporting Actor - Heath Ledger (I haven't seen most of these)
Actress - Kate Winslet
Supporting Actress - Penelope Cruz (haven't seen a lot of these either)
Director - Slumdog - for a minute his name escapes me
Picture - Slumdog
Animated - Wall-E
Documentary - Man on Wire
Animated Short - Oktopodi (it was shown on Sunday Morning today)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 10:03:39 AM
Well, since I know I'm going to be camped out in front of the TV for a coupe of hours tonight, I'm going to head out for a bit.  I don't care about the Red Carpet Arrivals or the Fashion Do's and Don't's, so if I'm not back for the pre-show, well, that's why. ;)

Laters...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:04:03 AM
Much as I think all the major awards that it's up for should go to Slumdog Millionaire, as I thought it really achieved everything it set out to achieve in a very creative way, which I can't say for the other films I saw (and I did manage to see most of the top candidates, at least I saw all the best pic noms) - all their recent wins and the jockeying by all the usual pundits may have peaked too early and there could be a surprise or two - doubtful, as voting occurred a couple of weeks ago, but that's the sort of thing that causes surprises.  It was the underdog going into the nominations, but suddenly it became the favorite, and it's important to remain the underdog or some other film suddenly is the underdog.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 10:05:30 AM
Original Screenplay    
Milk 31%
Wall-E 21%
In Bruges 17%
Happy-Go-Lucky    17%
Frozen River    15%
     
Adapted Screenplay    
Slumdog Millionaire    33%
The Curious Case of Benjamin Button    19%
Frost / Nixon    16%
The Reader    16%
Doubt    15%

I love the structure used in telling the story of Slumdog Millionaire. No screenplay 101 (in my opinion) in telling the story. Both Frost/Nixon and Doubt are adaptations of stage plays and latter winner of the Pulitzer Prize and the Tony Award for Best Play, but that doesn’t mean anything in Hollywood.
            
 

Both Screenplay categories didn't seem so cut and dry to me this year.  I liked "Happy-Go-Lucky", but with Mike Leigh's admitted and documented very improvisatory approach to directing and dialogue, I always wonder just how many of those words actually came from Mike Leigh, and how many came out of the actors' improvisations.  -I haven't read much about the making of this particular movie, so I could be totally off-base here.  However...

Yes, "Benjamin Button" was based on a short story by F. Scott Fitzgerald, but Eric Roth and Robin Swicord really expanded and transformed and transplanted the story to more, very recent time.  There was a lot of "original" work, imho.  I even had a similar problem with "Milk" but in the reverse, since so much of the film's structure was based on the actual historical events, and the inclusion of news and documentary footage.  -But that's truly a small quibble.

At least on Broadway, there's no such distinction made when it comes to shows based on previous historical events or literary or theatrical sources.

Even though they all claim it's only based on Fitzgerald's short story, the story of Benjamin Button is much much closer to The Confessions of Max Tivoli. 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 10:06:41 AM
Last year played a game of changing movie names into food. I think that's what really got us going
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:12:09 AM
Benjamin Mutton?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:12:31 AM
The Eater?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:13:00 AM
Frappy-go-Lucky?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:13:28 AM
Frozen Liver?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:13:42 AM
Wall-Eat?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:13:53 AM
Corndog Millionaire?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:14:22 AM
Milk?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 10:15:30 AM
Much as I think all the major awards that it's up for should go to Slumdog Millionaire, as I thought it really achieved everything it set out to achieve in a very creative way, which I can't say for the other films I saw (and I did manage to see most of the top candidates, at least I saw all the best pic noms) - all their recent wins and the jockeying by all the usual pundits may have peaked too early and there could be a surprise or two - doubtful, as voting occurred a couple of weeks ago, but that's the sort of thing that causes surprises.  It was the underdog going into the nominations, but suddenly it became the favorite, and it's important to remain the underdog or some other film suddenly is the underdog.

I am totally with you on this, BK.

I thought that SLUMDOG was the most remarkable achievement in film making that I've seen in quite a long time. 
I have since read the source novel, Q & A, and still feel that SLUMDOG is a remarkable film.  The changes made from source to screen all work in favor of the director's vision.    The one MAJOR difference is in Jamal's reason for appearing on the quiz show; a reason which makes perfect sense in the novel, but would have detracted from Boyle's vision of the film experience.  Both reasons work for their respective incarnations.

The novel is a wonderful read, I highly recommend it. 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:27:50 AM
Films into food?  I don't remember that from last year.  FJL has covered most of it.  Kung Pao Panda.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:30:54 AM
We're STILL on page three?  Is this Oscar day?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:31:36 AM
Slumdog Meatballsub
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:32:06 AM
Fries/Nachos
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:33:07 AM
The Spare Rib - starring Mickey Pork
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:33:54 AM
The animated short Presto = Pesto?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:34:05 AM
The Creamed Corn of Benjamin Button.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:35:00 AM
Wall-Eclair
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:35:16 AM
Frankfurter Langella
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:35:25 AM
Well, no one can say we didn't get to page four.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:35:55 AM
Bran Hathaway
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:36:28 AM
Is it cheating to have the list Jose linked to last night in front of me?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:37:06 AM
Teriyaki P. Henson
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:37:07 AM
Phillip Steamed Rice Hoffman
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:38:34 AM
A.R. Ramen.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:39:50 AM
Danny Boiled Chicken.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:45:03 AM
Skate Winslet
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:45:38 AM
Josh Broilin'
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 10:46:04 AM
NOSH BROLIN
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:46:45 AM
Frostee/Nixon
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:47:39 AM
If the food is bad - Marisa Ptomaine
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:48:28 AM
If the food is too rich - Goubt
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 10:48:30 AM
MARISA TUMMY
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:48:39 AM
(the b is silent in goubt)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 10:50:37 AM
ROBERT APPLE PAN DOWNEY
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 10:51:28 AM
It started as suggestions for food for Oscar parties as I remember
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 10:52:25 AM
HEATH BAR LEDGER
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 10:56:13 AM
BRAN PITT
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 10:56:40 AM
Man on Wine
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 10:58:41 AM
Revolutionary ala mode
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 10:59:09 AM
SCHMALTZ WITH BESHIR
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 10:59:41 AM
Kate Winglets
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 11:00:29 AM
Robert Brownie Jr
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 11:01:12 AM
Frank Vanilla
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 11:03:33 AM
Mickey Pork
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 11:04:45 AM
Wall-E(ye)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 11:05:59 AM
Coneydog Millionaire
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 11:06:16 AM
Plumdog Millionaire
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 11:07:46 AM
The curious taste of Benjamin Mutton
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 11:09:25 AM
And The Host Of The Academy Awards

HUGH FLAPJACKMAN
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 11:13:15 AM
A tasteless one - revolutionary roadkill
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 11:16:45 AM
A tasteless one - revolutionary roadkill

:D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 11:17:11 AM
GAMY ADAMS
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 11:17:27 AM
We could expand it into past oscar winners or nominees....that would leave lots of room for creativity
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 11:17:44 AM
PINEAPPLE CRUZ
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 11:23:56 AM
THE OSCAR MAYERS
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 11:26:42 AM
JEAN HERSHOLT AWARD TO

BERRY LEWIS
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 11:30:24 AM
Sugar Frost/Nixon
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 11:31:20 AM
The Dark Chocolate Knight
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 11:31:51 AM
Lickey Rourke
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 11:32:26 AM
If all of my files are downloaded when I get home, I shall switch for my first HHW Oscar Party in Apple!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 11:33:41 AM
I would like to see Marisa Tomei and Josh Brolin win the best supporting categories - I thought those performances were great - the others, andof course I haven't seen them all....but I really like Marisa and Josh.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 11:36:12 AM
TROUT
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 11:39:03 AM
It is a bit slow right now....perhaps things will pick up soon at the World of Wisdom and at HHW!!

As scary as the description of the Oscar ceremony sounds....I think I will skip TAR tonight......whew!!!  My hope is The Hillbillies go home.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 11:39:33 AM
Skim Milk
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 11:39:53 AM
Back to Work - which is an action, not a title.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: TCB on February 22, 2009, 11:47:27 AM




RAVIOLI ROAD
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: TCB on February 22, 2009, 12:00:17 PM
If there are any upsets or surprises tonight (I don't think there were any big surprises last year), I think that MILK may pull off Best Picture.

BEST ACTOR:  Sean Penn
BEST ACTRESS: Kate Winslet
BEST DIRECTOR: Danny Boyle
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR: Heath Ledger
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRES:  Pennelope Cruz
BEST ANIMATED FEATURE:  WALL-E
BEST FORIEGN FILM: WALTZ WITH BASHIR
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: TCB on February 22, 2009, 12:01:07 PM
Guess I really know how to ruin a party.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: TCB on February 22, 2009, 12:03:12 PM
It's okay.  I will go and get ready for the last performance of GLORIOUS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Laura on February 22, 2009, 12:07:02 PM
I have nothing to add to today's discussion.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 12:41:39 PM
Funny stuff.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 12:42:04 PM
Back from the long jog.  Must now go retrieve my Nudie script from Mr. Geissman's.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 12:42:20 PM
I must also figure out the foodstuffs for today.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 01:09:43 PM
I'm feeling a bit better today.  I REALLY needed to just relax and unwind.  I'm thinking a hot shower or hot bath before tonight's show will make me feel better. I spent 30 minutes sitting in the sun. That felt really good
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 01:13:48 PM
I also made some home made chicken and noodles and am eating whatever I want to this weekend.  I may gain a pound or two but that's ok. I refuse to spend another out of town trip sick in the hotel room 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 01:15:05 PM
Jodie Bananas Foster
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 01:15:09 PM
I may not be around these parts for the whole Oscar celebration.  I have a few returns that need to be prepared by tomorrow morning, or at least  i need  to be ready with my list of open items by tomorrow morning.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 01:16:01 PM
Carrot cake for everyone!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 01:16:15 PM
The First Noodle Musical

(not part of the game, but it just came to mind)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 01:17:00 PM
The First Noodle Musical

(not part of the game, but it just came to mind)

I don't think this game should have rules. It's funnier that way
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 01:17:00 PM
Chicky Christina Barcelona
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 01:17:51 PM
Vicky Christina Bologna
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 01:19:03 PM
Starch of the Penguins
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 01:20:01 PM
Fried Cousin Vinny

Is that too graphic?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 01:20:29 PM



Although Slumdog Millionaire has a lock on this award as it has won practically every other award. Milk might be the surprise winner as Academy has (I assume) many gay members and they just might vote for this film

 

Well. . . .If that were true, then CRASH would never have won for Best Picture a couple of years ago. 
Remember, you have Academy members like Ernest Borgnine (and to a lesser degree, Tony Curtis) who vehemently and vocally spoke out against BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN.

neither of whom saw it, if I remember their interviews correctly. They objected to the very IDEA of its winning the top Oscar.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 01:23:47 PM
Still quite cold outside. My washer-dryer are on the back porch which is enclosed but not heated. I HATED going out there to tend to laundry matters.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 01:25:30 PM
I watched DAMAGES while I ate lunch. Such a good episode with so many strings twisting together to make such a fascinating muddle. Love this show. I wish more people were watching.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 01:27:28 PM
Then, on to today's work project: PRIMAL FEAR. I hadn't watched the movie in many years, but it was memorable enough for me to remember all of its twists so I could concentrate on performances and other aspects of the film this time around.

It's a great new transfer, too, with the film looking as if it were filmed yesterday.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 01:31:28 PM
I watched all of the bonus features, too. There was a making of documentary and one that concentrated on the search for an actor to play the key role of Aaron when Leonardo DiCaprio turned it down and how they found Edward Norton.

Funny. In neither of these featurettes did the fact that he received an Oscar nomination for his first film even come up. No one (not even Norton) mentioned it. Nor did they mention the three prizes (including the Golden Globe) that he did win for the part.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 01:31:55 PM
6,000th Posting


Congrats on the 6000+ Posts!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 01:32:51 PM
So, in a bit, I'll be hopping off-line to write up the DVD and then I'll head downstairs to take part in the Oscar party.

WBBL.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Kerry on February 22, 2009, 01:37:53 PM
What a lovely day this has been.  And there is still much to go!  Sugar says hello to all and sundry.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DERBRUCER on February 22, 2009, 01:38:45 PM
It started as suggestions for food for Oscar parties as I remember

Ideas for Edisaurus to make for a party, IIRC.

der Brucer
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 01:40:25 PM
Last night, after working concessions for "A Really Big Shoe 3" (that my friend Claudia was not in...when I thought that she would be), my friend Margo and I met for a late dinner and then we went to a later showing of "The Reader."  I haven't seen "Revolutionary Road" so I can't compare Kate's performances, but I thought that she was very good in this.  I haven't seen enough of the movies to make predictions, but I've really liked all the nominated movies that I have seen.  These are the four nominated movies that I have seen:

The Curious Case of Benjamin Button
The Reader
Slumdog Millionaire
WALL-E
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 01:47:40 PM
What a lovely day this has been.  And there is still much to go!  Sugar says hello to all and sundry.

Hi Sugar!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jeanne on February 22, 2009, 01:49:36 PM
Hello, everyone.

I have no predictions for tonight. I kept thinking that I haven't seen any of the nominated films, but actually I saw two: THE DUCHESS and WALL-E. I enjoyed both, but thought WALL-E was brilliant in several respects.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jeanne on February 22, 2009, 01:52:04 PM
MATTH and other DRs who enjoy DAMAGES may also enjoy the Canadian production, INTELLIGENCE. I liked DAMAGES, but LOVED INTELLIGENCE. Absolutely riveting, IMHO.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DERBRUCER on February 22, 2009, 01:53:55 PM
The First Noodle Musical

(not part of the game, but it just came to mind)

I don't think this game should have rules. It's funnier that way

Oh how you would enjoy a court-room without rules :D

der Brucer
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DERBRUCER on February 22, 2009, 01:58:10 PM
(http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/images/2009/02/16/tacomawa11am.jpg)

Tacoma - yesterday morn.

Where be the sun?

der Brucer
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 02:02:23 PM
The First Noodle Musical

(not part of the game, but it just came to mind)

I don't think this game should have rules. It's funnier that way

Oh how you would enjoy a court-room without rules :D

der Brucer

Yes, it was the deadline rule I messed up last week. I would be much happier without that one!  On the other hand, I often use the rules to my benefit against the other side, so I don't know that I'd really like that
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 02:03:39 PM
TV Guide Network is already covering the Oscars...even though the red carpet isn't open yet, so they are interviewing each other. tee hee.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 02:04:33 PM
I actually haven't watched as many of the movies as I did in previous years,  I'll catch them on DVD>
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jeanne on February 22, 2009, 02:06:01 PM
WBBL.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DERBRUCER on February 22, 2009, 02:06:19 PM
A different slant on getting goosed:

(http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/photos/uncategorized/2009/02/21/chacho2.jpg)

der Brucer
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 02:06:39 PM
Only three hours till pre-show (the show DOES start at six, yes?).  And we're not even to page seven?  Will we never get to page ninety? 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 02:06:50 PM
At long last page seven. 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 02:18:56 PM
Right now, I'm watching Thursday's "Private Practice."  I recorded this and "Grey's Anatomy" to put on a DVD for my friend Margo and am cutting out the commercials as I watch it. 

Just had to share. :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 02:24:17 PM
Congrats Michael....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 02:27:16 PM
I get that same "feeling" whenever I'm staying and paying for a really nice hotel room.

And do all of your "guests" agree?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 02:28:58 PM
Good day one and  all... I will do my best to drop in here from work...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 02:29:10 PM
A different slant on getting goosed:

(http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/photos/uncategorized/2009/02/21/chacho2.jpg)

der Brucer

hee hee hee
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 02:32:45 PM
A belated Happy Birthday to Matthew!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: ArnoldMBrockman on February 22, 2009, 02:33:16 PM
Then, on to today's work project: PRIMAL FEAR. I hadn't watched the movie in many years, but it was memorable enough for me to remember all of its twists so I could concentrate on performances and other aspects of the film this time around.

Matt

When is the Blu-Ray going to be released?



It's a great new transfer, too, with the film looking as if it were filmed yesterday.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 02:35:08 PM
Congratulations to DR Michael S. on his lofty new perch in the HHW firmament!   :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 02:38:07 PM
Sunday afternoon greetings!  We've just returned from Cincinnati.  Richard conducted morning prayer and then we took Rob and Mary Linda to one of their favorite places for lunch - Wild Ginger, an Asian bistro.  We sat at the grill and a guy entertained us while he cooked our food.  Richard and I then stopped at my Mom's to adjust her TV and at Kroger.  Now, we're settled in for an Oscar evening.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 02:39:51 PM
Having received her permission, I want to share this exquisite photo of Mary Linda.  Anyone want to hire her?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 02:45:55 PM
Here are my choices for the major categories

Actor, leading: Sean Penn
Actor, supporting: Heath Ledger
Actress, lead: Angelina Jolie
Actress, supporting: Amy Adams
Animated feature: Wall-E
Directing: Frost / Nixon
Original song: Jai Ho
Best Picture: Milk
Short film, animated: Oktapodi
Short film, live action: The Pig
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 02:58:29 PM
We're STILL on page seven?  Two hours to pre-show.  Is this WUSSBURGERING and non-posting due to the economic situation?  They blame everything else on it, so why not this?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jennifer on February 22, 2009, 03:01:14 PM
We don't get the tv guide channel in canada. But E! starts their red carpet coverage in 5 minutes. So i will watch that. And then switch to TAR. And then back to the Oscars.

I don't think i'll be around during the Oscars. Maybe after if i'm not too tired.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jennifer on February 22, 2009, 03:02:46 PM
My Oscar predictions:

Best Film: Slumdog Millionaire
Best Actor: Mickey Rourke
Best Actress: Kate Winslet
Best Supporting Actor: Heath Ledger
Best Supporting Actress: Penelope Cruz
Best Director: Danny Boyle
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 03:05:36 PM
Well, I must be going for a little while.  I have to take a shower and then go to my sister's.  I will be back before the festivities start. :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 03:22:26 PM
I am trying to look busy and keep an eye out...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 03:23:11 PM
Less than two hours to pre-show.  I'm watching a low-budget noir - had a nice little meeting earlier, too.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 03:24:40 PM
Welcome four GUESTS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jeanne on February 22, 2009, 03:24:52 PM
I'm having computer trouble. I played a DVD last night and it froze the computer. Once I finally got it unstuck I thought it was OK, but just now it conked out again. Sigh. And double sigh.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Druxy on February 22, 2009, 03:25:03 PM
OSCARS:

Kate Winslet was nominated for the wrong movie. The Reader IMHO was a disappointment all around. Revolutionary Road was the One. However,Leonardo's performance in that movie was stunning'
I hope Meryl Streep wins for Doubt.

This is interesting, I thought The Reader was much better than Revolutionary Road

THE READER was my favorite movie of the year.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jane on February 22, 2009, 03:26:59 PM
DR Ginny, BEAUTIFUL PHOTO! 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 03:30:04 PM
Well, I'm back. Yes, I saw that the TV GUIDE channel was already talking among themselves. I geuss I'll switch back and forth between E and TV GUIDE
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:30:40 PM
OSCARS:

Kate Winslet was nominated for the wrong movie. The Reader IMHO was a disappointment all around. Revolutionary Road was the One. However,Leonardo's performance in that movie was stunning'
I hope Meryl Streep wins for Doubt.

This is interesting, I thought The Reader was much better than Revolutionary Road

THE READER was my favorite movie of the year.

THE READER and FROST/NIXON were my favorites
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:31:27 PM
I"m watching the red carpet on TV Guide network. We don't get E
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 03:32:13 PM
Then, on to today's work project: PRIMAL FEAR. I hadn't watched the movie in many years, but it was memorable enough for me to remember all of its twists so I could concentrate on performances and other aspects of the film this time around.

Matt

When is the Blu-Ray going to be released?



It's a great new transfer, too, with the film looking as if it were filmed yesterday.

I'm assuming the same day as the regular DVD - March 10th.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 03:32:26 PM
DR Ginny, BEAUTIFUL PHOTO! 

Thank you, DR Jane.  Just to clarify, I did not take this photo.  It was taken by a professional dance photographer who's a graduate of the same program ML is in.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 03:33:04 PM
She is a beautiful dancer...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 03:33:21 PM
in the process of repairing books...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 03:34:37 PM
I'm really, really wishing we'd seen more of the Oscar-nominated movies.  We had 2 bad weather weeks right after the noms were announced and they've yet to play at the theater here in town.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 03:34:59 PM
I am watching MONK, the last of the shows from last week I hadn't yet gotten to. It's a funny episode and a pretty good mystery.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:38:27 PM
Oh, I didn't know THE WITNESS....was about the last person with MLK Jr.  That was an interesting interview with Lisa Renna
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:38:56 PM
They brought in the young stars of SLUMDOG who have never been on a plane
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:40:27 PM
The cast of SLUMDOG just arrived.  I think they are all there, lol
It would be great if they started doing the dance
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jane on February 22, 2009, 03:40:30 PM
DR Ginny, BEAUTIFUL PHOTO! 

Thank you, DR Jane.  Just to clarify, I did not take this photo.  It was taken by a professional dance photographer who's a graduate of the same program ML is in.

I was referring to the grace & beauty of the subject as well as the artistic talent of the photographer.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 03:40:52 PM
Zac Efron and Vanessa Hudgens on the red carpet.  The bar is low this year.....they will appear.

What's with all the secrecy?  That's dumb.....it's probably a dumb musical number like the year Snow White danced with Rob Lowe.

