Starting the cooking for Thanksgiving! Sweet potatoes first.
Since last Saturday I've felt like I'm fighting an oncoming cold or something - please send excellent vibes and xylophones that I win this fight - I cannot afford to get sick, nor do I want to get sick. This has happened three times this year and each time I've won and I must win this time. I've been sucking down Coldeez for the last three days. I think I'll go have some chicken soup right now.
I survived Costco, barely. And I'm pretty sure I'm closer to moving to that island. I hate people at the holiday season - and sometimes barely tolerate them the rest of the year.
Quote from: TCB on November 21, 2012, 02:10:15 PMQuote from: ChasSmith on November 21, 2012, 05:50:32 AMSpeaking of CDs and such, I have something toAsk BK :This is probably a stupid question, but are Kritzerland CD mixes created with traditional two-channel stereo playback in mind, even on today's multi-channel receivers? Are there exceptions?I was a late-comer to surround sound at home, setting up my first decent system only two years ago. The receiver I chose needed to not only process movie tracks wonderfully, but also assume the duties of a traditional stereo amp in being the hub for turntable and other goodies. (I added a decent outboard phono pre-amp.) It was my belief then, and is now, that traditional stereo sources should be appreciated in their own element, not "processed" in any number of schemes by the receiver. Not that I don't experiment now and then. But I'm a purist at heart, and always force the system into plain old stereo when enjoying regular CDs and records and tapes. I'll bet a lot of people don't pay much attention to that stuff, but it makes sense to me.What the Hell did he say?I think he is speaking Greek, DR TCB.
Quote from: ChasSmith on November 21, 2012, 05:50:32 AMSpeaking of CDs and such, I have something toAsk BK :This is probably a stupid question, but are Kritzerland CD mixes created with traditional two-channel stereo playback in mind, even on today's multi-channel receivers? Are there exceptions?I was a late-comer to surround sound at home, setting up my first decent system only two years ago. The receiver I chose needed to not only process movie tracks wonderfully, but also assume the duties of a traditional stereo amp in being the hub for turntable and other goodies. (I added a decent outboard phono pre-amp.) It was my belief then, and is now, that traditional stereo sources should be appreciated in their own element, not "processed" in any number of schemes by the receiver. Not that I don't experiment now and then. But I'm a purist at heart, and always force the system into plain old stereo when enjoying regular CDs and records and tapes. I'll bet a lot of people don't pay much attention to that stuff, but it makes sense to me.What the Hell did he say?
Speaking of CDs and such, I have something toAsk BK :This is probably a stupid question, but are Kritzerland CD mixes created with traditional two-channel stereo playback in mind, even on today's multi-channel receivers? Are there exceptions?I was a late-comer to surround sound at home, setting up my first decent system only two years ago. The receiver I chose needed to not only process movie tracks wonderfully, but also assume the duties of a traditional stereo amp in being the hub for turntable and other goodies. (I added a decent outboard phono pre-amp.) It was my belief then, and is now, that traditional stereo sources should be appreciated in their own element, not "processed" in any number of schemes by the receiver. Not that I don't experiment now and then. But I'm a purist at heart, and always force the system into plain old stereo when enjoying regular CDs and records and tapes. I'll bet a lot of people don't pay much attention to that stuff, but it makes sense to me.
