Haines His Way

Archives => Archive 2 => Topic started by: bk on December 08, 2004, 10:28:53 PM

Title: BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: bk on December 08, 2004, 10:28:53 PM
Well, you've read the notes, you're back in the swing of the notes, and now it is time to post until the swingin' cows come home.  To it, I say.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: bk on December 08, 2004, 10:41:05 PM
Welcome five GUESTS.  We're talkin' about Brando.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 08, 2004, 10:46:37 PM
Marlon - In the pretty bad category...REFLECTIONS IN A GOLDEN EYE (I'd love to have seen Monty in that!)
Favorites: I agree that WATERFRONT is hard to top. I haven't seen THE MEN in years, but I recall it as great - his first film role, I think.
THE WILD ONE is so much fun to watch. ...And suddenly I'm REALLY sleepy. More tomorrow.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Tomovoz on December 09, 2004, 12:05:16 AM
I have never been a Brando fan. I quite like "One Eyed Jacks" - the film the score and the song inspired by the film (Johnny Burnette's "Ballad Of the One-Eyed Jacks")
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 12:13:02 AM
Indeed we can listen to Mr BK this evening on the program

2 ON THE DIAL on KCSN.

Here is the link.   8)

http://kcsn.org/programs/programs.html (http://kcsn.org/programs/programs.html)

Oh Marlon Brando.  Oh my.

Guiltiest pleasures - one already mentioned, one not:

Reflections in a Golden Eye
Bedtime Story - with David Niven & Shirley Jones

Favorite:

Sayonara - beautiful performance, beautiful photography.  This is also one of my favorite scores, Franz Waxman with a title song by Irving Berlin.  Brando is SO handsome in his uniform.  

Brando - I am sure we will hear some wonderful stories today in the posts.  He was controversial, talented, and an icon.

DtM - yes, wasn't the Betty Hutton interview a revelation?  She is just the same.  And it was followed by a couple of her BEST movies.   When she sings "I Wish I Didn't Love You So" written for HER by Frank Loesser - I am gone....    :'(
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Tomovoz on December 09, 2004, 12:18:47 AM
DR CP.  My confusion : I was thinking Stars in Love/Relative Values.  I have not been well.  OK!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Charles Pogue on December 09, 2004, 12:28:23 AM
While I enjoy Brando, I'm not one of those who think he was God's gift to acting and there are plenty of performers who I think have contributed more to the profession and the art. That said, I'm fond of Viva Zapata, On The Waterfront, Bedtime Story (in which he is very funny), The Chase, and the Godfather.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: George on December 09, 2004, 12:29:29 AM
I have to admit (yet again) that I've never seen a Marlon Brando movie all the way through.  Clips, yes.  Scenes between commercials on TV, yes.  Whole movies from beginning to end, no.  Not even "Guys and Dolls."  I've watched most of it, but not necessarily the parts with Marlon.  (I even bought it ::))  Sue me.  (a "Guys and Dolls" reference!)

Now I must go to bed.  I've stayed up much later than I should (as usual).  I was asked to be part of a hiring committee for a the recently vacated mail clerk job in my building.  The first interview is this (Thursday) morning.  The second (and final) interview will be Friday at 1:00 p.m.  I guess they needed someone and I just happened to be the random person they asked.  I have to be at work BEFORE 9:00 a.m.  I can do it (a Fantasticks reference), but I need to sleep first.  So, good night!

And BK, I'm glad you had a great birthday! ;D
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Emily on December 09, 2004, 03:10:45 AM
Vibeage request for yet another one of my exams (this is number two of five).

Anytime around nine am EST start thinking "Family and Modern Society" vibes my way please :)
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Michael on December 09, 2004, 04:33:36 AM
I liked Brando in The Freshman.
Latter day best performance: Dry White Season

Never saw Last Tango In Paris, but from what I have read it is supposed to be his best role.

I have never seen a Brando film just because he was in it. I think starting in the 60's with most films, but not all, he whored himself for a paycheck.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Hisaka on December 09, 2004, 05:18:11 AM
Thank you all for many warm welcomes.
Hope all dear readers will have the patience to read my poor English and will understand it.

Marlon Brando: I've seen many films featured by Brando.
A Streetcar Named Desire is my favorite one. I saw it at teenaged and remember I had a terror of him in it, because he's very violent and very coercive and very high-handed.  Stanley Kowalski  is one of his great roles, however, I think.    He’s left a strong impression on me.


Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: elmore3003 on December 09, 2004, 05:38:21 AM
Good morning, all!  Dear Friend BK, what an ecventful and long day you had yesterday!  I hope you don't sleep too late.

I'm listening to an RCA Christmas collection at; the moment Eartha Kitt's doing "Santa Baby."  

So, the TOD is Brando.  It's amazing how many of his films I've never seen.

Favorites:  STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE
               THE GODFATHER
               GUYS AND DOLLS
I don't the G&D film much, but I do like Jean Simmons and Marlon Brando.

Worst:  REFLECTIONS IN A GOLDEN EYE
          LAST TANGO IN PARIS

And so to work!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Dan-in-Toronto on December 09, 2004, 05:59:00 AM
The "Desperate Housewives" writers should check out the NY Times summary of Reflections In A Golden Eye:


Major Penderton (Marlon Brando) is a hard-driving Army officer married to Leonora (Elizabeth Taylor). The impotent Penderton hides his latent homosexuality under his strict military discipline, while Leonora is having an affair with Lt. Colonel Langdon (Brian Keith), who is married to the troubled Allison (Julie Harris). Allison is having an affair with her houseboy Anacelo (Zorro David) after she slices off her own nipples after a disappointing pregnancy. Private Williams (Robert Forster) is a young recruit who likes to ride naked on horseback. The Major is driven to insane jealousy when he discovers Williams would rather be with Leonora than with him.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: elmore3003 on December 09, 2004, 06:07:17 AM
Allison is having an affair with her houseboy Anacelo (Zorro David) after she slices off her own nipples after a disappointing pregnancy. Private Williams (Robert Forster) is a young recruit who likes to ride naked on horseback. The Major is driven to insane jealousy when he discovers Williams would rather be with Leonora than with him.

The TIMES is wrong about the houseboy affair; the boy is so nelly he makes Julie Harris look butch.  Oy! What a stinkin' movie.  Liz has one great line:  "Normal? You call that normal? She cut off her nipples with the garden shears!"  

Southern gothic hits rock bottom, and that's not a Henry Willson client!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Dan-in-Toronto on December 09, 2004, 06:12:57 AM
Favorite Brando performances include ON THE WATERFRONT, THE YOUNG LIONS and ONE EYED JACKS. I also enjoyed his performance (but especially Johnny Depp's) in DON JUAN DeMARCO.

Least favorite: LAST TANGO IN PARIS.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Noel on December 09, 2004, 06:31:38 AM
Liz has one great line:  "Normal? You call that normal? She cut off her nipples with the garden shears!"

Liz is right: It's only considered normal if it's done with pinking shears.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: MBarnum on December 09, 2004, 07:00:48 AM
Brando movies: without a doubt, my favorite is SAYONARA, what with Miko Taaka, Miyoshi Umeki, Red Buttons, and James Garner in it!! Beautiful movie and story, and I loved Marlon Brando in that film. I also enjoyed him in THE WILD ONE.

I watched REFLECTIONS IN A GOLDEN EYE only because my interviewee Gordon Mitchell was in it....what strange film.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: MBarnum on December 09, 2004, 07:01:36 AM
Hisaka, do not worry about your English...it is better then mine!!

Where in Japan do you live? And did you enjoy your recent trip to Los Angeles?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: MBarnum on December 09, 2004, 07:08:08 AM
Last night I watched a movie that will shock you!!! It was called GOLDILOCKS AND THE 3 BARES...yes, Bares, not Bears.

I am sorry to tell you this BK, but GOLDILOCKS AND THE 3 BARES appeares to be the real FIRST Nudie Musical! LOL! It was made in 1963 in Florida with an all Floridian cast, LOL, and is one of many nudie films to come from that state in the 50s and 60s. It actually was a cute, charming, amusing film. I don't know why I bought the DVD but it just intrigued me. It is on a double feature with SINDERELLA AND THE GOLDEN BRA...which is also a musical!!

GOLDILOCKS was made by Florida film producer Herschell Gordon Lewis who also made the cult films BLOOD FEAST, 2000 MANIACS, and COLOR ME BLOOD RED back in the 1960s, films I know a few DRs are familiar with.

I wonder if our Florida DRs realize what a rich film history their state has? LOL!

OH, by the way, the cast included some very cute male actors, one of whom I have already managed to track down...I smell an interview coming on!!

(I can just hear DR Elmore3003 now!)
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Matt H. on December 09, 2004, 07:57:34 AM
My favorite Brando performance is definitely A STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE: great delivery and an imposing physical presence: all you could hope for in the role of Stanley. I also like him in THE WILD ONE, GUYS AND DOLLS (though his singing is sometimes sharp), and A DRY WHITE SEASON.

I think his performance in THE GODFATHER is vastly overrated. I find him mannered and irritating, and still makes my blood boil that he got the Oscar for this over Laurence Olivier in SLEUTH.

I also think he's just terrible in TEAHOUSE OF THE AUGUST MOON and (the worst ever) CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS : THE DISCOVERY. Talk about doing something merely for the paycheck.

My favorite score from a Brando movie is MUTINY ON THE BOUNTY. I think that's a truly terrific score!

Brando performances I've missed and would like to catch up with at some point: THE YOUNG LIONS (I have it on DVD; just haven't gotten to it yet), THE FUGITIVE KIND, and NIGHT OF THE FOLLOWING DAY.

That marvelous biography on Brando some years ago revealed that starting with SAYONARA, Marlon stopped memorizing his lines and required them to be written on cue cards on any film he did.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: DERBRUCER on December 09, 2004, 08:00:55 AM

...I smell an interview coming on!!


Well, that gets a nomination for "Euphemism of the Day Award"

der Brucer

PS Take your camera!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: DERBRUCER on December 09, 2004, 08:04:53 AM


I also think he's just terrible in TEAHOUSE OF THE AUGUST MOON ..

Well, it's horserace time! - I thought he was great in Teahouse!

der "Once Played Capt Fisby" Brucer
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: DERBRUCER on December 09, 2004, 08:06:30 AM


Southern gothic hits rock bottom...
And did rock bottom hit back?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Matt H. on December 09, 2004, 08:17:45 AM
How quickly we get spoiled! For the last two days, we've had spring-like conditions here in the Carolinas: low 70s and beautiful blue skies. Today, won't get out of the 50s and rain, rain, rain with worse to come for the weekend. ARgh!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Stuart on December 09, 2004, 08:30:44 AM
Similar to DR George, I think the only Brando film I have ever seen all the way through is G&D.  True.  I don't even think I have seen the film version of STREETCAR in its entirety.  I was never impressed enough with Mr. Brando to seek out his other films.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: JoseSPiano on December 09, 2004, 08:32:27 AM
Good Morning!

