Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6   Go Down

Author Topic: NO MORE CANDY  (Read 24630 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1816
  • Cake or Death?
    • My LiveJournal
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #30 on: November 02, 2003, 12:32:32 PM »

I drove down near Olympia last night, that's south of Seattle for those not in the know.  And as I was driving back, I was going through an honest to god snowstorm.  It turned into rain after I got up near Tacoma, but for a while there, it was really snowing!  And according to my sources that are actually up at ungodly hours on Sundays, we here in Tacoma had a bit of snow this morning.  Amazing...winter has come early to the Northwest.  My best friend is from Hawaii, and she goes absolutely nuts when it snows...it's so funny.
 8)
Logged

Ann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1816
  • Cake or Death?
    • My LiveJournal
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #31 on: November 02, 2003, 12:34:00 PM »

Hey cool, first post on page 2!
Logged

SwishySarah

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 336
  • Swish On!
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #32 on: November 02, 2003, 12:40:32 PM »

RP: I know what you mean, but like TCB said, I can't change them. They have to change themselves. It's a small step, but at least they realized that they were setting a bad example. The husband talked to my dad for a little bit after he spoke to me, and my dad told me that he had been really embarassed about their behavior. And I know what you mean about talking to my parents. They are NOT drinkers by any means, I've never seen them even close to drunk. Some might say that it's bad for me, because now I'll want to run out and try it, but seeing things like this just makes me realize that I'd much rather be the designated driver than the loser throwing up in the backseat. I'd feel too guilty to drink as well, my brother put them through hell and back during his high school years, I've learned from his mistakes. Speaking of him, he got a speeding ticket yesterday going 90 mph on Rt. 66, where the limit is 65. How dumb can you get? And he asked them if they'd pay for it, because he's saving up for a car.

Ann: It is sunny and warm in NoVa at a nice 83 degrees. I'm wearing shorts. On the second of November. It's wonderful, you should come visit.
Logged
...Walk in the sunshine...

Ann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1816
  • Cake or Death?
    • My LiveJournal
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #33 on: November 02, 2003, 12:47:30 PM »

Come on people!
I'm bored, and I need something to distract me from all the work I should be doing.  
Here's a question for all you art lovers out there.  My coworker in the bookstore where I work is on a hunt for a picture she saw years ago, and I thought you guys might be able to help.  It's a picture, as she describes it, of a lady reclining in a boat, on a lake, with her hand running through the water, causing little ripples.  Not it's not the Lady Of Shalott, by J Waterhouse.  I've already looked at that one
Logged

MBarnum

  • Guest
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #34 on: November 02, 2003, 12:58:03 PM »

OH, man BK, that last picture, the magazine illustration that you say hangs above your bed...the colors are magnificent!! Can you put me in your will???? I promise that there will not be any mysterious deadly accidents! LOL! But that picture would look GREAT (!!!) hanging in my home! It so matches my furniture!

I am also glad that you are enjoying the Jack Benny DVD...I have that also and love it! The second disk has the funniest episodes IMHO (in my humble opinion in internet talk). I picked up a budget DVD called CLASSIC TELEVISION COMEDIES which is also very fun. It has one episode each of SUSIE, A DATE WITH THE ANGELS, TOPPER, I MARRIED JONE, THE LIFE OF RILEY, PETTICOAT JUNCTION. BURNS AND ALLEN, THE BOB CUMMINGS SHOW, and others. It is interesting to see which show have held up over the years...SUSIE, BURNS AND ALLEN hold up very well, while LIFE OF RILEY, and TOPPER really don't, at least not for me. And the less said about A DATE WITH THE ANGELS (sorry Betty White) the better! LOL!
Logged

François

  • Guest
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #35 on: November 02, 2003, 01:04:00 PM »

Is it me but all I see on that Parrish painting are.... phallic symbols! :o

Oh yes, people getting drunk is a great danger here too, mainly teenagers on weekends who drive drunk and kill themselves and others...

Another "insinuous" plague is people who never get drunk but get their daily ratio of alcohol. That's alcoholism!

Once society (us?) will understand that alcoholism is a sickness and alcoholics are not weirdos but people who need help we all be better!

Sorry for being that heavy on such a beautiful rainy autumn night in Paris.

Have I mentioned that I see phallic symbols in Paris... err... Parrish??

