Topic: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR (Read 105664 times)

I think the "settings" are a wonderful touch.

You have to remember that Oscars are telecast for the regular people, not those with industry ties, or propensities to bitch about all awards shows.

Cillaliz · « **Reply #855 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:28:15 PM »

Quote from: JoseSPiano on February 22, 2009, 06:27:08 PM

Quote from: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:26:07 PM
For cutting back on expenses in a time of recession, you'd think there would be less in the way of set changes rather than more

That was a lie.

You think?

Edisaurus · « **Reply #856 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:28:18 PM »

Ralph got a shout-out!

bk · « **Reply #857 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:28:27 PM »

Why are they DOING this? One after another, with the same presenters??? Oh, Lord, never EVER let Bill Condon near this ceremony again.

Matt H. · « **Reply #858 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:28:32 PM »

BENJAMIN BUTTON for make-up. Isn't the film about that?

Matt H. · « **Reply #859 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:29:02 PM »

Quote from: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:28:27 PM

Why are they DOING this? One after another, with the same presenters??? Oh, Lord, never EVER let Bill Condon near this ceremony again.

Piffle! They're moving the show along. Bravo for that!

Jrand74 · « **Reply #860 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:29:09 PM »

More button.....

He did his own makeup very nicely

Kerry · « **Reply #861 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:29:14 PM »

Quote from: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 06:21:19 PM

I think "Inside Daisy Clover" ought to take ALL THE REST of the Oscars.

OKAY!

bk · « **Reply #862 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:29:29 PM »

The "settings" in MY opinion are inane for just about anyone. What's the POINT? It's a bloody awards show, not a Shields and Yarnell special.

Ron Pulliam · « **Reply #863 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:29:34 PM »

Quote from: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:26:55 PM

Quote from: JRand58 on February 22, 2009, 06:25:26 PM
Why is she wearing that frigging belt with that dress?

Because she's Sarah Jessica Parker and she always dresses funny

Quirky funny, of course.

DAW · « **Reply #864 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:29:41 PM »

The presenters are not landing many of their scripted "jokes" so far. But they don't have much to work with.

bk · « **Reply #865 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:29:45 PM »

Button deserved this award.

Edisaurus · « **Reply #866 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:29:54 PM »

I guess this year they're not doing a stats announcement as the winners go on stage.

bk · « **Reply #867 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:30:04 PM »

This is probably not the place to be if you don't want to read bitching.

Jrand74 · « **Reply #868 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:30:32 PM »

Damn....extreme close up....right up Brad Pitt's nose!

Ron Pulliam · « **Reply #869 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:30:45 PM »

Quote from: bk on February 22, 2009, 06:29:29 PM

The "settings" in MY opinion are inane for just about anyone. What's the POINT? It's a bloody awards show, not a Shields and Yarnell special.

I think they look great. When they come knocking at your door to produce the show, you can do it the way you think it should be done.

News:

Author Topic: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR (Read 105664 times)

Cillaliz

Cillaliz

Cillaliz

DAW