BK - Be sure Marcy the Marketing Lady contacts the musical theatre departments at both the University of Maryland and Catholic University.  Both departments have a pretty decent number of students, and I can assure you that almost of those students have "depended" on the various albums you've produced as a source for their recital and audition repertoire.  Oh, and the faculty too!  They know you as a producer, now it's time to let them know you're an author too!  Of course, then there's all the Outreach departments at the Kennedy Center, Arena Stage, National Theatre, Wolf Trap, The Studio Theatre, The Theatre Lab, etc., etc., etc...

If you want to go the non-mystery bookstore route, there is always Kramerbooks and Afterwords - which is a bookstore and cafe (with very good food too).  -They're even open 24 hours on the weekend.  Great clientele, and it's in Dupont Circle too - very "artsy" crowd, and very Metro accessible too.

Oh... As for Brando films... I'm another one who hasn't really seen a full Brando performance all the way through.  And if I have, I was most likely watching the film and not Brando - and no Brando performance sticks in my head right now.  I did watch "Apocalypse Now" in my AP English class in high school since it was based on Conrad's "Heart of Darkness"... Oh, I guess I did watch an entire Brando movie then!  But, with that movie.. Eh...

OK - I gotta get ready for rehearsal.  1-5 rehearsal, and then invited dress tonight at 8:00...

Laters...
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: DERBRUCER on December 09, 2004, 08:39:23 AM
NEWSFLASH!

Noted guitarist 'Dimebag' Darrell Abbott among dead at Ohio concert; 2 hurt; gunman's motive unknown.

(http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20041209/capt.ny11112090815.nightclub_shooting_ny111.jpg)

I think it was Fashion Rage!

Dimebag was killed, on the stage, by Steven Cojocaru, beaten to death with a pair of  Carrie Bradshaw’s Manolo Blahnik stilettos!

der Brucer
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: JMK on December 09, 2004, 08:41:13 AM
Well, since it's virtually all I've been listening to for the last week or so, I'd have to say Mutiny on the Bounty is my favorite score to a Brando film.

For those who like the similarly scored Hawaii, believe it or not there is a sample of its Theme used on bossa-hip-hop artist Cibelle's self-titled CD.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jay on December 09, 2004, 08:42:08 AM
I'm a little amazed at the number of Dear Readers who have not seen The Godfather and The Godfather Part II.  I mention them not as Marlon Brando films per se, but rather as two of the best films ever made.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Joey on December 09, 2004, 08:45:10 AM
Nothing Brando related but I thought all of you would appreciate this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/features/story/0,,1369643,00.html (http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/features/story/0,,1369643,00.html)
It has me slightly miffed.

I think the only Brando movie I have seen is Guys and Dolls. I don't like it at all and wish they would do a remake. They replaced such good music and both Brando and Sinatra's acting was flat to me. It never felt cohesive(?) to me I guess.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jay on December 09, 2004, 08:46:42 AM
(My last comment was driven by the number of posts indicating "I've never seen a Brando film all the way to the end" and the assumption that if someone has not seen Godfather I, he or she will not have seen Godfather II.)

And if you've ever started to watch Godfather I and didn't stick around 'til the end, you missed what may be the greatest denouement ever committed to celluloid.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Joey on December 09, 2004, 08:48:30 AM
I can't believe I have not seen the Godfather 1 or Godfather 2 I will have to make sure I do that over Christmas Break.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: JMK on December 09, 2004, 08:58:34 AM
Re:  Guys and Dolls remake.  IIRC, there was indeed scuttlebutt (what is the etymology of that word, I wonder?) about a remake, starring Vin Diesel.  No joke.  At least no intentional joke.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Joey on December 09, 2004, 09:04:43 AM
Vin Diesel?!!!! Somehow I don't see that working, but I could be wrong. People can suprise you I guess, but it still is a scary idea to me.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Elan on December 09, 2004, 09:07:43 AM
IIRC, there was indeed scuttlebutt (what is the etymology of that word, I wonder?)

Well, since you ask: (Source: dictionary.com)

"Scuttlebutt" apparently takes its source from nautical usage. A "scuttlebutt" was a drinking cask on a ship ("butt" being an old term for "cask," dontcha know?), and I guess that the tradition of gossiping 'round the water cooler is older than we thought.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Elan on December 09, 2004, 09:09:58 AM
Oh, and put me down on the list of people who've never seen a Brando film (actually, if I started listing all the classics that I've never seen, I'd probably be here all night... heck, I didn't even see Citizen Kane until last year, when The Lovely Wife taught an "intro to film" course)
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: DERBRUCER on December 09, 2004, 09:11:53 AM
Nothing Brando related but I thought all of you would appreciate this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/features/story/0,,1369643,00.html (http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/features/story/0,,1369643,00.html)
It has me slightly miffed.


I'm miffed, but not surprised considering the source, at the headline:

President Bush wants 'pro-homosexual' drama banned.

Total poppycock. The generator of the movemnet is an Alabama RedNeck Republican Whacko (is there some redundancy here?). There has been nothing to suggest that the Adminstration would support any such (additional) lunacy.

Back on Dec 1's thread "DECEMBER TO REMEMBER" (post #53) I posted the source article from the Alabama Press - no need to go to the British media for twisted takes - read HHW daily for the most current poop!

der Brucer
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Tomovoz on December 09, 2004, 09:13:36 AM
I'm a little amazed at the number of Dear Readers who have not seen The Godfather and The Godfather Part II.  I mention them not as Marlon Brando films per se, but rather as two of the best films ever made.
Horses and Courses. I am more amazed that there are so many who are not Brando fans. I would't bother with The Godfather films again or his "mannered" performances. "Emperor's New Clothes" to me.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:16:21 AM
DRJAY - yes, I have seen THE GODFATHER I II & III.  I have very mixed feelings about these films.  And they have been manipulated into so many parmutations, that I don't know what I am seeing when I see different versions.  I enjoyed them, but I don't know if I want to see them again.  

I forgot JULIUS CAESAR.  And now that MUTINY ON THE BOUNTY has been mentioned, I will add it to my list.  I like the way his Fletcher Christian changes and becomes a responsible person.

DRHISAKA is correct in her assessment of STREETCAR - he is all of the things she wrote about.  
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Ginny on December 09, 2004, 09:32:33 AM

Hope all dear readers will have the patience to read my poor English and will understand it.


DRHisaka - Your English is better than my Japanese will ever be  ;)
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Stuart on December 09, 2004, 09:33:58 AM
Re:  Guys and Dolls remake.  IIRC, there was indeed scuttlebutt (what is the etymology of that word, I wonder?) about a remake, starring Vin Diesel.  No joke.  At least no intentional joke.

If Val Kilmer can play Moses, I think Vin Diesel can handle Sky Masterson.  I think....
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: DERBRUCER on December 09, 2004, 09:57:10 AM
Well, since you ask: (Source: dictionary.com)

"Scuttlebutt" apparently takes its source from nautical usage. A "scuttlebutt" was a drinking cask on a ship ("butt" being an old term for "cask," dontcha know?), and I guess that the tradition of gossiping 'round the water cooler is older than we thought.

Elan - go to the head of the class!

Word of the Day (http://dictionary.reference.com/wordoftheday/archive/2003/01/24.html):

Quote
scuttlebutt \SKUHT-l-buht\, noun:
1. (Nautical)
    a. A drinking fountain on a ship.
    b. A cask on a ship that contains the day's supply of drinking water.
2. Gossip; rumor.
….
Scuttlebutt comes from scuttle, "a small opening" + butt, "a large cask" -- that is, a small hole cut into a cask or barrel to allow individual cups of water to be drawn out. The modern equivalent is the office water cooler, also a source of refreshment and gossip.

Actually, I thought you would think a "SKUHT-l-buht" was a gentile rump.

der Brucer
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jay on December 09, 2004, 10:16:53 AM
If Val Kilmer can play Moses, I think Vin Diesel can handle Sky Masterson.  I think....

If the billboards can be believed, actually Val Kilmer IS Moses.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: DERBRUCER on December 09, 2004, 10:17:06 AM
Thank you all for many warm welcomes.
Hope all dear readers will have the patience to read my poor English and will understand it.


Lucky for all of us - English is a very user-friendly communication tool. (Though it has been observed that English is the easiest language to learn to speak to be understood, but the hardest to learn to speak "correctly".

Even though we may silently giggle at non-native speakers' garbled syntax, confused idioms, and "that just doesn't sound right" sentence structure, we usually get the thought clearly - and that's what counts. It is one of the spoken languages that is relatively insensitive to tone, stress, or word arrangement. You can usually take a simple English sentence, write each word on a separate slip of paper, drop them in a hat, pull them out at random, and still keep the thought. (This works less well for compound sentences.)

A great welcome mat of acceptance has been laid before you by that fact that we have giggled for years reading assembly instructions and user manuals created for our imported products.

We at HHW never criticize each other - (never, what never, well hardly ever) - and many of us take great glee in "mishearing" what others thought they'd said).

der Brucer

Note to Fellow posters:
(http://pic8.picturetrail.com/VOL242/891350/1624689/65443462.jpg)





Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: JMK on December 09, 2004, 10:27:14 AM
If the billboards can be believed, actually Val Kilmer IS Moses.

Well, then, in that case I propose:

[size=8]LEA DELARIA is

GUYS AND DOLLS[/size]
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Ron Pulliam on December 09, 2004, 10:30:05 AM
For anyone who would like to sample music from the Film Score Monthly 3-CD issue of the complete score for "Mutiny on the Bounty" (1962-MGM-Brando version), plus an alternate score AND re-recorded cues that were on the LP issue, visit:

http://www.screenarchives.com/fsm/detailCD.cfm?ID=313

This site generously offers about 80 minutes of cues, or about one/third of the total (which is just under four hours of music).

The entire set is a magnificent accomplishment.

It's probably my favorite movie score of all time....always among the top 5.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: bk on December 09, 2004, 10:32:28 AM
I think I slept eleven hours in my Maidenform Bra.  I got up at ten to beautiful blue skies (apparently I brought the sunshine back with me and left some in NY).  I'm going to take it pretty easy today and not overdo anything.  I'll try to write some, and that's about it.  Then tomorrow I'll dive into things again in a major way.  