Logged

François

  • Guest
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #36 on: November 02, 2003, 01:10:58 PM »

OH, man BK, that last picture, the magazine illustration that you say hangs above your bed...the colors are magnificent!! Can you put me in your will???? I promise that there will not be any mysterious deadly accidents! LOL! But that picture would look GREAT (!!!) hanging in my home! It so matches my furniture.

For me it's reverse!

My furniture matches that painting!
So much for art aprreciation!! ;)
Logged

Jrand73

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91236
  • Valley of the Dolls.
    • Facebook for Jackrandall
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #37 on: November 02, 2003, 01:12:14 PM »

DR Ron - that theatre is just west of Illinois Street on Washington St.  The building behind it is the new Claypool Court-Suites that was built on the site of the now demolished Claypool Hotel.

Money means nothing at IRT - ego of the Artistic Director and "city favorite" actors is all.


Logged
.....you're alone.....and the feeling of loneliness is overpowering.

George

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 134450
  • A person should celebrate what passes by.
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #38 on: November 02, 2003, 01:18:47 PM »

SUNDAY (recorded by The Manhattan Transfer...and many others, I'm sure)
Written by Miller, Conn, Styne, Kreuger

I'm blue every Monday
Thinking only of Sunday
That's one day when I'm with you
It seems I sigh all day Tuesday
I cry all day Wednesday
Oh my how I long for you
And then comes Thursday, gee it's long it never goes by
Friday makes me feel like I'm gonna die
But after payday it's my fun day
I shine all day Sunday
That's one day when I'm with you
Wanna see you next Sunday!
Logged
Voldemort is basically a middle school girl: he has a locket, a diary, a tiara, a ring, and is completely obsessed with a teenage boy.

George

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 134450
  • A person should celebrate what passes by.
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #39 on: November 02, 2003, 01:22:12 PM »

Ann, I was out and driving about in Tumwater (just south, but almost attached to Olympia) last night and I drove by a bank.  The temperature on their reader board showed 38 degrees!  I couldn't believe it.  After that, I went to the local mall and when I left there was snow mixed with rain.  The cold season is upon us!
« Last Edit: November 02, 2003, 01:23:15 PM by George »
Logged
Voldemort is basically a middle school girl: he has a locket, a diary, a tiara, a ring, and is completely obsessed with a teenage boy.

Maya

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 515
  • I've always wanted to see the lights of Broadway..
    • My LiveJournal
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #40 on: November 02, 2003, 01:27:59 PM »

François--LOL!  I totally didn't think about that but the castle spires certainly could be interpreted that way!!

Ann--I LOVE Waterhouse!  Forgive the art-craziness today, but BK's habit of posting his wonderful paintings must be rubbing off on me!

A purty mermaid for your visual enjoyment, peoples!  Maybe I'll post a Merman later, hehe.

 
Logged

Maya

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 515
  • I've always wanted to see the lights of Broadway..
    • My LiveJournal
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #41 on: November 02, 2003, 01:30:39 PM »

Oh, I forgot!

Ann, you should be able to find the name of the pic you're looking for at this link!

http://www.artmagick.com/artists/waterhouse.aspx
Logged

François

  • Guest
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #42 on: November 02, 2003, 01:34:41 PM »

WARNING!

L O N G post!   --  sorry!  --

 
Past Sunday's London Times.