Time will tell.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:41:47 PM
Lisa Renna just had the Big O because she talked to Valentino....oh puhleese
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 03:43:45 PM
not a fan of Lisa Rinna...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:44:28 PM
Taraji Henson looks good!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 03:44:40 PM
OMG  Madonna looks sort of pretty.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 03:44:58 PM
DR Ginny, BEAUTIFUL PHOTO! 

Thank you, DR Jane.  Just to clarify, I did not take this photo.  It was taken by a professional dance photographer who's a graduate of the same program ML is in.

I was referring to the grace & beauty of the subject as well as the artistic talent of the photographer.

I love the way she's holding her hands and, especially, the expression on her face.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 03:45:05 PM
Missed it, went to wrap my hot dogs in roast beef.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 03:45:27 PM
Yes, DR GINNY....I wish I had a job for her!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 03:45:44 PM
Of all the films, I have only seen Wall-E...     :(
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 03:46:30 PM
I miss Joan Rivers and her miscues whenever interviewing someone on the red carpet. If she was still doing it she'd probably ask Meryl Streep if this was her first Oscar nomination.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:46:35 PM
OMG  Madonna looks sort of pretty.

What channel are you watching?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 03:46:42 PM
Love the photo of Mary Linda, DR Ginny!!!!!   :D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 03:47:28 PM
Zac Efron and Vanessa Hudgens on the red carpet.  The bar is low this year.....they will appear.

What's with all the secrecy?  That's dumb.....it's probably a dumb musical number like the year Snow White danced with Rob Lowe.

Time will tell.


Give them a break, DR JRand. They are wanting a younger audience, and they'll do whatever they need to get them.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 03:47:43 PM
I forget is the Oscars on time delay like the Tony and Emmy awards?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 03:47:46 PM
I don't get the TV Guide channel.  Is Joan Rivers on that?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 03:49:10 PM
I forget is the Oscars on time delay like the Tony and Emmy awards?

No, it's live everywhere.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:49:42 PM
No, it Lisa Renna and Joe Fatone and a couple other people
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:50:21 PM
They are actually doing fairly good interviews ..more than just who are you wearing
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 03:50:23 PM
I'm on the TV GUIDE channel. I'm not thrilled with the interviewers.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 03:50:53 PM
Pretty blue dress on Frieda
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 03:51:10 PM
I don't get the TV Guide channel.  Is Joan Rivers on that?

No. Joan is not doing any shows this year.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 03:51:12 PM
OMG  Madonna looks sort of pretty.

What channel are you watching?

E!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 03:51:52 PM
Zac Efron and Vanessa Hudgens on the red carpet.  The bar is low this year.....they will appear.

What's with all the secrecy?  That's dumb.....it's probably a dumb musical number like the year Snow White danced with Rob Lowe.

Time will tell.


Give them a break, DR JRand. They are wanting a younger audience, and they'll do whatever they need to get them.

No one gets a break from me!  If I don't like it, they'll hear about it.  LOL
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 03:52:04 PM
Well, E! has Ryan Seacrest.         :P
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 03:52:26 PM
I don't get the TV Guide channel.  Is Joan Rivers on that?

No. Joan is not doing any shows this year.

A friend who did the Oscar shows with her said she was great to work with.....Melissa not so much.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 03:52:42 PM
Ryan is actually doing a pretty good job, too.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 03:52:51 PM
I really prefer E!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 03:53:19 PM
I don't get the TV Guide channel.  Is Joan Rivers on that?

No. Joan is not doing any shows this year.

She hasn't been doing any shows of any kind the last few years.


Unless you count hawking her jewelery line on QBC
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:53:42 PM
I'm on the TV GUIDE channel. I'm not thrilled with the interviewers.

Better than Joan Rivers
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 03:53:49 PM
I don't get the TV Guide channel.  Is Joan Rivers on that?

No. Joan is not doing any shows this year.

A friend who did the Oscar shows with her said she was great to work with.....Melissa not so much.

I am not surprised by that. Frankly, without her mother, I'm not sure she would have had much of a career.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:54:09 PM
I really prefer E!

I wish I could get E!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 03:54:21 PM
Oh my Melissa Leo....bad choices head to foot....pretty color.....but Irene Sharaff dresses are out.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 03:55:11 PM
Or at least Wall-E.......DR CILLA LIZ.....TV Guide Channel is good as well.

Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 03:56:24 PM
I can only sneak peaks at the online stream and also pics

Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 03:56:30 PM
Frieda is just stunning, though.  Such a beautiful blue dress.  Don't love the neckline, but it's not a disaster.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 03:56:41 PM
THey're raving about Taraji P. Henson's dress. It's a bit much, I thought.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:56:43 PM
What I do like about what they are doing on the TV Guide channel is that they are interviewing the documentary people and I'm actually learning something
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 03:57:17 PM
Do you like Viola Davis' dress?  I think she looks great!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 03:57:20 PM
A different track

anyone heard of

Spaceballs: The Animated Series???

I enjoyed the film but didn't know there was animated version of it. When and what network did it play on?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:57:51 PM
Mickey Rooney is looking pretty good.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 03:57:54 PM
The color of Freida's dress is striking.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 03:59:24 PM
I'm going to get tired hearing people raving about SLUMDOG all night. Once I see it, I hope I'm not disappointed.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 03:59:30 PM
Oh, there's Viola Davis. She does look great
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: elmore3003 on February 22, 2009, 04:00:11 PM
I was really enjoying THE INTERNATIONAL and then, it just ended! I was enjoying the suspense, the shootings, the assassinations, the espionage, and it ended. It was lke reading a good novel to find the publisher forgot the last 5 chapters. I felt quite cheated and sat there wondering whether the budget ran out and they had to tell the rest of the events through newspaper clippings over the credits. I was not amused.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 04:00:13 PM
Mickey Rooney is looking pretty good.

How old is he?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:00:22 PM
Brad and Angelina are nice.....but I tell you, for my money best looking couple:

Diane Lane & Josh Brolin.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:00:44 PM
Mickey Rooney is looking pretty good.

How old is he?

Somewhere between 40 and death.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:01:23 PM
 Didn't even get to see Melissa's dress. She was kept in a small window.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:01:40 PM
Gus Van Sant forgot it was today!

What is the white ribbon on his lapel for?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:01:57 PM
Didn't even get to see Melissa's dress. She was kept in a small window.

LOL.....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 04:02:15 PM
DR elmore3003 - perhaps the final reel snapped.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:03:18 PM
Viola Davis' dress is gorgeous.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:04:08 PM
For some odd reason I cant get Chocolate Milk out of my head..
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:04:52 PM
There are times I do not mind Ryan Seacrest and then there are times I want to push the channel button up or down..
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:05:09 PM
Maybe if you turn your head to the side and shake it will come out of your ears....that's what I do when I get water in my ears ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:05:49 PM
Heidi Klum got jewelry-itis - bad.....but pretty red dress.

Michael Sheen (Frost) went for the scruffy face look.

Dominic Cooper will be onstage tonight!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:06:35 PM
Viola Davis' dress is gorgeous.

Absolutely.....looks gold on my tv....well designed....and a good interview.  Her hair looks nice, too! 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:07:08 PM
Other than the jewelry, I thought Hedi Klum looked pretty
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:07:41 PM
I'll get to review the DVD iof REVOLUTIONARY ROAD when it finally comes out.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:07:59 PM
Wow Michael Shannon of Revolutionary Road reminds me of David Letterman.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:08:33 PM
Yes, that jewlery was pretty overpowering especially for someone who's petite.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:08:34 PM
Amy Adams' necklace is a bit much for me.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:08:34 PM
Other than the jewelry, I thought Hedi Klum looked pretty

Maybe you can borrow it next time you go in front of the circuit court.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 04:09:12 PM
I wish Amy Adams had applied the makeup a little less heavily.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:09:30 PM
I'm not loving Marisa's dress....so far.....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:09:48 PM
Haven't seen Amy yet.....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 04:10:07 PM
Only 80 pages of posts to go...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:10:12 PM
ok, I switched to CNN, they are interviewing the Slumdog kids
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Druxy on February 22, 2009, 04:10:21 PM
OSCARS:

Kate Winslet was nominated for the wrong movie. The Reader IMHO was a disappointment all around. Revolutionary Road was the One. However,Leonardo's performance in that movie was stunning'
I hope Meryl Streep wins for Doubt.

This is interesting, I thought The Reader was much better than Revolutionary Road

THE READER was my favorite movie of the year.

THE READER and FROST/NIXON were my favorites

FROST/NIXON is my #2 Choice.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:10:43 PM
Ask Heidi if she knows when the legal issues with PROJECT RUNWAY will be over.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 04:11:00 PM
I agree...Heidi's Honking Jewelry is a bit much...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:13:25 PM
I want Lash Blast Luxe.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:13:39 PM
LOL. back to TV GUIDE, these SLUMDOG kids are really cute and funny. It's nice to see some genuine excitement on the red carpet
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:14:16 PM
Shave your face, Sheen.........................
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:14:32 PM
Those kids got on my nerves, so I switched channels.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:15:41 PM
Seth Rogan is loookeeeen good!

Don't like the daughter from MAMMA MIA.....too much nose and not enough upper lip.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: elmore3003 on February 22, 2009, 04:15:43 PM
Mickey Rooney is looking pretty good.

How old is he?

Somewhere between 40 and death.

I think you left out a zerio!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:15:59 PM
So why are the Jonas Brothers part of Barbara Walters Oscar Special?  Am I missing something?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 04:16:03 PM
Wow.  Mickey has gone henna.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:16:06 PM
Mickey Rooney is looking pretty good.

How old is he?

Somewhere between 40 and death.

I think you left out a zerio!


Prolly at least one.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:17:00 PM
Sarah J and Matthew......pretty dress on Sarah....too bad about the face.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:17:13 PM
So why are the Jonas Brothers part of Barbara Walters Oscar Special?  Am I missing something?

Yes, you are. They have a concert film coming out next month.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:18:04 PM
I agree... some the jewelry is a bit much
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:18:11 PM
Wow....I think the necklace MAKES Amy Adams' dress.....not in love with the thing hanging down in front.....but she looks good in RED.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:18:27 PM
Ok, maybe I can see Melissa Leo's dress on this channel....she's been in a little box on the others- hey, they just put her in a little box!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:18:30 PM
Diane and Josh.


*sigh*
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:19:37 PM
Melissa Leo has a spider on her chest!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:20:22 PM
Wow...tower cam just shot down Ann Hathaway's dress....and you could see Honolulu....

And Hathaway got a lot of junk in her trunk.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:20:41 PM
Amy's dress is pretty. I don't like her hair.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:20:46 PM
I thought the pre-show started at five???
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:20:53 PM
Melissa Leo has a spider on her chest!

Sounds like a game from Remco.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:21:25 PM
There was one dress that I saw that has a starburst like design on the dress. I rather like that one
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:21:26 PM
What time does the actual show start?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:21:38 PM
Robert Downey Jr looks very nice all shaved up....and dressed.....  Oh brother another pandering to the teen crowd.....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:21:51 PM
8:30 EST
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:22:07 PM
Just turned on channel seven and they're showing the arrival.  I do love "show business royalty."
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:22:27 PM
That's the network feed MR BK.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:22:29 PM
When did the Oscars used to take place?  Mid to late March?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:22:38 PM
ABC - Red Carpet at 7:00 Central and Show at 7:30 Central
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:22:46 PM
At 5 p.m.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:22:54 PM
So the show starts at five-thirty here?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:23:05 PM
When did the Oscars used to take place?  Mid to late March?

At least April.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:23:40 PM
Well, the partay has started.  I can't make any comments as there are commercials on.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:23:40 PM
When did the Oscars used to take place?  Mid to late March?

Yup.  Didn't they change it so it's close to the Golden Globes so they would have less of an impact on the Oscars?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:24:17 PM
Actually, I thought Sarah JEssica looked better than usual.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:24:25 PM
Robert Downey looks great!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:24:42 PM
Latest telecast date in the past 20 years April 11, 1988 (60th Academy Awards)
Earliest telecast date in the past 20 years February 25, 2007 (79th Academy Awards)

I was wrong......March is the usual date.

SETH SETH SETH SETH SETH SETH!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:25:01 PM
I thought they were in March last year
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:25:30 PM
Read my ON TV TOnight on page Two
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:25:39 PM

I was wrong......March is the usual date.


Yup ;)    Hey it's another post
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:25:53 PM
I am mending an appropriate book for the night....

65 Years of Oscar
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:26:22 PM
Sarah Jessica - blechhh
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:26:46 PM
Amy Adams is beautiful tonight...just too big a necklace for my taste
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:26:51 PM
Posts are always good...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:27:09 PM
"The famous and the nearly-famous" - that's the title of my next novel.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:27:21 PM
Mickey Rourke won the Independent Spirit Award last night. Does that auger anything?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:27:51 PM
Oh, dear.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:28:31 PM
A freind of mine has Square Pegs dvds... ...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:28:35 PM
I am mending an appropriate book for the night....

65 Years of Oscar

Wonder who broke it?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:29:16 PM
Welcome five GUESTS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:29:20 PM
Amy Adams is beautiful tonight...just too big a necklace for my taste

LOL....I loved it....but then I love chandeliers in my foyer.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:29:39 PM
So, we get two minutes of pre-show to ten minutes of commercials.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:29:50 PM
I am thinking it will be a curious night...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:29:52 PM
It's going to be a long evening.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:30:06 PM
So, we've got an hour more of pre-show?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:30:08 PM
Actually E! hasn't had that many commercials.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:30:09 PM
There seems to be "upset" in the air! 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:30:40 PM
So, we've got an hour more of pre-show?

Just about.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:30:42 PM
Natalie Portman looks pretty and simple.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:30:54 PM
BK, I just switch channels when the commercials come on.  I don't like CNN with the little boxes, but it works during the commercial
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:31:19 PM
I like Natalie Portman's hair
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:31:29 PM
We'll see if my theory about Millionaire is right - I hope not.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:32:06 PM
Why are they putting Downey and wife in a tiny little box while they show other people big?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 04:32:33 PM
I won't be watching the tv until the show actually starts.
Dixie Bell must get her activities in before the show starts.
We are currently tossing her green elephant around.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jane on February 22, 2009, 04:32:34 PM
DR Ginny, BEAUTIFUL PHOTO! 

Thank you, DR Jane.  Just to clarify, I did not take this photo.  It was taken by a professional dance photographer who's a graduate of the same program ML is in.

I was referring to the grace & beauty of the subject as well as the artistic talent of the photographer.

I love the way she's holding her hands and, especially, the expression on her face.

I agree :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:32:35 PM
Not sure about Beyonce's dress.....hmmmmmmmmmm

Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:33:13 PM
More stars per minute and Beyonce is an oxymoron
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:33:14 PM
Mickey Rourke looks pretty awful.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:33:16 PM
Sophia Loren is auditioning for the next MUMMY movie.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:33:31 PM
I have never thought Sarah Jessica looked good.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:33:40 PM
Mickey Rourke looks pretty awful.

Agreed in spades.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:33:56 PM
Mickey Rourke looks pretty awful.

Yup
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:34:06 PM
Why are they putting Downey and wife in a tiny little box while they show other people big?

I'm hating this trend tonight with the coverage.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:34:27 PM
I think Sean Penn looks good tonight
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:34:49 PM
The more awful Mr. Rourke looks the more sure his win is.  Too bad.  I'd vote for Mr. Penn or Mr. Langella, neither of whom has had to make a "comeback" and sabotaged their lives at every turn.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jane on February 22, 2009, 04:34:56 PM
I can't keep up and I'm not watching.  I think I'll skip the rests of the posts this evening.  If I can't keep up I'm certainly not catching up later on ;)

'night
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:35:02 PM
Ron Howard.....homely.

Queen Latifah's dress does not flatter.

JOSH AND DIANE   JOSH AND DIANE
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:35:42 PM
Isn't that your usual mo Jane?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:36:05 PM
Oh, Lord - Mickey Rourke.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:36:11 PM
I like Josh Brolin. He's done well.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:36:24 PM
I think Sean Penn looks good tonight

I agree...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:36:37 PM
Yeah, Ron Howard looks like his dad now.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:36:46 PM
Sean Penn has come a long way since Fast Times At Ridgemont High
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:36:52 PM
Tomei looks AWFUL.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:37:00 PM
Jessica Biel get off the g.d. phone!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:37:01 PM
At least her dress does.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:37:22 PM
Have never been a fan of Mickey Rourke
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:37:38 PM
Wow, great commentary - "I just saw Natalie Portman go by."
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:37:52 PM
Ron Howard has been one of just a small group of child actors who have managed to stay on the straight and narrow
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:38:06 PM
Anne Hathaway's dress is gorgeous!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:38:14 PM
Hollywood royalty and Queen Latifah is an oxymoron.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:38:59 PM
I have liked some of Rourke's performances. His life, not so much.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:39:03 PM
Welcome eight GUESTS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:39:45 PM
Meryl looks nice, but haven't we seen that dress before?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:39:50 PM
Michael Sheen got robbed of a nomination for THE QUEEN, and probably should have been up for FROST/NIXON.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:40:42 PM
I like Fred Willard
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:40:56 PM
Peter giving the Academy hell.

I mean, come on, three and half hours and we can't hear the WHOLE song?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:41:06 PM
It seems we've really seen that dress before
That necklace she's wearing she was wearing then
But I can't remember where or when
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:41:10 PM
Michael Sheen got robbed of a nomination for THE QUEEN, and probably should have been up for FROST/NIXON.

We agree AGAIN!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:41:11 PM
I still have not seen Marion Cotillard's film from last year!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 04:41:22 PM
Anne Hathaway looks great.  She seems so poised and mature for her age.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:41:43 PM
We're almost to four hundred posts and the show is still fifty-five minutes away.  I say GO FOR IT!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:41:52 PM
I really disliked that girl in THE WRESTLER.....and the way she played it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:42:12 PM
I still have not seen Marion Cotillard's film from last year!

Find a couple of hours....you'll be glad you did.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:42:22 PM
We've got us quite a crowd, but nowhere near as many people as last year - hopefully that will change closer to show time.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:42:30 PM
Don't like JEssica Biel's dress.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:43:11 PM
Natalie Portman's dress needs pressed badly.  Or it was pressed badly.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 04:43:40 PM
It looks like Brangelina has arrived.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:43:53 PM
Nice when couples are nominated. There have never been any couple that won during the same year.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:43:58 PM
Brad and Angelina do look good!  But they should!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:44:24 PM
Don't like JEssica Biel's dress.

Maybe she borrowed it from Justin.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:44:27 PM
Everybody loves the way Mickey Rourke looks???
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:44:54 PM
Is Roger Ebert gone?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:44:55 PM
LOL! Both E! and TVG Channel have commercials.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:45:15 PM
Good, more commercials.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:45:27 PM
Everybody loves the way Mickey Rourke looks???

Only if they were out of the room.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:45:32 PM
Everybody loves the way Mickey Rourke looks???

No we DON'T love the way Mickey Rourke looks.   I thought Mickey Rooney looked good
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:45:41 PM
I ate a lot of small items.  They were all okay.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:45:50 PM
Everybody loves the way Mickey Rourke looks???

Only if they were out of the room.

:D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 04:45:53 PM
Brad and Angelina do look good!  But they should!

It's their job - it's what they do.     :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:46:30 PM
That's what those two fashion idiots said - "Everyone loves the way Mickey Rourke looks."
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:47:25 PM
Penelope is kinda homely......not SJP homely....but plain......

Anne Hathaway's dress fits funny up on top.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:47:40 PM
Frank/Nixon
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 04:47:52 PM
Philip Seymour Hoffman in a ski cap??
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:48:18 PM
Everybody loves the way Mickey Rourke looks???

No we DON'T love the way Mickey Rourke looks.   I thought Mickey Rooney looked good

I thought Mickey Rourke WAS Mickey Rooney!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:48:19 PM


Anne Hathaway's dress fits funny up on top.

I think so too
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:48:24 PM
This jerk who's interviewing Langella should be run out of town on a rail.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:48:46 PM
Who IS this idiot?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:48:49 PM
It stands out too far from her - uh - uh - her superstructure.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:49:06 PM
Philip Seymour Hoffman in a ski cap??

I saw that...what's THAT all about??
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 04:49:07 PM
I love that screen title:   "________", Attendee.       :D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:49:09 PM
I have never been able to understand Penelope Cruz's appeal. Never been my cup of tea, especially in English-language movies.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:49:31 PM
Watching different channels.....obviously......but if Frank Langella turned up on my screen....I would change the channels.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:49:31 PM
I am almost done repairing oscar....

I just hate what some people do to books...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:49:45 PM
Kate Winslet - me no understand AT ALL.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:50:42 PM
The stars are shining brightly.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:50:44 PM
I have never been able to understand Penelope Cruz's appeal. Never been my cup of tea, especially in English-language movies.

I think she's beautiful.  I like her
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:51:10 PM
Angelina Jolie - she lost me at the tattoo.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:51:31 PM
More commercials.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:51:46 PM
I'm full - don't know why, really.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:51:51 PM
I have never been able to understand Penelope Cruz's appeal. Never been my cup of tea, especially in English-language movies.

I think she's beautiful.  I like her

DOn't like her looks either. Oh, well....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:51:57 PM
Angelina Jolie - she lost me at the tattoo.

I don't like tattoos at all
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 04:52:02 PM
Kate Winslet looks very nice.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:52:12 PM
Based on a true story - The Soloist.  A must-miss film.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:52:16 PM
Damn....right now I give the whole look package to Kate Winslet!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:52:24 PM
I popped some corn and have been nibbling.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:52:48 PM
Angelina's green earrings bug me for some reason. Maybe if she had some green in her necklace or something.  But I like the dress
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:52:53 PM
And I HATE the Kodak.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:53:03 PM
Penelope Cruz I guess is where we part ways, DR CILLA LIZ......
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:53:06 PM
More commercials on E!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:53:16 PM
Meryl Streep looks frumpy to me
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 04:53:28 PM
Good Evening!