Everyone must use the link on page one so you can hear the radio show tonight - and call in - we love that.  There will be some things played that most of you haven't heard so it will be worth it.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: DERBRUCER on December 09, 2004, 10:45:17 AM
HAPPINESS IS A WARM PUPPY GIFT FROM OVERSEAS

Romanian Editorial  (http://www.expres.ro/evz/editorial_en.html):

Quote
An ode to America
by Cornel Nistorescu
________________________________________
Why are Americans so united? They don't resemble one another even if you paint them! They speak all the languages of the world and form an astonishing mixture of civilizations. Some of them are nearly extinct, others are incompatible with one another, and in matters of religious beliefs, not even God can count how many they are. Still, the American tragedy turned three hundred million people into a hand put on the heart. Nobody rushed to accuse the White House, the army, the secret services that they are only a bunch of losers. Nobody rushed to empty their bank accounts. Nobody rushed on the streets nearby to gape about. The Americans volunteered to donate blood and to give a helping hand. After the first moments of panic, they raised the flag on the smoking ruins, putting on T-shirts, caps and ties in the colours of the national flag. They placed flags on buildings and cars as if in every place and on every car a minister or the president was passing. On every occasion they started singing their traditional song: "God Bless America!".

Silent as a rock, I watched the charity concert broadcast on Saturday once, twice, three times, on different tv channels. There were Clint Eastwood, Willie Nelson, Robert de Niro, Julia Roberts, Cassius Clay, Jack Nicholson, Bruce Springsteen, Silvester Stalone, James Wood, and many others whom no film or producers could ever bring together. The American's solidarity spirit turned them into a choir. Actually, choir is not the word. What you could hear was the heavy artillery of the American soul. What neither George W. Bush, nor Bill Clinton, nor Colin Powell could say without facing the risk of stumbling over words and sounds, was being heard in a great and unmistakable way in this charity concert. I don't know how it happened that all this obsessive singing of America didn't sound croaky, nationalist, or ostentatious! It made you green with envy because you weren't able to sing for your country without running the risk of being considered chauvinist, ridiculous, or suspected of who-knows-what mean interests. I watched the live broadcast and the rerun of its rerun for hours listening to the story of the guy who went down one hundred floors with a woman in a wheelchair without knowing who she was, or of the Californian hockey player, who fought with the terrorists and prevented the plane from hitting a target that would have killed other hundreds or thousands of people. How on earth were they able to sacrifice for their fellow humans? Imperceptibly, with every word and musical note, the memory of some turned into a modern myth of tragic heroes. And with every phone call, millions and millions of dollars were put in a collection aimed at rewarding not a man or a family, but a spirit which nothing can buy.

What on earth can unite the Americans in such a way? Their land? Their galloping history? Their economic power? Money? I tried for hours to find an answer, humming songs and murmuring phrases which risk of sounding like commonplaces. I thought things over, but I reached only one conclusion.

Only freedom can work such miracles!


Note:

"An Ode to America" is a leading article written by Cornel Nistorescu, manager of "Evenimentul Zilei" newspaper, and published in the 24-th september issue.
This leading article is spreading worldwide, retransmitted by hundreds of thousands of readers on the Internet. In addition, the article is also distributed by the US Forces Command Public Affairs Office.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: bk on December 09, 2004, 11:06:24 AM
I like Hisaka's English - even in person I had no trouble understanding anything she or her friend said, although I think I confused them a few times.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 11:23:10 AM
What is the "theme" of tonight's radio show/interview?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: MBarnum on December 09, 2004, 11:32:29 AM
In 30 minutes I will be off work for the weekend! Hallelujah!!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: bk on December 09, 2004, 11:42:07 AM
We'll be talking about Writer's Block and What If and playing a lot of interesting music you'll want to hear.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 11:52:32 AM
DtM I was hoping the interview with Betty Hutton would be on again since I missed it.

Matt H I agree last night’s episode of LOST was a good one.

JMK when is your birthday?  Craig’s birthday is September 27th.  Since we aren’t overly religious his birthday came first.

To continue the discussion on birthdays near holidays, my uncle always enjoyed celebrating his birthday on Dec. 24th.  Last night my uncle passed away suddenly.  I had truly hoped this would be the year we didn’t loose any family members, including our 4 legged ones.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: TCB on December 09, 2004, 11:52:34 AM
TOD
[/b][/u]

Sorry, but I have seen a great many Brando films all the way through, and I don’t care for the majority of them.  I do enjoy GUYS AND DOLLS, but then I like the musical.  But also, I think his Sky is one of his least mannered performances.  Other than that, I do not enjoy his work as an actor.  I don’t enjoy him is his classic roles in ON THE WATERFRONT or STREETCAR, and I have certainly not seen him do anything in the last thirty years that would change my opinion of him.  As for LAST TANGO IN PARIS, it was interesting, but I certainly didn’t enjoy it.  This is not to take away from the quality of many of the films that he was in, but his performance was always the least enjoyable part of those movies.

Hisaka – Welcome to HHW!

I have a question for anyone here (even though it is not an Ask Question day):   I have just a regular 27” television and probably will have for the foreseeable future.  When I buy a DVD (in this case Harry Potter) should I buy the Widescreen version or the Full screen version, and why?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: George on December 09, 2004, 11:58:51 AM
I have a question for anyone here (even though it is not an Ask Question day):   I have just a regular 27” television and probably will have for the foreseeable future.  When I buy a DVD (in this case Harry Potter) should I buy the Widescreen version or the Full screen version, and why?

Widescreen...ALWAYS!  27 inches is more than big enough to be able to see all the details and you'll be ready WHEN (not if) you get a widescreen TV.  Just my 2¢.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 12:12:33 PM
CP I very much agree with your assessment of Marlon Brando.

Matt H, I was upset Michael Cain didn’t win for SLUETH or my very close 2nd choice Olivier.  Not far behind I felt Peter O’Toole gave a great performance in THE RULING CLASS.  Last on my list was Marlon Brando.

elmore I strongly agree with your least favorites.

Off hand my favorites are SAYANARA and GUYS AND DOLLS but I need to think more on my answer.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: DERBRUCER on December 09, 2004, 12:14:48 PM
...27 inches is more than big enough...

George is advising TCB that 27 inches is more than big enough. Will no one swing at this?

der Brucer
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 12:17:03 PM
I like Hisaka's English - even in person I had no trouble understanding anything she or her friend said, although I think I confused them a few times.

LOL-I bet. ;D

Hisaka your English is beautiful.  Feel free to question us when we don't make any sense. :D
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: elmore3003 on December 09, 2004, 12:18:54 PM

OH, by the way, the cast included some very cute male actors, one of whom I have already managed to track down...I smell an interview coming on!!

(I can just hear DR Elmore3003 now!)

OY!!!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 12:22:58 PM
When you mention Mutiny on the Bounty the first thing that comes to mind is Humphrey Bogart in THE CAINE MUTINY. ;D
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: td on December 09, 2004, 12:24:36 PM
Brando, I adore Brando.
Tops on my list are:
THE FRESHMAN
THE GODFATHER
THE NIGHTCOMERS
MUTINY ON THE BOUNTY
ON THE WATERFRONT
A STREETCAR NAMED DESIRE

In the middle are:
THE ISLAND OF DR. MOREAU
GUYS AND DOLLS
LAST TANGO IN PARIS
DON JUAN DE MARCO
VIVA ZAPATA
THE YOUNG LIONS
THE FORMULA

Bottom-feeding are:
DESIREE
THE MISSOURI BREAKS
CANDY
A COUNTESS FROM HONG KONG
REFLECTIONS IN A GOLDEN EYE (which, however, I still find a fascinating film)
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jay on December 09, 2004, 12:25:40 PM
Michael Caine is doing Bounty commercials now?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: td on December 09, 2004, 12:28:23 PM
Shall we have a new page dance?

(http://www.americanphoto.co.jp/photosearch/Previews/PLX035755.jpg)
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: MBarnum on December 09, 2004, 12:28:51 PM
DR Jane, I am sorry to hear about your uncle  :-\
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: elmore3003 on December 09, 2004, 12:28:58 PM

I have a question for anyone here (even though it is not an Ask Question day):   I have just a regular 27” television and probably will have for the foreseeable future.  When I buy a DVD (in this case Harry Potter) should I buy the Widescreen version or the Full screen version, and why?


DRTCB, the Widescreen version!  Is there any other way?  it will look fine on your set, and you'll be seeing the film as it was meant to be seen.  I detest fullscreen!

I am my own frenzied raving.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jennifer on December 09, 2004, 12:35:58 PM
DR Jane, sorry about your loss.

I will actually disagree with DR George on the Harry Potter issue.  I know I've said before that I'm not overly fond of widescreen.  But the widescreen Harry Potter dvd IMO would be quite difficult to watch on a smallish tv.

I saw this dvd a few weeks ago (and have a very big tv) and I remember remarking how small the picture was vs the black portions on the top and bottom.

I know most people here will still prefer the widescreen version.  But DR TCB, just keep in mind the ratios.  Also, only you know if you normally prefer widescreen.

Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jennifer on December 09, 2004, 12:39:52 PM
Hmmm, I guess I just disagreed with DR Elmore too. :)

Actually, I think each person should buy whichever version they prefer.  

I recently got the widescreen of Spiderman2, cause that is what my brother-in-law prefers.  Also I believe my video store only carries the widescreen versions (although do most movies have both versions, or only the biggies?).

Btw, does anybody else's dvd have buttons to turn the widescreen into fullscreen?  Mine makes the people look funny!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Stuart on December 09, 2004, 12:45:25 PM
Feel free to question us when we don't make any sense. :D

Can the English-as-a-first language speakers do that too?  ;)

Sorry to hear of your loss, DR Jane.  My thoughts are with you.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 12:45:29 PM
MBARNUM has another LONG weekend!

Hmmmmmmm.....I prefer the Widescreen versions of movies as well - and letterboxing size does vary from film to film depending on the original ratio, but I do think it's a personal preference.  Widescreen for me!

DRJENNIFEr I think when you Fullscreen a Widescreen movie the problem is you are stretching the image (well your DVD is) more one way than the other, so there is some distortion.

Vibes to DRJANE.

Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 12:46:16 PM
DRJANE - I have Betty's interview on tape - if you still have a VCR, I can make you a copy this weekend.  
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Stuart on December 09, 2004, 12:46:46 PM
Michael Caine is doing Bounty commercials now?

Well, Nancy Walker is dead, so someone has to do them....
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Emily on December 09, 2004, 12:50:06 PM
I officially HATE new winter boots!!!

My feet are both two giant blisters.  It's so bad I might not even be able to take them OFF :(
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Emily on December 09, 2004, 12:50:35 PM
I'm moving to California... where the only boots you need are either militarily volunteer issue or a fashion statement
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Stuart on December 09, 2004, 12:51:34 PM
Speaking of Miss Walker, we were watching the Cinderella kinescope telecast last night (it was on here last night, though I know in a great many markets it was on Sunday night)....

