Topic: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR (Read 106739 times)

Edisaurus · « **Reply #990 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:57:33 PM »

"The musical is BACK"!

DAW · « **Reply #991 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:57:36 PM »

Hugh is now sporting one of those stupid mikes.

Ron Pulliam · « **Reply #992 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:57:38 PM »

Quote from: Matt H. on February 22, 2009, 06:56:53 PM

Well, I'm enjoying the show.

And that auditorium is gorgeous in high-def!!!

Cillaliz · « **Reply #993 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:57:55 PM »

I agree that having this commentary makes the show much more enjoyable

Edisaurus · « **Reply #994 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:58:00 PM »

Hmmmm..I think I may hit a very big millstone this very night!

JoseSPiano · « **Reply #995 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:58:01 PM »

Well, the producers have done a good job of making this year's ceremony more "inclusive" and "young".

Laura · « **Reply #996 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:58:12 PM »

I think this photo is hilarious:

DakotaCelt · « **Reply #997 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:58:27 PM »

It is moving at snail's pace

Cillaliz · « **Reply #998 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:58:39 PM »

AH - Your friend must have done his lifting, DR Jose

JoseSPiano · « **Reply #999 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:59:10 PM »

"Hi, Mark!!!!"

*He's standing to the left of Hugh Jackman.

"Hi, Dan!!!"

*He just lifted up Beyoncé - his hand was on her ass.

bk · « **Reply #1000 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:59:33 PM »

Oh, boy, here we go with the Fosse lighting and moves - bring back Allan Carr.

Cillaliz · « **Reply #1001 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:59:40 PM »

Quote from: Laura on February 22, 2009, 06:58:12 PM

I think this photo is hilarious:

LOL! I agree

Ron Pulliam · « **Reply #1002 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:59:46 PM »

Is Jackman just a tad off the mark, pitch-wise?

DakotaCelt · « **Reply #1003 on:** February 22, 2009, 06:59:57 PM »

Quote from: Cillaliz on February 22, 2009, 06:20:32 PM

"The script has been written and rewritten..." I think they needed another rewrite

yep

bk · « **Reply #1004 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:00:02 PM »

This is poor - again, you could do something interesting about musical films, but this isn't it.

bk · « **Reply #1005 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:00:23 PM »

And this choreography.

Ron Pulliam · « **Reply #1006 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:00:42 PM »

Quote from: Edisaurus on February 22, 2009, 06:57:33 PM

"The musical is BACK"!

The musical may be receving final rites with this number....

bk · « **Reply #1007 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:01:38 PM »

Save me from "young."

Ron Pulliam · « **Reply #1008 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:01:41 PM »

Quote from: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:00:02 PM

This is poor - again, you could do something interesting about musical films, but this isn't it.

And if you wanted to use the word "inane" referring to it, I'd be saying "amen".

bk · « **Reply #1009 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:02:02 PM »

It's just POINTLESS.

DAW · « **Reply #1010 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:02:19 PM »

Why do our leads occasionally sound like they're singing in a wind tunnel?

Cillaliz · « **Reply #1011 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:02:22 PM »

Quote from: Ron Pulliam on February 22, 2009, 07:01:41 PM

Quote from: bk on February 22, 2009, 07:00:02 PM
This is poor - again, you could do something interesting about musical films, but this isn't it.

And if you wanted to use the word "inane" referring to it, I'd be saying "amen".

bk · « **Reply #1012 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:02:32 PM »

One of the worst arrangements ever.

Matt H. · « **Reply #1013 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:02:48 PM »

I'd like for Hugh Jackman to DO a film musical.

Cillaliz · « **Reply #1014 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:02:55 PM »

But those crystals sure do look purty

bk · « **Reply #1015 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:02:57 PM »

Where is elmore?

Jrand74 · « **Reply #1016 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:03:01 PM »

Yes....off pitch....a tad....off base - a mile.

Ron Pulliam · « **Reply #1017 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:03:26 PM »

Baz did that number?

Baz Luhrmann?

Holy sh*t.

Edisaurus · « **Reply #1018 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:03:27 PM »

OK, Baz Lurhman. Now I understand.

DAW · « **Reply #1019 on:** February 22, 2009, 07:03:28 PM »

Blame Baz!

News:

Author Topic: ON THE SUBJECT OF OSCAR (Read 106739 times)

DAW

Cillaliz

Cillaliz

Cillaliz

DAW

Cillaliz

Cillaliz

DAW