I wonder how many more pages I'll have to catch up once I hit "Post" for this post.  ;)  :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:53:33 PM
Kate Winslet - me no understand AT ALL.

Maybe you need to see the shot from the other channel!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:53:36 PM
Oh, this jerk interviewer - I would like to annihilate him.  How do these people get hired.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:53:58 PM
Penelope Cruz I guess is where we part ways, DR CILLA LIZ......

that's why it's fun to dish together...we don't all agree
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:54:13 PM
Meryl Streep looks frumpy to me

But less than 20 years ago she was in a great power girl rock band.....or at least MAMMA MIA would have us believe it's so.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:54:25 PM
"It takes a lot of people to make a film."  Someone FIRE this jerk.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:54:29 PM
I haven't seen Kate Winslet yet.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:54:36 PM
Oh, this jerk interviewer - I would like to annihilate him.  How do these people get hired.

My guess is with a horizontal interview.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:54:59 PM
I haven't seen Kate Winslet yet.

Her hair is beautiful!  Someone done her up right!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:55:15 PM
I am affixing the label to the book...

I had to insert several pages that had fallen out and a photocopy of a page that someone razored the pictures out it...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 04:55:15 PM
bk - Roger Ebert is not gone.  He can no longer speak due to his thyroid and salivary gland cancers, and the treatments for those diseases.  However, he has started writing again.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:55:18 PM
"It takes a lot of people to make a film."  Someone FIRE this jerk.

I thought the actors made it up as they went along.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:55:27 PM
LOL, the Slumdog kids are running around getting autographs.  I like that
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:55:48 PM
I only caught a glance at Meryl, but I thought she looked better than she did at the SAGS and Globes.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 04:55:55 PM
Forty minutes to the show.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:56:01 PM
I may go for 30 minutes of TAR....if I dare.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:56:04 PM
You are right bk, it takes MANY people to make a film
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 04:56:09 PM
I haven't seen much of the pre-show, Red Carpet... But I did glimpse Amy Adams and her necklace.  Hmmm....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:56:12 PM
bk - Roger Ebert is not gone.  He can no longer speak due to his thyroid and salivary gland cancers, and the treatments for those diseases.  However, he has started writing again.

He blogged today about Gene Siskel because it's been 10 years since he died
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:56:15 PM
I only caught a glance at Meryl, but I thought she looked better than she did at the SAGS and Globes.

Agree AGAIN!!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:56:43 PM
I haven't seen much of the pre-show, Red Carpet... But I did glimpse Amy Adams and her necklace.  Hmmm....

DR JOSE three people thanked MOMA Monkey and you missed it!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:56:53 PM
Kate on E!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 04:57:55 PM
I think I saw Angelina's earrings at the Dollar Store.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 04:58:06 PM
I haven't seen much of the pre-show, Red Carpet... But I did glimpse Amy Adams and her necklace.  Hmmm....

DR JOSE three people thanked MOMA Monkey and you missed it!

;D  ;D  ;D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 04:58:10 PM
Kate on E!

Don't get E!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:58:27 PM
Kate Winslet should have won years ago for SENSE AND SENSIBILITY.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 04:59:37 PM
I agree MattH
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 04:59:46 PM
CHristopher Nolan is gorgeous!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:00:23 PM
So what do they do for the next thirty minutes?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 05:00:53 PM
Is anyone else watching Barbara Walters?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:01:23 PM
The next 30 minutes is the Network pre-show
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:01:45 PM
Is anyone else watching Barbara Walters?

I have not watched her special in decades.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 05:02:23 PM
Is anyone else watching Barbara Walters?

EVERYHING YOU WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT THE JONAS BROTHERS...AND MORE!!!!!   ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:02:23 PM
On that Dentyne commercial it looks like that guy is kissing his mother.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:02:27 PM
Is anyone else watching Barbara Walters?

I am.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:02:27 PM
Is anyone else watching Barbara Walters?

I turned it on and saw Mickey Rourke say he was living in a closet or something...I turned back to the pre-show
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 05:02:56 PM
I'm back...and I've got some catching up to do!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:02:58 PM
Ooohh... And Hugh Jackman is giving Barbara Walters a LAP DANCE!!!!!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:03:00 PM
Kate Winslet should have won years ago for SENSE AND SENSIBILITY.


Damn....I just going to quote MATTH and write IBID tonight.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:03:07 PM
What is the network pre-show - just a rehash?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:03:55 PM
Ooohh... And Hugh Jackman is giving Barbara Walters a LAP DANCE!!!!!!!

I hope she doesn't break.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:04:08 PM
My TV says "Oscars Red Carpet:
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:04:13 PM
What is the network pre-show - just a rehash?

Yes....taped rehash trying to pretend it's live.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:04:34 PM
Did RDJr have work done?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 05:04:55 PM
My televison captions it "Barb'a Walters Special"
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:05:24 PM
And now the "Official" Oscar Red Carpet coverage starts...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:05:47 PM
Barbara Walters is over.  It will be a good way to see the dresses since they aren't following them live
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:06:02 PM
Switched from network when I saw who the hosts were.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:06:11 PM
OH, Kate is first. She does look lovely.  I love the hair and earrings
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:06:11 PM
I have not watched Barbara Walters in years...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:06:48 PM
I love Tim Gunn.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:06:50 PM
I still remember Gilda Radner's spin on Barbara Walters...

Baba WaWa
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: elmore3003 on February 22, 2009, 05:06:53 PM
I have never been able to understand Penelope Cruz's appeal. Never been my cup of tea, especially in English-language movies.

I'll drink to that!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:08:35 PM
I don't think AMy's necklace goes well with that gown.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:09:03 PM
I'm not a Sara Jessica fan
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:09:14 PM
OH!

As for "Project Runway" - there was a great article in the New York Times this past week. -With comments from Heidi Klum, Nina Garcia and Tim Gunn.

‘Project Runway’ Battle Dampens Fashion Week (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/21/arts/television/21runw.html)

*Bookmark it to read later. -Or during the commercial breaks.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:09:19 PM
I love Tim Gunn.

Tim I like...his co-host not so much.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:09:42 PM
I don't think AMy's necklace goes well with that gown.

Finally....we disagree.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:10:06 PM
OH, Kate is first. She does look lovely.  I love the hair and earrings

Isn't she pretty?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:10:26 PM
I don't think AMy's necklace goes well with that gown.

The more I look at the whole package, I think it will look better once she's inside the Kodak, and under the television lights.  -The overcast skies aren't really helping anyone outside.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:10:48 PM
Still downloading so I guess I am on the PC for the Oscars this year.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:11:04 PM
I like that Frank Langella's date is his daughter
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:11:15 PM
Brad and Angie didn't want to talk?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:12:06 PM
not a fan either of penelope cruz
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 05:12:19 PM
Actually, I thought Sarah JEssica looked better than usual.

I did too.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:12:24 PM
I like that Frank Langella's date is his daughter

I think that is neat also...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:13:07 PM
I don't think AMy's necklace goes well with that gown.

I agree ... Love the necklace... and the dress but they do not mix


I just looked at a picture of her online
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:13:17 PM
Actually, I thought Sarah JEssica looked better than usual.

I did too.

Kinda like whitewashing the outhouse.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:13:44 PM
For anyone who did watch the Barbara Walter's special... There were a series of commercials for Kohl's.  A friend of mine was in one of them.  They flew everyone to South Africa to shoot it.  WHAT?!?!?!  WHY!?!?!?!?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:14:25 PM
Wow I may hit a milestone tonight during the Oscar Show!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:15:12 PM
Valentina on camera?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:15:15 PM
Hasn't there only been ONE posthumous Oscar winner?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:15:35 PM
When I was nominated for a Grammy, my date was my daughter.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:15:48 PM
Not going to generate big ratings.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:15:57 PM
Yes, Peter Finch was the only dead winner.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:16:28 PM
I don't know which I would like less.....going to South Africa or going to Kohl's.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:16:51 PM
The last time this sort of producer team did the Oscars (you know what I mean) was Allan Carr.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:16:51 PM
When I was nominated for a Grammy, my date was my daughter.

What year?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:17:19 PM
The last time this sort of producer team did the Oscars (you know what I mean) was Allan Carr.

And we know how that turned out......
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:17:27 PM
I don't like Vanessa's dress.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:17:43 PM
Yes, Peter Finch was the only dead winner.


That's what I was thinking.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:18:26 PM
What's up with Zac Efron's hair?  Is it safe to touch it?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:19:03 PM
When I was nominated for a Grammy, my date was my daughter.

What year?

The Hello, Dolly revival year - 1996 or 97?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 05:19:09 PM
LOL, JRand58...    :D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:19:30 PM
Where were we at this time last year?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:20:19 PM
Miley's dress overwhelms her a bit.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:20:38 PM
LOL.....I will have to check the Grammy archive for photos of MR BK and MS K.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:20:47 PM
Did a rhinestone factory throw up on Miley Cyrus'?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:21:01 PM
What's up with Zac Efron's hair?  Is it safe to touch it?

I'll never tell.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 05:21:09 PM
The Hello, Dolly revival year - 1996 or 97?

Even though Carol Channing remembers nothing about it...          ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:21:33 PM
14 minutes till Jackman.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:21:37 PM
More commercials. Sheesh!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:22:05 PM
The Hello, Dolly revival year - 1996 or 97?

Even though Carol Channing remembers nothing about it...          ;)

She thinks those guys were checking the electricity in her dressing room.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:22:15 PM
14 minutes till Jackman.

Be still, my heart!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:22:35 PM
If I have time later, I'll try to scan the photo from the Grammys.  If I can do so without removing it from the frame.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:22:54 PM
10 minutes, Mr Jackman.  Ten Minutes.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:22:56 PM
When I was nominated for a Grammy, my date was my daughter.

Cool...

I bet she enjoyed herself also
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:22:58 PM
Who's watching the show in HIGH DEFINITION?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:23:04 PM
What's up with Zac Efron's hair?  Is it safe to touch it?

I'll never tell.

Something tells me, neither will he.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:23:09 PM
If I have time later, I'll try to scan the photo from the Grammys.  If I can do so without removing it from the frame.

Nice!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:23:11 PM
Miss Channing was eating corn and remembers very little.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:23:20 PM
When I was nominated for a Grammy, my date was my daughter.

That's very cool, BK
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:23:25 PM
Go Jrand...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:23:32 PM
Who's watching the show in HIGH DEFINITION?

ME ME ME ME ME
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 05:23:37 PM
What's up with Zac Efron's hair?  Is it safe to touch it?

I'll never tell.

Did he use the same hair treatment as Ben Stiller in "There's Something about Mary"?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:23:46 PM
More commercials. Sheesh!

Commercials are good.  Gives us time to post and read, and read and post.

;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:24:01 PM
I am wondering if I will hit 14000
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:24:12 PM
What's up with Zac Efron's hair?  Is it safe to touch it?

I'll never tell.

Something tells me, neither will he.

Someday all will be revealed when the scrolls are opened in the last days.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:24:17 PM
I have gotten over 300 posts here before in one day
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:24:17 PM
I'm watching in HD. That's TWO.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:24:26 PM
anything is possible
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:24:26 PM
I am wondering if I will hit 14000


Go for it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:24:56 PM
What's up with Zac Efron's hair?  Is it safe to touch it?

I'll never tell.

Did he use the same hair treatment as Ben Stiller in "There's Something about Mary"?

How do you think he gets all those TV parts?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:25:00 PM
One thing I hate about award shows...

Too many commercials... Same with football games
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:25:19 PM
With all the stars, they show the accountants!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:25:34 PM
Who's watching the show in HIGH DEFINITION?

I am
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:26:11 PM
Switched back....oh my....Meryl does look frumpy.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:26:36 PM
Penelope sounds like Jose Jimenez.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:26:42 PM
Penelope's necklace is lovely.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:26:56 PM
Meryl looked better in this shot than the one I saw on the other channel
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:27:18 PM
Yay! Three in hD!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:27:43 PM
Does them Oscar statues has light bubs in their haids?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:28:18 PM
Jack Black? Why?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:28:26 PM
Jack Black looks like a g.d. bum!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:28:35 PM
35,000 POSTS!!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:28:59 PM
Meryl looked better in this shot than the one I saw on the other channel

Meryl Streep wears too much gray, taupe and tan.  I want to see some COLOR on her!  -Her daughter looks fabulous!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:29:08 PM
Congrats JRand
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:29:27 PM
Oh wow....Marisa dress is a mistake.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:29:28 PM
Congratulations on your millstone, DR JRAND!!!!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:29:36 PM
SETH SETH SETH
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:29:37 PM
Congrats Jrand....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:29:54 PM
Thanks DRs CILLA LIZ and JOSE.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:29:57 PM
Congrats, DR JRand.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:30:01 PM
I agree Jose, she definitely needs to show more color
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:30:08 PM
SETH SETH SETH

I think Seth looked hunkier at the Golden Globes. ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 05:30:08 PM
Congratulations on your Oscar night milestone, DR JRand!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:30:12 PM
Page 20 Dance!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:30:26 PM
Five minutes, Mr Jackman.  Five Minutes.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 05:30:28 PM
What WAS Meryl thinking?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 05:30:44 PM
CONGRATULATIONS to DR JRand5 on his new milestone!!!! :D   :D   :D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:31:07 PM
SETH SETH SETH

I think Seth looked hunkier at the Golden Globes. ;)

He would look hunkier standing in my room.

Thanks DR GINNY.

This designer is NUTS!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:31:23 PM
What WAS Meryl thinking?

She said I tried it on and it fit...her daughter looked at the ground and didn't say anything..
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:31:25 PM
What WAS Meryl thinking?

If it fits...I will wear it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 05:31:28 PM
During the lull, I'll thank DRs DAW, JRand, and DakotaCelt for their comments on Mary Linda's photo.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:31:31 PM
SEMI-SPOILER

I have three friends dancing in tonight's ceremony.  Their emails have been cryptic and colorful.  Just sayin'.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:31:32 PM
Thanks DR DAW.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:31:33 PM
I am about to throw in the towel for mending... I am in the bottom of the bin that is home for all the NASTIES...  to repair
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 05:31:35 PM
Who's watching the show in HIGH DEFINITION?

I am!  For the first time!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:31:52 PM
SEMI-SPOILER

I have three friends dancing in tonight's ceremony.  Their emails have been cryptic and colorful.  Just sayin'.

Oh brother...............................
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:32:17 PM
Get out of there DR DAKOTA CELT.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:32:37 PM
"Swerski cyrstals" - ??? :P ::)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:32:47 PM
Four in HD!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 05:33:05 PM
Regarding Seth Rogan....

Is there supposed to be that little triangle of white showing where the jacket crosses the pants?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:33:09 PM
DR Ginny, it is a lovely photo
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:33:18 PM
Places Mr Jackman. Places for the top.  Beginners onstage please.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 05:33:45 PM
Thanks, DR Cillaliz!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:33:47 PM
Regarding Seth Rogan....

Is there supposed to be that little triangle of white showing where the jacket crosses the pants?

What are you doing looking there?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:33:49 PM
I want Hugh!!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:34:11 PM
Here we goooooooooooo.....

Fingers crossed that they don't mess it up in the first five minutes!!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:34:15 PM
Speaking of HD...they are comparing the switch to digital here to Y2K.  It happened and there were none of the problems people thought there would be
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:34:24 PM
bk and daughter at the Grammys.

(http://i40.tinypic.com/ajky3d.jpg)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:34:34 PM
Still a minute away.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 05:34:36 PM
Only 70 pages of posts to go...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:34:37 PM
I envy those of you who can see Hugh Jackman...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:34:46 PM
page 21 dance......
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 05:35:06 PM
I'm not in HD because I left the new TV to DH Richard and I'm in my "haven" on my desktop computer.

And, I gotta tell ya, I'm pretty tired of wearing these sunglasses.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:35:18 PM
Nice photo BK
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:35:27 PM
Kodak Thee-ter?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 05:35:52 PM
Great picture, bk!!!!!   Thanks for sharing.    :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 05:36:02 PM
Heeere's Hugh!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 05:36:16 PM
Very nice picture, BK!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 05:36:24 PM
Hugh looks yummilicious.   No surprise there.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:36:28 PM
bk - Nice picture!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 05:37:10 PM
35,000 POSTS!!!!

Congrats, JRand!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:37:17 PM
Oh, boy, the theater is overrun with twelve-year-old whoopers.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:37:28 PM
Will each person in the Kodak get to take home a strand of that Swarovski Crystal Curtain?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:38:35 PM
OOOOOHHHH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:38:38 PM
Great picture bk...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:39:07 PM
Are these your friends Jose?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:39:14 PM
Oh, dear - we're in Allan Carr territory.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:39:30 PM
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHHH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:40:20 PM
Are these your friends Jose?

Not yet.

There are at least four production numbers tonight.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:41:15 PM
They couldn't hire someone who could actually write a real musical number???
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:41:32 PM
So, how many dresses did Anne Hathaway bring tonight?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:41:54 PM
I mean this is the NADIR - it might have worked had they got someone who knew how to write this stuff.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 05:42:06 PM
OMG!  Gold and silver spandex??
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 05:43:00 PM
Will each person in the Kodak get to take home a strand of that Swarovski Crystal Curtain?

Yes, and each television viewer worldwide, too.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:43:05 PM
YIKES!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 05:43:36 PM
At least Hugh Jackman can really sing. :-\
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 05:43:40 PM
Uh...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:43:53 PM
Why are these stupid idiots STANDING UP?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:43:54 PM
Wonderful energy!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:43:57 PM
Who did "write" the music for tonight's ceremony? -well, for that opening number. :-\
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 05:43:57 PM
That got a standing O?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:44:28 PM
Energy is one thing - crap is another.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:44:50 PM
Mickey Rourke is shocking.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 05:45:02 PM
What's with Mickey Rourke's tooth?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:45:11 PM
Oh dear......
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:45:19 PM
Nice pic, MR BK.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:45:19 PM
That got a standing O?

They were just following the flashing lights in the theater.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:45:20 PM
interesting to say the least....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:45:37 PM
That's a pot load of crystals to be sure!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:46:11 PM
This is embarrassing.  More embarrassing than what's going on is this teenage whooping and hollering - makes one think that they brought in ringers to do it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:46:41 PM
11 minutes in.....big tech glitch
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:46:55 PM
I guess the curtain pullers missed the dress rehearsal.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 05:47:15 PM
Randy Newman has had more nominations than Meryl Streep.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:47:25 PM
Oh you think they should have opened the curtain before the video started, do you?  Well we're changing things this year!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:47:47 PM
umm.... what happened....

It is like something out of a bad high school musical....

Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:47:58 PM
Oh my the BIG GUNS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 05:48:15 PM
Laura DR should love Whoopie's dress.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:48:21 PM
Whoopi's dress is awful.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:48:29 PM
And the award for the ugliest dress goes to...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:48:33 PM
What is this the GOLDEN GLOBES.  Are these twits going to stand for every entrance.  Someone needs to help Tilda to NEVER dress like that.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:48:48 PM
Did they rehearse....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:48:58 PM
Eva Marie Saint is so classy.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:49:11 PM
Oh you think they should have opened the curtain before the video started, do you?  Well we're changing things this year!

If you rewind, you can here, "Steve, open it!"
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:49:16 PM
Randy Newman has had more nominations than Meryl Streep.

I'm sure they meant acting nominations.

Walt Disney had more nominations than anyone.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:49:16 PM
it is scary....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:49:34 PM
Eva Marie Saint puts everyone to shame.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:49:46 PM
wrong lipstick on Angelica for that color dress fer shur.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:49:58 PM
And the award for the ugliest dress goes to...

That would be tough with this group, but I vote Whoopi
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:50:10 PM
This writing is sickening. 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:50:16 PM
Go home Whoopi, you left your class there.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:50:39 PM
Oh you think they should have opened the curtain before the video started, do you?  Well we're changing things this year!

If you rewind, you can here, "Steve, open it!"

I heard it and chuckled.  I'm being sarcastic
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 05:50:51 PM
Now I see what y'all meant about Amy's necklace.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:50:56 PM
sorry gang - I love Amy's necklace with that dress
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:50:57 PM
It's a unique way to introduce the nominees, but if they do this for all the acting roles, we're going to go WAY over.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:51:21 PM
Okay, is Goldie Hawn the new Mickey Rourke.  I just threw up on the ground.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 05:51:23 PM
That's some dress Goldie is almost wearing.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 05:51:28 PM
Oh you think they should have opened the curtain before the video started, do you?  Well we're changing things this year!

If you rewind, you can here, "Steve, open it!"

I missed it.  I'll have to go back later because I'm recording this to my DVD burner and not on my DVR.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:51:29 PM
It's a unique way to introduce the nominees, but if they do this for all the acting roles, we're going to go WAY over.

And it ain't that great.....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:51:35 PM
I wouild nominate the dress for What not to Wear....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:51:52 PM
It's a unique way to introduce the nominees, but if they do this for all the acting roles, we're going to go WAY over.

Especially if we have 3 more production numbers
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:52:05 PM
Tilda didn't rehearse.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:52:43 PM
Penelope - I believe that was expected, yes?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 05:52:43 PM
It's a unique way to introduce the nominees, but if they do this for all the acting roles, we're going to go WAY over.

Especially if we have 3 more production numbers

You got that right.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:52:48 PM
Oh no.......................why. Lord, why?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:52:53 PM
It's a unique way to introduce the nominees, but if they do this for all the acting roles, we're going to go WAY over.

