Topic: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR (Read 105617 times)

Cillaliz · « **Reply #660 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:50:39 PM »

Quote from: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:49:11 PM

Quote from: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:47:25 PM
Oh you think they should have opened the curtain before the video started, do you? Well we're changing things this year!

If you rewind, you can here, "Steve, open it!"

I heard it and chuckled. I'm being sarcastic

Ginny · « **Reply #661 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:50:51 PM »

Now I see what y'all meant about Amy's necklace.

Jrand74 · « **Reply #662 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:50:56 PM »

sorry gang - I love Amy's necklace with that dress

Matt H. · « **Reply #663 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:50:57 PM »

It's a unique way to introduce the nominees, but if they do this for all the acting roles, we're going to go WAY over.

bk · « **Reply #664 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:51:21 PM »

Okay, is Goldie Hawn the new Mickey Rourke. I just threw up on the ground.

DAW · « **Reply #665 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:51:23 PM »

That's some dress Goldie is almost wearing.

George · « **Reply #666 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:51:28 PM »

Quote from: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:49:11 PM

Quote from: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:47:25 PM
Oh you think they should have opened the curtain before the video started, do you? Well we're changing things this year!

If you rewind, you can here, "Steve, open it!"

I missed it. I'll have to go back later because I'm recording this to my DVD burner and not on my DVR.

Jrand74 · « **Reply #667 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:51:29 PM »

Quote from: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:50:57 PM

It's a unique way to introduce the nominees, but if they do this for all the acting roles, we're going to go WAY over.

And it ain't that great.....

DakotaCelt · « **Reply #668 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:51:35 PM »

I wouild nominate the dress for What not to Wear....

Cillaliz · « **Reply #669 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:51:52 PM »

Quote from: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:50:57 PM

It's a unique way to introduce the nominees, but if they do this for all the acting roles, we're going to go WAY over.

Especially if we have 3 more production numbers

Jrand74 · « **Reply #670 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:52:05 PM »

Tilda didn't rehearse.

bk · « **Reply #671 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:52:43 PM »

Penelope - I believe that was expected, yes?

George · « **Reply #672 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:52:43 PM »

Quote from: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 05:51:52 PM

Quote from: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:50:57 PM
It's a unique way to introduce the nominees, but if they do this for all the acting roles, we're going to go WAY over.

Especially if we have 3 more production numbers

You got that right.

Jrand74 · « **Reply #673 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:52:48 PM »

Oh no.......................why. Lord, why?

JoseSPiano · « **Reply #674 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:52:53 PM »

Quote from: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:50:57 PM

It's a unique way to introduce the nominees, but if they do this for all the acting roles, we're going to go WAY over.

Yep. Each winner will join "The Circle" tonight.

Four hours for sure tonight. Maybe even five.

Edisaurus · « **Reply #675 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:52:57 PM »

I do like hearing some Mercer...it will help pay off the bills from the film that's bleeding money.

Matt H. · « **Reply #676 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:53:00 PM »

There goes my chance for a perfect score.

Jrand74 · « **Reply #677 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:53:25 PM »

Her breasticals is really squeezed tight together.

Ginny · « **Reply #678 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:54:01 PM »

Quote from: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 05:52:53 PM

Quote from: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:50:57 PM
It's a unique way to introduce the nominees, but if they do this for all the acting roles, we're going to go WAY over.

Yep. Each winner will join "The Circle" tonight.

Four hours for sure tonight. Maybe even five.

Sure glad I'm retired and don't have to go to work in the morning.

DakotaCelt · « **Reply #679 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:54:55 PM »

It could prove to be an interesting evening of commentary... any way you slice it

DAW · « **Reply #680 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:54:55 PM »

This "new" method takes probably 3 times as long as showing the clips...

On the other hand, it's nice screen time for the former winners.

But I agree with y'all...the WRITING....

JoseSPiano · « **Reply #681 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:55:03 PM »

Quote from: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 05:53:00 PM

There goes my chance for a perfect score.

And mine.

Although, of all the acting races, this one was the "weakest" of them all to me. -Now, if Kate Winslet had been nommed in this category for "The Reader", well...

Jrand74 · « **Reply #682 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:55:03 PM »

I think, however, that it was a beautiful acceptance speech.

Matt H. · « **Reply #683 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:55:05 PM »

Another Oscar for a Woody Allen written role

Michael · « **Reply #684 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:55:40 PM »

OK what do people think so far of the new format

Matt H. · « **Reply #685 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:55:52 PM »

Quote from: JRand58 on February 22, 2009, 05:55:03 PM

I think, however, that it was a beautiful acceptance speech.

Yes, a very heartfelt speech (and this coming from a nonfan like me.)

Cillaliz · « **Reply #686 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:56:06 PM »

I got it right, but I doubt I'll be perfect

Jrand74 · « **Reply #687 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:56:13 PM »

Something tells me the ratings will not be good this year.

bk · « **Reply #688 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:56:13 PM »

I can't remember who you all thought was going to win - the gal from Doubt?

JoseSPiano · « **Reply #689 on:** February 22, 2009, 05:56:19 PM »

Quote from: Michael S on February 22, 2009, 05:55:40 PM

OK what do people think so far of the new format

Haven't you been reading?

News:

Author Topic: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR (Read 105617 times)

Cillaliz

DAW

Cillaliz

DAW

Cillaliz