I keep having to take breaks from the rather excruciating motion picture I'm watching on DVD - something called Across The Universe.  After reading about the stunning visual imagery, the brilliance of Julie Taymor's "vision" I, despite having seen many comments saying it was a travesty, had to see for myself.  I have yet to see one brilliant image or any particular "vision."  What I have seen is, as usual these days, lots of yellow in the transfer.  Note to idiot filmmakers - skies are BLUE, not yellow/green.  The color BLUE is your friend.  Stop draining the color from film.  It is nauseating.  Mr. Ebert says this film "reimagines" the 60s - how so?  How is it "reimagining"?  It takes place in the 60s, Mr. Ebert, and I just don't see this reimagining, but then again, I've always felt that Mr. Ebert was a total bore as a critic.  No, it's just the 60s as seen through the eyes of the 2000s - yellow, hip, and too damn long.