Yep. Each winner will join "The Circle" tonight.

Four hours for sure tonight. Maybe even five.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 05:52:57 PM
I do like hearing some Mercer...it will help pay off the bills from the film that's bleeding money.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:53:00 PM
There goes my chance for a perfect score.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:53:25 PM
Her breasticals is really squeezed tight together.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 05:54:01 PM
It's a unique way to introduce the nominees, but if they do this for all the acting roles, we're going to go WAY over.

Yep. Each winner will join "The Circle" tonight.

Four hours for sure tonight. Maybe even five.

Sure glad I'm retired and don't have to go to work in the morning.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 05:54:55 PM
It could prove to be an interesting evening of commentary... any way you slice it
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 05:54:55 PM
This "new" method takes probably 3 times as long as showing the clips...

On the other hand, it's nice screen time for the former winners.

But I agree with y'all...the WRITING....     :P
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:55:03 PM
There goes my chance for a perfect score.

And mine.

Although, of all the acting races, this one was the "weakest" of them all to me.  -Now, if Kate Winslet had been nommed in this category for "The Reader", well...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:55:03 PM
I think, however, that it was a beautiful acceptance speech.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:55:05 PM
Another Oscar for a Woody Allen written role
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 05:55:40 PM
OK what do people think so far of the new format
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:55:52 PM
I think, however, that it was a beautiful acceptance speech.

Yes, a very heartfelt speech (and this coming from a nonfan like me.)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:56:06 PM
I got it right, but I doubt I'll be perfect
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:56:13 PM
Something tells me the ratings will not be good this year.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:56:13 PM
I can't remember who you all thought was going to win - the gal from Doubt?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:56:19 PM
OK what do people think so far of the new format

Haven't you been reading?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:56:37 PM
OK what do people think so far of the new format

It stinks.....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:56:52 PM
I did have Penelope as my second choice of the possible winner. So I scored "some points," just not a perfect number of points thus far.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 05:56:56 PM
OK what do people think so far of the new format

It's gonna be a long night.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 05:56:56 PM
I think, however, that it was a beautiful acceptance speech.

¡Si! ¡Me gusta!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:57:12 PM
I can't remember who you all thought was going to win - the gal from Doubt?

I was going for either Viola Davis or Marisa Tomei.

*I liked "VCB", but it was such an ensemble film, that no one really stuck out - which was a good thing.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:57:39 PM
Welcome seven GUESTS.  Less commercials, but that will probably change as the night goes on.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 05:57:52 PM
Right to screenplay???
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 05:58:05 PM
CHristopher Nolan is gorgeous!

I agree!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:58:14 PM
Well, at least this Oscar ceremony has the potential to be "memorably bad", and not just "mediocre". ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 05:58:50 PM
It's going to be a long night.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 05:59:12 PM
Steve - sue your doctor.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 05:59:22 PM
I am afraid, very afraid, of the new format.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:00:03 PM
Did Steve Martin and Goldie Hawn use up all of the Botox in L.A.?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:00:08 PM
No no no.....I hate this format.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:00:21 PM
It will be the shortest show if the commercial breaks are all very short like this last.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:00:51 PM
I'm rooting for our friend Richard King for Sound Design, but I imagine SLUMDOG will be a favorite.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:01:17 PM
Our furnace was not working this evening; it was down to 62 degrees before Mum or I noticed.
It's fixed now.  Our furnace people made an evening visit.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:01:19 PM
This is TERRIBLE!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:01:49 PM
I like the way they did the Screenplay presentation...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:01:51 PM
A gay winner! Yay!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:01:52 PM
Milk - should have  been Wall-E.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:01:57 PM
MILK takes screenplay!  Hoo and ray!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:01:57 PM
Good choice!!!

One for MILK.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 06:01:59 PM
"Milk" won original screenplay.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:02:00 PM
Darn.  I was hoping for "Wall-E".
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:02:03 PM
Well being perfect didn't last too long
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:02:13 PM
And I love Tina Fey's dress.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 06:02:24 PM
Did I just see some fidgeting in the audience?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:02:33 PM
MILK was my 2nd choice after WALL-E.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:02:35 PM
He looks so young!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 06:02:53 PM
I like the way they did the Screenplay presentation...

I did, too, DR Edi.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:02:57 PM
Did I just see some fidgeting in the audience?

Brad is bored out of his gourd....and he has to sit there ALL NIGHT.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:03:08 PM
BROKEBACK also won Screenplay a couple of years ago.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:03:35 PM
Another nice speech....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 06:03:36 PM
I chose milk
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:03:46 PM
Heartfelt speeches tonight.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 06:03:57 PM
Another nice speech....

I liked it a lot.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:03:58 PM
Anyone have a milk mustache?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:04:13 PM
I liked Tina's dress better when Elizabeth Taylor wore it in CLEOPATRA.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:04:20 PM
OK... I'm crying...

And now back to Tina and Steve...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:04:45 PM
An inept quiet - oy and vey.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: elmore3003 on February 22, 2009, 06:04:57 PM
I did have Penelope as my second choice of the possible winner. So I scored "some points," just not a perfect number of points thus far.

I think she won for her sterling performance as Tom Cruise's love interest several years ago. Can anyone understand a thing she says?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:05:16 PM
Why on earth would they give these big awards so soon?  It's really stupid.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:05:34 PM
I did have Penelope as my second choice of the possible winner. So I scored "some points," just not a perfect number of points thus far.

I think she won for her sterling performance as Tom Cruise's love interest several years ago. Can anyone understand a thing she says?

Yes
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:05:59 PM
I did have Penelope as my second choice of the possible winner. So I scored "some points," just not a perfect number of points thus far.

I think she won for her sterling performance as Tom Cruise's love interest several years ago. Can anyone understand a thing she says?

Si.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:06:10 PM
This award will tell the tale.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:06:13 PM
Well, that was predictable!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:06:21 PM
And there's the tale.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:06:44 PM
Go Simon!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:06:59 PM
I like the bead banner.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:07:00 PM
I do so love a good tale.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:07:15 PM
Why on earth would they give these big awards so soon?  It's really stupid.

Remember, there's a narrative to tonight's ceremony.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:07:17 PM
Sixteen users - a good turnout!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Kerry on February 22, 2009, 06:07:38 PM
I know nothing of tonight, but I do know that when Loretta Young won for "The Farmer's Daughter," it was unexpected, and she was seated farther away.  She wore an emerald green taffeta dress with yards of skirt, ruffles, peplums and was clearly not meant for trying to get up to the stage.

I also know that when the delicious Gloria Grahame won for "The Bad and the Beautiful," she tripped on the steps leading up to the stage and uttered a very audible, "Oh shit!"  Most people presumed she had a toddy or two beforehand to calm her nerves.

Loretta, of course would never say such a thing!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:07:50 PM
What's the narrative - did they announce that or were we supposed to read something somewhere?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:07:51 PM
Loved the "Milk" screenplay acceptance speech.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:07:55 PM
How can I be so intensely bored after just 31 minutes.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 06:08:01 PM
To whom were people referring when they were referring to one of the interviewers on the red carpet as being terrible?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:08:01 PM
I think it's GREAT they're switching it up and putting some big awards up front. They're trying to keep the audience around.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:08:02 PM
Sixteen users - a good turnout!!!

Had it not been for the furnace, I wouldn't have been here at all until much, much later.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:08:10 PM
What the hell are these two clowns doing there?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:08:55 PM
This is not funny.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:09:04 PM
CUT THE JOKES!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:09:07 PM
Jennifer is celebrating her 40th birthday. . .
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:09:09 PM
So unfunny.....bad script and terrible delivery.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:09:26 PM
Jennifer is celebrating her 40th birthday. . .

BUT her nose is only six!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:09:31 PM
We're forty minutes in, three major awards, and it is STILL a bore.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:09:40 PM
Has the viewer population died down considerably at this point?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:09:54 PM
The format was OK, but most of the screenplay "excerpts" were pretty inane.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:10:05 PM
Gang, I don't know how much of this .... stuff ... I can take.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:10:24 PM
How can I be so intensely bored after just 31 minutes.

Well, a friend of mine will be lifting up a famous singer later on in the ceremony.  The singer's name rhymes with "Ee-yon-say".  I wonder who that could be?  ::)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:10:35 PM
This jernt on Oscar night - the best.  And much more entertaining than the show.  But last year at this time there'd already been three commercial breaks to the one we've had so far.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 06:10:37 PM
Just present the darn awards!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:10:53 PM
Did Mr. Workman do this "yearbook?"
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 06:10:58 PM
I've got to switch the computer back to tax return mode.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:11:02 PM
DR JRand - I guess we should have watched "The Amazing Race" instead. :-\
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:11:22 PM
I didn't like that montage of animation at all
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:11:26 PM
What is the POINT of this endless thing they just did? 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:11:37 PM
A little too frenzied to be effective.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:11:38 PM
This better be Wall-E.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:11:44 PM
This jernt on Oscar night - the best.  And much more entertaining than the show.  But last year at this time there'd already been three commercial breaks to the one we've had so far.

They're stacking the commercials.  Can you say, "Set change"?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:11:50 PM
There is not a point to all this . . .yet. . .is there?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:11:58 PM
Good!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:11:59 PM
Yay---finally one for bk!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:12:05 PM
YEAH!!!!  I loved Wall-E
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:12:09 PM
It is WALL-E.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 06:13:01 PM
YEAH!!!!  I loved Wall-E

One of the few nominees I've seen.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:13:05 PM
LOL nice speech with a bit of sweet history.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:13:20 PM
Loved the shot of Angelina Jolie laughing... after panning away from Jennifer Aniston. ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:13:29 PM
They give feature FIRST and THEN short film?  Are these people insane?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:13:37 PM
DR JRand - I guess we should have watched "The Amazing Race" instead. :-\

I guess.

It just gets unfunnier and UN FUNNIER.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:13:42 PM
I LOVED the shot PRESTO.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:14:05 PM
Loved the shot of Angelina Jolie laughing... after panning away from Jennifer Aniston. ;)

hehehehehehehe
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:14:16 PM
Presto is such good fun.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 06:14:24 PM
YEAH!!!!  I loved Wall-E

Me, too.  And it's the only animated movie (of the three nominated movies) that I'd seen.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:14:27 PM
I've seen Presto and Oktapodi
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:14:32 PM
They give feature FIRST and THEN short film?  Are these people insane?

I think the question is moot at this point, MR BK.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:14:43 PM
I didn't get the "animation yearbook" thing...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:14:54 PM
Very big surprise!  I don't think anyone guessed this.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:14:59 PM
Hmmm haven't seen that one.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:15:08 PM
Oh, well. Pixar might win the big one, but they haven't won the animated short award in a long, long time.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:15:09 PM
First reference to Oscar's weight....and he was on Weight Watchers all year!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:15:21 PM
thank you, my pencil
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:15:28 PM
I guess this is the first "shock" of the evening?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:15:31 PM
And him they interrupt.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 06:15:44 PM
Meryl's dress looks better sitting down.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:15:47 PM
I didn't get the "animation yearbook" thing...

You are one of millions, DR EDISAURUS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:15:50 PM
It must be a bad show - I keep waiting for the commercial break.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:15:58 PM
lol he was funny!  Domo obligato Mr. Roboto  (I think that's how you spell that)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:16:26 PM
thank you, my pencil

I think some of the Academy Members vote the same way.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:16:43 PM
thank you, my pencil

That was nice. So often the pencils are overlooked.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:16:54 PM
But it's a lot easier to post and comment on a bad show than a so so one
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:17:00 PM
We're about to enter our top ten - good job!  GO FOR IT!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:17:17 PM
Cilla - you're right.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:17:25 PM
"Domo arigato, Mister Roboto" -The first truly funny and genuine laugh of the evening.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:17:29 PM
I gotta tell you.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:17:45 PM
If the next production member is another horror, I may have to give up, DRs.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:17:55 PM
So we're 45 minutes into the show and have had what....5 awards? 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:18:12 PM
But it's a lot easier to post and comment on a bad show than a so so one

Well THAT is true...that is TRUE!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:18:35 PM
"Domo arigato, Mister Roboto" -The first truly funny and genuine laugh of the evening.

I always wondered what that second word was...arigato?  thanks
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:18:43 PM
Seems like we've been on for an hour and 45 minutes.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:18:50 PM
It's only six-fifteen!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:18:53 PM
Bob Hope is not there.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:19:03 PM
HA!  A friend of mine just "tweeted" about Miley Cyrus' dress:

Mylie = barbiedoll stuck in a toilet roll with a dress layered over it...remember those?

;D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:19:07 PM
This isn't striking me as bad as some of the ones in the past, but then I've ben sitting in a pitch black cold room for hours looking at archival baseball footage, so anything else would look good at this point.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:19:52 PM
They must have a LOT of tributes and numbers planned if they're giving out the major awards this fast.  I guess the idea is they "hook" the "audience" and then they stick around for the smaller awards.  But they're wrong.  Which is why amateurs should not be producing this show.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:20:00 PM
And where's the HOST?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:20:08 PM
I only have one more review disc waiting to be done. A Criterion disc that doesn't come out until the 17th. I may take tomorrow off if nothing comes in the mail.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:20:32 PM
"The script has been written and rewritten..."   I think they needed another rewrite
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:20:32 PM
I had to go see Mrs. Murphy.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:21:02 PM
Oh, I get it now.   The NARRATIVE of the evening.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:21:02 PM
More botox...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:21:15 PM
Daniel is so much prettier than Sarah.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:21:15 PM
"Domo arigato, Mister Roboto" -The first truly funny and genuine laugh of the evening.

I always wondered what that second word was...arigato?  thanks

Do itashimashite.

(don't touch my moustache)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:21:19 PM
I think "Inside Daisy Clover" ought to take ALL THE REST of the Oscars.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:21:20 PM
I have never found this woman attractive.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:21:56 PM
What is the narrative?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:22:08 PM
I had to go see Mrs. Murphy.

Miss Karen is here?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:22:10 PM
And where's the HOST?

Changing into his next costume.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:22:21 PM
I predict Button or Dark Knight.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:22:35 PM
Good Evening, DR Ron Pulliam.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:22:48 PM
BENJAMIN BUTTON will win some of these tech awards, I guess.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:22:50 PM
One for me.  And one for Button - and I don't think there'll be many more.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:22:54 PM
I think it's the order in which a movie comes together...but then Best Supporting Actress makes no sense at the beginning
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:23:19 PM
Sure are lots of sparkly dresses tonight!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:23:33 PM
Such a self-important film.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:23:43 PM
(don't touch my moustache)

Or the coat.     ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:23:55 PM
Maybe producers shouldn't leave them alone -
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:24:04 PM
Nice that they had such an attractive set while they gave out the design awards.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:24:29 PM
This is SO dreary.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:24:48 PM
Are these "settings" necessary? 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:24:48 PM
Daniel is a doll, but his mouth isn't working right tonight.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:25:04 PM
Fa...a long, long way to run.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:25:26 PM
Why is she wearing that frigging belt with that dress?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:25:43 PM
Are these "settings" necessary? 

In a word NO.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:25:51 PM
They really could end this show by seven o'clock if they wanted to just keep giving out awards one after the other.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:25:55 PM
Oh brother.........................
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:26:02 PM
THE DUCHESS was not a surprise winner in the category.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:26:07 PM
For cutting back on expenses in a time of recession, you'd think there would be less in the way of set changes rather than more
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:26:30 PM
(don't touch my moustache)

Or the coat.     ;)

If you say "don't touch my moustache" very fast, that's basically how you would say, "You're welcome" in Japanese: DO ITASHIMASHITE
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:26:44 PM
Why is she wearing that frigging belt with that dress?

I thought that when I first saw it. Not needed.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:26:53 PM
They weren't playing the music from The Duchess???  Why???
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:26:55 PM
Why is she wearing that frigging belt with that dress?

Because she's Sarah Jessica Parker and she always dresses funny
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:27:08 PM
For cutting back on expenses in a time of recession, you'd think there would be less in the way of set changes rather than more

That was a lie.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:27:52 PM
I think the "settings" are a wonderful touch.

You have to remember that Oscars are telecast for the regular people, not those with industry ties, or propensities to bitch about all awards shows.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:28:15 PM
For cutting back on expenses in a time of recession, you'd think there would be less in the way of set changes rather than more

That was a lie.


You think? :D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:28:18 PM
Ralph got a shout-out!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:28:27 PM
Why are they DOING this?  One after another, with the same presenters???  Oh, Lord, never EVER let Bill Condon near this ceremony again.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:28:32 PM
BENJAMIN BUTTON for make-up. Isn't the film about that?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:29:02 PM
Why are they DOING this?  One after another, with the same presenters???  Oh, Lord, never EVER let Bill Condon near this ceremony again.

Piffle! They're moving the show along. Bravo for that!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:29:09 PM
More button.....

He did his own makeup very nicely
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Kerry on February 22, 2009, 06:29:14 PM
I think "Inside Daisy Clover" ought to take ALL THE REST of the Oscars.


OKAY!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:29:29 PM
The "settings" in MY opinion are inane for just about anyone.  What's the POINT?  It's a bloody awards show, not a Shields and Yarnell special.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:29:34 PM
Why is she wearing that frigging belt with that dress?

Because she's Sarah Jessica Parker and she always dresses funny


Quirky funny,  of course.

Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:29:41 PM
The presenters are not landing many of their scripted "jokes" so far.  But they don't have much to work with.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:29:45 PM
Button deserved this award.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:29:54 PM
I guess this year they're not doing a stats announcement as the winners go on stage.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:30:04 PM
This is probably not the place to be if you don't want to read bitching. :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:30:32 PM
Damn....extreme close up....right up Brad Pitt's nose!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:30:45 PM
The "settings" in MY opinion are inane for just about anyone.  What's the POINT?  It's a bloody awards show, not a Shields and Yarnell special.

I think they look great.  When they come knocking at your door to produce the show, you can do it the way you think it should be done.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:31:16 PM
This is probably not the place to be if you don't want to read bitching. :)

You think? :D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:31:25 PM
Yeah, they're moving the show right along, which is why one-hour in it seems like it's been on for three hours.  Got it.  And these jokes.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:32:24 PM
This is probably not the place to be if you don't want to read bitching. :)


And certainly not the place to be if pissy comments about everything rule the day.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Kerry on February 22, 2009, 06:32:45 PM
What the hell are these two clowns doing there?

I beg your pardon--- I am only ONE clown; I just look like two!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:32:46 PM
The "settings" in MY opinion are inane for just about anyone.  What's the POINT?  It's a bloody awards show, not a Shields and Yarnell special.

I think they look great.  When they come knocking at your door to produce the show, you can do it the way you think it should be done.

Right.  Me and anyone else with a brain.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:33:35 PM
Hey...they showed a gay kiss!!!!!   :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:33:36 PM
Well, Ron, the lovely thing is we can all say whatever we want - the glory of a discussion board.  We're just having fun - really.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:33:44 PM
Ok, I liked that.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:33:48 PM
Not a bad love montage.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:33:50 PM
And here are all the crappy-films-that-did-great-box-office-but-did-not-get-nominated montage...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:34:10 PM
Guess the commercial breaks will now be quite regular.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 06:34:46 PM
And here are all the crappy-films-that-did-great-box-office-but-did-not-get-nominated montage...

LOL!  Those are the ones I've seen!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:34:46 PM
The commercials are better than the show.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:34:52 PM
Hey...they showed a gay kiss!!!!!   :)

I would have been FURIOUS if they hadn't.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:35:01 PM
The couples montage, that is...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:35:13 PM
Revolutionary Road looks like a movie I might like to see.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:35:15 PM
The romance montage was better than the animation one. These look like the network upfront things we cut every year.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:35:16 PM
Not really, but they move along better, for me.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 06:35:26 PM
The commercials are better than the show.

Kinda like the Super Bowl.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:35:35 PM
And here are all the crappy-films-that-did-great-box-office-but-did-not-get-nominated montage...

LOL!  Those are the ones I've seen!

Coincidence?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:35:40 PM
Guess the commercial breaks will now be quite regular.

Oh...  I didn't see the Metamucil ad.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:35:47 PM
And here are all the crappy-films-that-did-great-box-office-but-did-not-get-nominated montage...

Mind reader!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:36:04 PM
Yeah, they're moving the show right along, which is why one-hour in it seems like it's been on for three hours.  Got it.  And these jokes.

Only forsome. Not to me.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:36:05 PM
Revolutionary Road looks like a movie I might like to see.

If you like depressing people fighting for 2 hours you'll love it
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:36:12 PM
I have a triple chocolate moose to eat at some point (white chocolate, milk, and dark).
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:36:23 PM
Revolutionary Road looks like a movie I might like to see.

It look beyond depressing to me...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:36:34 PM
Oh, I'm starting to "get" the narrative.  So unnecessary.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:36:54 PM
The settings would be fine....if it weren't the OSCARS!!!!!   It's about the awards!  Not some dumb bunny's idea of what a movie set looks like.

Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:37:08 PM
Is Ben playing Joaquin?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:37:19 PM
Well this sucks....and I will say it no matter what anyone thinks.  And I COULD do it better.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 06:37:38 PM
Oh, I love Natalie Portman's dress!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:37:54 PM
Revolutionary Road looks like a movie I might like to see.

It look beyond depressing to me...

It is.  But it's also the performance that Kate Winslett and Leonardo di Caprio should have been nominated for.  (Echo... echo.. echo... ) ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:38:00 PM
Revolutionary Road looks like a movie I might like to see.

