On another discussion group in which I participate, I encountered the following statement:
I see you just responded to my one statement ignoring what went before. Very unique approach. I may try that for some of these longer chains within threads. Sort of like playing roulette, hoping you caught the right meaning while ignoring context.
The response to it was that no context had been ignored, including the demeaning context of this statement. The originator protested it was not demeaning but a statement indicating his confusion over what the respondent had said in his previous post. (The originator was confused because he wasn't considering the respondent's comments were not directed solely at his input but also to another's).
I ask you, Dear Readers of the HainesHisWay.com family, was it a snarky, supercilious statement...or not?