Topic: THE UNSEEMLY RESIDUE (Read 62784 times)

Ron Pulliam · « **Reply #150 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:18:14 AM »

Quote from: S. Woody White on April 18, 2007, 10:16:58 AM

I have no idea why Lee's lipstick wasn't in color.

Possibly because he was never especially "colorful" (in a fashion sense) in his film roles?

singdaw · « **Reply #151 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:18:51 AM »

Quote from: S. Woody White on April 18, 2007, 10:16:58 AM

Most of this dream was in black and white, except for Lucy's lipstick.

Usually I dream in color, so this was unusual.

I have no idea why Lee's lipstick wasn't in color.

Lucy probably had it in her contract, so as not to be upstaged.

Ron Pulliam · « **Reply #152 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:19:59 AM »

[shadow=color,glow width,#characters wide][size=8] Page 6 [/size][/color][/shadow]

Jeanne · « **Reply #153 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:20:58 AM »

Quote from: singdaw on April 18, 2007, 10:16:11 AM

No, DR Jeanne, I never have. But I suppose that now, I'll have to!!!

Not that anyone here would twist my arm or anything!

Aside from the obvious REQUIREMENT of HHW Godhood, I just thought you'd have some interesting things to say. You know a lot about music, for instance, yes?

singdaw · « **Reply #154 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:21:52 AM »

Quote from: Jeanne on April 18, 2007, 10:17:49 AM

Speak for yourself, my dear. (Haven't I told you that before?)

IIRC... Yes!!!

Jeanne · « **Reply #155 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:23:11 AM »

Quote from: S. Woody White on April 18, 2007, 10:16:58 AM

Most of this dream was in black and white, except for Lucy's lipstick.

Usually I dream in color, so this was unusual.

I have no idea why Lee's lipstick wasn't in color.

Where's that JRAND and his DREAM-0-MATIC? WHY are some things in dreams in COLOR???

singdaw · « **Reply #156 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:24:34 AM »

Quote from: Jeanne on April 18, 2007, 10:20:58 AM

You know a lot about music, for instance, yes?

Well...

I don't know if I'd claim that, given the eminent personages here at HHW...

But I have been taking a few notes on bk's trilogy as I've gone along, with the idea that at some point I might post a few musings.

Jeanne · « **Reply #157 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:28:07 AM »

Quote from: singdaw on April 18, 2007, 10:24:34 AM

Well...

I don't know if I'd claim that, given the eminent personages here at HHW...

Don't let that scare you. God only knows who some of these folks are! You notice they don't tell us their real names!

Jeanne · « **Reply #158 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:30:09 AM »

Quote from: singdaw on April 18, 2007, 10:24:34 AM

But I have been taking a few notes on bk's trilogy as I've gone along, with the idea that at some point I might post a few musings.

Oh, do! Do!

Then...never mind.

singdaw · « **Reply #159 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:31:06 AM »

Quote from: Jeanne on April 18, 2007, 10:28:07 AM

God only knows who some of these folks are! You notice they don't tell us their real names!

That's to protect the innocent.

What happens at HHW stays at HHW.

Ron Pulliam · « **Reply #160 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:31:53 AM »

Quote from: Jeanne on April 18, 2007, 10:28:07 AM

Don't let that scare you. God only knows who some of these folks are! You notice they don't tell us their real names!

I beg your pardon!

Harrumph!

Ron Pulliam · « **Reply #161 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:32:30 AM »

Quote from: singdaw on April 18, 2007, 10:31:06 AM

What happens at HHW stays at HHW.

Hee-hee-e-e-e-e-e-e...!!!

Jeanne · « **Reply #162 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:34:07 AM »

Don't keep quiet, BRETTYSPAGHETTI!

We want to hear from you!

Ron Pulliam · « **Reply #163 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:34:30 AM »

Quote from: Jeanne on April 18, 2007, 10:28:07 AM

Don't let that scare you. God only knows who some of these folks are! You notice they don't tell us their real names!

Oh...THOSE folks....like "SINGDAW" for instance?

Or have you unmasked his true identity?

Jeanne · « **Reply #164 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:35:34 AM »

Quote from: singdaw on April 18, 2007, 10:31:06 AM

What happens at HHW stays at HHW.

WHO TOLD YOU THAT???!!!

Oh, dear. I think SINGDAW'S in big trouble!

Ron Pulliam · « **Reply #165 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:37:02 AM »

Quote from: Jeanne on April 18, 2007, 10:35:34 AM

WHO TOLD YOU THAT???!!!