Mary Poppins - brought to the stage at last
An international alliance between two theatrical giants is set to
finally bring Mary Poppins to the stage. By Matt Wolf
It’s traditional, in the theatre, to think of the great partnerships
being on stage rather than off: Gielgud and Richardson, Finney and
Courtenay, Jessica Tandy and Hume Cronyn. But a recent Saturday found me
down in Somerset, in what was once a 13th-century priory, to discuss the
biggest behind-the-scenes theatrical pairing of our time: the first
collaboration between Sir Cameron Mackintosh, the British musicals
impresario, and Thomas Schumacher, the American head of Disney
Theatrical Productions.
What makes this important, you might ask. Because one can, without any
exaggeration, claim that these two men, between them, bestride the
theatrical world. Even Judi Dench and Maggie Smith, a glamorous West End
pairing though the Dames were last year, don’t represent such a potent
combining of forces, as theatregoers will discover when the first fruit
of the Mackintosh-Disney collaboration ripens at the end of next year:
the stage-musical premiere of Mary Poppins.
The story of Poppins’s belated stage birth is the one I have come to
Somerset to hear. And so I find myself in the spacious kitchen of
Stavordale, the seven-bedroom country estate (situated on 34 acres when
Mackintosh bought it just over a decade ago; the property now
encompasses upwards of 1,500 acres) that is the preferred one of the
producer’s multiple homes. With a personal fortune estimated by his own
office to be as much as £240m, much of it in land, Mackintosh, 57 last
Friday, need never start a new project again. He could live off the
continuing incarnations of the so-called Big Four — Cats, Les Mis, The
Phantom of the Opera and Miss Saigon — as they continue to blaze trails
around the globe. Last year, his company had a £30m turnover. But never
discount the power of individual passion in the theatre — the kind that
Mackintosh has, for a quarter of a century, harboured for Mary Poppins.
And in Schumacher — the 45-year-old American who joined Disney in 1987,
only to move over time from animation in order to devote himself wholly
to the conglomerate’s now crucial theatrical portfolio — Mackintosh may
just have met his theatrical soul mate. Like Mackintosh before him,
Schumacher is someone used to rolling out musicals around the world:
Beauty and the Beast, Aida and The Lion King, the last of which opens
its 10th production in Sydney tonight. And, as an employee of a company
whose total revenue for the 2002 fiscal year was £18 billion, Schumacher
is not exactly unaccustomed to thinking big or dealing with charismatic
people who operate on a large scale. The two producers, says Julian
Fellowes, who won an Oscar for his Gosford Park screenplay and is
writing the book for Mary Poppins, represent “rather an extra- ordinary
alliance; there’s showbiz history here, and, as the Americans say,
they’re on the same page”.
That’s where a shared desire to see a theatre adaptation of Mary Poppins
comes in, and it is what has brought Mackintosh and Schumacher together.
Still, why colla-borate? Simple: Mackintosh has long held the stage
rights to the author Pamela Travers’s Poppins books — three main texts
and several more collections written at her publisher’s behest. Disney,
of course, owns the hugely popular 1964 film, an epoch-making mixture of
live action and animation that brought Julie Andrews an Oscar as the
magical nanny (and preserved for ever her co-star Dick Van Dyke’s
distinctly dodgy cockney accent). If Mary Poppins were ever, therefore,
to come to the stage, it would have to arrive as some sort of theatrical
union.
Says Mackintosh: “Travers created the books, and Disney created the film
that turned everyone on to the books, and it is one of the most
wonderful films ever made. In my mind, there is no question that this is
part of the reason Mary Poppins is known by people in a way that I am
not. I hope I will be seen to have been the third person” — after
Travers and Disney — “who has brought something to it.”
Mackintosh first applied for the theatrical rights in 1978: “Like
basically every producer in the world, I had had the brilliant idea of
putting Mary Poppins on the stage.” But it wasn’t until 1993, when David
Pugh, the London producer of Art, arranged an introduction to Travers,
that things started hotting up, and various names even began to be
floated in gossip columns: Stephen Daldry as director, Emma Thompson or
Fiona Shaw as Mary Poppins. (“I’ve never heard Fiona Shaw’s soprano,”
deadpans Mackintosh.) The year is significant, as it was that same