It got me to thinking that there seems to be this whole little sub-category of women who we think of primarily as comediennes who have great vocal chops (and somehow we have forgotten that fact):  Misses Ballard and Ghostley to name two.  Miss Walker.  Miss Martha Raye.  To some degree, Miss Burnett.  Am I missing others?  I am sure I am.  Why do you think we forget that they sang, too?  Why do we think they are "just" funny?  Because "comedy is hard?...."  Is it because there are no more variety shows for them to showcase those talents as well?  Or because we just expect them to be only funny?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: elmore3003 on December 09, 2004, 12:54:44 PM
Hmmm, I guess I just disagreed with DR Elmore too. :)

Btw, does anybody else's dvd have buttons to turn the widescreen into fullscreen?  Mine makes the people look funny!

You sure did!  

DRJennifer, any DVD player that tells you it can convert widescreen to fullscreen is lying:  it can only alter the shape of the image and so it stretches and distorts the picture.  
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Sandra on December 09, 2004, 12:55:39 PM
Still working on this term paper. Four pages down, eleven to go. This is going to be a fun night.

I will have to tell you about my day on Saturday, when I'm awake.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: DERBRUCER on December 09, 2004, 12:56:17 PM
Btw, does anybody else's dvd have buttons to turn the widescreen into fullscreen?  Mine makes the people look funny!

Sounds like a full-bodied version of a mammogram - ooch!)

Back in the good old days, a projectionist could always count on free-popcorn by forgetting to put the CinemaScope lens on the projector!

The good lord offered Liz Taylor as the prize for popularizing wide-screen - and he doesn't make mistakes!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: DERBRUCER on December 09, 2004, 12:58:28 PM
..it stretches and distorts...  

Do they have such a botton on the machines that make Political Commercials?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Tomovoz on December 09, 2004, 12:59:06 PM
Can the English-as-a-first language speakers do that too?  ;)

In America they haven't used it for years.

(Which is no doubt why AJL used hung and not hanged)
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: elmore3003 on December 09, 2004, 01:01:32 PM
Speaking of Miss Walker, we were watching the Cinderella kinescope telecast last night (it was on here last night, though I know in a great many markets it was on Sunday night)....

It got me to thinking that there seems to be this whole little sub-category of women who we think of primarily as comediennes who have great vocal chops (and somehow we have forgotten that fact):  Misses Ballard and Ghostley to name two.  Miss Walker.  Miss Martha Raye.  To some degree, Miss Burnett.  Am I missing others?

Let's see:  I can think of Betty Hutton, Dorothy Loudon, and Fanny Brice, off the bat.  No matter what anyone thinks of her later singing, Ethel Merman was a fantastic singer in the 30s.  I need to think more about the other parts of your question, DRStuart.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: DERBRUCER on December 09, 2004, 01:02:46 PM
My feet are both two giant blisters.  It's so bad I might not even be able to take them OFF :(

If I were you, I'd leave my feet on - just a suggestion.

der Brucer
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 01:03:45 PM
We just received a Chanukah gift from Bryan, metallic colored Jordon Almonds in blue, yellow and silver.  Also included was the most beautiful Chanukah card I have ever seen.

In the box was my slightly late birthday card and gift.  He sent me a pink martini HANK ON LITTLE TOMATO CD.  Best of all was my beautiful birthday card with words to melt a mother’s heart.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Matt H. on December 09, 2004, 01:04:12 PM
I agree with DR Jay about THE GODFATHER Part II being one of the greatest films ever made, but Mr. Brando is not in it, of course.

I, too, forgot about JULIUS CAESAR. He does just fine as Marc Antony, but James Mason leaves everyone in the dust as Brutus, I think.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Matt H. on December 09, 2004, 01:07:29 PM
Another vote for widescreen, DR TCB. If you opt for the fullscreen version, you're losing 40% of the photographed image at any one time, and the director has things going on in all corners of the frame. Resist fullscreen!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 01:07:48 PM
DRJANE - I have Betty's interview on tape - if you still have a VCR, I can make you a copy this weekend.  

Yes, in our bedroom which we hope to return to some time soon. ;D
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Matt H. on December 09, 2004, 01:09:37 PM
BTW, a 27" TV is not a smallish screen. I used to watch widescreen films on a 19" screen, and I never found it undesirable.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 01:11:21 PM
Thank you  MBarnum, Jennifer, Stuart,  and JRand.  I will take these as double vibes.  What I didn’t mention on my birthday was the bittersweet call from a cousin.  She now has our family curse, as I have begun to call it, cancer.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: bk on December 09, 2004, 01:16:48 PM
There will be no convincing dear reader Jennifer, just like there will be no convincing her that Academy ratio films should fill her screen when she gets a widescreen TV (you know, Academy ratio puts bars on the sides on a widescreen TV).  It's a mentality you either get over or not, and come to understand or not.  When you watch Harry Potter full screen (or any scope film full screen) you are missing forty percent of the image, not to mention you are bastardizing the director and cameraman's art and imagery.  Again, would you take the art of The Last Supper and only want to see the middle portion of it just because it would fill your TV screen?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 01:25:35 PM
Bruce-LOL but she does have a point about those small TV screens and TCB should decide for himself.  With that said, I vote for widescreen.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Joey on December 09, 2004, 01:29:12 PM
I suppose I shouldn't get worked up over that article unless Bush actually says something about banning it. Maybe if I had elected that guy I could be worked up...
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jay on December 09, 2004, 01:29:58 PM
Speaking of Miss Walker, we were watching the Cinderella kinescope telecast last night (it was on here last night, though I know in a great many markets it was on Sunday night)....

It got me to thinking that there seems to be this whole little sub-category of women who we think of primarily as comediennes who have great vocal chops (and somehow we have forgotten that fact):  Misses Ballard and Ghostley to name two.  Miss Walker.  Miss Martha Raye.  To some degree, Miss Burnett.  Am I missing others?  I am sure I am.  Why do you think we forget that they sang, too?  Why do we think they are "just" funny?  Because "comedy is hard?...."  Is it because there are no more variety shows for them to showcase those talents as well?  Or because we just expect them to be only funny?

Excellent observation, Dear Brother.  I remember being shocked when I learned who the singer was after hearing the original version of "Lazy Afternoon" for the first time.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: DERBRUCER on December 09, 2004, 01:30:25 PM

It got me to thinking that there seems to be this whole little sub-category of women who we think of primarily as comediennes who have great vocal chops (and somehow we have forgotten that fact):  Misses Ballard and Ghostley to name two.  Miss Walker.  Miss Martha Raye.  To some degree, Miss Burnett.  Am I missing others?  

Yes, Jim Nabors. Wait, he wasn't a women, or...

der Brucer

How about another intriguing category of comic-persons (how's that for PC!) we always expect to laugh at, and then we find them in deadly serious roles doing a bang-up job: Art Carney - (Harry and Tonto), Jackie Gleason - (Soldier in the Rain) , Red Buttons - (Sayonara), Mary Tyler Moore - (Ordinary People), Mickey Rooney (Requiem for a Heavyweight).
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Stuart on December 09, 2004, 01:30:26 PM
Let's see:  I can think of Betty Hutton, Dorothy Loudon, and Fanny Brice, off the bat.  No matter what anyone thinks of her later singing, Ethel Merman was a fantastic singer in the 30s.  I need to think more about the other parts of your question, DRStuart.

Though they were both funny, at times, I do think of both Loudon (very funny, at that) and Merman as singers first.

Perhaps Judy Canova also fits the category.  Minnie Pearl, too, I suppose, though I never cared for her very much.

Rose Marie, too, in a sense.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Stuart on December 09, 2004, 01:32:28 PM
Excellent observation, Dear Brother.  

Thank you , Dear Brother.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Joey on December 09, 2004, 01:34:28 PM
Sorry to hear about your cousin Jane.

[size=10][move=left,scroll,6,transparent,100%]~Healing vibes for DRJane's cousin.~[/move][/size]
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: DERBRUCER on December 09, 2004, 01:37:25 PM
Only 250+ posts 'till we hit 80,000!

Merkin!
George Bush!
Andrew LLoyd Weber
That Other Site
Colorized Classics

der Brucer
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: bk on December 09, 2004, 01:37:29 PM
Just had a very sweet call from our very own Michele Pawk.  I must tell you, dear readers, I sent out many invites, both regular and e-mail, to all the people I've worked with over the years, and Michele, of all of the people who were no-shows, is the only one who had the courtesy to call me and tell me she was out of town and sorry she missed it.  Frankly, I just don't understand people sometimes - how much work did I have to give folks, how many albums did I have to put people on, how many recording careers did I have to give before people learn to have loyalty or at least graciousness.  It does take me aback sometimes and sometimes it even takes me afront.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Matt H. on December 09, 2004, 01:37:45 PM
Back to the show tonight to finish our run over the next few days. It has been a marvelous experience, but I'm tired and looking forward to having nights free for the next few months.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jay on December 09, 2004, 01:38:04 PM
How about another intriguing category of comic-persons (how's that for PC!) we always expect to laugh at, and then we find them in deadly serious roles doing a bang-up job: Art Carney - (Harry and Tonto), Jackie Gleason - (Soldier in the Rain) , Red Buttons - (Sayonara), Mary Tyler Moore - (Ordinary People), Mickey Rooney (Requiem for a Heavyweight).


...Frank Sinatra (From Here to Eternity)

Not a comic but a stage idol crooner who proved his acting chops in a dramatic role.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Matt H. on December 09, 2004, 01:39:05 PM
I loved Michelle Pawk even before she won her HOLLYWOOD ARMS Tony, but this only reinforces what a classy lady I think she is.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 02:14:09 PM
Jane - Sorry to hear of your uncle's death and your cousin's illness.

And nice to hear about the card that would melt a mother's heart!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 02:18:47 PM
They will all come running again, MR BK, if you are once again aligned with a label.

A friend of mine once said, he was at a party with Yvette Vickers (for God's sake) - she was very friendly to him at first, sized him up, realized he could do nothing for her, moved on without a word to someone else.....

You know many Yvettes - the Micheles are few and far between.  
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: TCB on December 09, 2004, 02:24:29 PM
Actually, it really isn’t a matter or which version of Harry Potter that I prefer.  I didn’t know what the difference was between Full screen and widescreen, nor did I know if I could watch both versions on my television.  Hey, I barely know how to turn on my computer.  That is as technical as I get!

Thanks for the advice, one and all.

Charles, great to have you back on this side of the pond.  I have missed your insights.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Ron Pulliam on December 09, 2004, 02:27:07 PM
I'm all at sixes and sevens, checking the weather on the 8's, while being dressed to the nines, waiting on my new Disney tins.

Ah, num-BEHZ!

Maybe if I count my blessings.....The total number of posts I've made, counting this one, accounts for the remainder of the string, except number 5.

Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 02:27:34 PM
Still no one has mentioned one of the Brando movies I listed as a favorite. His first, THE MEN, directed by Fred Zinnemann, written by Carl Foreman, score by Dimitri Tiomkin. Co-starring the lovely Teresa Wright. Surely people have seen it...?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: elmore3003 on December 09, 2004, 02:27:59 PM
Just had a very sweet call from our very own Michele Pawk.  I must tell you, dear readers, I sent out many invites, both regular and e-mail, to all the people I've worked with over the years, and Michele, of all of the people who were no-shows, is the only one who had the courtesy to call me and tell me she was out of town and sorry she missed it.  Frankly, I just don't understand people sometimes - how much work did I have to give folks, how many albums did I have to put people on, how many recording careers did I have to give before people learn to have loyalty or at least graciousness.  It does take me aback sometimes and sometimes it even takes me afront.

Dear Friend BK, just don't let it take you down!  Did you get yourself a nice gift yet?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: elmore3003 on December 09, 2004, 02:30:41 PM
Still no one has mentioned one of the Brando movies I listed as a favorite. His first, THE MEN, directed by Fred Zinnemann, written by Carl Foreman, score by Dimitri Tiomkin. Co-starring the lovely Teresa Wright. Surely people have seen it...?

Hmmmm. . . . no.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Ron Pulliam on December 09, 2004, 02:31:16 PM
Speaking of Miss Walker, we were watching the Cinderella kinescope telecast last night (it was on here last night, though I know in a great many markets it was on Sunday night)....

It got me to thinking that there seems to be this whole little sub-category of women who we think of primarily as comediennes who have great vocal chops (and somehow we have forgotten that fact):  Misses Ballard and Ghostley to name two.  Miss Walker.  Miss Martha Raye.  To some degree, Miss Burnett.  Am I missing others?  I am sure I am.  Why do you think we forget that they sang, too?  Why do we think they are "just" funny?  Because "comedy is hard?...."  Is it because there are no more variety shows for them to showcase those talents as well?  Or because we just expect them to be only funny?

Maybe it's because they were never particularly "commercial" as vocalists???
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: elmore3003 on December 09, 2004, 02:33:13 PM
DRJane,  I'm so sorry about your uncle!  I don't know how I missed it earlier, but I just went back and found your post.  I'm so sorry.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 02:37:40 PM
 Frankly, I just don't understand people sometimes - how much work did I have to give folks, how many albums did I have to put people on, how many recording careers did I have to give before people learn to have loyalty or at least graciousness.  It does take me aback sometimes and sometimes it even takes me afront.

Unfortunately, loyalty and graciousness are not exactly high on the list of characteristics of people in the business of show. A sad fact but true.  
I've been with the same agent for many years. He has stuck with me through thick and thin and has always proved a friend as well as an agent. He's also made mistakes - but who hasn't? There was a time some years ago when the agency he is with was in the doldrums. This coincided with a time when I happened to win a number of fairly high profile awards. Of course, quite a few agents from rival agencies who were doing very well at the time tried to "raid" me. There was always a very long, very stunned silence when I would stop the initial conversation to say that I wasn't interested because I felt I owed my agent loyalty.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Ron Pulliam on December 09, 2004, 02:40:17 PM
The only year that O'Toole wasn't my number one choice (as great as he was) for the Best Actor Oscar was 1962.

Gregory Peck staked a unique claim that I doubt anyone could begrudge him.  O'Toole was mesmerizing as T. E. Lawrence in "Lawrence of Arabia," but Peck WAS Atticus Finch.

His Henry II in "Becket" and "The Lion in Winter" were authoritarian and electrifying.  I can understand him losing to Rex Harrison for the former, but not to anyone for the latter, much less Cliff Robertson in "Charly."

Any one of the 1969 nominees was better than John Wayne, but O'Toole's "Mr. Chips" was a glorious and amazing creation.

O'Toole in "The Ruling Class" was beyond brilliant.  His Eli Cross in "The Stunt Man" was magnetic.

Oddly, I was never really fond of "My Favorite Year."

But....O'Toole is my favorite actor of all time.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: JoseSPiano on December 09, 2004, 02:43:17 PM
Good Afternoon!

Coming to you live from the production office at Arena Stage...

I was planning on heading home between the rehearsal this afternoon and tonight's dress rehearsal, but after literally sitting in traffic for ten minutes as soon as I left the parking lot...  I just decided it wasn't worth the aggravation of dealing with the traffic right now... So, I pulled back into the parking lot, and here I am.

-I'll get something to eat a little later at the pre-show cafe.

I know I've seen at least Godfather and Godfather II, but it's been a while, a long while.  I guess I should revisit those movies sometime in the future.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 02:43:39 PM
DR PANNI - I didn't like THE MEN very much, but really can't say because I never watched it all the way from beginning to end.

DR RLP - did you order the Mickey Mouse Club tinbox set.....if so, how is it?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 02:45:24 PM
Hollywood Person:  Where is your loyalty?

SFX: Crickets.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Ron Pulliam on December 09, 2004, 02:46:19 PM
DR RLP - did you order the Mickey Mouse Club tinbox set.....if so, how is it?

Ordered....not here...not yet (i.e., that's why I'm at 6's and 7's...because it's due).

But I won't be watching it immediately, so....

:D
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: JoseSPiano on December 09, 2004, 02:46:22 PM
Just had a very sweet call from our very own Michele Pawk.  I must tell you, dear readers, I sent out many invites, both regular and e-mail, to all the people I've worked with over the years, and Michele, of all of the people who were no-shows, is the only one who had the courtesy to call me and tell me she was out of town and sorry she missed it.  Frankly, I just don't understand people sometimes - how much work did I have to give folks, how many albums did I have to put people on, how many recording careers did I have to give before people learn to have loyalty or at least graciousness.  It does take me aback sometimes and sometimes it even takes me afront.

...And Michelle's every-lovin' and very handsome hubby, John Dossett is also a very kind and gracious person.  And I have a feeling that there son will grow up to be just like them too - he's already a wonderful child.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Ron Pulliam on December 09, 2004, 02:48:18 PM
I loved Brando in "Mutiny on the Bounty," "Sayonara," "The Young Lions."
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: JoseSPiano on December 09, 2004, 02:53:51 PM
DR Jane - Sorry to hear about your "curse".  -With the current situation with my father, I'm hoping our own family doesn't have to deal with such a "curse".

Btw, he's scheduled for surgery this coming Monday.  It's been a little strange talking about it with my parents.  My mother doesn't really have an idea of how long my father will have to stay in the hospital - at least that's the impression I'm getting.  And my father just seems to be treating it like another day in the hospital.  Hmm... Of course, I could just be in worry-wart mode, so...
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: JoseSPiano on December 09, 2004, 02:55:48 PM
Well, I'm gonna go be productive and get some keyboard programming done.  I may be heading back to Richmond tonight after the dress rehearsal, so if I do do that then I might not be logging back on to HHW until the morning... So...

Laters...
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: td on December 09, 2004, 02:56:22 PM
DR TCB - if you even consider buying a full screen dvd. . .well. . .you'll have me to reckon with.   ;)
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 02:59:29 PM
Have a good rehearsal DRJOSE.

DR RLP - how could you let Annette and Lonnie, Bobby and Darlene, and Karen and Cubby just linger on the shelf?

A girl on my local TV just announced the a church in the area will be presenting HEN-DALL's Messiah this weekend!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: td on December 09, 2004, 03:02:17 PM
Suppose you were reading a mystery novel, let's say it's WRITER'S BLOCK, and someone other than the author randomly removed up to 40 % of the novel. . .would you still want to read that novel?
That's how I feel about widescreen and full frame, for the latter, someone has removed about 40% of the picture . . .

Would you consider this as a true reproduction of Da Vinci's THE LAST SUPPER?

(http://www.hhes.net.nz/H0088817.jpg)
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 03:03:28 PM
Page Five Dance!  ;D

(http://hjem.get2net.dk/petermad4/cartoons/monster_.gif)
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: bk on December 09, 2004, 03:07:24 PM
Haven't been to a Barnes and Noble yet, elmore, but perhaps on the way to the radio show tonight.  Again I will say, those who tune in and listed will get several treats.  The link is somewhere on page one I believe, thanks to jrand.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 03:19:03 PM
It's 88.5 FM, KCSN in LA.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 03:22:55 PM
More info at

http://kcsn.org/programs/programs.html
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jay on December 09, 2004, 03:27:13 PM
Suppose you were reading a mystery novel, let's say it's WRITER'S BLOCK, and someone other than the author randomly removed up to 40 % of the novel. . .would you still want to read that novel?
That's how I feel about widescreen and full frame, for the latter, someone has removed about 40% of the picture . . .

Would you consider this as a true reproduction of Da Vinci's THE LAST SUPPER?

(http://www.hhes.net.nz/H0088817.jpg)

Kind of reminds me of the time I saw "rence of Ara" starring ter O'Too.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: S. Woody White on December 09, 2004, 03:35:22 PM
I'm a little amazed at the number of Dear Readers who have not seen The Godfather and The Godfather Part II.  I mention them not as Marlon Brando films per se, but rather as two of the best films ever made.
I'm one of those who hasn't seen any of the Godfather films, and you may have helped pinpoint the reason why.  Not only am I not attracted to Mafia-themed films, but I'm not attracted to Brando films.  Never cared for him.  So the combination of Brando and Mafia isn't going to be high on my must-see list.

On the other hand, I did enjoy Teahouse, but that's hardly standard Brando, is it?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 03:45:08 PM

O'Toole in "The Ruling Class" was beyond brilliant.  But....O'Toole is my favorite actor of all time.

Very true.  I felt there were three brilliant nominees that year and Brando didn't equal them.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jay on December 09, 2004, 03:49:17 PM
I'm one of those who hasn't seen any of the Godfather films, and you may have helped pinpoint the reason why.  Not only am I not attracted to Mafia-themed films, but I'm not attracted to Brando films.  Never cared for him.  So the combination of Brando and Mafia isn't going to be high on my must-see list.

On the other hand, I did enjoy Teahouse, but that's hardly standard Brando, is it?

I recommend these films for their craft.  The writing, direction, acting, cinematography, score, editing and scenic design all come together as an organic whole in these two pictures far more successfully than in most any other film I've seen.



Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 03:51:27 PM
Joey thank you for the much needed healing vibes.  My cousin has serious health issues that will complicate her treatment.

Thank you Panni and elmore.

Jose good surgery vibes to your father!  You will keep us posted?  I also think you have a right to worry and to get more detail.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 03:52:18 PM
that's the one dRPANNI!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Dan (the Man) on December 09, 2004, 04:21:03 PM
Michael Caine is doing Bounty commercials now?