If you like depressing people fighting for 2 hours you'll love it

Oh wow....it sounds like my kind of flick!  Thanks, DR CILLA LIZ.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:38:22 PM
Oh, I love Natalie Portman's dress!

But it needs pressed.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:38:23 PM
Is Ben playing Joaquin?

Yes.  And the visual joke would have been enough.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:38:27 PM
Is Ben playing Joaquin?

Yeah, but it isn't that funny
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:38:51 PM
Oh no wait....she changed......never mind.  What is the audience laughing at?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:39:02 PM
Oh, I love Natalie Portman's dress!
Me Too
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:39:33 PM
OK... Now the bit is just being disrespectful.  I'd be pissed.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:39:33 PM
Oh no wait....she changed......never mind.  What is the audience laughing at?

No, it's the same dress
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:39:46 PM
Please explain the narrative...and Joaquin...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:40:05 PM
Another one which was heavily predicted.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:40:09 PM
Frank Langella sneaks back in after visiting Mrs Murphy.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:40:27 PM
Yeah, Slumdog
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:40:48 PM
Oh, I love Natalie Portman's dress!

I loved it, too.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:40:57 PM
Please explain the narrative...and Joaquin...

Joaquin Phoenix was on Letterman and looked and acted like that and wanted to quit being an actor
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:41:04 PM
....she changed......

Into what?


That audience is laughing at the absurdity of it all.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:41:08 PM
Please explain the narrative...and Joaquin...

I think he acted a bit strange on Letterman last week.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:41:33 PM
Oh...I am thinking of Jessica Biel's dress...sorry.....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:41:35 PM
The "settings" in MY opinion are inane for just about anyone.  What's the POINT?  It's a bloody awards show, not a Shields and Yarnell special.

I think they look great.  When they come knocking at your door to produce the show, you can do it the way you think it should be done.

Right.  Me and anyone else with a brain.

I wouldn't hold  my breath waiting for that  knock.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:41:40 PM
More commercials!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:42:00 PM
The narrative. First the script is written, then the set created and make up applied, then the cinematography....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:42:01 PM
This is the best Oscar show in years.  There, is that better?  :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:42:28 PM
Guess I"ll have to look for that on YouTube...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:42:45 PM
Please explain the narrative...and Joaquin...

Joaquin Phoenix was on Letterman and looked and acted like that and wanted to quit being an actor

Truly one of the strangest talk show appearances ever.  -And Dave handled it/him like a champ!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:42:46 PM
The "settings" in MY opinion are inane for just about anyone.  What's the POINT?  It's a bloody awards show, not a Shields and Yarnell special.

I think they look great.  When they come knocking at your door to produce the show, you can do it the way you think it should be done.

Right.  Me and anyone else with a brain.

I wouldn't hold  my breath waiting for that  knock.

Stop being a rude prick, really.  It's unbecoming.  Unless you'd like ME to suddenly get personal.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:43:13 PM
This is the best Oscar show in years.  There, is that better?  :)

It's the best Oscar show THIS year  :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:43:14 PM
Awwwwwwwwwwww....Badger the dog made it home!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:43:27 PM
Well, I liked the "Badger" Mastercard commercial.        ::)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:43:38 PM
Maybe Ron is PMSing.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:43:52 PM
This is the best Oscar show in years.  There, is that better?  :)

Much!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:43:59 PM
Who is this woman?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:44:05 PM
This is the best Oscar show in years.  There, is that better?  :)
This is the best Oscar show in years.  There, is that better?  :)


No, Bruce, it's not.  The show is what it is.  But for some folks -- and it doesn't make those folks STUPID -- those settings are a nice change of pace from the same-old same-old.

It's not your cup of tea.  Understood.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:44:11 PM
Well, I liked the "Badger" Mastercard commercial.        ::)

Me TOO!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:44:18 PM
This is the dress I was talking about.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:44:53 PM
And who told her to wear such a dress?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 06:45:01 PM
This is the dress I was talking about.

This one, I don't love.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:45:11 PM
This is the dress I was talking about.

I think she had it on backwards.  And/or inside-out.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:45:13 PM
Ben Stiller was utterly inane in the Cinematography segment, though.  Totally disrespectful of the award itself.  And the viewers' intelligence in general.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:45:36 PM
This is the dress I was talking about.

This one, I don't love.

Me either
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:45:46 PM
Ron, I only speak for myself - if others like the setting GREAT!  And no, it doesn't make them stupid, and I don't think I said that.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:46:14 PM
I understand Downey, Jr. is amazing in THE SOLOIST.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:46:32 PM
I want to see THE SOLOIST
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:46:32 PM
Yes, Ben Stiller was awful and unfunny.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:47:13 PM
The narrative. First the script is written, then the set created and make up applied, then the cinematography....

I guess that would put the composers last.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:47:14 PM
We're in the top ten.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:47:36 PM
More commercials.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:47:37 PM
The presenters are not landing many of their scripted "jokes" so far.  But they don't have much to work with.


And that's been the trouble with many of these shows down the years.  The jokes land badly...either because they weren't good jokes to begin with or they didn't have the right joke for the right person.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:47:53 PM
I think the Coca-Cola commercial was great!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:48:30 PM
I understand Downey, Jr. is amazing in THE SOLOIST.

I'm just hoping that Jamie Foxx doesn't ruin it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:49:03 PM
The narrative. First the script is written, then the set created and make up applied, then the cinematography....

I guess that would put the composers last.

I really appreciated that guy from "The Duchess" mentioning  Rachel  Portman and her score.  Many of these movies are MADE by the scores, IMO. 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:49:30 PM
I'm actually finding the show more INTERESTING than it has been in recent years.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:50:10 PM
. . .but why were they playing "I Have Dreamed" when THE DUCHESS won?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ann on February 22, 2009, 06:50:34 PM
Good evening.  We tuned into the Oscars in time to see Jessica Biel's god-awful dress.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:50:43 PM
That was funny. Franco and ROgan were very ausing.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:50:56 PM
OK, James Franco---that made me laugh.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:50:57 PM
Now THAT'S comedy.       :P
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:50:57 PM
LOL....that made me laugh.

Oh here comes SETH SETH SETH again!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:51:02 PM
Kaminsky has a new career.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:51:20 PM
I understand Downey, Jr. is amazing in THE SOLOIST.

I'm just hoping that Jamie Foxx doesn't ruin it.

I wouldn't count on it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:51:34 PM
The "settings" in MY opinion are inane for just about anyone.  What's the POINT?  It's a bloody awards show, not a Shields and Yarnell special.

I think they look great.  When they come knocking at your door to produce the show, you can do it the way you think it should be done.

Right.  Me and anyone else with a brain.

I wouldn't hold  my breath waiting for that  knock.

Stop being a rude prick, really.  It's unbecoming.  Unless you'd like ME to suddenly get personal.


Rude?  I simply said I thought the settings were good.  That was in response to your dimissal of them.  I was speaking for me.

You came back with the comment that I was wrong and that the settings were INANE ---  the implication being that I was, too.



Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:51:38 PM
So, in the narrative, after the script, casting, camerawork, sets, and costumes, they take a break and make a short film?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:52:10 PM
OK... Seth Rogan should not be wearing a black velvet jacket.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Kerry on February 22, 2009, 06:52:11 PM
It's evening like these when I realize what a good thing it is not having cable!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:52:23 PM
WHo's seen that one?

;D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 06:52:24 PM
That was funny. Franco and ROgan were very ausing.

Very. :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:52:26 PM
I don't think I said you were wrong - I think I said I thought they were terrible.  I would never say you were inane.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:52:38 PM
I guess my "funny" meter must be off.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:52:58 PM
Why is Sophia sitting so far back?  Is she planning a quick getaway?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:53:33 PM
Note to Presenters: DON'T laugh when you read the winner's name.  Show some respect!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:53:33 PM
We're back to commercials.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:53:39 PM
I thought the new comedy short film with James Franco was a hoot!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:53:46 PM
A once in a lifetime performance - is Judy Garland showing up?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:53:48 PM
OK... Seth Rogan should not be wearing a black velvet jacket.

yes he should take it off immediately.....that and everything else.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 06:54:02 PM
Too many commercials.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:54:15 PM
I guess my "funny" meter must be off.

You can have it checked at Midas.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:54:19 PM
I don't think I said you were wrong - I think I said I thought they were terrible.  I would never say you were inane.

Then I apologize for misreading your comment.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:54:33 PM
WHo's seen that one?

;D

Not me, but I got it right on my ballot with some friends
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:54:33 PM
I only found Kaminsky amusing - the two guys don't amuse me and neither does the director of the piece, but that's just ME.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 06:54:35 PM
A once in a lifetime performance - is Judy Garland showing up?

We'll stay all night and sing 'em all!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:54:52 PM
Why is Sophia sitting so far back?  Is she planning a quick getaway?

The GOLDEN GIRLS are in the house?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:55:14 PM
I guess my "funny" meter must be off.
Me too
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:56:10 PM
I love our partay and all who are attending - make no mistake about THAT.  We're all bound to disagree, but it's all in FUN, which is more than I can say for this show.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:56:27 PM
Penelope Cruz was talking about NINE earlier tonight. When is it scheduled to come out? Next fall?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:56:31 PM
I find I am enjoying the ceremony more with the HHW commentary turned on.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:56:53 PM
Well, I'm enjoying the show.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:56:55 PM
I only found Kaminsky amusing - the two guys don't amuse me and neither does the director of the piece, but that's just ME.

James Franco watching James Franco and their reaction; that was funny to me.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 06:56:56 PM
Glad to see that Wall E won...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:57:06 PM
I guess my "funny" meter must be off.
Me too

I watched "Inside Daisy Clover" twice today....and it's got me in this weird place, emotionally.

Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: MBarnum on February 22, 2009, 06:57:08 PM
I am enjoying the Oscars! But then I am not particular.

Hugh Jackman is the most handsome man...holy mack!

And Brad Pitt gets better looking the older he gets.

And how did Sarah Jessica get such big boobs?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:57:33 PM
"The musical is BACK"!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 06:57:36 PM
Hugh is now sporting one of those stupid mikes.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:57:38 PM
Well, I'm enjoying the show.

And that auditorium is gorgeous in high-def!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:57:55 PM
I agree that having this commentary makes the show much more enjoyable
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:58:00 PM
Hmmmm..I think I may hit a very big millstone this very night!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:58:01 PM
Well, the producers have done a good job of making this year's ceremony more "inclusive" and "young".
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Laura on February 22, 2009, 06:58:12 PM
I think this photo is hilarious:
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 06:58:27 PM
It  is moving at snail's pace
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:58:39 PM
AH - Your friend must have done his lifting, DR Jose
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:59:10 PM
"Hi, Mark!!!!"

*He's standing to the left of Hugh Jackman.

"Hi, Dan!!!"

*He just lifted up Beyoncé - his hand was on her ass.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:59:33 PM
Oh, boy, here we go with the Fosse lighting and moves - bring back Allan Carr.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:59:40 PM
I think this photo is hilarious:
LOL!  I agree
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:59:46 PM
Is Jackman  just a tad off the mark, pitch-wise?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 06:59:57 PM
"The script has been written and rewritten..."   I think they needed another rewrite

yep
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:00:02 PM
This is poor - again, you could do something interesting about musical films, but this isn't it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:00:23 PM
And this choreography.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 07:00:42 PM
"The musical is BACK"!

The musical may be receving final rites with this number....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:01:38 PM
Save me from "young."
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 07:01:41 PM
This is poor - again, you could do something interesting about musical films, but this isn't it.

And if you wanted to use the word "inane" referring to it, I'd be saying "amen".
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:02:02 PM
It's just POINTLESS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:02:19 PM
Why do our leads occasionally sound like they're singing in a wind tunnel?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:02:22 PM
This is poor - again, you could do something interesting about musical films, but this isn't it.

And if you wanted to use the word "inane" referring to it, I'd be saying "amen".

:D 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:02:32 PM
One of the worst arrangements ever.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:02:48 PM
I'd like for Hugh Jackman to DO a film musical.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:02:55 PM
But those crystals sure do look purty
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:02:57 PM
Where is elmore?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:03:01 PM
Yes....off pitch....a tad....off base - a mile.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 07:03:26 PM
Baz did that number?

Baz Luhrmann?

Holy sh*t.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:03:27 PM
OK, Baz Lurhman. Now I understand.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:03:28 PM
Blame Baz!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:03:28 PM
Baz Lurhman.....that answers that question.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:03:33 PM
Baz Luhrmann "created" that number. 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:03:48 PM
Yes DR EDISAURUS you are approaching a milestone....go for it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:04:04 PM
I liked Natalie's dress also...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:04:24 PM
I may need to eat mousse.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:04:26 PM
Ryan Reynolds is beyond beautiful.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:04:31 PM
DR DAKOTA CELT is approaching a milestone as well.....of a sort.....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:04:31 PM
Ryan Reynolds and Betty White....how can it miss?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:04:39 PM
I hope that's it for the production numbers.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 07:04:49 PM
Baz Luhrmann "created" that number. 

He's done better work.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:05:33 PM
Ryan Reynolds and Betty White....how can it miss?

Ain't THAT the truth!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:05:35 PM
The number was okay, unless you consider the talent involved......the possibilities were unlimited.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 07:05:35 PM
Oy
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 07:05:43 PM
Thankfully, they trimmed that number. (from what I understand) ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:06:39 PM
As long as it's not Burt Reynolds and Milky White.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:07:17 PM
Note to Presenters: DON'T laugh when you read the winner's name.  Show some respect!

I agree... Totally tacky
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:07:36 PM
I find I am enjoying the ceremony more with the HHW commentary turned on.

The commentary is entertaining.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 07:08:15 PM
HA!

Jimmy Fallon is "Twittering"

@jimmyfallon Best Tony's ever!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 07:09:04 PM
Ryan Reynolds is beyond beautiful.

Absolutely! 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:09:58 PM
Josh got a nice pompadour going on thar!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 07:10:11 PM
Well, at least Hugh Jackman already knew "One Night Only".
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:10:22 PM
HA!

Jimmy Fallon is "Twittering"

@jimmyfallon Best Tony's ever!!!

LOL
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:11:36 PM
Christopher Walken looks sort of creepy.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 07:11:37 PM
And another HA!! courtesy of Twitter:

For the supporting actor, instead of a coven, it's more like a circle jerk.


*Can we say "circle jerk" here on HHW?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:11:38 PM
"Seymour Phillip Hoffman"--spoo!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:12:12 PM
Christopher Walken looks sort of creepy.

Christpher Walken always looks sort of creepy
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:12:28 PM
Beautiful copper colored curtain back there....at least on my screen.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:12:49 PM
And another HA!! courtesy of Twitter:

For the supporting actor, instead of a coven, it's more like a circle jerk.


*Can we say "circle jerk" here on HHW?

LOL
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:12:52 PM
Well, no surprise here.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:12:55 PM
No surprise there
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:12:59 PM
Interesting.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 07:13:01 PM
And why didn't they include something from "Hello, Dolly" in that montage with "WALL-E"?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:13:11 PM
That was predictable.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:13:24 PM
The number was too busy, but there was talent on that stage.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:13:49 PM
Yep, the surest winner of the evening.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 07:13:56 PM
And why didn't they include something from "Hello, Dolly" in that montage with "WALL-E"?

It would've been too much money.

;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 07:14:01 PM
Christopher Walken looks sort of creepy.

Christpher Walken always looks sort of creepy


Talks that way, too...LOL
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:14:33 PM
I lost my wireless internet signal, and then it came right back. Argh!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:14:38 PM
Ohhhhhhhh...........I am slow.  I bet Sophia Loren will be one of the Best Actresses behind the door when that award comes up......
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:15:31 PM
I lost my wireless internet signal, and then it came right back. Argh!

I lost my signal too....and then it was back.  Must be a conspiracy.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:15:56 PM
Is it Oklahoma?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:15:57 PM
Why is the orchestra playing The Big Country?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 07:16:06 PM
Ohhhhhhhh...........I am slow.  I bet Sophia Loren will be one of the Best Actresses behind the door when that award comes up......

BINGO!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:16:22 PM
Javier Bardem who won last year was NOPT here this year to present. This hasn't happened in quite a long time.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 07:16:45 PM
Nice speech from Heath's family.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:17:14 PM
MAN ON WIRE---I hope...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:17:23 PM
We're getting close to two hours.  Are there any awards left to five?  I'm looking forward to the Jerry award.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ann on February 22, 2009, 07:17:32 PM
Nice speech from Heath's family.

I agree.  Classy, all of them. 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:18:02 PM
I want to see Trouble The Water.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:18:18 PM
That was nice.  Leave it to the Documentarians to do a good montage
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: MBarnum on February 22, 2009, 07:18:24 PM
Bosco threw up so I missed most of the musical number.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:18:49 PM
Welcome nine GUESTS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:18:56 PM
Bill Mahr who didn't get nominated for his film.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:19:14 PM
I don't know that we'll achieve 2000 posts - I think last year we were doing a page every five minutes :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:19:37 PM
Thank you, Bill Maher.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:19:42 PM
But we have achieved even at this point, our seventh highest posting day.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:19:44 PM
A documentary about documentaries.

Applause for you DR EDISAURUS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Dan (the Man) on February 22, 2009, 07:19:53 PM
Worst Oscars ever.  That's all I have to say.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 07:19:55 PM
I think all of us should go out and buy a suit like Bill's.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 07:19:58 PM
Bosco threw up so I missed most of the musical number.

Well, he would have thrown up had he seen the musical number.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ann on February 22, 2009, 07:19:58 PM
Dear god those are some scary teeth
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:20:09 PM
Bosco threw up so I missed most of the musical number.

La mem chose.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:20:31 PM
Yay for Edi's choice!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 07:20:31 PM
Worst Oscars ever.  That's all I have to say.

It doesn't come anywhere near being as bad as the Letterman-hosted Oscarcast, IMO.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:20:37 PM
YEAH!!! I just watched that this afternoon it was great
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:20:38 PM
Allriiiight!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ann on February 22, 2009, 07:20:39 PM
Bosco threw up so I missed most of the musical number.

Well, he would have thrown up had he seen the musical number.

I'll risk the wrath and say I don't think it was that bad.  It could have been much worse. 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:20:41 PM
Man On Wire.  I really have to see this film.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:20:59 PM
Worst Oscars ever.  That's all I have to say.

It doesn't come anywhere near being as bad as the Letterman-hosted Oscarcast, IMO.

I agree completely.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:21:27 PM
congrats edi
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:21:34 PM
Bosco threw up so I missed most of the musical number.

Everyone's a critic.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:21:55 PM
The French guy was the best thing on the show.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:22:01 PM
Just saw the speech on livestreaming from oscars.com

That was a nice speech by Ledger's family
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 07:22:10 PM
Nice call, DR Edi!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:22:21 PM
Christopher Walken looks sort of creepy.

Christpher Walken always looks sort of creepy


Talks that way, too...LOL

not a fan of his either
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:22:28 PM
I don't think it's the worst Oscar show, but it's right up there, for me.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:22:56 PM
This is the award we were one film away from being nominated for with THE INTERNATIONALE. Had we been nominated, I would have been there when Randy Newman finally won an Oscar.

But I'm not bitter...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:23:18 PM
I'm quite enjoying it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:23:23 PM
Ledger died way too young
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:23:32 PM
But we say it every year - last year everyone said it was "okay" - but it was a ratings disappointment and it was a bore.  This show at least has some really bad moments worth talking about.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:23:34 PM
Man On Wire.  I really have to see this film.

If you have Netflix it's a watch instantly film
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:23:40 PM
Man On Wire.  I really have to see this film.

I loved it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:24:04 PM
I was not terribly impressed with the gold leotards
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:24:23 PM
Jerry Lewis is coming up.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:24:23 PM
The French guy was the best thing on the show.