autumn that Disney launched its theatrical division with Beauty and the
Beast, from which it was clear many more stage properties would flow.
Poppins, unsurprisingly, was in the mix relatively early. Says
Schumacher: “I have a memo that Michael Eisner (the head of Disney)
wrote in 1995, saying: ‘Let’s try to get this Mary Poppins thing tied up
in the next six months.’” What followed, instead, was a complex series
of negotiations. It wasn’t until the end of 2001 that Schumacher took
the initiative and arranged a meeting with Mackintosh. “I said to
Cameron, ‘Look, there’s all this deal stuff that is obviously never
going to work. But what nobody’s talked about is what the show could be.’”
Ah, the deal, that most salient of all words, whether you’re talking
Tony Blair and Gordon Brown or some of the partnerships entered, in
different ways, by Disney’s film-animation division — with Steven
Spielberg and Robert Zemeckis, for example, on Who Framed Roger Rabbit,
or Tim Burton on The Nightmare Before Christmas. But the Mary Poppins
deal is different from the Hollywood norm. “Much of Hollywood is about
the deal,” says Schumacher, “because so little of it is about the
making, and so there are people who are producers because they can make
a deal, and then they drop by the set twice — and the deal is not the
making of something. By contrast, this Mary Poppins is about making
something, about coming back to the table again and again.”
For Mackintosh, Schumacher’s wholesale commitment to Disney’s theatre
division was the impetus the British impresario required. “Everywhere
else in the world, you have to deal with a group of producers. Look at
(the Broadway musical) The Producers — there are about a dozen of them.”
With Schumacher, Mackintosh finds “it is like dealing with another me:
the artistic process couldn’t be simpler”. And though the men had met
only once prior to Poppins — “Over a jolly lunch,” recalls Schumacher,
in St Tropez in August 1997 — it is clear that they speak the same
language. Says the designer Bob Crowley, who will work on Poppins,
having won a Tony for the Mackintosh-backed National Theatre’s Carousel
and another one for the Disney-backed Aida on Broadway: “Once Tom and
Cameron met up, as opposed to the idea of the Cameron-Mackintosh
organisation and the corporation of Disney, and it became personalised
as it has, I knew it would be a great marriage.” For that, Crowley
credits Schumacher, for breaking from what might be seen as the Disney
mould: “I knew that if this was going to work, it would work because of
Tom. He’s a man of the theatre, not just a man in a suit from Burbank.”
That it seems to be working so far can be judged from the buzz that has
built around Poppins ever since a rehearsed reading of the show on
September 15, upstairs at the Old Vic in front of an audience of about
50, Eisner included. At last, the production’s co-director and
choreographer, Matthew Bourne, and its director, Richard Eyre — the
latter making his own bid for the kind of international musical
franchise over which his National Theatre successor, Trevor Nunn, has
long presided — could hear Fellowes’s Travers-steeped book wedded to the
extant Sherman brothers songs (one of which, Chim Chim Cher-ee, won an
Oscar) as well as half-a-dozen new ones from the composer-lyricist team
of George Stiles and Anthony Drewe, whose National Theatre entry, Honk!
The Ugly Duckling, won the 2000 Olivier Award for best musical over,
wait for it, The Lion King. (“I guess the judges couldn’t get tickets to
Lion King,” quipped Stiles and Drewe at the time.) At the reading,
Joanna Riding was Poppins, with Drewe himself taking on the Dick Van
Dyke role. Julia McKenzie, in a rare return to singing, played Miss
Andrew, a former governess of the Banks family who features prominently
in the books and not at all in the film, while Alex Jennings (winner of
an Olivier for Mackintosh’s My Fair Lady in the West End) and Claire
Moore played Mr and Mrs Banks. The West End production has yet to be cast.
Rehearsals start next July, followed by an out-of-town tryout —
Mackintosh’s first — leading to a December 15 London first night at the
Prince Edward, one of Mackintosh’s seven West End theatres. “We have to
give the audience a show that delivers what you hope will happen when
you come to see Mary Poppins,” says Schumacher, “not just ride on the
title.” But will the Disney-Mackintosh names by themselves sell tickets?
“Let’s put it this way,” smiles Mackintosh, “I don’t think we’ll put
anybody off.”
Mary Poppins opens on December 15, 2004, at the Prince Edward, W1
Matt Wolf is the London theatre critic for Variety
Logged

