I keep having to take breaks from the rather excruciating motion picture I'm watching on DVD - something called Across The Universe. After reading about the stunning visual imagery, the brilliance of Julie Taymor's "vision" I, despite having seen many comments saying it was a travesty, had to see for myself. I have yet to see one brilliant image or any particular "vision." What I have seen is, as usual these days, lots of yellow in the transfer. Note to idiot filmmakers - skies are BLUE, not yellow/green. The color BLUE is your friend. Stop draining the color from film. It is nauseating. Mr. Ebert says this film "reimagines" the 60s - how so? How is it "reimagining"? It takes place in the 60s, Mr. Ebert, and I just don't see this reimagining, but then again, I've always felt that Mr. Ebert was a total bore as a critic. No, it's just the 60s as seen through the eyes of the 2000s - yellow, hip, and too damn long.