He's the one who walked the wire between the twin towers
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:24:40 PM
and Whoopi's dress
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 07:24:59 PM
Bosco threw up so I missed most of the musical number.

~~~Vibes for Bosco!!~~~
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 07:25:09 PM
As for this year's Oscar ceremony being "young and hip", and wanting to draw in a larger audience, and a younger audience..

Then why did they keep the presenters and performers a secret before tonight?!?!?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:25:18 PM
The French guy was the best thing on the show.

He's the one who walked the wire between the twin towers

I have seen excerpts of it in a few news stories. A rather remarkable feat
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:25:30 PM
DR EDISAURUS when you win you have to balance the Oscar on your chin!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:25:32 PM
Worst Oscars ever.  That's all I have to say.

It doesn't come anywhere near being as bad as the Letterman-hosted Oscarcast, IMO.

I agree.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:25:44 PM
Let's see what I've eaten today - a small container of Chinese chicken salad.  A small container of lobster salad.  A VERY tiny amount of potato salad (someone had come in and bought ALL the righteous red potato salad about fifteen minutes before I got there - there was about two ounces left.  One piece of rye bread.  Triple chocolate mousse.  I guess that's all okay.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:25:51 PM
Vibes for dog Bosco...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:26:00 PM
They're trying something different. Some of it has worked. Some hasn't. But I admire the effort. They could have done the same old show.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:26:07 PM
As for this year's Oscar ceremony being "young and hip", and wanting to draw in a larger audience, and a younger audience..

Then why did they keep the presenters and performers a secret before tonight?!?!?

So the rest of us would still watch.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:26:23 PM
Worst Oscars ever.  That's all I have to say.

It doesn't come anywhere near being as bad as the Letterman-hosted Oscarcast, IMO.

I agree.

That broadcast was strange... to say the least
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:26:33 PM
Where is ELMORE?  Wasn't he with us last year?  Did he say he wouldn't be here?  He is going to be bitch-slapped from here to eternity and hell and back and so is Ben.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:26:43 PM
You do have a point MattH
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:27:02 PM
I'm not talking about what I've eaten today.  Too much, but I am feeling much better and can always go back on my diet tomorrow
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:27:08 PM
DerBrucer and SWW are not here either...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:27:33 PM
But they could do it in an hour and half and we could see everyone - and get to bed earlier.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:27:36 PM
I am feeling a bit hungry right now...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:27:46 PM
I hate to say it but I think that may have been my only shot. If a damned film about dolphins with music by Sting hadn't been in the competition...

But, I'm not bitter...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: MBarnum on February 22, 2009, 07:27:58 PM
Jimmy Kimmel commercial was funny...and did anyone notice Matt Battaglia in one of the earlier commercials?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 07:28:12 PM
Did I miss anything?  Wasn't that a great great tribute to Broadway musicals?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:28:20 PM
***FEEL BETTER VIBES***
FOR DD BOSCO!!!!


And that DC Freddy doesn't eat it all up.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 07:28:23 PM
JOAQUIN IN MEMPHIS - my new bit about Joaquin's music career
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:28:37 PM
I am surprised that Ben was not here tonight.....

TCB and Tomovoz are not present either, unless they come later
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:28:42 PM
Did I miss anything?  Wasn't that a great great tribute to Broadway musicals?

You must have read about it online
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:28:58 PM
The music under these montages is headache-making.    :(
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:29:19 PM
I hate to say it but I think that may have been my only shot. If a damned film about dolphins with music by Sting hadn't been in the competition...

But, I'm not bitter...

U still get an oscar in my book...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:29:27 PM
The music under these montages is headache-making.    :(

Turn down the volume
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:30:06 PM
Edi, in 10 more posts you will be at 10,000
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 07:30:15 PM
This Oscarcast is quite schizophrenic.  IMHO.  Looks fabulous, however, in glorious Hi-Def.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 07:31:00 PM
The music under these montages is headache-making.    :(

That's because a lot of filmmaking today is headache inducing.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 07:31:27 PM
Edi, in 10 more posts you will be at 10,000

BK hit 46,000 Posts!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:31:48 PM
I'm not talking about what I've eaten today.  Too much, but I am feeling much better and can always go back on my diet tomorrow

I had a very fattening breakfast with my little French boy.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:32:18 PM
Will Smith "asked" to do this part of the awards?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:32:23 PM
A lot of winners.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:33:08 PM
This Oscarcast is quite schizophrenic.  IMHO.  Looks fabulous, however, in glorious Hi-Def.

It sure does!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 07:33:39 PM
And Jose rolled over 38,000! ;D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:33:42 PM
CONGRATULATIONS to bk on his new milestone!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:33:43 PM
Sound editing! Go, Richard!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 07:33:50 PM
This Oscarcast is quite schizophrenic.  IMHO.  Looks fabulous, however, in glorious Hi-Def.

It sure does!

I can't remember an Oscarcast looking this fabulous!  Of course having Mr. Jackman as host. . . .
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:33:54 PM
Fingers crossed....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:34:00 PM
The music under these montages is headache-making.    :(

Turn down the volume

What?  I can't hear you.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:34:24 PM
CONGRATULATIONS to DR JoseSPiano on HIS new milestone!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:34:26 PM
OMG!!!!!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:34:28 PM
Very nice!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:34:32 PM
That's certainly a well deserved award.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:34:35 PM
Congrats bk on your new plateau!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 07:34:44 PM
This Oscarcast is quite schizophrenic.  IMHO.  Looks fabulous, however, in glorious Hi-Def.

It sure does!

I can't remember an Oscarcast looking this fabulous!

Also remember that the "switch to digital TV" was supposed to have taken place by this time.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:34:55 PM
Is Music coming up?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:35:05 PM
Nice speech.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 07:35:10 PM
Everybody ought to have a plateau.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:35:23 PM
Congrats to Jose on his new plateau!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:35:35 PM
I visited Richard last time I was in LA.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:35:40 PM
Ina Garten says to TURN UP the volume!      ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:35:42 PM
Plateau for DR JOSE as well.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:35:45 PM
No complaints on these awards.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jeanne on February 22, 2009, 07:35:48 PM
I've been trying to watch, read posts, watch, read. Not easy!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 07:35:55 PM
Thank you.  Thank you, very much.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:35:59 PM
This Oscarcast is quite schizophrenic.  IMHO.  Looks fabulous, however, in glorious Hi-Def.

It sure does!

I can't remember an Oscarcast looking this fabulous!

Also remember that the "switch to digital TV" was supposed to have taken place by this time.

ND is already digital....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:36:00 PM
Will Smith is the #1 box-office star. Prettyamazing.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:36:17 PM
I visited Richard last time I was in LA.

Next time have your picture taken with his Oscar.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:36:21 PM
I am thrilled!! This is his second Oscar; he also won for Master and Commander.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 07:36:41 PM
Ina Garten says to TURN UP the volume!      ;)

I baked HER carrot cake today.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jeanne on February 22, 2009, 07:36:43 PM
Ditto to many of tonight's posts.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 07:36:44 PM
All right, Bruce....who will win the two music Oscars?

Slumdog and .... ?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:36:54 PM
Congrats to Richard King...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:36:54 PM
Will Smith is the #1 box-office star. Prettyamazing.

Unbelievable.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:36:58 PM
I had my picture taken with Johnny Mercer's oscar.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:37:06 PM
Page 40 dance!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 07:37:15 PM
Go, SLUMDOG, go!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:37:20 PM
That amazes me that Will Smith had to ask for a part in the program
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:37:21 PM
That wasn't unexpected either.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:37:21 PM
Slumdog and Slumdog, I think.  Song and score.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 07:37:31 PM
So who was the red-carpet interviewer everyone was unhappy with?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:37:31 PM
This Oscarcast is quite schizophrenic.  IMHO.  Looks fabulous, however, in glorious Hi-Def.

It sure does!

I can't remember an Oscarcast looking this fabulous!

Also remember that the "switch to digital TV" was supposed to have taken place by this time.

It has happened here and in some other places
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 07:37:57 PM
I had my picture taken with Johnny Mercer's oscar.

Did Mr. Mercer only win ONE Oscar?!?!?!?!?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:38:08 PM
I agree bk on your music guess..
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 07:38:22 PM
Slumdog and Slumdog, I think.  Song and score.

I completely agree.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:38:23 PM
Cilla, did all the stations in your area go digital
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 07:38:47 PM
I had my picture taken with Johnny Mercer's oscar.

Not quite the same thing, but I got to touch Diane Schurr's Grammy!

;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:38:53 PM
one station is still maintaining some analog until June but they are primarily digital
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:38:59 PM
Slumdog and Slumdog, I think.  Song and score.

And Best Picture, DIrector, and FIlm Editing, too.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:39:20 PM
Cilla, did all the stations in your area go digital

Yes, all of them did and there were no problems or complaints that I've heard of
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 07:39:27 PM
So who was the red-carpet interviewer everyone was unhappy with?

I didn't pay attention to the pre-show stuff.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 07:39:28 PM
I am thinking of DR Edisaurus right now. . .
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:39:29 PM
I'm going to hit my millstone during the editing award.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:39:35 PM
I don't like Will Smith - but he is doing a very nice job with this part of the show.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:39:42 PM
I had my picture taken with Johnny Mercer's oscar.

Did Mr. Mercer only win ONE Oscar?!?!?!?!?

Oh, no, he won more than that.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:39:45 PM
Right...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 07:40:01 PM
I had my picture taken with Johnny Mercer's oscar.

Not quite the same thing, but I got to touch Diane Schurr's Grammy!

;)

I touched Angela Lansbury's Tony.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:40:07 PM
now! Go, SLumdog!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:40:20 PM
Cilla, did all the stations in your area go digital

Yes, all of them did and there were no problems or complaints that I've heard of

No complaints here....

Soem student groups have gone around and helped people get ready and did it as a public service project
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:40:23 PM
Slumdog it is.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:40:31 PM
Yeah! That deserved it!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:40:35 PM
Seewhat I mean?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:40:42 PM
Wooo hoooooooo..

We need to see said picture, DR EDISAURUS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:40:49 PM
Congrats to Edi on her new plateau!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:40:50 PM
I got to touch Diane Schurr's Grammy!

Is THAT what they're calling it these days?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 07:40:58 PM
Slumdog it is.

And SLUMDOG it will be.  So let it be written; so let it be done.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:41:00 PM
Page 41 dance!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:41:10 PM
I had my picture taken with Johnny Mercer's oscar.

Did Mr. Mercer only win ONE Oscar?!?!?!?!?

4!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:41:18 PM
I figured it would be
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:41:27 PM
Congratulations on your milestone DR EDISAURUS....you are now five digits.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: MBarnum on February 22, 2009, 07:41:43 PM
Will Smith is a much more natural presenter then most.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:41:51 PM
I had my picture taken with Johnny Mercer's oscar.

Did Mr. Mercer only win ONE Oscar?!?!?!?!?

4!

And not ONE rap song among them.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:42:19 PM
Congrats to Edi
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 07:42:25 PM
Congrats on your Oscar-night, during-the-editing-award milestone, DR Edi!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:42:29 PM
Will Smith is a much more natural presenter then most.

Yes.  And he looks better......than he did a few months ago....hmmmmmmmmmm......
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:42:32 PM
Congrats to BK
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:42:38 PM
CONGRATULATIONS to DR Edisaurus on her new milestone!   :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:42:52 PM
Will Smith is a much more natural presenter then most.

He clicks better with the audience than some do
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:43:16 PM
I visited Richard last time I was in LA.

Next time have your picture taken with his Oscar.

Wish I'd thought of that, but he didn't have it in his editing room anyway...

I am so happy for him. He didn't win the BAFTA, so I thought SLUMDOG would win the Oscar, too.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:43:29 PM
Congrats Jose
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 07:43:29 PM
I had my picture taken with Johnny Mercer's oscar.

Did Mr. Mercer only win ONE Oscar?!?!?!?!?

4!

And not ONE rap song among them.

Well, it is hard to be a pimp in Savannah.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:43:35 PM
I have 180 until I reach my new plateau
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 07:43:42 PM
So, are we in the Top Five yet?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:43:51 PM
I had my picture taken with Johnny Mercer's oscar.

Did Mr. Mercer only win ONE Oscar?!?!?!?!?

4!

And not ONE rap song among them.

But that was back when the Best Songs were REAL songs.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:43:53 PM
I am fading....which will be good news to some.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:43:56 PM
Congratulations on your milestone DR EDISAURUS....you are now five digits.

I already had 5 happy little digits!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: MBarnum on February 22, 2009, 07:44:03 PM
Everytime I watch the Oscars I wish that I had followed my dream to work in Hollywood.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:44:34 PM
I have 180 until I reach my new plateau

Keep pushing.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: MBarnum on February 22, 2009, 07:44:36 PM
Fortunately, I followed my dream to visit Hollywood!

Almost as good...but doesn't pay as well.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:44:42 PM
More commercials.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 07:44:53 PM
All the folks on HHW are MY Huckleberry friends. . . :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:45:00 PM
Congratulations on your milestone DR EDISAURUS....you are now five digits.

I already had 5 happy little digits!

U so funnee.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:45:23 PM
Congrats to bk and Jose on their millstones!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 07:45:28 PM
Congrats to Edi!  Here's the proof:

(http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff302/HHWgroup/Edis10000th.png)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:45:33 PM
Everytime I watch the Oscars I wish that I had followed my dream to work in Hollywood.

You ain't dead yet.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:45:51 PM
I think they average 25 minutes of commercials for each hour
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:46:14 PM
I see George has enshrined Edi's accomplishment!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:46:32 PM
Today is number 5 closing in on number 4
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:46:35 PM
Congrats to Edi!  Here's the proof:

(http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff302/HHWgroup/Edis10000th.png)

Thanks, George--a.k.a. official HHW web photographer!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:46:47 PM
Posting, Posting, Posting.....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:47:05 PM
Jean Hershult.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 07:47:07 PM
Congrats to Edi!  Here's the proof:

(http://i238.photobucket.com/albums/ff302/HHWgroup/Edis10000th.png)

Thanks, George--a.k.a. official HHW web photographer!

My pleasure!  It's all in the timing. ;D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:47:08 PM
I have noted that George is pretty handy at that sort of thing
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 07:47:38 PM
This Oscarcast is quite schizophrenic.  IMHO.  Looks fabulous, however, in glorious Hi-Def.

It sure does!

I can't remember an Oscarcast looking this fabulous!

Also remember that the "switch to digital TV" was supposed to have taken place by this time.

It has happened here and in some other places

Yep...my mom's cable company when digital/HD.   She is astonished at how beautiful it all looks!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:48:34 PM
Which song from Slumdog will win?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 07:48:55 PM
WHOA!

DR Dan (the Man) - Did you just see this:

@BreakingNewsOn UPDATE -- AP: The Philadelphia Inquirer and Philadelphia News have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:49:20 PM
Jerry Lewis.  Laaaayyy-deeeee...

That was nice. My godson was on the telethon one year.  I'm verklempt. Long overdue.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:49:23 PM
HD programs on the one tv look fantastic... however they do not look as crisp on my older tv with the converter box.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 07:49:45 PM
I've touched Jose Eber's ponytail.  Is that the same thing as touching someone's grammy?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:49:47 PM
WHOA!

DR Dan (the Man) - Did you just see this:

@BreakingNewsOn UPDATE -- AP: The Philadelphia Inquirer and Philadelphia News have filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy.

That is surprising
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:49:55 PM
Which song from Slumdog will win?

My guess was "Jai Ho"
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:49:55 PM
Yay for Jerry - the highlight of the show.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:50:29 PM
Wonder if he got the tuxedo from Sy Devore?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:50:46 PM
StarTribune in Minneapolis already filed to reorganize
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:51:04 PM
Which song from Slumdog will win?

My guess was "Jai Ho"

Mine also
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:51:21 PM
So great.....love Jerry....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:51:21 PM
He certainly looks better than I have seen him in years.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:51:32 PM
He certainly looks better than I have seen him in years.

Very very true!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:51:34 PM
I have touched and olympic gold medal...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:52:03 PM
I would like one of those shiny chandeliers for my bathroom.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:52:18 PM
I am distressed at how Sophia Loren looks.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:52:20 PM
he was looking better not too long ago when I saw a picture of him on the telly
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:52:37 PM
I would like one of those shiny chandeliers for my bathroom.

Watch EBAY.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:52:38 PM
We're number four now.  About 250 to go to get to number three
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:52:49 PM
Yay for Jerry - the highlight of the show.

Yes, that was great. Jerry looks good, too!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:53:09 PM
and people may be stripping houses and selling all sorts of stuff
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:53:23 PM
Well, we have the two music awards (including the best song medley) and then the big four, and that will be it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:53:28 PM
Posting, posting, posting
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:53:54 PM
Someone tried selling their lunch one day on ebay
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:54:13 PM
I like the idea of a fish named Dorothy
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:55:00 PM
I thought the fish was called Wanda.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:55:10 PM
Who's the cute guy in The Castle?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:55:25 PM
More Moon River!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:55:37 PM
Cha-ching!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:55:47 PM
Here comes music.  Wonder what Peter G will say if he wins?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:56:13 PM
Someone tried selling their lunch one day on ebay

Before or after it had been digested?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:57:02 PM
That's a nice way to do the scores...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 07:57:11 PM
DR Edi, that is Nathan Fillion.  Much discussed here.   :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:57:32 PM
I thought the fish was called Wanda.

It's a Windows commercial where the little girl takes a photo of her fish named Dorothy and emails it to her parents
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:57:46 PM
But I wish they would list the composers along with the movies...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 07:57:55 PM
Who's the cute guy in The Castle?

Nathan Fillion, formerly of "Firefly," "Serenity" and "Desperate Housewives."
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:57:58 PM
I thought the fish was Stanley
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 07:58:17 PM
That would be nice Edi
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:58:24 PM
DR Edi, that is Nathan Fillion.  Much discussed here.   :)

I guess I don't watch enough TV.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 07:58:30 PM
So... Is this being played live, or being playing "live to tape"?  -à la the Inauguration quartet.

Regardless - I liked it.  But too short.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 07:58:33 PM
Pretty colors.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 07:58:52 PM
I like that dress
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 07:58:56 PM
I like Alicia's dress.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:59:19 PM
Who's the cute guy in The Castle?

Nathan Fillion, formerly of "Firefly," "Serenity" and "Desperate Housewives."

That's why---I've never seen any of those shows.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 07:59:24 PM
No surprises.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 07:59:31 PM
HE IS NOT GERMAN!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 07:59:47 PM
Even though I like Thomas Newman, YAY for SLUMDOG!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 08:00:02 PM
I like Alicia's dress.

I do, too - this is a good year for pink.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:00:16 PM
Nathan FIllion is a talented, charismatic actor.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:00:21 PM
I'm happy for Slumdog. 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:00:59 PM
Time to be transported by song...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:01:03 PM
Alicia has a beautiful dress to be sure....but she got crazy eyes!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:01:26 PM
Hope Mikey is watching...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:01:39 PM
I hope MBarnum is watching this
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:02:00 PM
Great minds think alike DR Edi
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 08:02:08 PM
All the singers tonight sound like they're singing to pre-recorded tracks of themselves.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:02:46 PM
what's the pitch?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 08:03:11 PM
Love John Legend!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 08:03:13 PM
Alicia Keys grew up in our building.    Her mom lived here until about a year or two ago.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:03:18 PM
Are you really sure that he's pre recorded?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:03:34 PM
Great minds think alike DR Edi

LOL!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:03:48 PM
I really don't like the Wall-E song - it was the only thing I didn't like in that film.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:04:12 PM
But it could take it, although I'm hoping Slumdog does.  With Jai Ho.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:04:16 PM
All the singers tonight sound like they're singing to pre-recorded tracks of themselves.

I think it's the reverb in the hall. ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 08:04:29 PM
So seriously:

Who was the red-carpet interviewer everyone says made such a fool of himself?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:04:38 PM
I think the camerawork and cutting on these numbers is nicely done.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:04:47 PM
There were a couple of songs in HIGH SCHOOL MUSICAL 3 that Iliked better than any of those nominated songs.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:04:55 PM
Why can't they get a choreographer who knows how to stage a number and give it a POINT?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 08:05:04 PM
Is Jai Ho related to Tally Ho?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:05:38 PM
I guess we're not getting anywhere near 2000 posts.  But I do think we might get close to being fifth or sixth highest.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:05:40 PM
Now, will they pronounce A.R. Rahman's last name properly this time.  ???
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 08:05:45 PM
what's the pitch?

The stuff the prince spread on the stairs to catch Cinderella.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 08:05:50 PM
It's Hard Out Here for a Pimp would do well in a medley with Jai Ho.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:06:14 PM
I guess we're not getting anywhere near 2000 posts.  But I do think we might get close to being fifth or sixth highest.

We're already fourth highest....didn't I already say that?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:06:21 PM
But it could take it, although I'm hoping Slumdog does.  With Jai Ho.

Jai Ho, Jai Ho
It's to the slums we go!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 08:06:22 PM
So, since the movie musical is back and "Slumdog Millionaire" is so popular, will there be a movie version of A. R. Rahman's "Bombay Dreams"??

;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:06:23 PM
Jai Ho.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:06:38 PM
Good choice!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:06:41 PM
It's pretty much a sweep for this film - there is no stopping it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:06:43 PM
Well, I've gotten another one right.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:06:49 PM
So seriously:

Who was the red-carpet interviewer everyone says made such a fool of himself?

I dunno. Since I didn't watch the red carpet coverage.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:06:52 PM
Those routines were really better than the ones in the movie.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:07:34 PM
When it wins the last two (Picture, Director), how many will that make in all? 8 or 9?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 08:07:51 PM
So, since the movie musical is back and "Slumdog Millionaire" is so popular, will there be a movie version of A. R. Rahman's "Bombay Dreams"??

;)

Or maybe a revival?  It could happen. ;D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:08:16 PM
We'd have to have another thirty pages of posts to beat last year.  Hmmm.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: MBarnum on February 22, 2009, 08:08:20 PM
My heart is so warm seeing the appreciation for Bollywoodishness!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:08:22 PM
Glad that Jai Ho won...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 08:08:38 PM
We'd have to have another thirty pages of posts to beat last year.  Hmmm.

PPPPUUUUSSSSHHHH!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:08:41 PM
