Everybody digs a public catfight.
I think Shaiman's responses were funny and biting. LaC does make some okay points, I mean many of us have complained about the lack of chance-taking shows out there. Although any show takes a chance by virtue of the money invested in it, even if it is based on a Disney cartoon, a "Full House" episode, or the songs of the Doobie Brothers.
The problem is in the orthodoxy espoused by LaC, as if there is only one right way to do a musical or to BE a musical. There is no right or wrong, only what works and what doesn't. And that is highly subjective.
Most of the first half of the 20th Century featured shows that hung on barely-existing plots with songs thrown in. It evolved into plot and character-driven shows, and some would say it is "devolving" back towards the former. I personally don't dislike so-called jukebox musicals on principle. The question to me is if each one works or not. Is Broadway everything I want it to be right now? No. Neither is Cinema, and neither is pop music. But then I don't rule the world just yet.
Anyways, as LaC points out, it's all Jose's fault for wanting to get rich as a musician!