Well, Alfie was a quicker-picker-upper (of chicks, anyway.)
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: S. Woody White on December 09, 2004, 04:22:35 PM
It got me to thinking that there seems to be this whole little sub-category of women who we think of primarily as comediennes who have great vocal chops (and somehow we have forgotten that fact):  Misses Ballard and Ghostley to name two.  Miss Walker.  Miss Martha Raye.  To some degree, Miss Burnett.  Am I missing others?  I am sure I am.  
Add Tracey Ullman, who had a couple of Billboard hits in '84: "They Don't Know" and "Breakaway."
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: td on December 09, 2004, 04:30:39 PM
There's always Madeline Kahn when it comes to voices and funny ladies. . . .
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: td on December 09, 2004, 04:32:33 PM
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ MUCH NEEDED VIBES FOR DR JANE AND FAMILY ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: S. Woody White on December 09, 2004, 04:37:11 PM
How about another intriguing category of comic-persons (how's that for PC!) we always expect to laugh at, and then we find them in deadly serious roles doing a bang-up job: Art Carney - (Harry and Tonto) ... Red Buttons - (Sayonara) ...
Comedy is hard, winning an Oscar (and getting the big paychecks later) makes it all easy.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: TCB on December 09, 2004, 04:49:02 PM
Just had a very sweet call from our very own Michele Pawk.  I must tell you, dear readers, I sent out many invites, both regular and e-mail, to all the people I've worked with over the years, and Michele, of all of the people who were no-shows, is the only one who had the courtesy to call me and tell me she was out of town and sorry she missed it.  Frankly, I just don't understand people sometimes - how much work did I have to give folks, how many albums did I have to put people on, how many recording careers did I have to give before people learn to have loyalty or at least graciousness.  It does take me aback sometimes and sometimes it even takes me afront.

Well, BK, if you put me on just one album, I would probably follow you around for life!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Dan (the Man) on December 09, 2004, 04:53:17 PM
I officially HATE new winter boots!!!

My feet are both two giant blisters.  It's so bad I might not even be able to take them OFF :(

DR Emily, have you ever tried on a pair of Ugg boots?  My sister swears by them (which is a strange sight, her standing there cursing while standing next to a pair of boots.)
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: TCB on December 09, 2004, 04:55:14 PM
DR TCB - if you even consider buying a full screen dvd. . .well. . .you'll have me to reckon with.   ;)


Promises.......... promises.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: S. Woody White on December 09, 2004, 04:55:22 PM
Re: the Godfather films
I recommend these films for their craft.  The writing, direction, acting, cinematography, score, editing and scenic design all come together as an organic whole in these two pictures far more successfully than in most any other film I've seen.
So, I should watch these films to admire them, but not for any sense of enjoyment?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Danise on December 09, 2004, 05:00:46 PM
Evening all,

Jane, please accept my most sincere condolences on the loss of your Uncle.  My very best good wishes for your cousin as well.

DR Jose, those same good wishes to your father.  

I'm glad that BK had a wonderful birthday.  

Quote
Jane
HHW God   
Re:HAINES 57
« Reply #215 on: Yesterday at 05:47:46pm »    
________________________________________
Danise you need to be more verbal and plan something yourself.  Call a friend and say it is your birthday “let’s do something”.  Maybe your friends will be busy but it’s worth a try.  I have even treated a friend to lunch just so we could go out together (she couldn’t afford to pay).  I make sure I have plans if I want to do something.  

I'm very sorry, Jane, but I would never do that.  If I'm remembered then I'm remembered but if I'm not, so be it.  

Quote

TCB
Re:HAINES 57
« Reply #216 on: Yesterday at 05:47:50pm »    
________________________________________
Quote from: Danise on Yesterday at 05:20:03pm

Thanks Panni.  That was in the past because I had very nice birthday right here on HHW.  

And don't you ever forget it, Danise.  Every day in my prayers I make sure that I:
Thank God for my Friends.
Thank God for my Family.
And I thank God for my Friends that have become my Family.

Your right, TCB, as always. I am very grateful for the friendships I've made here.  

I promised I would never drag things from one board to the other  but I have to say that last night I saw something on another board that had my jaw hitting the floor.  I don't consider myself a prude but one poster told another poster to do something that I can't even repeat--at least not in public.  

 I almost contacted the board administrator and told myself, “No, it’s not my place to say anything” Then I almost contacted him again--even typed up a long PM and my hand hovered over the send button but I told myself, “It’s not your place.”  

I noticed it was gone this evening.  I just had to go back and check but I’m still in a state of shock that someone could have said something like that.  

I’m so glad we don’t talk to one another like that.  

End of rant.

Quote

 MBarnum

Re:HAINES 57
« Reply #252 on: Yesterday at 07:38:58pm »    
________________________________________
JMK, I am beginning to think that BK is skipping our posts! He has still not answered our Portland questions from today or yesterday.

Don't feel rained on.  He never answered my $54.00 question either.   ;)  :)

Big news of the day.

I'm so scared and happy and excited all at the same time.  I might be getting a new (to me) vehicle.  A 1991 Ford Explorer.

 There was an ad in our work bulletin for one at an unbelievable low price.   I went to look at it today and it is a nice royal blue color.  I’ve already decided that if I get her, she shall be named Bonnie Blue and yes, I do name all of my vehicles.  I’m driving the “A” team van now.  

The battery was dead on her today but the lady said her son was going to put a new one in tonight so I can test drive her tomorrow.   I just can’t wait!  




 
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: TCB on December 09, 2004, 05:04:47 PM
Re: the Godfather filmsSo, I should watch these films to admire them, but not for any sense of enjoyment?