It's pretty much a sweep for this film - there is no stopping it.

It won't win Best Actress...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:08:45 PM
But that's what happens when elmore and Ben and others just stay away for our most festive evening.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:08:51 PM
Ok, here's the list as of the moment I copied it

THE ANNUAL OSCAR BASH  2062
YOUNGER THAN SPRINGTIME  1929
THE CROWING OF THE COCK  1503
ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR  1325
THE ANNUAL TONY AWARDS DO  1238
AND THE WINNER IS...  1220
AND THE OSCAR GOES TO...  1183
LOLLYGAGGING  1151
THE IMPORTANCE OF BEING OSCAR  915
GOING AND DOING  906
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:08:53 PM
I also like Alicia Keys
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:08:55 PM
I just counted. It will have won 8. Same as AMADEUS, MY FAIR LADY, CABARET.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 08:08:59 PM
I hear Liza is back, too.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:09:12 PM
And now a word from our sponsor....Merlin the Magic Cat.  ;D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:09:30 PM
PUSH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:09:57 PM
I am so glad that our sponsor could drop in personally
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:10:50 PM
Foreign Language Film.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:10:51 PM
He truly is a beautiful cat
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:11:13 PM
I chose THE CLASS here
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:11:25 PM
Thanks DR DAKOTA CELT....I took that photo at work today.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:11:28 PM
Yes, I just looked and this is now our fourth highest posting day - pretty good, and it's still early here on the West Coast.  It will definitely be a three-hour show by the time they're done, probably over that.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 08:11:50 PM
Merlin the Magic Cat.

I'm in love...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:11:54 PM
We must get to fifty pages.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:12:10 PM
I had the feeling the Japanese film was going to win.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:12:11 PM
Hmm I didn't expect that.  DR Jose, have you seen that one?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:12:19 PM
I don't think that one was expected.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:12:22 PM
Don't know why, really.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:12:25 PM
Wonder who the FIVE actresses from the past will be including last year's winner?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:12:44 PM
I like her necklace
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:12:45 PM
Hmm I didn't expect that.  DR Jose, have you seen that one?

Yes, I saw it.

WHOA!!!

That was a surprise.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 08:13:07 PM
And now a word from our sponsor....Merlin the Magic Cat.  ;D

She looks like my cat, Ebonie. :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 08:13:10 PM
I thought our sponsor was Ethel Merman singing the praises of Vel, which makes your hands feel like roses

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2UVVxe04pI
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:13:11 PM
The small necklace not the beads
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:13:23 PM
Yes, I just looked and this is now our fourth highest posting day - pretty good, and it's still early here on the West Coast.  It will definitely be a three-hour show by the time they're done, probably over that.

Oh, sure. They have the four big prizes and will do those elongated tributes to the nominees.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:13:24 PM
Are the three biggies next?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:13:36 PM
Oh, and director, too.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 08:13:43 PM
Miss Dixie Bell is happy.  She hears "Jai Ho" several times a day.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:13:50 PM
I have some cucumber roll here, but I'm still full.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:13:54 PM
indeed....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:14:25 PM
I chose THE CLASS here

I saw "The Class"... And was hoping that "Un Conte de Noel" would have been the French nominee.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:14:25 PM
So, maybe it will be over at eight-thirty.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 08:14:38 PM
HD programs on the one tv look fantastic... however they do not look as crisp on my older tv with the converter box.

The converter box makes it possible to "see" the TV signal...it does not convert to HD or otherwise give your analog TV "HD properties".
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:14:44 PM
Wonder who the FIVE actresses from the past will be including last year's winner?

Well, we know Sophia Loren. COuld it be Liza? Jane Fonda? Jessica Lange? Sally Field?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:14:51 PM
cucumber roll sounds good...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 08:15:11 PM
I may just eat another small piece of Ina Garten's Carrot Pineapple Cake. . . just a little one, with a glass of cold, cold milk.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:15:19 PM
But, it's funny - no matter what one thinks of the new producers of the show, no matter who produces it, the last ninety minutes never change - it just begins to stagnate.  Oh, and we haven't had the death montage yet, either.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: MBarnum on February 22, 2009, 08:15:19 PM
If that cute Japanese guy on stage is in that Japanese movie, then I am there!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:15:26 PM
Ihave not seen the Japanese film yet
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:15:27 PM
I want some Vel!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:15:47 PM
In Memorium.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:15:48 PM
HD programs on the one tv look fantastic... however they do not look as crisp on my older tv with the converter box.

The converter box makes it possible to "see" the TV signal...it does not convert to HD or otherwise give your analog TV "HD properties".

You need to have the HD package from your cable company
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:15:49 PM
I'll have to check out that Japanese movie - here comes the death montage.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 08:15:52 PM
Here comes the Queen.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:15:53 PM
Oh......
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:15:54 PM
HD programs on the one tv look fantastic... however they do not look as crisp on my older tv with the converter box.

The converter box makes it possible to "see" the TV signal...it does not convert to HD or otherwise give your analog TV "HD properties".

True but I do get CC capability on the old beast adn it is something it has never had
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:16:21 PM
I like Helen Mirren
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:16:33 PM
Wonder who the FIVE actresses from the past will be including last year's winner?

Well, we know Sophia Loren. COuld it be Liza? Jane Fonda? Jessica Lange? Sally Field?

Well, Jane Fonda still had her matinee of 33 Variations here in NYC this afternoon, so... -At least I think she did.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 08:16:42 PM
I like Helen Mirren

Wrong Queen. . .
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:16:45 PM
The memoriam montage is always so varied in quality. I bet it will be good this year...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:16:48 PM
 A lot of remarkable people have died this past year
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 08:16:56 PM
Here's an in-between shirts gratuitous post.

I'm ironing the weekend's wash now.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:17:14 PM
I like Helen Mirren

Wrong Queen. . .

I thught it was her....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 08:17:40 PM
"I'll Be Seeing You"  is one of my favorite songs of all time -- top three, at least.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:18:01 PM
I wish they'd stop moving the camera around, it's making me dizzy
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 08:18:13 PM
"I'll Be Seeing You"  is one of my favorite songs of all time -- top three, at least.

It's up there with "Moon River" in my favorites, too.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:18:33 PM
I dont have cable and have to rely on antennas. I get rather good reception despite the building not having an antenna
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:18:40 PM
Why are they so far away from the screen on so many people?  Shame on them.  You couldn't even see it was Cyd Charisse.  And this crowd doesn't even know who half these people are.  Where was the applause for Robert Mulligan, Kon Ichikawa, David Watkin.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:18:59 PM
If you are getting dizzy, think of the camera operator
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:19:34 PM
Manny Farber is big, Ricardo Montalban you can't see.  Jules Dassin is Topkapi, not Never On Sunday or, heaven forbid, any of his classic noirs for Fox.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:19:34 PM
Why are they so far away from the screen on so many people?  Shame on them.  You couldn't even see it was Cyd Charisse.  And this crowd doesn't even know who half these people are.  Where was the applause for Robert Mulligan, Kon Ichikawa, David Watkin.

Well... They had to show off Queen Latifah's dress.  :-\
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ann on February 22, 2009, 08:19:42 PM
The camera work on this is awful.  You can't see half the names. 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:20:32 PM
The camera was WAY too busy during that tribute. I found that very distracting.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ann on February 22, 2009, 08:20:38 PM
Was Heath Ledger in that montage?  Did I miss it?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:20:42 PM
Very nice.  Ten out of ten.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:20:47 PM
Nice---although it was hard to read the ones that were far off camera.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:20:55 PM
That was just not good.  All names should have been readable and easy to see.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:21:02 PM
Umm.... Heath Ledger? Eartha Kitt?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:21:03 PM
Didn't he die at the end of 2007?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: MBarnum on February 22, 2009, 08:21:05 PM
I love Queen Latifa.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:21:57 PM
Didn't he die at the end of 2007?


It was January 22, 2008, but it was before the last Oscar show. They showed him last year.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:21:58 PM
Four more awards in fifteen minutes.  It FEELS like I've been watching for four hours, though.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:22:08 PM
Heath was in last year's montage.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:22:20 PM
There's a NEW Mac Book pro???
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:22:32 PM
Didn't see Heath....passed away in January 2008....maybe he was in last year's montage.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:22:35 PM
Four more awards in fifteen minutes.  It FEELS like I've been watching for four hours, though.

Umm... No.  43 minutes.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:22:57 PM
What does this new Mac Book do that others don't - other than the eight-hour battery, which is, of course, appealing.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ann on February 22, 2009, 08:23:00 PM
Oh yeah, I forgot.  My mistake.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:23:42 PM
The show was in a three and a half hour time slot?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:23:53 PM
What's with the nude straps on the dress Reese?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:23:59 PM
This is bad, bad writing.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ann on February 22, 2009, 08:24:11 PM
Reese looks like she'd rather not be reading the lines she has to read. 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:24:15 PM
Well... Maybe it was supposed to be 15 minutes left, but that's highly in doubt right now.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:24:37 PM
AND, AND, they are putting a LAUGH TRACK in - that just became totally obvious with Miss Witherspoon.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:24:39 PM
What's with the nude straps on the dress Reese?

Insurance.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 08:24:40 PM
I sincerely hope they never do the "In Memoriam" segment that way again.

Poor Cyd Charisse was nearly lost with that long shot of  Queen Latifah and the weaving camera -- meant to be moving with the music ? -- was headache-inducing.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:24:44 PM
When the winner seems so obvious, you want the introduction to go a lot faster.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:24:50 PM
Miss Boo things Merlin looks great!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:25:02 PM
I thought Ledger was in last year's also
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:26:10 PM
Not sure about the quality of the camera work here.... Vertigo....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:26:20 PM
Well, it's clear that Slumdog will win best picture.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:26:33 PM
No surprise there.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:26:59 PM
Merlin is such a handsome lad!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:27:02 PM
Well, it's clear that Slumdog will win best picture.

It was a foregone conclusion even before the show started.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:27:02 PM
okay choice.....some real competition in that category
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:27:38 PM
AND, AND, they are putting a LAUGH TRACK in - that just became totally obvious with Miss Witherspoon.

That's what I was thinking.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:27:47 PM
Well, I guess that means Stephen Daldry will win for Billy Elliot instead. ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:27:52 PM
Merlin is such a handsome lad!

Me ow.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:27:53 PM
Thanks to those who *didn't" help make the film?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:27:53 PM
To all of those who helped make this film and all of you who didn't...thank you
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:28:11 PM
Two minds...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:28:13 PM
Miss Boo things Merlin looks great!

Purrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:28:14 PM
I do have to say that Jai Ho is one of small handful of songs that have won an Oscar that I like
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: MBarnum on February 22, 2009, 08:28:19 PM
Dev Patel looksl like he is in total wonderment at being there!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:28:23 PM
LOL edi
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:28:29 PM
To all of those who helped make this film and all of you who didn't...thank you

LOL......
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:28:50 PM
I really don't want to hear Mickey Rourke when he wins.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:28:52 PM
Merlin is such a handsome lad!

He is a beautiful cat
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:29:06 PM
But, it's ordained, I suppose.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:29:09 PM
Well there are some people whose help you are glad NOT to have.....maybe that's what he meant....they left him alone.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:29:12 PM
WIll Best Actress be next?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:29:19 PM
I really don't want to hear Mickey Rourke when he wins.

shudders....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:29:51 PM
Merlin is such a handsome lad!

He is a beautiful cat

Me ow to you, too.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:29:58 PM
We'll definitely get to page fifty.  I'm right, the commercial breaks are MUCH shorter this year.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:30:07 PM
Looks like best actress is next
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:30:23 PM
Danny Boyle got the Oscar
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:31:01 PM
DR Dakota, are you watching on line?  You seem to be behind on the announcements.  Not a criticism, just curious
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 08:31:42 PM
Dev Patel looksl like he is in total wonderment at being there!

He's looked that way in every interview I've seen him give.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:31:44 PM
Mbarnum have you heard of GHAJINI?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:32:00 PM
I am so glad SHirley MacLaine finally won those years. ago.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:32:05 PM
Dev Patel looksl like he is in total wonderment at being there!

He's looked that way in every interview I've seen him give.

he is in a state of amazement
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:32:35 PM
such individuals....nice to see them all.....Shirley didn't practice
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:32:54 PM
DR Dakota, are you watching on line?  You seem to be behind on the announcements.  Not a criticism, just curious

they blocked the feed so I am checking CNN listing of the winner and they are slow
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:33:29 PM
Work that is
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:33:35 PM
We'll definitely get to page fifty.  I'm right, the commercial breaks are MUCH shorter this year.

Well... Considering some of the big name companies that bought commercial time this year... NOT!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:34:00 PM
DR Dakota, are you watching on line?  You seem to be behind on the announcements.  Not a criticism, just curious

they blocked the feed so I am checking CNN listing of the winner and they are slow

Ok, that makes sense, thanks for answering
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:34:02 PM
I am also looking at pictures some of the entertainment sites and on teh oscars site
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:34:38 PM
DR Dakota, are you watching on line?  You seem to be behind on the announcements.  Not a criticism, just curious

No prob. I did try to watch and after 5 minutes they blocked it

they blocked the feed so I am checking CNN listing of the winner and they are slow

Ok, that makes sense, thanks for answering
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:34:59 PM
I like the way they are paying tribute to each nominee
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:35:23 PM
DR Dakota, are you watching on line?  You seem to be behind on the announcements.  Not a criticism, just curious

No prob. I did try to watch and after 5 minutes they blocked it

they blocked the feed so I am checking CNN listing of the winner and they are slow

Ok, that makes sense, thanks for answering

Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:35:36 PM
Me, too. Very touching and personal.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:35:39 PM
I do hope Anne Hathaway does a musical some time. I liked her voice earlier tonight singing with Hugh.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:36:06 PM
Hopefully they announce the keywinners soon... I have to get a few work things done before midnight
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:37:14 PM
YES!!!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 08:37:16 PM
Kate!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:37:22 PM
No surprise there.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:37:52 PM
Well, I guess Clint isn't having a good night.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:37:52 PM
And seh does look beautiful tonight
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:37:53 PM
Kate it is.  I guess I should see the film now.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:37:55 PM
Kate is a good actress... I was hoping Amy would win....

Very strong field
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:38:05 PM
I do hope Anne Hathaway does a musical some time. I liked her voice earlier tonight singing with Hugh.

Well.. I liked her when she was in Carnival at Encores!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:38:14 PM
Page 50 dance
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:39:04 PM
I hope to eventually see Frozen River and Doubt
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:39:10 PM
Awwww...Kate's dad is so cute!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:39:22 PM
Yes, they'll go to nine o'clock if they do the same with the actors.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:39:30 PM
Good thing Dad can whistle
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 08:39:45 PM
I do hope Anne Hathaway does a musical some time. I liked her voice earlier tonight singing with Hugh.

Well.. I liked her when she was in Carnival at Encores!

I don't know if they're still there, but there were clips on YouTube of her singing "Opening Doors" with Eric McCormack and other Sondheim songs from a tribute.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:39:54 PM
I will also have to add THE READER to my list
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:39:56 PM
Kate is a good actress... I was hoping Amy would win....

Very strong field

Amy Adams was in the Best Supporting Actress category.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:40:29 PM
Kate, great speech!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:40:35 PM
A lovely speech. Very poised.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:41:05 PM
We're close now to becoming the third highest posting day - but four people have disappeared, so no help there.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:41:22 PM
Nice....and she looked so pretty.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:41:39 PM
It has been one of those days... I got mixed up...   :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:41:41 PM
I liked Yul Brenner - "I hope this is not a mistake"
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:42:17 PM
However the evening has been missing a few people also...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:42:47 PM
Awwww...Kate's dad is so cute!

-I could have been looking away from the TV at the time, but...

I thought that was her husband, Sam Mendes.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 08:42:49 PM
That was cute...Meryl has to just "suck it up." ;D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:42:59 PM
Another winner from last year missing: Daniel Day-Lewis.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DAW on February 22, 2009, 08:43:01 PM
Sorry, folks.  That's it for me.

Good night!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:43:36 PM
Awwww...Kate's dad is so cute!

-I could have been looking away from the TV at the time, but...

I thought that was her husband, Sam Mendes.

It was definitely Sam.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:43:37 PM
I do like this format of the 5 winning actors presenting the awards.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 08:44:08 PM
Yay, Kate!

I also loved watching Ann Hathaway's reaction to Shirley MacLaine's speech about her.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:44:18 PM
Awwww...Kate's dad is so cute!

-I could have been looking away from the TV at the time, but...

I thought that was her husband, Sam Mendes.

In the hat?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:44:38 PM
It is a neat way of "passing the torch" so to speak
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:44:58 PM
It has been one of those days... I got mixed up...   :)

No worries.

*Kate Winslet was submitted and won the Golden Globe in the Supporting Actress Category (as well as the Lead Actress GG).
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 08:45:11 PM
Another winner from last year missing: Daniel Day-Lewis.

That must be why they did it this way.  Two of last year's four winners missing.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:45:31 PM
Awwww...Kate's dad is so cute!

-I could have been looking away from the TV at the time, but...

I thought that was her husband, Sam Mendes.

In the hat?

Ah!  Gotcha!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:45:40 PM
Awwww...Kate's dad is so cute!

-I could have been looking away from the TV at the time, but...

I thought that was her husband, Sam Mendes.

She told her dad to whistle and then they showed a man with a hat
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:45:53 PM
Adrien Brody. Not one of my favorites.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:46:31 PM
I would love for Richard Jenkins to win, but I'm sure he won't...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:46:57 PM
So... Who will they bring out to read the Best Film nominees?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:47:47 PM
I like Adrian Brody...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:48:22 PM
OMG....this is fine!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:48:23 PM
Total upset and I'm glad he won.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:48:31 PM
I am SO glad Sean Penn won!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 08:48:34 PM
I would love for Richard Jenkins to win, but I'm sure he won't...

He didn't.  Sean did!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 08:48:34 PM
HOLY CRAP!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:48:38 PM
I liked MILK, good for Sean.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:48:48 PM
If only Josh had won supporting......
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:48:55 PM
I just knew he was going to win!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:49:09 PM
LOL....Sean......
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:49:44 PM
Total upset and I'm glad he won.

Not a total upset, imho.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:49:49 PM
Hooray for Sean!

Great movie!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:51:19 PM
We are closing in the #3 standing in posts
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:52:09 PM
What a speech!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 08:52:30 PM
Nice speech from Sean.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 08:52:38 PM
What a speech!

Definitely!!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 08:52:44 PM
Is Sean still with Robin Wright Penn?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:52:49 PM
The intro music is the worst I've ever heard.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:52:59 PM
It is almost 11 pm here
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:52:59 PM
What a speech!

Made me cry. Again.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 08:53:02 PM
Steven Spielberg!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 08:53:16 PM
Is Sean still with Robin Wright Penn?

Yes.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:53:37 PM
Is Sean still with Robin Wright Penn?

not sure... I thougth I had heard at one time they were separating...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:53:44 PM
Not many of the music choices have been appropriate.

The show has gotten better as it went along....and the sets got more elegant!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:54:11 PM
Almost midnight here.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:54:14 PM
WOnder what will win Best Picture?

;D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:54:23 PM
Sean Penn has really grown as an actor since I saw him in Fast Times at Ridgemont High
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:54:35 PM
Page 52 dance
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:54:36 PM
51 pages is nothing to sneeze at!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:54:46 PM
Told ya!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:54:58 PM
Only 20 or so pages to get to number one
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:56:33 PM
I have grown to like his other Oscar winning performance, Mystic River
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:56:48 PM
I like your avatar Jrand....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:57:14 PM
And the winner is: Slumdog Millionaire.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:57:31 PM
Amazing that Spielberg gets to give Best Picture. I guess he is the most powerful person in Hollywood.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:57:50 PM
I am not surprised... I was hoping it was either Slumdog or Milk
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:58:00 PM
Ooh, a timpani roll
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 08:58:06 PM
That is interesting...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:58:09 PM
WHAT AN UPSET!!!!!!


not.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:58:15 PM
Basically a total sweep for Slumdog.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 08:58:34 PM
I'm going to run back the DVR to see Sean's speech.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 08:58:50 PM
And the best picture is the only nominee we've actually seen!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 08:58:57 PM
I love the little kids and am so glad they got to be there
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 08:59:26 PM
No arguments with that choice.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 08:59:59 PM
Well, we've achieved our third highest posting day - interestingly, our second and fourth highest posting days had nothing to do with an awards show, which is pretty astonishing.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 09:00:05 PM
Amazing that Spielberg gets to give Best Picture. I guess he is the most powerful person in Hollywood.

Now that Betty Hutton has crossed over.....yes.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 09:00:12 PM
And yet, the evening is not over.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 09:00:20 PM
Well we made it to the third highest posting day.  That's pretty good
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 09:00:23 PM
But the show IS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 09:00:27 PM
Great par-tay at HHW..........

Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 09:00:44 PM
I want to see who arranged the music and who wrote the special material.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 09:00:52 PM
Oh, I guess BK already noticed that
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 09:01:03 PM
Well we made it to the third highest posting day.  That's pretty good

Cool!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:01:10 PM
WHAT?  A sneak peek of next year's movies?!?!?!?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 09:01:11 PM
I wouldn't want to have to catch up after missing today.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 09:01:38 PM
Almost midnight in EST......I wish we had seen more of Hugh....or he had been used more as a host than a prop.....but there you are.