Tomovoz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15837
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #43 on: November 02, 2003, 01:36:07 PM »

Back from the land of sleep and not much has happened here at HHW. I expected to see at last another entertaining and informative posts. At least a few of the Hainsies and Kimlets have returned from the wilderness but really.....
Logged
"I'm sixty-three and I guess that puts me with the geriatrics, but if there were fifteen months in every year, I'd only be forty-three".
James Thurber 1957

George

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 134450
  • A person should celebrate what passes by.
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #44 on: November 02, 2003, 01:37:28 PM »

A purty mermaid for your visual enjoyment, peoples!  Maybe I'll post a Merman later, hehe.

An Ethel Merman?

Does this picture count as a Merman?  He's in the water!
Logged
Voldemort is basically a middle school girl: he has a locket, a diary, a tiara, a ring, and is completely obsessed with a teenage boy.

Tomovoz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15837
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #45 on: November 02, 2003, 01:37:38 PM »

That's what I call a post. You could hitch a whole wagon train to that one.
Logged
"I'm sixty-three and I guess that puts me with the geriatrics, but if there were fifteen months in every year, I'd only be forty-three".
James Thurber 1957

Tomovoz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15837
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #46 on: November 02, 2003, 01:42:29 PM »

"Sunday Morning Comin' Down" -Kris Kristofferson. I love the Johnny Cash version. I still can't find "November" (I know it's lurking somwhere between October and December).
My previous post was of course meant to relate to the one by François - I think it would be unseemly to relate it to the photo posted by George.
Logged
"I'm sixty-three and I guess that puts me with the geriatrics, but if there were fifteen months in every year, I'd only be forty-three".
James Thurber 1957

Matt H.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 52338
  • Side by side by Sondheim
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #47 on: November 02, 2003, 01:45:44 PM »

The Kander/Ebb oral history is reviewed very positively at Playbill-on-Line today (Stephen Suskin wrote it, I think, but I didn't read the byline). He also reviews the cast album to SEVENTH HEAVEN and Barbara Cook's Christmas CD.

Does make me want the Kander/Ebb book all the more, but I'm disappointed because it's less than 300 pages. For a career that stretches back to the 1950s before they teamed up, the book ought to be twice that length whether its a Q&A format or not.
Logged
If at first you don't succeed, that's about average for me.

Matt H.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 52338
  • Side by side by Sondheim
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #48 on: November 02, 2003, 01:48:58 PM »

Wow! That's a beautiful picture, George. Took my breath away!  :D
Logged
If at first you don't succeed, that's about average for me.

George

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 134450
  • A person should celebrate what passes by.
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #49 on: November 02, 2003, 01:51:35 PM »

Wow! That's a beautiful picture, George. Took my breath away!  :D

Thanks...mine, too!  It's my computer wallpaper right now.  ;)
« Last Edit: November 02, 2003, 01:51:55 PM by George »
Logged
Voldemort is basically a middle school girl: he has a locket, a diary, a tiara, a ring, and is completely obsessed with a teenage boy.

Tomovoz

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 15837
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #50 on: November 02, 2003, 01:52:44 PM »

Thanks for the update on the K & E book Matt.
Logged
"I'm sixty-three and I guess that puts me with the geriatrics, but if there were fifteen months in every year, I'd only be forty-three".
James Thurber 1957

Maya

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 515
  • I've always wanted to see the lights of Broadway..
    • My LiveJournal
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #51 on: November 02, 2003, 01:53:17 PM »

François--thanks for the article!  I think Maria Friedman would make a great Mary Poppins--would love to see her do it.

LOL, George!  Wow, that's some merman!

Although this is more what I had in mind:
Logged

François

  • Guest
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #52 on: November 02, 2003, 01:58:44 PM »

NO MORE candy???

Really???


 
Toot Sweets

Caractacus:
Don't waste your pucker on some all day sucker
And don't try a toffee or cream
If you seek perfection in sugar confection
Well there's something new on the scene
A mouth full of cheer
A sweet without peer
A musical morsel supreme!
Toot Sweets!
Toot Sweets!
The candies you whistle, the whistles you eat.
Toot Sweets!
Toot Sweets!
The eatable, tweetable treats!

Truly:
Toot Sweets!
Toot Sweets!
The toot of a flute with the flavor of fruit!
Toot Sweets!
Toot Sweets!
No longer need candy be mute!

Caractacus:
Don't waste your pucker on some all day sucker

Truly:
and don't try a toffee or cream!
If you seek perfection in sugar confection,

Caractacus:
well, there's something new on the scene:

Truly:
that mouth full of cheer;

Caractacus:
that sweet without peer;

Both:
That musical morsel supreme!
Toot Sweets!
Toot Sweets!
A bon-bon to blow on at last has been found
Toot Sweets!
Toot Sweets,
with tweetable, eatable sound!

Scrumptious:
No--take it away!

Truly:
Father, please! (he takes one)
Toot! Hmm-Hmm. Toot! Laughter from Truly and her father. (He takes a bite)

Caractacus:
He likes it!

Cast:
Hooray!