Oh, dear. I think SINGDAW'S in big trouble!

If you modify that to "singdaw IS big trouble", you'd be onto somethin'!

singdaw · « **Reply #166 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:37:09 AM »

Quote from: Jeanne on April 18, 2007, 10:30:09 AM

Oh, do! Do! Then...

So do, do, do, like you've done, done, done, before.
-I. Gershwin

Jeanne · « **Reply #167 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:37:36 AM »

Quote from: Ron Pulliam on April 18, 2007, 10:34:30 AM

Oh...THOSE folks....like "SINGDAW" for instance?

Or have you unmasked his true identity?

I know that he's a quiet, unassuming office worker--who has a wild and wooly side. Yes?

S. Woody White · « **Reply #168 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:38:11 AM »

Quote from: singdaw on April 18, 2007, 08:29:39 AM

Reported elsewhere on the net:

Jamie Bell, the child star who shot to fame in film Billy Elliott, will be the next young actor to appear in Equus, replacing Daniel Radcliffe. Digitalspy.com reports: "Jamie is really excited about taking over and isn’t at all daunted about stripping off."

So, will appearing in Equus be mandatory for all male former child stars?

I can see it with Kurt Russell, but I draw the line at Mickey Rooney.

Ginny · « **Reply #169 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:38:22 AM »

Quote from: MBarnum on April 18, 2007, 08:33:02 AM

DR Ginny, glad to hear your hubby is mending well. Do you ~~get to~~ have to go back to see ~~Dr. Hunk~~ the surgeon again?

Yes, DR MBarnum, next Thursday at 8:40am EDT.

singdaw · « **Reply #170 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:39:07 AM »

Quote from: Ron Pulliam on April 18, 2007, 10:37:02 AM

If you modify that to "singdaw IS big trouble", you'd be onto somethin'!

I would say, "I resemble that remark," but some DR used that yesterday. $:-\$

singdaw · « **Reply #171 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:40:27 AM »

Quote from: Jeanne on April 18, 2007, 10:37:36 AM

I know that he's a quiet, unassuming office worker--who has a wild and wooly side. Yes?

Wooly. Yes, definitely wooly.

Jeanne · « **Reply #172 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:40:55 AM »

Do we know that DR RON PULLIAM is REALLY Ron Pulliam?
The other day DR FRANCOIS was telling me that I am really DR JANE.
But I'm not! I'M JEANNE!

singdaw · « **Reply #173 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:41:51 AM »

Quote from: Ginny on April 18, 2007, 10:38:22 AM

Yes, DR MBarnum, next Thursday at 8:40am EDT.

I think DR MBarnum would like to inspect Dr. Hunk's bedside manner for himself.

Jennifer · « **Reply #174 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:43:06 AM »

So who is getting voted off of IDOL tonight?

I would speculate that sanjaya and chris would be in the bottom. I would have thought phil would have been there too. But his performance last night seems to have made him popular again.

Hopefully sanjaya will go.

singdaw · « **Reply #175 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:44:22 AM »

Quote from: Jeanne on April 18, 2007, 10:40:55 AM

Do we know that DR RON PULLIAM is REALLY Ron Pulliam? The other day DR FRANCOIS was telling me that I am really DR JANE. But I'm not! I'M JEANNE!

How very true, DR Jeanne.

For instance, no one has pointed out that an anagram for RON PULLIAM is:
I AM NO PLURL

So what can we really believe?

singdaw · « **Reply #176 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:45:38 AM »

It looks like DR JoseSPiano made it for his half hour call.

singdaw · « **Reply #177 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:47:46 AM »

DR newbie BrettySpaghetti has departed after one post.

Following DR EverLovinHeather before him.

Should we take this personally? $:-\$

JoseSPiano · « **Reply #178 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:53:21 AM »

Good Afternoon!

Yes, indeed, I made it up to Westport in plenty of time. I even had a lovely bowl of soup from Organic Market next door. Chicken Vegetable. Yum!

JoseSPiano · « **Reply #179 on:** April 18, 2007, 10:54:01 AM »

...And even though I sort of like the cold temperatures, the fact that I'm still wearing my winter coat in mid-April is most unseemly.

News:

Author Topic: THE UNSEEMLY RESIDUE (Read 62784 times)

singdaw

singdaw

singdaw

singdaw

singdaw

singdaw

singdaw

singdaw

singdaw

singdaw

singdaw