Okay show.....some nice moments....and it did get better....but my guess is - a ratings disaster.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:02:01 PM
I love the little kids and am so glad they got to be there

I heard that they got to attend and they were flown in for the event. What an experience for them.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:02:12 PM
Page 53 dance
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 09:02:29 PM
That awful choreography was by Rob Ashford.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 09:02:56 PM
I wouldn't want to have to catch up after missing today.

One of the MAJOR reasons to stay with the party until the end of the show.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 09:02:57 PM
Fifty-three pages is nothing to sneeze at - and yet, I just sneezed.  Go know.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:03:15 PM
I wouldn't want to have to catch up after missing today.

OUCH!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:04:12 PM
No Tdale tonight?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 09:04:35 PM
That preview was fun
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jrand74 on February 22, 2009, 09:04:49 PM
Thank you and good night!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 09:05:16 PM
Basically a total sweep for Slumdog.

That made Richard's win even sweeter; he might have been the only contender to beat SLUMDOG!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 09:05:23 PM
This has been a fun evening
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:05:30 PM
Oh - I liked the previews.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: MBarnum on February 22, 2009, 09:05:32 PM
Mbarnum have you heard of GHAJINI?

Yes. It is a big hit film.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 09:05:59 PM
Speaking of Nathan Fillion...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:06:15 PM
That awful choreography was by Rob Ashford.

Ah, I thought I saw him in that "rehearsal video" on YouTube.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:07:32 PM
Mbarnum have you heard of GHAJINI?

Yes. It is a big hit film.

That is what I have heard. Have you seen it?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:07:41 PM
Good night Jrand
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 09:07:55 PM
I was waiting for Sean Penn to thank his wife...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:08:01 PM
It has been an entertaining evening
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ginny on February 22, 2009, 09:08:29 PM
Great Oscar par-tay, BK.  Thanks for hosting.

I liked the last hour or so best and am glad I stayed up for the whole show.  The previews were a nice touch.

'night!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:09:48 PM
It has been fun tonight... Great job hosting bk!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: MBarnum on February 22, 2009, 09:10:30 PM
That was fun!

Now I really must get out and see more of those films!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 09:11:21 PM
Well I was following Mark Bakalor mathamatical choices and he got 19 out 24 categories.

He missed Animated Short, Short Documentary, Foreign Language (Which is hard to gage because the favorite never seems to win). Sound Mixing and Best Actor (he went with Mickey Rourke) although Sean Penn was two points behind Rourke. So It was close.

Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Druxy on February 22, 2009, 09:12:07 PM
One surprise would have been nice.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Druxy on February 22, 2009, 09:12:49 PM
I was waiting for Sean Penn to thank his wife...

I noticed that, too.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 09:13:55 PM
I thought thanking her was the other last thing he was going to say, but forgot. He said one last thing...well two last things..but I thought he only said one.   

If this makes any sense, you are as tired as I am
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 09:14:57 PM
Talley

Slumdog Millionaire  8
Benjamin Button  3
Milk 2
Dark Knight 2
Duchess 1
Vicky Christina Barcelona 1
The Reader 1
Wall-E 1
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 09:15:26 PM
It was a lot of fun!  Thanks for the party, BK!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 09:15:30 PM
I think Danny Boyle voiced it best when he said that the show was stunning in the theater, but wasn't sure if the effect(s) were translating to the home audience.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 09:16:02 PM
Did Sean Penn even thank Harvey Milk?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Jeanne on February 22, 2009, 09:16:29 PM
It was fun reading the posts tonight. My computer had trouble keeping up, but I was here!

Good night.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 09:17:22 PM
No, Sean Penn didn't thank Harvey Milk, at least not that I remember
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 09:17:23 PM
I'm certain that the Memorial sequence worked quite well in the hall with all of the LCD screens, but, here on the home screen, it did not.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 09:17:48 PM
No, Sean Penn didn't thank Harvey Milk, at least not that I remember

I didn't think he did, but, I wasn't sure. . .
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 09:18:18 PM
Someone had to explain to me what Ben Stiller was doing. I thought it was very unfunny.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:18:18 PM
I thought thanking her was the other last thing he was going to say, but forgot. He said one last thing...well two last things..but I thought he only said one.  

If this makes any sense, you are as tired as I am

I'm wondering if he said his best friend's name - a.k.a. his wife - in Japanese?

;)

-And, yes, I'm Googling away.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:18:43 PM
Did Sean Penn even thank Harvey Milk?

That is a good question
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 09:19:17 PM
Turns out they had an Oscar party at one of our local theaters, with red carpet and all.  It was on the big screen.  That memorial montage would have made me REALLY dizzy
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Charles Pogue on February 22, 2009, 09:19:20 PM
I liked the surprise of Sean Penn.  I was pulling for Frank Langella; but fearfully expected the Academy with go with the redemption sentiment and give to Mickey Rourke.  But Penn was my second choice after Langella.  Would've liked to have seen Michael Shannon get best supporting over Ledger.

My big question of the night:  Where was Jack?  I figgered Nicholson, usually in the front row with shades, would finally appear as one of the five best actor winners, especially when they showed him in the clips, but nope.  So I ask, where was Jack?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:19:28 PM
Peculiar indeed
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:20:45 PM
According to wikipedia.... (not certain of its accuracy)

states that Sean and Robin were divorcing and they ended proceedings in 2008
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Charles Pogue on February 22, 2009, 09:20:50 PM
Someone had to explain to me what Ben Stiller was doing. I thought it was very unfunny.

He was spoofing Joaquin Phoenix who recently appeared on David Letterman like that and proved to be a rather difficult and disconnected interview.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 09:21:30 PM
I remember Robin Penn when she was on "Santa Barbara."
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 09:22:56 PM
OK, time for sleep!

Thanks for a fun par-tay, bk!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 09:23:40 PM
BK ALWAYS throws the best parties.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:24:11 PM
I remember Robin Penn when she was on "Santa Barbara."

She played Kelly Capwell... I have her work on a couple of tapes
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:25:42 PM
her character was changed a few times.

Jensen Buchanan played Kelly after Robin left the show
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 09:26:22 PM
He didn't thank her at the SAGS either. I think there is an arrangement between them. I know there has been strained relationship there for awhile.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 09:27:22 PM
Someone had to explain to me what Ben Stiller was doing. I thought it was very unfunny.

It was the Joaquin Phoenix parody. But that didn't make it funny.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 09:27:55 PM
He thanked Clive Jones whos around to hear the thanks. Harvey isn't here.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:28:52 PM
They are probably civil because of the kids
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 09:31:20 PM
Who were the protester that Penn was referring to?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 09:31:57 PM
Who were the protester that Penn was referring to?

Anti-gay protesters who didn't want MILK to win anything.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:32:04 PM
i would suspect those who did not like the movie and anti-gay
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: td on February 22, 2009, 09:32:22 PM
He thanked Clive Jones whos around to hear the thanks. Harvey isn't here.

I understand THAT part.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 09:32:26 PM
Someone had to explain to me what Ben Stiller was doing. I thought it was very unfunny.

He was spoofing Joaquin Phoenix who recently appeared on David Letterman like that and proved to be a rather difficult and disconnected interview.

And how many people who don't watch Letterman got what he was doing? Why did they let him do it?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:32:26 PM
I rather liked Milk
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:33:12 PM
Someone had to explain to me what Ben Stiller was doing. I thought it was very unfunny.

He was spoofing Joaquin Phoenix who recently appeared on David Letterman like that and proved to be a rather difficult and disconnected interview.

And how many people who don't watch Letterman got what he was doing? Why did they let him do it?

The probably thought everyone watched Letterman

I saw the interview and to me he looked bored
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 09:33:16 PM
I'm heading toward the bedroom now.

Good night!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 09:34:06 PM
I once held Burle Ives Oscar. I found on the floor in one of the rooms in the Billy Rose Collection at the NYPL. It was being used as a door stop!

No one at the library knew why it was there.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 09:34:36 PM
I'm watching a repeat of the arrivals and they just showed Sean Penn and Robin Wright Penn, so she was with him tonight
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:34:43 PM
Who were the protester that Penn was referring to?

Anti-gay protesters who didn't want MILK to win anything.

Sadly, here was a Fred Phelps contingent there tonight. :-\

I've been in a show that was picketed by his followers too.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 09:35:19 PM
Now I am going to sign off. I knew they showed him arriving with a date, so I was curious who it was.  They were holding hands and looked very friendly
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:35:22 PM
I once held Burle Ives Oscar. I found on the floor in one of the rooms in the Billy Rose Collection at the NYPL. It was being used as a door stop!

No one at the library knew why it was there.

Sheesh... the indignity of it alll
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 09:35:54 PM
I am glad that TOYLAND won the oscar.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:36:07 PM
Someone had to explain to me what Ben Stiller was doing. I thought it was very unfunny.

He was spoofing Joaquin Phoenix who recently appeared on David Letterman like that and proved to be a rather difficult and disconnected interview.

And how many people who don't watch Letterman got what he was doing? Why did they let him do it?

The clip was shown on lots of other shows, and it even made the "entertainment news" portion of some local network newscasts.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 09:36:08 PM
Who were the protester that Penn was referring to?

Anti-gay protesters who didn't want MILK to win anything.

Sadly, here was a Fred Phelps contingent there tonight. :-\

I've been in a show that was picketed by his followers too.

they picketed a judge friend of mine here in town a couple years ago.  He still won reelection.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:36:09 PM
Who were the protester that Penn was referring to?

Anti-gay protesters who didn't want MILK to win anything.

Sadly, here was a Fred Phelps contingent there tonight. :-\

I've been in a show that was picketed by his followers too.

I have heard of him... he is a nutcase
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:37:31 PM
I'm watching a repeat of the arrivals and they just showed Sean Penn and Robin Wright Penn, so she was with him tonight

Yep, and she was seated next to him during the ceremony.  -And kept cutting to her during his speech... and again... and again... ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 09:38:23 PM
Who were the protester that Penn was referring to?

Anti-gay protesters who didn't want MILK to win anything.

Sadly, here was a Fred Phelps contingent there tonight. :-\

I've been in a show that was picketed by his followers too.

I have heard of him... he is a nutcase

That's an understatement!
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Charles Pogue on February 22, 2009, 09:38:32 PM
Someone had to explain to me what Ben Stiller was doing. I thought it was very unfunny.

He was spoofing Joaquin Phoenix who recently appeared on David Letterman like that and proved to be a rather difficult and disconnected interview.

And how many people who don't watch Letterman got what he was doing? Why did they let him do it?

The clip was shown on lots of other shows, and it even made the "entertainment news" portion of some local network newscasts.

It was also all over the internet.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:40:31 PM
Catching up on "The Amazing Race" now...

FOOD FIGHT!!!!

:)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 09:41:10 PM
AARRGGHH!!  I'm burning a DVD with Nero using an avi file.  It's burning (and hopefully will actually work as a DVD), but the 82 minute file will take over 2 hours to burn. :-\
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 09:42:43 PM
Who were the protester that Penn was referring to?

Anti-gay protesters who didn't want MILK to win anything.

Sadly, here was a Fred Phelps contingent there tonight. :-\

I've been in a show that was picketed by his followers too.

he and his daughter were banned from the UK when they tried to go there and protest I think at a funeral. They were banned because they used hate in their speaches and UK doesn't allow it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Michael on February 22, 2009, 09:43:44 PM
Someone had to explain to me what Ben Stiller was doing. I thought it was very unfunny.

He was spoofing Joaquin Phoenix who recently appeared on David Letterman like that and proved to be a rather difficult and disconnected interview.

And how many people who don't watch Letterman got what he was doing? Why did they let him do it?

The clip was shown on lots of other shows, and it even made the "entertainment news" portion of some local network newscasts.

It was also
all over the internet.

I honestly never saw anything about it. I heard about it but didn't even know what he looked like
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:47:20 PM
DR DakotaCelt - The Rev. Fred Phelps is not a "nutcase".  "Nutcase" implies that he has or had some sort of redeeming value.  He is a very vile, dangerous - and sadly still influential - hate-monger.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:50:39 PM
Who were the protester that Penn was referring to?

Anti-gay protesters who didn't want MILK to win anything.

Sadly, here was a Fred Phelps contingent there tonight. :-\

I've been in a show that was picketed by his followers too.

I have heard of him... he is a nutcase

That's an understatement!

I was trying to use a freindly word.... I can think of a few for this man but they are not to be placed on a family board
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:51:08 PM
DR DakotaCelt - The Rev. Fred Phelps is not a "nutcase".  "Nutcase" implies that he has or had some sort of redeeming value.  He is a very vile, dangerous - and sadly still influential - hate-monger.

There is no redemption but the word I wanted to use would not have been appropriate
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 09:51:37 PM
What a grand night.  And it's not even ten o'clock here on the West Coast.  Let's stay all night and sing 'em all.  Only another fifteen pages of posts.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 09:51:53 PM
I've got the iPod on.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 09:52:10 PM
I updated it today so there's lots of new music playing on shuffle play.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:52:19 PM
I only have 96 posts to reach my goal
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:52:50 PM
Wish I did not have dail up so I could use an mp3 player
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 09:56:29 PM
I would not mind putting a lot of good music.. .some broadway, adult contemporary, classic 80s, film music, and some light classic

Some of the artists i would like to put on one are Guy Haines, Liz Callaway, and several others
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 09:59:29 PM
And now that I've watched "The Amazing Race"...

Goodnight.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 10:00:17 PM
P.S. - It was a swell par-tay!  Wonderful guests, and a great host.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DERBRUCER on February 22, 2009, 10:02:11 PM
Who did "write" the music for tonight's ceremony? -well, for that opening number. :-\

Well, he did manage to attempt a rhyme with "excrement" and "sentiment".

der Brucer
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 10:07:33 PM
I like Adrian Brody...

Me, too, Edisaurus~
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:10:08 PM
The Carpenters are singing.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: FJL on February 22, 2009, 10:14:23 PM
Will we never see page 56?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:15:38 PM
David just sent me his notes based on our reading.  Ninety percent of the dialogue suggestions are right on the money and the others we'll have to discuss, since they involve lines that are pretty well loved by fans of the film - that's been my struggle with this all along - keeping the stuff I know people like - but that doesn't always mean that it's right for THIS incarnation of it, so I'm totally keeping an open mind.  He also had some suggestions for me about some of the songs, including the little prologue number, which I think he's mistakenly thinking of as an opening number, which it really isn't - it's just a scene setter like the Opening Night section of The Producers prior to The King Of Broadway.  I wrote it because I felt it wasn't musical enough to start with a six-page scene before we had singing.  But maybe I'm wrong and maybe we'll cut it - he just thought it should function more as an opening number, but that's not its intention - it's only a minute long - it does have two big laughs in it, both of which landed at the reading.  He had a good suggestion for Rosie's ballad, which I'll try and if I like it, I'll have Lauren come back and redo the last verse for the demo.  And he thought the little number that precedes the audition sequence (where we meet the people who are going to the audition) was too repetitive, and boy is he right about that - I really didn't like it at all - I like the first part of it, and then I'm probably going to rewrite the rest. 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:16:03 PM
At long last page fifty-six.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:16:15 PM
I wonder if we can get to page sixty?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 10:16:23 PM
I'm watching the after-Oscars show and Sean Penn is being interviewed.  Robin Wright Penn is right there with him.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 10:17:27 PM
And this after-Oscars show is NOT in high-def. :P
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:18:03 PM
I did eat the cucumber roll, since it wouldn't have really been good tomorrow, nor would I have had time to eat it.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:18:14 PM
Guy Haines just sang Druthers.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: MBarnum on February 22, 2009, 10:22:32 PM
Since it is the night of A. R. Rahmen...one of my favorite of his songs....of many....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOOlgbfFy3k&feature=related (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOOlgbfFy3k&feature=related)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DERBRUCER on February 22, 2009, 10:30:44 PM
Good evening.  We tuned into the Oscars in time to see Jessica Biel's god-awful dress.

The dress wasn't that bad - it's just that she inadvertantly caught her lobster bib in the bodice when leaving the restuarant.

der Brucer
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:47:44 PM
Was der Brucer and S. Woody White around for the festivities - yes or no?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:48:29 PM
The pages were flying by so quickly I honestly don't remember, although I don't think I saw their monikers - and if that's so, why weren't they here?  No wonder we fell a few hundred posts short.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:49:56 PM
Not that I'm complaining about fifty-six pages, but I think you can see that had elmore been around and if Jeanne had not had computer problems, and if Ben had shown up even for part of the show and had der Brucer been here - well, it would have been a slightly different story.  Not that I'm complaining about fifty-six pages.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:50:38 PM
Welcome five GUESTS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:50:49 PM
I liked my gown best of all. 
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:51:03 PM
Guess der Brucer doesn't want to answer the question.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:51:17 PM
We'll stay all night and we'll sing 'em all.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:52:01 PM
I am really not looking forward to tomorrow's endless work session.  And I know I am going to have to be very tough.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:53:07 PM
Make that seven GUESTS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:54:12 PM
Our GUESTS sure love the year 2007.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:54:27 PM
der Brucer is about to get a bitch-slapping he will never forget.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 10:54:36 PM
I am my own frenzy.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 11:01:21 PM
der Brucer is clearly not interested enough to post.  He just sits there like so much fish, and probably takes delight in doing so.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 11:01:46 PM
Guess our postings are done for the evening.  Still and all, our third highest posting day ever.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 11:08:25 PM
I liked my gown best of all. 

Where are the pictures??

;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 11:18:29 PM
I'm now watching "Desperate Housewives" from two weeks ago.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:37:14 PM
Was der Brucer and S. Woody White around for the festivities - yes or no?

I do not recall seeing either of them...

Tomovoz was  missing also
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:38:30 PM
I liked my gown best of all. 

Where are the pictures??

;)

I am intrigued...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:39:33 PM
Has any of your music ever been used in a movie and been nominated for an award bk?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DERBRUCER on February 22, 2009, 11:39:52 PM
Was der Brucer and S. Woody White around for the festivities - yes or no?

Yes - but the computer is in one room and the TV in another (plus SWW had a dinner to prepare). Once one is established for TV watching, there is a cocooning operation that involves 2 or three dogs who entrap you on the couch - getting up is a major operation. And by the time I played ketch-up everybody had left.

der Brucer
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:41:10 PM
I find it interesting George that not many watch the soaps but they watch Desperate Housewives, which IMHO has many soap operatic overtures
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:42:17 PM
any insights der brucer....

so Fletcher was curled up on the couch
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:42:52 PM
Page 57 dance because I can... and it is not often that we get to say that
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 11:42:57 PM
Has any of your music ever been used in a movie and been nominated for an award bk?

That would be a big no, although the songs from Nudie Musical were eligible and members of the music branch had to sit through the movie, which tickled me.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 11:43:29 PM
Well, gee, der Brucer, how did you ever manage to post during the festivities of years past, which I pretty much recall you doing?
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:43:37 PM
86 more posts to 14000
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 11:43:42 PM
At long last page fifty-seven.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DERBRUCER on February 22, 2009, 11:43:45 PM
der Brucer is clearly not interested enough to post.  He just sits there like so much fish, and probably takes delight in doing so.

I started posting over an hour ago - it just takes time to catch-up.

der Brucer
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 11:43:48 PM
I find it interesting George that not many watch the soaps but they watch Desperate Housewives, which IMHO has many soap operatic overtures

"Desperate Housewives" is an evening show and only has one episode per week.  It's much more easy to keep up with it than a show that's on five times a week. :)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 11:44:20 PM
Will we never get to page fifty-eight.  If we could get to page sixty we'd be close to getting in second place.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:44:32 PM
I wonder that also bk, how did he do it
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:45:14 PM
It could happen someday bk....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 11:46:50 PM
Welcome six GUESTS.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:46:58 PM
George, which housewife do you like on that show....

Bree is icy and calculating... I like Eva Longoria's character
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: bk on February 22, 2009, 11:47:02 PM
Notes are written and will go up right at midnight.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DERBRUCER on February 22, 2009, 11:48:03 PM
Well, gee, der Brucer, how did you ever manage to post during the festivities of years past, which I pretty much recall you doing?

Simple - I didn't watch much of the show - just listened (and also did some room-to-room bouncing, which is getting a bit much for these tired bones)

der Brucer
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 11:48:56 PM
George, which housewife do you like on that show....

Bree is icy and calculating... I like Eva Longoria's character

I just like the show.  I don't usually play favorites. ;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:49:55 PM
George did you like all the snow that seattle has gotten this winter. My cousin is not amused....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:51:02 PM
The show is interesting....

I just dont have time to watch the telly at night since I work
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 11:51:36 PM
George did you like all the snow that seattle has gotten this winter. My cousin is not amused....

Well, I only got stuck in the snow only one time and since I only live one mile from where I work and it's all flat driving, I had no problem. ;D
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:54:12 PM
You are lucky... My cousin lives in WEst SEattle and she said there were some entertaining driving experiences...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:56:46 PM
Her daughters Dalmations enjoyed teh snow...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:57:55 PM
They engage in Animal REscue.... They have four dalmations.. Two have health issues, one has behavioural issues and the other one they decided to keep. That one is quite the character.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DERBRUCER on February 22, 2009, 11:57:59 PM
My biggest complaint with this evening's show was that it was an utter failure at what should have been its prime mission - drum up business for the current crop of films. For instance, I didn't see one clip of Viola Davis in Doubt, and saw very little of Slumdog. I've seen more about Frost/Nixon on TV ads than I did on the Oscar show. Surely each of the four acting nominations deserve meaningful clips of the performances.

I had no fault with the change in format - but was appalled at the poor execution of much of the show. Hugh Jackman was totally wasted (as in "poorly utilized" not "drunk"). It was also apparent that the director's were oblivious to what their show was looking like on the nation's TV sets. For many of the montages I kept thinking "what was the point of that?"

der Brucer

Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 22, 2009, 11:58:42 PM
Getting sleepy in my end...
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 22, 2009, 11:58:58 PM
You are lucky... My cousin lives in WEst SEattle and she said there were some entertaining driving experiences...

I would not ever want to live in Seattle.  I love visiting, but I wouldn't want the hills.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: George on February 23, 2009, 12:00:00 AM
Getting sleepy in my end...

TMI!!

;)
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DERBRUCER on February 23, 2009, 12:00:54 AM
I must admit, at the end of the opening number my reaction was "There will be a pile of vomit on the ground in Studio City!".

der Brucer
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 23, 2009, 12:01:29 AM
With me at work, I was lucky that I missed out on some of the show.
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 23, 2009, 12:02:44 AM
I really am trying to post but feel oddly tired
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DERBRUCER on February 23, 2009, 12:03:18 AM
So, do we push for page 58?

der Brucer
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 23, 2009, 12:03:30 AM
I did see a couple of clips... I was not overly impressed with the first number
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 23, 2009, 12:03:53 AM
Page 58 dance
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 23, 2009, 12:04:22 AM
72 more posts
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 23, 2009, 12:06:03 AM
Only 300+ posts to get to number 1
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 23, 2009, 12:06:31 AM
I detect an echo.....
Title: Re: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR
Post by: DakotaCelt on February 23, 2009, 12:07:07 AM
It has grown very quiet...