There is, SWW, the additional pleasure of watching, both a young Al Pacino and a young James Caan.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: TCB on December 09, 2004, 05:10:13 PM
Jane, I too missed the post about your uncle.  My deepest sympathies.

~~~Healing vibes to Jane's cousin and Jose's father~~~
[/size]

And new car vibes for Danise!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: MBarnum on December 09, 2004, 05:54:37 PM
Still no one has mentioned one of the Brando movies I listed as a favorite. His first, THE MEN, directed by Fred Zinnemann, written by Carl Foreman, score by Dimitri Tiomkin. Co-starring the lovely Teresa Wright. Surely people have seen it...?

I have seen THE MEN DR Panni, but for some reason I had forgotten that Brando was in it! It was a very good movie, however.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 05:59:44 PM
Time for the radio show to start.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 06:00:51 PM
LOL....I lied......9 pm Pacific time!.....  Three more hours!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: bk on December 09, 2004, 06:04:46 PM
S. Woody, how can you possibly know if you'll get enjoyment or not - in order to get enjoyment or not you'd actually have to watch the Godfather movies, which I, too, recommend.  I'm not a huge fan of the genre, but these films transcend the gangster genre.  They're wondefully written, directed and acted, with brilliant photography by Gordon Willis and wonderful scores by Nino Rota.  
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: bk on December 09, 2004, 06:06:00 PM
I do hope we get some call-ins from dear readers on the radio show this evening.  Maybe Hisaka will call in all the way from Japan.  Perhaps I'll play a Japanese show tune tonight.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: George on December 09, 2004, 06:12:36 PM
Bruce, are you going to be on the show for all three hours or just a portion of it?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 06:14:26 PM
I meant to say this, perhaps I did, but it never hurts to repeat...

EXCELLENT VIBES TO DR JOSE'S FATHER!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: George on December 09, 2004, 06:15:53 PM
It would have to be on at the same time as The Apprentice!  Of course, I do have three VCRs so that the taping of the TV show will absolutely NOT be a problem!! ;D
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: George on December 09, 2004, 06:24:04 PM
I do hope we get some call-ins from dear readers on the radio show this evening.  Maybe Hisaka will call in all the way from Japan.  Perhaps I'll play a Japanese show tune tonight.

I have the Japanese cast recordings of Hair, Scarlett, The Phantom of the Opera and Disney's Beauty and the Beast.  But reading the description (http://www.kcsn.org/programs/2onthedial.html) of the radio show, I can't imagine that they'd have ANY trouble finding something to play for ANY of your fans from around the world!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 06:24:21 PM
The curse of people who write for a living is that you never quite get the feeling that you're finally no longer in school.
Tonight, for example, fueled by popcorn and hot chocolate, I'll be pulling as much of an all-nighter as I can manage. I have a big meeting with the right coast tomorrow for which I need to have all my ducks in a row story-wise. (Yes - I'm writing a script about duck hunting.) I'm the one who suggested tomorrow because I tend to thrive under pressure. Let us hope. My ideas are there - floating all over the place. I just need to rope them in and organize them.

BTW - On my way home from borrowing some popcorn (I ran out and who wants to go to the supermarket this time of night with millions of frenzied post-work Christmas-crazed shoppers) - anyway, on my way home, I decided that I needed something sweet. I dropped in to a local bakery/restaurant. They had a slew of interestingly flavored bagels. Usually I abhor sweet bagels, but this time I was willing to give them a taste. This is a place that usually has samples sitting on the counter. I asked if there were any samples available of the cinammon crunch bagels. The young clerk said, "Samples? No. I'll just give you a bagel. If you like it, you'll buy one next time. If you don't like it, I'll give you another flavor."
And he did. And I did like it. And next time I WILL buy one. Now THAT'S good customer PR!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: elmore3003 on December 09, 2004, 06:25:23 PM
Dear Friend BK, I will be long unconscious when you hit the airwaves, so break a leg and know I'm wishing your radio time be filled with wit, learning, and fab music!

DRJose, great healing vibes for your father.  I missed you on Monday.

Nurse Jane, great healing vibes for your cousin.  I miss you all the time.  Aw, Keith, can't Jane come back and play?

Good night, DRs!

Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 06:27:28 PM
Goodnight, Elmore!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 06:28:44 PM
I will, of course, have 88.5 FM on in the background as I work.

Which reminds me - QUESTION FOR BK - you never reported on the Hungarian MY FAIR LADY. What did you think of it?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: bk on December 09, 2004, 06:41:20 PM
I liked the Hungarion My Fair Lady.  

I'm on for all three hours, which is why the notes will be going up at one or later.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 06:57:08 PM

I deleted a more complicated post. This simplifies matters.
The actual way to link to tonight's radio show can be found at...

 http://kcsn.org/listen/
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: td on December 09, 2004, 07:00:23 PM
Thank you, Panni!  I can listen. . .through Musicmatch Jukebox   ???
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 07:04:38 PM
Bruce can I get a recording of your radio show?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 07:14:16 PM
Td thank you very much for the vibes.

Danise thanks for your caring thoughts and good wishes.
Good car possibility vibes.  Are you aware of the gas prices on those SUV’s?  Some only take premium gas.

Thank you TCB for your sympathies and healing vibes.

Panni I like that bagel store.   :)Do they have egg bagels?  I ate my last one the other day.

Aw elmore I miss you too and thanks
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Ginny on December 09, 2004, 07:16:39 PM
Bruce can I get a recording of your radio show?

Jane, I was wondering the same thing!  

Also, Jane, sorry to hear you've had a couple of pieces of bad news this week.

I've had some very long work days this week and tonight a delightful holiday banquet with my mom and husband.   Also, our son came home from his first quarter in college for a well-earned vacation.  I'm ready to crash now, will be a more active conversant tomorrow and over the weekend.  G'night, all, and have fun with BK on the airwaves!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: George on December 09, 2004, 07:18:33 PM
Bruce can I get a recording of your radio show?

I'm going to attempt to record it.  It's three hours long, so I don't know if that's too much for my computer to handle, but we'll see.  If it works (and that's a big IF), I can make copies for people...unless Bruce can get copies. ::)
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: td on December 09, 2004, 07:20:35 PM
Promises.......... promises.

I NEVER make a promise I can't keep . . .
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: bk on December 09, 2004, 07:28:05 PM
I think the station can ultimately provide me with a tape or CDs.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Michael on December 09, 2004, 07:28:38 PM
Dearest Reader Jane:

My thoughts are with you at this most difficult time.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Michael on December 09, 2004, 07:29:14 PM
DR Jose:

The best of health vibes to your father.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 07:30:52 PM
Ginny thank you and I hope you rested well.  You must be thrilled to have your son home in time to celebrate your birthday with you.

Speaking of birthdays, have a good one tomorrow MBarnum.

George, three hours-good luck.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 07:33:04 PM
Bruce are you going to be on the entire three hours?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jane on December 09, 2004, 07:41:50 PM
Thank you Michael Shayne
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: S. Woody White on December 09, 2004, 07:43:06 PM
There is, SWW, the additional pleasure of watching both a young Al Pacino and a young James Caan.
Neither of whom have ever been a turn-on for me.  That's horseracing.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: bk on December 09, 2004, 07:51:56 PM
Yep, all three hours.  A marathon.  I'm on my way to the studio now.  Keep the home fries burning.  It looks like tomorrow we may just achieve our new plateau - very exciting.  Hope some of you call in whilst I'm on the radio.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 07:58:54 PM
I think MR BK wants us to call in when he is on the air.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: S. Woody White on December 09, 2004, 08:01:01 PM
S. Woody, how can you possibly know if you'll get enjoyment or not - in order to get enjoyment or not you'd actually have to watch the Godfather movies, which I, too, recommend.  I'm not a huge fan of the genre, but these films transcend the gangster genre.  They're wondefully written, directed and acted, with brilliant photography by Gordon Willis and wonderful scores by Nino Rota.  
As I stated earlier, it's not just the genre I don't enjoy, it's also Brando.  For that matter, I don't enjoy Cahn or Pacino much, either.  That doesn't knock the acting out of the ballpark for me; it's a strike-out.  

Let's put in a parallel here.  Suppose someone had told you that this most magnificent film had come out, and that you had to see it, and if you didn't there was something wrong with you.  It's a daring film starring a singer in his first dramatic film role, semi-autobiographical but very important.  

Would you still have wanted to see 8 Mile?

Me neither.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jennifer on December 09, 2004, 08:04:19 PM
Good vibes to DR Jane's cousin and DR Jose's father.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jennifer on December 09, 2004, 08:05:22 PM
BK, great story about Michele.  Very classy.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Matt H. on December 09, 2004, 08:09:01 PM
Al Pacino is actually the star of the three GODFATHER films, not Marlon Brando. Truth be told, I think Brando's role in more supporting in the first one than leading (though his is the character's name in the title). Brando does not appear in either II or III.

Yes, I abhor violence in films, and THE GODFATHER films, particularly the first, have scenes of visceral violence, but it's not merely for shock value. It defines the people and their code of conduct.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: S. Woody White on December 09, 2004, 08:11:50 PM
...I have a big meeting with the right coast tomorrow for which I need to have all my ducks in a row story-wise. (Yes - I'm writing a script about duck hunting.)
Does this mean you're writing this story...wait for it...blind?

 ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Matt H. on December 09, 2004, 08:12:51 PM
We got through the recording of the show tonight. I had one small slip of the tongue in my monologue (sad to say, before I get drunk which might have covered it otherwise), but anyway, I think the taping went well. I'm delighted that's over, however. I can enjoy the rest of the run without feeling under any undue pressure.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Matt H. on December 09, 2004, 08:13:21 PM
DRs Jane and Jose, my thoughts are with you in this difficult time.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Matt H. on December 09, 2004, 08:15:46 PM
I watched ANIMAL CRACKERS this afternoon. Yep, Universal has cleaned it up. Those darned edits are still present in the musical numbers, but they aren't as choppy as they have appeared before. Looks like somehow they have smoothed them out a bit. I was quite pleased with the quality of the disc.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 08:17:47 PM
Congrats, Matt H!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 08:18:17 PM
I wonder if Olga Rodriguez will call in??
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: S. Woody White on December 09, 2004, 08:19:42 PM
BTW - On my way home from borrowing some popcorn (I ran out and who wants to go to the supermarket this time of night with millions of frenzied post-work Christmas-crazed shoppers) - anyway, on my way home, I decided that I needed something sweet. I dropped in to a local bakery/restaurant. They had a slew of interestingly flavored bagels. Usually I abhor sweet bagels, but this time I was willing to give them a taste. This is a place that usually has samples sitting on the counter. I asked if there were any samples available of the cinammon crunch bagels. The young clerk said, "Samples? No. I'll just give you a bagel. If you like it, you'll buy one next time. If you don't like it, I'll give you another flavor."
And he did. And I did like it. And next time I WILL buy one. Now THAT'S good customer PR!
I've had something similar happen to me, several years ago.  I'd been stopping on my way from the bus stop to work to get a cup 'o joe at Starbucks, but was faced with increasing lines and, sadly, increasing rudeness from the staff.  One morning, I simply skipped out of the line and headed on in to work.  There was, however, an independent coffee joint enroute, so I went in there.  Chris, the javameister, noticed my grumpiness and got me to tell my tale of woe.  He told me that that day's cup was on the house, because if I liked it, I'd be back.

I never went back to Starbucks, never wanted to and never needed to.  And Chris got a loyal customer.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 08:21:42 PM
Speaking of the lost... There are posters up all over my neighborhood offering a $2000. reward - that's right, TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS - for a lost African parrot named Katie. I think the bird flew the coop because she was embarrassed by her name. I once had the sweetest dog in the world and my then very young DD named her Katie. Fine for a dog -- but not a parrot. IMHO.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Matt H. on December 09, 2004, 08:26:05 PM
Congrats, Matt H!

Thank you, Panni. Once the video arrives, I'll do some screen grabs and show you folks what I've been boring you about for two months.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 08:31:02 PM
Good work vibes for DRPANNI.

Good healing vibes for DRJOSE's father....
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Sandra on December 09, 2004, 08:35:31 PM
Tonight, for example, fueled by popcorn and hot chocolate, I'll be pulling as much of an all-nighter as I can manage.

We can have an all-nighter party together! I am fueled by Cherry Coke and a sandwich from Fazoli's.

I only have five pages to go! Woo hoo!! And then I get to memorize it so that I can present my paper tomorrow. At least this presentation is instead of a final. Whew!

Vibes for Jane and Jose. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Dan (the Man) on December 09, 2004, 08:46:33 PM
Rose Marie, too, in a sense.

DR Stuart, have you ever seen clips of Rose Marie performing in vaudeville as a child?  She was belting them out at the age of five.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 08:51:43 PM
And wasn't Rose Marie also considered to dub Miss Roz in the film of GYPSY?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 08:54:40 PM
You're on, DR Sandra. Bring on the Cherry Coke!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 08:55:18 PM
Thanks, JR!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: George on December 09, 2004, 08:56:29 PM
Well, it's almost 9:00 and I'm going to go so that I can start recording BK on the radio (a Donna Summer reference).  I hope that my computer doesn't crash!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:01:19 PM
Good work vibes for DRPANNI.

Good healing vibes for DRJOSE's father....

Wow!  Perfect opening music for MR BK!!!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:09:15 PM