Caractacus:
Their value is intrinsic,

Truly:
surpass any mint stick

Kids:
Or marshmallow mouthful you munch

Caractacus:
Though licorice is chewy

Truly:
And gum drops are gooey

Kids:
And chocolate is charming to crunch

Caractacus and Truly:
That savory fife,

Women:
that sweet of your life

Kids and factory workers:
It's clearly the best of the bunch.

(Dance break)

All:
Toot Sweets!
Toot Sweets!
Toot Sweets!
Toot Sweets!

Caractacus:
That savory fife

Truly:
That sweet of your life

All:
Is clearly the best of the bunch
Toot Sweets!
Toot Sweets!
A bon-bon to blow on at last has been found
Toot Sweets!
Toot Sweets!
The treat that's so tweetable,
lusciously eatable,
with that unbeatable--(break) sound!

Logged

Matt H.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 52338
  • Side by side by Sondheim
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #53 on: November 02, 2003, 02:03:28 PM »

Here's my wallpaper. Just right to take me to the prom (or the Emmys which is where the pic was snapped).
Logged
If at first you don't succeed, that's about average for me.

George

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 134450
  • A person should celebrate what passes by.
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #54 on: November 02, 2003, 02:08:05 PM »

Ya wanna here (well, actually read) something funny?  I lost my driver's license.  That’s not the funny part.  I didn't realize how long it had been or when it had happened, but I have not been able to find my driver’s license…and have been driving without it, as well.  Just now, I found my Patti LuPone Live CD so that I could scan a picture of her back-up group, The Mermen, and continue the Merman thread.  I opened up my scanner and there was my (current) driver’s license AND my previous one!  I had left them there when I scanned them to make my HHW picture!  Oh, my.  Sometimes I really do believe that I have early onset of Alzheimer’s disease!

Anyway, here’s the picture of The Mermen, Patti’s back-up group…they’re really good, as is Patti—IMHO (In My Humble Opinion, in Internet lingo).
« Last Edit: November 02, 2003, 02:09:27 PM by George »
Logged
Voldemort is basically a middle school girl: he has a locket, a diary, a tiara, a ring, and is completely obsessed with a teenage boy.

François

  • Guest
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #55 on: November 02, 2003, 02:10:03 PM »

That's what we'd call a Mère Man here!

Merman "sold" beer??

"I had a beer!
A beer about you, baby!"

"I get a beer
Every time I see you
Standing there before me!"

"Make it another old fashioned beer!"

"If i'm the bottom,
You're the beer!"

burp!
Sorry!
Logged

George

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Online Online
  • Posts: 134450
  • A person should celebrate what passes by.
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #56 on: November 02, 2003, 02:12:32 PM »

Nice picture, Matt!

Well, I'm off to dine.  I will be back in plenty of time to chat.  Until then, then.
Logged
Voldemort is basically a middle school girl: he has a locket, a diary, a tiara, a ring, and is completely obsessed with a teenage boy.

Jrand73

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91236
  • Valley of the Dolls.
    • Facebook for Jackrandall
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #57 on: November 02, 2003, 02:14:25 PM »

I am watching one of my favorite movies today!  Click on the link for a clue:



http://www.mydannykaye.com/sounds/jester3.wav


 ;D
Logged
.....you're alone.....and the feeling of loneliness is overpowering.

Jrand73

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 91236
  • Valley of the Dolls.
    • Facebook for Jackrandall
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #58 on: November 02, 2003, 02:17:24 PM »

DR George - is my OLIVER London Cast CD in your scanner?  I took it out of the case to read the song list two months ago, and I can't find it anywhere.
Logged
.....you're alone.....and the feeling of loneliness is overpowering.

Matt H.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 52338
  • Side by side by Sondheim
Re:NO MORE CANDY
« Reply #59 on: November 02, 2003, 02:20:42 PM »

I've had a similar senior moment, DR JRand. I got the tape A CARIBBEAN MYSTERY (the Helen Hayes version) in the mail a couple of months ago. I took it out of the mailing wrapper, laid it down somewhere in my house, and I haven't seen it since. The only thing I can figure is that I laid the morning newspaper on it and it somehow got thrown out. I have turned my house upside down trying to find it to no avail.  :(
Logged
If at first you don't succeed, that's about average for me.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 6   Go Up