Old Friends/Bookends -
DR Larry: Were turn of the century audiences gifted with a better attention span to cope with all those twists in the final act of "Babes in Toyland"?
DRTomovoz, the one thing I can say good about the BABES IN TOYLAND libretto is that it didn't talk down to children and it never ignored the more unpleasant aspects of life. Unlike the Laurel & Hardy, the Disney, and all other contemporary versions, the original dealt with child abuse, murder, demonic possession and dismemberment, public execution, and torture in 3 hours of vaudeviile, song, dance, and a lot of ladies in tights (the original ad on the side of the Majestic Theatre said "Cast of 104 - Mostly Girls" and a lot of those ladies were turning tricks after the show with their stagedoor johnnies).
I think the plot, for the most part Barnaby's trying to kill his nephew and niece for their inheritance, is very clearly laid out, but I'm sure the Act Three clause used to save Alan by marriage to a widow might have been incomprehensible to younger audiences. My goddaughter, at age 13, loved SLEEPY HOLLOW, but she was stymied by the inheritance plot. I suspect the kids got a little bored by the songs that were primarily intended for the adults like "The Moon Will Help You Out" (go have sex in the moonlight and land him) or "Before and After" (marital tribulation), but for a family show, it's so much more mature than anything currently being written. I fought constantly with the Houston Grand Opera about dumbing down the more violent aspects of the plot!
Now, if only Glen MacDonough had been a talent the size of W.S. Gilbert, the show might still be better regarded, but Glen's a second-stringer, and his libretto is poor dramaturgy. I love the killer dolls, though.