Sounding good so far......VOD reference!  Hahahaha!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: MBarnum on December 09, 2004, 09:09:19 PM
BK is on now!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: td on December 09, 2004, 09:10:41 PM
"I'll plant my own tree!"
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:11:23 PM
Close your ears DRHisaka!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:12:27 PM
Fire that piano player!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: MBarnum on December 09, 2004, 09:15:17 PM
My introduction to modern Broadway music is coming to me in Japanese...and that is just the way I prefer it!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:18:22 PM
LOL MBARNUM.....but A CHORUS LINE isn't modern....hehehe....oh well compared to FLOWER DRUM SONG, I guess it is.  LOL

Guy Haines is singing now....
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: MBarnum on December 09, 2004, 09:23:28 PM
LOL! To me, anything after 1970 is modern! LOL!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:24:42 PM
Maggie Flynn with Shirley Jones and Jack Cassidy
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: td on December 09, 2004, 09:25:20 PM
Well, ain't technology grand? ? ?

BK is in my office!  Kinda-sorta.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: TCB on December 09, 2004, 09:25:43 PM
As I stated earlier, it's not just the genre I don't enjoy, it's also Brando.  For that matter, I don't enjoy Cahn or Pacino much, either.  That doesn't knock the acting out of the ballpark for me; it's a strike-out.  

Let's put in a parallel here.  Suppose someone had told you that this most magnificent film had come out, and that you had to see it, and if you didn't there was something wrong with you.  It's a daring film starring a singer in his first dramatic film role, semi-autobiographical but very important.  

Would you still have wanted to see 8 Mile?

Me neither.


Yes!
[/size][/font][/color]


.........but instead they told me it was a poorly made film by that homophobic snot of a rap singer.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: td on December 09, 2004, 09:26:07 PM
now if i could only find a way to make TCB in my office. . . .
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:29:45 PM
A verb is a word denoting an action.......
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Dan (the Man) on December 09, 2004, 09:30:30 PM
Gawd, I'm such a maroon!  I got mixed up with the time differences and I thought I missed the Big Broadcast of 04.  It's on now here in Philly!

Tony Roberts in Promises, Promises! Who is doing Fran Kubelik?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:31:21 PM
Dame EDNA!!!!!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:31:54 PM
That is NOT the answer to your question DtM!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:32:56 PM
DR TCB did you ever write that letter to Stephen Sondheim and get a response?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Dan (the Man) on December 09, 2004, 09:33:33 PM
I was expecting a smart-alek answer like Mr. Sheldrake.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:35:08 PM
LOL....
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: TCB on December 09, 2004, 09:35:29 PM
DR TCB did you ever write that letter to Stephen Sondheim and get a response?


No, I tried composing (a Sondheim reference) a letter, but it came out sounding really dorky, so...........
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: td on December 09, 2004, 09:37:24 PM
I thought they were playing the London cast recording of PROMISES, PROMISES with Betty Lynn. . . .
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:37:47 PM
LOL TCB - so did mine, but he answered me!

Oh he is talking about us!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Dan (the Man) on December 09, 2004, 09:39:20 PM
Cross your fingers!  A number from What If?...
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:40:24 PM
Hurray....some of What If?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: td on December 09, 2004, 09:40:41 PM
Yes! a number from WHAT IF!  Oh! TWO!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: td on December 09, 2004, 09:46:29 PM
Hey! "Disneyland" is NOT from What If!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:49:47 PM
Where is the producer? LOL
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 09:58:17 PM
Who Killed Teddy Bear?  LOL
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 10:00:36 PM
I called with a question....ehehehehehe
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 10:07:32 PM
That wasn't QUITE my question LOL....
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: François de Paris on December 09, 2004, 10:10:11 PM
Please call 911!

One Archived Column -- BK's bien sûr! -- is missing!

For some strange and weird reason, I wanted to read THE FULL MONTY.... I mean, errr,  THE FULL REPORT and the Report is not full, or half full, or half empty, it's plainly GONE!

If you want my opinion, and of course you want my opinion, don't you?......... well that column has flown the coup with.......
Olga Rodriguez! :D

Anyway! Call 911!
One of our dinosaurs, err..., one of our HHW columns is missing!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 10:17:26 PM
How strange!  The internet is a strange place and weird things happen.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: MBarnum on December 09, 2004, 10:17:45 PM
Good question "caller from Indiana"
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: MBarnum on December 09, 2004, 10:19:09 PM
I am shopping on Ebay, trying to find a Julia doll, whilst listening to BK.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Dan (the Man) on December 09, 2004, 10:20:25 PM
Rats!  My Comcast connection crapped out and I missed the last 15 minutes, including the question from the caller From Indiana.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: S. Woody White on December 09, 2004, 10:22:51 PM
Yes!
[/size][/font][/color]


.........but instead they told me it was a poorly made film by that homophobic snot of a rap singer.
You miss my point, TCB.  The desire to see something has to be there.  Regardless of the reviews on 8 Mile (and there were plenty of good reviews as well as negative), I simply had no desire to watch or hear it.  Back when I was in college, which is when the original Godfather was released, people were telling me I had to see it, but I still had no desire, and still don't.

Another analogy refers back to my high school days.  The "popular" crowd insisted that everyone listen to certain music, dress in certain styles, watch certain shows.  I may not have had the best self-image back then, but I knew my own tastes didn't match theirs.  Some of the songs they liked I liked, but others I didn't.  The same was with clothes and shows.  My desires were different from theirs.

This followed into my twenties and thirties, as I entered adulthood and the gay community.  At the time, in the Los Angeles area, "everyone" who was gay centered their lives in West Hollywood.  But I wasn't interested in West Hollywood and gravitated to the Silverlake area instead, and later to Long Beach.  I knew myself well enough to follow my own instincts.

Is my life the less for not having watched The Godfather?  I don't think so, not really.  The iconography has been pervasive enough that I know something about the film, so that when it is mentioned I know what is being referred to in a conversation.  DR Noel has told us he has not watched any of the LOTR films, which is his choice.  I daresay he's heard quite enough about the films to be in a similar position to mine on The Godfather.

The reverse is also true.  I seriously doubt that many here are familiar with Mike Oldfield's recording career.  That doesn't make them lesser people in my frame of mind, simply because I happen to enjoy his works a great deal.  And I doubt Bollywood films would be to everyone's tastes, but I don't think any less of MBarnum because of his enjoyment of them.

That's part of the nature of horseracing.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 10:24:27 PM
LOL DtM - he paraphrased me......I didn't get on the air...LOL.

Oh I love this CINDERELLA song!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 10:25:34 PM
MBARNUM likes Bollywood films?  Who knew??
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 10:25:52 PM
What is a JULIA doll?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Dan (the Man) on December 09, 2004, 10:28:26 PM
What is a JULIA doll?


It's either a doll of a black nurse or of a wooden-legged resistance fighter that comes with an impossibly furry hat accessory that's stuffed with money.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: MBarnum on December 09, 2004, 10:34:47 PM
LOL! Julia is from the old JULIA TV show...and one of Mattel's Barbies from the late 60s. I am searching for one UNDER $20.00!! But no luck so far.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: TCB on December 09, 2004, 10:35:39 PM
You miss my point, TCB.  The desire to see something has to be there.  Regardless of the reviews on 8 Mile (and there were plenty of good reviews as well as negative), I simply had no desire to watch or hear it.  Back when I was in college, which is when the original Godfather was released, people were telling me I had to see it, but I still had no desire, and still don't.

Another analogy refers back to my high school days.  The "popular" crowd insisted that everyone listen to certain music, dress in certain styles, watch certain shows.  I may not have had the best self-image back then, but I knew my own tastes didn't match theirs.  Some of the songs they liked I liked, but others I didn't.  The same was with clothes and shows.  My desires were different from theirs.

This followed into my twenties and thirties, as I entered adulthood and the gay community.  At the time, in the Los Angeles area, "everyone" who was gay centered their lives in West Hollywood.  But I wasn't interested in West Hollywood and gravitated to the Silverlake area instead, and later to Long Beach.  I knew myself well enough to follow my own instincts.

Is my life the less for not having watched The Godfather?  I don't think so, not really.  The iconography has been pervasive enough that I know something about the film, so that when it is mentioned I know what is being referred to in a conversation.  DR Noel has told us he has not watched any of the LOTR films, which is his choice.  I daresay he's heard quite enough about the films to be in a similar position to mine on The Godfather.

The reverse is also true.  I seriously doubt that many here are familiar with Mike Oldfield's recording career.  That doesn't make them lesser people in my frame of mind, simply because I happen to enjoy his works a great deal.  And I doubt Bollywood films would be to everyone's tastes, but I don't think any less of MBarnum because of his enjoyment of them.

That's part of the nature of horseracing.


Apparently you missed my point, SWW.....


It was a joke!
[/font][/size]
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 10:37:00 PM
Now, now, boys - no fighting in the schoolyard!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Dan (the Man) on December 09, 2004, 10:41:13 PM
LOL! Julia is from the old JULIA TV show...and one of Mattel's Barbies from the late 60s. I am searching for one UNDER $20.00!! But no luck so far.

Have you come across any Julia dolls for over $20?

I would like to get a Honey West doll for my sister, but those are up in the $300+ range.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 10:43:56 PM
DtM - get a Barbie and put on mole on with a black marker!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: TCB on December 09, 2004, 10:45:32 PM
Now, now, boys - no fighting in the schoolyard!

I am not fighting, Panni.  I could care less if SWW has seen THE GODFATHER or not.  I have never seen THE GODFATHER, either.  I was only making reference to his mention of the film 8 MILE and its star, Eminem.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 10:48:18 PM
Bah Humbug!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Dan (the Man) on December 09, 2004, 10:49:07 PM
Bah Humbug!

"I want to put bugs in your hair!"
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 10:49:49 PM
My turn to say, "I was only joking!"
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 10:50:26 PM
LOL DtM.....that line is so funny....the audience laughs everytime anyone says it.  It is my new Christmas greeting!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Dan (the Man) on December 09, 2004, 10:52:32 PM
Jrand, the Bic pen mole idea could work, or I could buy this set of dolls that are currently on sale on eBay--one of them is supposedly a Honey West.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v130/WandaDuck/d9_1_b.jpg)

Kind of looks like a set of Kill Bill dolls.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 10:56:25 PM
Honey West is the first one (pre-operation).
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Dan (the Man) on December 09, 2004, 10:57:21 PM
Off to beddy-bye land here.  Night!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Noel on December 09, 2004, 10:58:01 PM
You're misremembering.
I saw the first Lord of the Rings movie and didn't like it.
Then the second Lord of the Rings movie came out, and people kept telling me "It's SO MUCH better than the first one.  Even if you didn't like the first one, you'll like this one."  So, I tried to see it, but gave up after about an hour, bored out of my mind.  When the third one came out, everybody said "It's SO MUCH better than the previous films.  Even if you didn't like the first two..." But, at this point, they'd lost all credibility.  I'd given the Rings trilogy about four hours of my time, and wasn't rewarded.

Ask anybody, just about, and they'll list The Godfather as one of the top ten American movies.  I love it, and I don't like violence, gangster films, James Caan, Abe Vigoda or Nino Rota.  You've your head in the sand if you don't give it a try.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 11:05:04 PM
DtM - I saw those....I think it's third from the left with her hair all up in the air.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Jrand74 on December 09, 2004, 11:14:21 PM
I tink I must go to bed as vell....so late in de night.

Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: TCB on December 09, 2004, 11:14:36 PM
If I have inadvertantly offended anyone this evening (Panni, SWW, Eminem, Mario Puzo, the estate of the late Marlon Brando), I do apologize.  I guess between performances for one show, rehearsals for the next, and trying to squeeze in the holidays besides; I am very tired.  And when I am tired, I don't always say things on paper (or computer) the way I mean them to sound.

Good Night
[/size]
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 11:58:16 PM
I for one was not in the least bit offended. I have to be ADVERTENTLY offended to be offended. No stinkin' inadvertent slights for me, no sir. You gotta put some effort into it.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 09, 2004, 11:59:43 PM
Hey, where'd everybody go? You'd think it was midnight (3 AM on the right coast) or something.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: George on December 10, 2004, 12:13:17 AM
Well, I think I got it all!  I broke it up into chunks (there are seven) and had to break in the middle of songs, but I chose songs for which I had recordings, so I can just drop in the songs from my CDs.

Pretty darned cool show, BK!!  And I loved the What If selections, as well as Sweet Charity in Dutch!  I don't have any Dutch musicals, but I do have Rent in Icelandic! ;D
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 10, 2004, 12:31:41 AM
I don't have any Dutch musicals, but I do have Rent in Icelandic! ;D

Who doesn't?
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: bk on December 10, 2004, 12:33:49 AM
I'm back, and to prove it, I'm here.  I've caught up on all the posts and now I must hurry and write the notes and get them posted.
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: Panni on December 10, 2004, 12:34:16 AM
I'm tired. I just ate some leftover popcorn. I don't think what I'm writing makes sense anymore. Perhaps I should quit for the night. Maybe the elves will finish it!
Title: Re:BACK IN THE SWING OF THINGS
Post by: George on December 10, 2004, 12:51:24 AM
So BK, were you able (will you be able) to get a copy of the show for yourself?